Bukit Aman urges safety review of drivers aged over 60 after nearly 7,000 deaths since 2019
According to Utusan Malaysia, Royal Malaysia Police (PDRM) data showed that 19,812 drivers in this age bracket were involved in road accidents — 6,733 were killed, 2,132 sustained serious injuries and 10,947 suffered minor injuries.
'Age is not an obstacle to prudent driving, but the Bukit Aman Traffic Investigation and Enforcement Department believes that safety involving elderly drivers must be taken into account,' department director Datuk Seri Mohd Yusri Hassan Basri was quoted as saying.
Mohd Yusri reportedly said that the aim was not to stop senior citizens from driving, but to have a mechanism to assess the health of older road users so that roads remain safe for everyone.
'We understand that stopping this group from driving is not easy due to cultural factors in Malaysia. Some use their vehicles to go to the surau, pick up grandchildren from school and so on,' he was quoted as saying
Mohd Yusri reportedly said that it was important for all stakeholders to carry out a comprehensive study on the issue before any decision is made, particularly by the Ministry of Transport, which is responsible for setting road-related policies.
According to the report, he also said the approach should be balanced with an assessment of a person's health and driving ability, rather than being based solely on age.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
Only here for big flag and nasi kandar, Umno Youth chief says after IGP warns against Jalur Gemilang clash in Penang
KEPALA BATAS, Aug 14 — Umno Youth chief Dr Akmal Saleh has today suggested that he was not out to cause trouble with a planned event on Jalur Gemilang in Bertam here. In a brief post on Facebook, he said the wing's members are just here for the scenery and food. 'We just came to see the big flag and have some nasi kandar,' he wrote, attaching a news article citing Inspector-General of Police Datuk Seri Mohd Khalid Ismail. 'The big flag' refers to the giant Jalur Gemilang hung by DAP at a hardware store on Jalan Bertam Perdana, which recently went viral for flying the national flag upside down. Earlier, the police urged the cancellation of a planned gathering in Bertam here today over the issue of Malaysian flag, to prevent any confrontation between opposing groups. PDRM said the move was to safeguard the safety of the local community and maintain public order, after both Umno Youth and DAP planned to host events on the matter. The controversy began when a 59-year-old hardware shop owner in Kepala Batas, Penang, was investigated after the Jalur Gemilang was seen hanging upside-down outside his premises. The shop owner has reportedly said it was an unintentional mistake made while measuring a flagpole, which he corrected soon after. Umno Youth chief Datuk Dr Akmal Saleh previously said it planned to hold a 'class' for the Penang shop owner, but later cancelled it after a warning by the police. DAP then announced it would sponsor a giant Jalur Gemilang for the shop and mobilise Penang party members to distribute 831 flags, should anyone attempt to stir trouble.
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Cancel rally in Kepala Batas
KEPALA BATAS: The Royal Malaysian Police (PDRM) has called for the cancellation of a rally scheduled in Bertam, Kepala Batas, Penang, to prevent potential clashes between opposing groups. Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Mohd Khalid Ismail emphasised the importance of public safety and community well-being. 'PDRM has taken note of the rally planned for Aug 14, 2025, in Bertam, Kepala Batas,' he said in a statement. Mohd Khalid confirmed that investigations are ongoing into the viral incident involving the Jalur Gemilang being hoisted upside down. A total of 38 police reports were filed nationwide, with 17 in Penang and 21 in other states. He added that action is being taken against those who recorded and shared the video under Section 233 of the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998. The investigation papers were submitted to the Penang Public Prosecutor's Office last Monday and are currently under review. Mohd Khalid reiterated PDRM's commitment to transparent and lawful investigations to uphold peace. 'The public is urged to avoid speculation that could disrupt the investigation process,' he said. He encouraged citizens to provide accurate and verified information to assist police efforts. - Bernama
Malay Mail
2 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Can cybercrime reshape vices and even banking in Malaysia?
AUGUST 14 — Here's an intriguing thought. Is it possible that in an era when financial-digital scams have become so ubiquitous and all-encompassing, one consequence is that many other social problems or vices may decline? But I'm getting ahead of myself. Let's do a quick rewind. Everybody knows that online scams and financial frauds are rising faster and faster. Last week's news in which a doctor lost more than RM8 million was only the latest in what is practically just another day in the land of cyber-fraud. The losses since 2019 have totalled billions. Eg, the State of Scam Report 2024 revealed that Malaysia lost RM54.02 billion (US$12.8 billion) to scams in 2023, equivalent to three per cent of our GDP. No two days go by before we read about a doctor or retiree or manager losing six or seven figures in their savings, usually due to some investment scam. Long and short, scamming has reached pandemic levels of titanic proportions, likely dwarfing most other illegal activity and vice. Note that throughout the region this problem is huge, too. The United Nations Office on Drugs & Crimes (UNODC) estimates Asian cybercrime syndicates inflicted US$37 billion in losses on East and South-east Asia by 2025. Ironically the scam phenomenon is also endemic in the sense that it's limited mainly to urban areas where, obviously, the wealthy are located. Incidentally, for digital frauds and scams, the most vulnerable also happen to be the most successful career-wise, the more educated and the more digitally savvy. At first this sounds bizarre but it makes sense when you think about it. It's usually folks with these profiles who have the most money and who also spend disproportionately high amounts of time online. Coupled with increasing urbanisation, rising wealth and more sophisticated technology let's be clear we are a long way off before we see online financial scamming follow the way of illegal DVDs. In fact, such cyber-crimes are going to happen more and more frequently with worse and worse outcomes. I don't wish to discuss strategies on preventing or avoiding such scams. Instead I want to highlight a few potential (but not immediately apparent) consequences of soaring financial fraud. The first is how, in some perversely positive sense, other crimes and vices may fall substantially. Before the era of financial-digital scamming, social vices were in a sort of all-out competition, weren't they? You had gambling competing with prostitution competing with drug peddling and so on. But can these survive the monopolistic onslaught of cyber frauds? Many tigers fighting on one mountain. But now there's a dragon there. Will the tigers still hold sway? The losses since 2019 have totalled billions. Eg, the State of Scam Report 2024 revealed that Malaysia lost RM54.02 billion (US$12.8 billion) to scams in 2023, equivalent to three per cent of our GDP. —Picture by Firdaus Latif Practically for the first time, you now have a situation where fraud syndicates can extract huge amounts of money even against the will of their victims. One imagines this makes things harder and, yes, as of today many people are more aware of scam calls so scammers need to constantly up their creativity. Nevertheless, the takings appear to far exceed that from 'traditional' crimes and vices. I don't think we need research to show that 'revenue' from non-scam related vices even come close to RM54 billion! Hence, when financial-digital frauds have become such a dominant monopoly it wouldn't appear too far-fetched to suggest that before long more and more folks would give up their old vice work and follow the trend. Cybercrime impacts criminal behavior. In the end it's good 'ol market forces doing their thing. Example: if I'm a woman from Bangkok who's thinking of coming to KL to work in a dodgy massage parlour, why not just join a scam syndicate and spend my day making cold calls to scam my fellow Thais? If I'm a Malaysian dude running illegal gambling dens in Subang Mentari, why not instead hire 10 people to sit by 20 phones and pretend to be post-office or jewelry shop clerks? Just like how the rise of online ordering potentially rips into walk-in dining, it's not hard to see online thievery or pilfering replacing physical practices of a wrong or unhealthy nature. Another trend, already alluded to above, is the 'war' between scammers and the public. Who can out-think the other? Who can be a few steps ahead? This is not unlike the war going on between AI deepfakes and counter-deepfake technology. One party strives to produce better fakes, another seeks to produce better fakery-identifying processes. Ad infinitum. I anticipate more and more seminars and conferences offering instruction and advice on avoiding scams. Hopefully government bodies and even software companies can produce regulations and apps to better detect and resist cyber-fakes, ploys and digital falsities. Sadly, one of the most effective ways to minimise fraud will be banks throwing more and more checks and guidelines when it comes to transferring funds. This is going to piss off a lot of people making valid transactions, not to mention the many elderly uncles and aunties who can barely get through a normal bill payment via their bank apps. Yet, alas, it may be inevitable if only to reduce the amount of funds lost. If more and more kids are being hurt from bicycle accidents, perhaps the primary move to take would be to severely curb the number of bikes on the road. Tough, but necessary. This brings us to (hopefully?) one of the best scam-proof methods: Offline banking. Back to basics. Who knows, maybe when we're forced to see a bank teller to transfer thousands our anti-scam Defcon levels will be stronger? Plus, banks could use the in-person moment to double-check suspicious transfers — maybe a quick 'Are you sure this is legit?' or 'Would it be wise to double-check your recipient?' before processing that RM100,000. Going offline may also force banks to rethink their systems entirely — like, say, mandatory in-person approvals or video-calls for high-value transactions. Long and short, cyber-crime can potentially reshape the landscape of not only vices, crimes but banking itself. Could it one day impact the very way we think about money?
