Supreme Court allows Mississippi to require age verification for social media as states move to protect children online
In an unsigned order, justices upheld a lower court ruling that sided with Mississippi and allowed the state law known as the ' Walker Montgomery Protecting Children Online Act" to take effect temporarily, as judges determine the law's constitutionality in court.
Until a federal appeals court issues a final ruling, anyone under the age of 18 seeking to use Instagram, Reddit, Pinterest, Snapchat, Facebook, YouTube, or X in the state will need to provide parental consent in order to use the social media platforms.
As is typical in such orders the justices did not provide a reason for siding with Mississippi.
Justice Brett Kavanaugh did issue a short concurring opinion, saying the social media companies failed to show that allowing the law to take effect would cause immediate harm.
Kavanaugh contended that he does believe the social media companies, represented by NetChoice LLC., a trade association that advocates for free speech, would 'likely' succeed in their argument that the law violates the First Amendment down the road.
The law, enacted by the governor last April, requires social media platforms to obtain parental consent for minors wishing to use their services or face civil penalties of up to $10,000 per violation as well as potential criminal penalties.
The law does not apply to websites devoted to news, sports, commerce, or video games. It also exempts email and direct messages.
Approximately 12 other states have passed similar laws, seeking to protect children from data collection, online predators, and other social media harms.
The debate over how to protect minors from harmful online content or behavior has been hotly contested over the last few years. More lawsuits have been filed at the Supreme Court in recent years, asking the justices to determine at what point protection laws infringe on the First Amendment.
Generally, the First Amendment protects a wide breadth of speech, with few exceptions.
NetChoice sued the Mississippi Attorney General on behalf of nine social media platforms belonging to its association members, claiming the law violated the First Amendment by infringing on minors' right to speak without parental control.
NetChoice also argued that many of the platforms already have 'their own suite of parental controls' to protect minors from certain services and allow parents to make their own decisions.
The state's Attorney General Lynn Fitch argued that the Mississippi law is designed similarly to protect young people from activists not protected by the First Amendment such as sexual or physical abuse, extortion, incitement to suicide, and more.
This past year, the court upheld a Texas law that requires people visiting sexually explicit websites to verify their age. The law was enacted, in part, to protect minors from viewing pornographic content.
While the Supreme Court's ruling is temporary, the justices could return to the issue if the Mississippi Attorney General or NetChoice appeals to the high court. But the lower court, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, must make a final ruling first.
Paul Taske, the co-director of the NetChoice Litigation Center, said in a statement, 'Although we're disappointed with the Court's decision, Justice Kavanaugh's concurrence makes clear that NetChoice will ultimately succeed in defending the First Amendment—not just in this case but across all NetChoice's ID-for-Speech lawsuits. This is merely an unfortunate procedural delay.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
33 minutes ago
- Sky News
Trump-Putin summit: No deal reached to end war in Ukraine
No deal has been reached to end the war in Ukraine - but Donald Trump has said there are "many points" he and Vladimir Putin agreed on during their highly anticipated summit. Following the meeting in Alaska, which lasted more than two-and-a-half hours, the two leaders gave a short media conference giving little detail about what had been discussed, and without taking questions. Mr Trump described the meeting as "very productive" and said there were "many points that we agreed on... I would say a couple of big ones". 2:20 But there are a few left, he added. "Some are not that significant. One is probably the most significant, but we have a very good chance of getting there... "We haven't quite got there, we've made some headway. There's no deal until there's a deal." Mr Putin described the negotiations as "thorough and constructive" and said Russia was "seriously interested in putting an end" to the war in Ukraine. He also warned Europe not to "torpedo nascent progress". After much build-up to the summit - with the US president threatening "severe" consequences for Russia should it not go well - it was ultimately not clear whether the talks had produced meaningful steps towards a ceasefire in what has been the deadliest conflict in Europe in 80 years. Mr Trump said he intended to speak with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and other European leaders, who were excluded from the discussions, to brief them. Despite not reaching any major breakthrough, the US leader ended his remarks with a thank you, and said he would probably see Mr Putin again "very soon". When the Russian president suggested that "next time" would be Moscow, he responded by saying he might face criticism, but "I could see it possibly happening". 2:10 The red carpet treatment The news conference came after a grand arrival at the Elmendorf-Richardson military base in Anchorage, where the US president stepped down from Air Force One and later greeted his Russian counterpart with a handshake and smiles on a red carpet. Mr Putin even travelled alongside Mr Trump in the presidential limousine, nicknamed "The Beast". It was the kind of reception typically reserved for close US allies, belying the bloodshed and the suffering in the war. Before the talks, the two presidents ignored frantically-shouted questions from journalists - and Mr Putin appeared to frown when asked by one reporter if he would stop "killing civilians" in Ukraine, putting his hand to his ear as though to indicate he could not hear. 3:22 Our US correspondent Martha Kelner, on the ground in Alaska, said he was shouting "let's go" - apparently in reference to getting the reporters out of the room. 3:02 A '10/10' meeting During his first day back in the White House in January, Mr Trump had pledged confidently to bring about an end to the war in Ukraine. But seven months later, after infamously berating Mr Zelenskyy during a meeting at the Oval Office in February, and then stanching the flow of some US military assistance to Kyiv, he still does not appear to have brought a pause to the conflict. In an interview with Fox News before leaving Alaska, Mr Trump described the meeting with Mr Putin as "warm" and gave it a "10/10", but declined to give details about what they discussed. He also insisted that the onus going forward could be on Mr Zelenskyy "to get it done", but said there would also be some involvement from European nations. 7:06 What happens next? Mr Trump is expected to speak to Mr Zelenskyy, Sir Keir Starmer and European leaders about the talks. A meeting of ambassadors from European countries has been scheduled for 8.30am UK time, EU presidency sources have told Sky News. European heads of state and Mr Trump are also likely to have a virtual meeting later in the day. Despite the US president's efforts to bring about a ceasefire, Russian attacks on Ukraine have only intensified in the past few months. On 9 July, Russia carried out its largest aerial attack on Ukraine since the start of the war, launching more than 740 drones and missiles. Furthermore, Mr Zelenskyy has said Russia is preparing for new offensives.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
‘What the f--- was that?' My nine hours at Trump's bewildering summit
After travelling 2,000 miles, enduring a three-hour security screening and arguing over seating arrangements with the Russian media, expectations were high for the meeting between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin. The early signs were positive – a warm handshake, a ride along in 'The Beast' and the claim by Russia that talks could last 'six or seven hours'. But that feeling came to a screeching halt inside the press tent at the Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, when a press conference was called just three hours in – and it emerged that the wider bilateral talks had been scrapped. The two leaders appeared on stage for just 12 minutes. There was no ceasefire and they did not take a single question. 'What the f--- was that?' one American journalist exclaimed. 'Is that all?' Indeed, it was. The first surprise of Mr Trump and Putin's post-summit press conference was that the Russian leader was the first to speak. After the two men had taken their place behind their respective podiums, almost the entire room had their eyes fixed on Mr Trump, assuming that the US host would lead the conversation. So when Putin first opened his mouth, you could almost hear the sounds of heads whipping towards the Russian leader. Mr Trump eventually followed suit, and for the first time in his second term, spoke very briefly. Twelve minutes later, it was all over. The press pack, who had flown more than 2,000 miles to the most remote state capital in America in the hopes of witnessing history, were left shouting into the abyss. Colleagues looked around in bewilderment. Almost immediately, chatter between journalists turned from astonishment to frustration, as we realised that the pair had spoken for a twentieth of the painstaking time that it took for us to each be individually screened by the Secret Service that morning. In the few days before the highly-anticipated summit, we had scrambled to secure hire cars and accommodation in Anchorage, which turned out to be as scarce as details of what the two leaders agreed in their talks. Space in Anchorage was precious. With a handful of hotels already bursting with anglers capitalising on the peak salmon season, there was no room at the inn. Some of the Russian delegation were relegated to dorms normally reserved for university students. We also faced accommodation woes. But my colleague, Dom Nicholls, managed to secure us a 26-foot-long Winnebago, affectionately nicknamed the 'Tel Force One', which became an office, recording studio and our sleeping quarters. Some were not so lucky. Angry members of the Russian press pack shared pictures of military camp cots erected on bare hardwood gym floors, prompting taunts about the state of American hospitality. Frustrations were compounded when, upon arriving at the media tents, our Russian counterparts found that their mobile data roaming did not work. In the end, they were able to connect to the special WiFi generously provided by the US Air Force. Security delays prompted outcry from some American journalists who were concerned that Russian reporters would get better seats at the briefing. 'Can we make sure Americans are seated before the Russians?' one disgruntled journalist asked. 'This is America, after all,' another added. The two media camps were being kept apart on separate buses. In the press tent, it was a similar scene. With Russian media lodged on one side, cables hidden under blue and yellow rubber covers acted as a de facto border. A smoking area beside a handful of portable toilets appeared to be exclusively used by chain-smoking Russians. But even they appeared bewildered by the underwhelming press conference, immediately scampering from the press tent via the snack bar to their awaiting bus once it had concluded. After Mr Trump left the venue and the roar of Air Force One receded, we were left wondering how the most consequential diplomatic summit in recent memory could produce so little. Ukraine was shut out of the talks, with no invite for Volodymyr Zelensky, much to the chagrin of his European allies. Given what a non-event the whole thing turned out to be, they may be relieved that they were not required to make the journey.
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Trump-Putin meeting summary: four key moments from press conference
After private talks lasting almost three hours, President Putin and President Trump's press conference at the Elmendorf airbase in Alaska was uncharacteristically brief. Trump has almost-daily exchanges with journalists in the full glare of the cameras. Putin has been known to speak to the media for more than four and a half hours while hosting his annual marathon phone-ins. But in Alaska, the two leaders refused to accept questions from journalists and they made a prompt exit after only 12 minutes. Putin stuck closely to his scripted comments while Trump made vague remarks about 'extremely productive talks'. Putin repeated his insistence that the war in Ukraine would only end when the 'root causes' of the conflict were addressed.
