logo
China tariffs are no longer 145%, but for small businesses in the crossfire, ‘it's still awful'

China tariffs are no longer 145%, but for small businesses in the crossfire, ‘it's still awful'

CNN19-05-2025

President Donald Trump's decision to impose a steep tax on most goods that come into America has tested the mettle of small business owners whose companies are reliant on global trade.
And the fits and starts that have come along with Trump's tariff program are not just testing these business owners' patience, they're also threatening their very operations.
The latest, and perhaps biggest, curveball came last week when the US and China agreed to sharply lower their respective tariff rates for 90 days. The de-escalation brought the US tariffs on Chinese goods down to 30% from 145%.
Markets cheered the news, and recession forecasts lessened in intensity.
And that surely meant that small business owners who faced steep tariff bills — including Busy Baby founder Beth Fynbo Benike, whose next shipment of baby products was going to come with an additional $230,000 price tag — should be super grateful, right?
Fynbo Benike answered that question with some seething sarcasm and a dose of realism.
'The tariffs came down. 30%. Yay!' Fynbo Benike said on a TikTok video posted last week. 'That still sucks, by the way. That sucks for any small business owner … It's still going to cost me $48,000 more than this shipment would've cost me two months ago.'
'It's still awful,' she said.
Tariff update - down to 30%! We can ship our products!!!! It still sucks though! #tarifftalk Fynbo Benike has become an archetype for small business owners caught in the crossfire of a tumultuous trade regime.
The erratic nature of President Donald Trump's trade policies and the severity of newly imposed tariffs have wreaked havoc on small businesses in the US, causing costs to quickly skyrocket, unsettling longstanding supply chains, swiftly stifling growth and expansion plans — and threatening to kill American-bred businesses.
A 30% tariff for Chinese imports 'is still a step up, and that's not the only tariff we're looking at. We're looking at tariffs around the globe,' Elizabeth Renter, senior economist at NerdWallet, told CNN in an interview. 'That relief was necessary, but let's not kid ourselves. The impact of this trade war is going to be significant, and I think it's going to hit smaller businesses potentially the worst.'
To understand the plight of small businesses one needs to only look at the largest corporation of them all.
The chief executive officer of Walmart late last week said that tariffs were 'too high' for the world's largest retailer to absorb, and that it would raise prices in the coming weeks.
'Walmart is the best equipped to handle increased costs; they have probably some of the most complex supply chains, and they're going to multiple suppliers for all of their products,' Renter said. 'If some place like Walmart is signaling that they're going to be increasing prices, we know that the stress on smaller corporations and smaller businesses is going to be significant.'
Francine Farkas Sears, who 50 years ago was the first American businesswoman invited to China after President Richard Nixon opened trade relations, told CNN that the tariffs are threatening the viability of her business, which makes professional bags for women as well as accessories for the Girl Scouts of America and the Red Cross.
'Well, we might as well just make a lunch date, because I won't have a business; it's that serious,' she said.
The steep and shifting tariffs are threatening to unwind decades-forged relationships and make her business unsustainable, she said.
'It's an industry that we don't produce today here,' she said, noting that the costs to produce bags, as well as caps and the roller 'cookie carts' for scouts would skyrocket if they weren't made overseas.
'These families are scraping by to join the Girl Scouts for their daughters, and they can buy that cart now for $39,' she said. 'If I made it in this country, it would be $200.'
'These are areas where we have to realize that we have to shake hands,' she added, noting the volatility could be too much for her and other businesses to withstand. 'Whether you like him or not, it doesn't matter, [Trump is] one of the smartest negotiators ever: He basically throws everyone off balance, and then he brings them back.'
'It's a slap and a kiss,' she said.
Fynbo Benike, a US Army veteran, has long made efforts to manufacture the tethered baby place mats and other accessories on domestic soil; however, the US infrastructure remains costly, limited, or in some cases nonexistent. So, she and others have had to rely on imported goods and materials to grow their businesses.
And Busy Baby was indeed growing: The company got its products into several hundred Walmart and Target stores, and Fynbo Benike had just paid for her largest-ever order to help backfill inventory for her website and for Amazon.
In recent weeks, Busy Baby was busy pivoting. The company was formulating an international distribution plan, in which the vast majority of the sales would occur outside of the US.
The de-escalation of tariff rates with China means that Fynbo Benike can pull the trigger on shipping the order to the US. However, it will come at a steep cost to her and others — most of the funds to pay for the expected $48,000 import tax are coming from a GoFundMe.
'Now that the tariff has come down, it's enough to bridge the gap; so, we're going to ship the product as soon as possible,' Fynbo Benike told CNN in an interview last week. 'And then — this is where it's very, very risky — we're going to start production for our next line. I'm going to be hopeful that it's not going to get worse.'
In case it does, she said, she's modifying production of the baby mats to meet European Union standards.
And despite the détente with China, the outlook for companies like Busy Baby has only become increasingly volatile.
'I would say it's more and more (uncertain) and different and stronger,' Fynbo Benike said. 'Last time, the tariff was going up and up and up; and now, the tariff all of a sudden dropped significantly. And they say it's for 90 days, but is it for 90 days?'
'Because our administration is known to make sudden and drastic changes out of nowhere, and now that is happening in both directions,' she added.
Last month was meant to serve as a milestone for Katharine Burke's Purryfuls business, a startup that made self-care purring plushies for stressed-out Millennials and Gen Zers. After two years in development, the first Purryfuls line was meant to go into production.
The month of April, put lightly, 'was not fun,' Burke told CNN last week.
'My (company's) survival was in question all of April,' she said via email. 'I had my first-, second-, and third-ever panic attacks. I was trying to come up with backup plans as [the tariffs] dramatically changed my outlook for the year.'
By the first week of May, the Purryfuls products were being manufactured and scheduled to ship from China at the end of the month.
At that time, the tariffs were still 145%, and Burke didn't know if she'd be in a tight spot, or if she'd be OK.
A week later, the tariffs dropped to 30%, a levy that's significant for small businesses like hers to absorb. But 'it's survivable,' she said.
That's not to say it has been smooth.
For one, her customs broker is still poring through the hundreds and thousands of tariff codes to tabulate the exact import duty Purryfuls will have to pay.
And then there are new risks of not only higher shipping costs, but also potential delays for her order.
'Now that the tariffs have eased, all of the shipments are going out at once which could backup ocean freight and drive up pricing,' she wrote. 'I'm hearing from my manufacturer that canceled orders are being revived, which is great for them, but the backlog may mean that there is no space for me to place another order as everyone rushes to get ready for Christmas.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Police cast wide net in probe of defunct North Texas car dealership's business practices
Police cast wide net in probe of defunct North Texas car dealership's business practices

CBS News

time25 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Police cast wide net in probe of defunct North Texas car dealership's business practices

Desire Godfrey said it was time for a vehicle upgrade. The Lancaster mother had her eye on a Lexus. "I had a baby, so I'm looking for something reliable for me and a baby," Godfrey said. She searched online and found what she thought was the right vehicle at The Reserve Auto Group in The Colony. She described the sales process in May 2024 as a positive experience. Warranty and GAP insurance issues But an unexpected oil change six months later changed everything. Godfrey, 33, said a Lexus dealership informed her the vehicle was not under warranty. She also discovered her GAP insurance policy didn't exist. "They (Reserve Auto Group) never paid the warranty company the money they were supposed to pay to activate this warranty and this GAP insurance," she said. Car loan charges continue Godfrey said the costs were included in her car note. She filed a report with The Colony Police Department — and she's not alone. Police said they received their first complaint on Jan. 31. According to a news release, police have been investigating multiple fraud claims connected to the dealership since 2023. The business shut down in December 2024, but complaints continue to come in. Alleged auto fraud pattern Investigators said customers were allegedly instructed to write separate checks for aftermarket warranties or GAP insurance policies. Those payments were supposed to go to third-party providers, but police said the dealership allegedly cashed the checks and never forwarded the money — leaving customers without coverage. Another victim comes forward A second alleged victim, who spoke to CBS News Texas anonymously, said she and her husband also bought a Lexus from the dealership. She provided a non-activation letter from DOWC Administrative Services LLC, a company that offers GAP insurance and warranties. The letter stated: "Please be advised that Reserve Auto has failed to remit payment to Us as the Administrator and Provider for your Contract. Consequently, the Contract was not activated in our system." Investigation still ongoing Police have not made any arrests or publicly identified anyone associated with the allegations. Officers said they are continuing to vet additional alleged victims. CBS News Texas is not naming the person listed as the dealership's owner, as police have indicated he did nothing wrong. He spoke briefly by phone, saying he wanted to schedule an appointment to discuss the claims further because he believed "we did not have all the facts." When asked for clarification, he said he didn't have time to explain. Legal team responds Two emails followed the call, and attorneys from Herrin Law introduced themselves. "We have no comment at this time. Thank you for your interest in our client's side of the story," attorney Benjamin Palatiere said. He requested that all future inquiries be directed to him. Buyer left without coverage Meanwhile, Godfrey said the vehicle itself has not had any issues. But she continues to pay for a warranty and insurance that don't exist. "So nobody wants to refinance the loan. Nobody wants to give me GAP insurance," she said. "It's just more so like I'm going to take it or leave it. If I wreck the car, then I would have to figure out a way to pay that car off." Godfrey said she hopes to recover the money one day.

Supreme Court halts lower court orders requiring DOGE to hand over information about work and personnel
Supreme Court halts lower court orders requiring DOGE to hand over information about work and personnel

CBS News

time35 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Supreme Court halts lower court orders requiring DOGE to hand over information about work and personnel

Elon Musk on DOGE and his work in and out of government Elon Musk on DOGE and his work in and out of government Elon Musk on DOGE and his work in and out of government Washington — The Supreme Court on Friday halted lower court orders that required the White House's Department of Government Efficiency to turn over information to a government watchdog group as part of a lawsuit that tests whether President Trump's cost-cutting task force has to comply with federal public records law. The order from the high court clears DOGE for now from having to turn over records related to its work and personnel, and keeps Amy Gleason, identified as its acting administrator, from having to answer questions at a deposition. Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented. "The portions of the district court's April 15 discovery order that require the government to disclose the content of intra–executive branch USDS recommendations and whether those recommendations were followed are not appropriately tailored," the court said in its order. "Any inquiry into whether an entity is an agency for the purposes of the Freedom of Information Act cannot turn on the entity's ability to persuade. Furthermore, separation of powers concerns counsel judicial deference and restraint in the context of discovery regarding internal executive branch communications." The Supreme Court sent the case back to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit for more proceedings. Chief Justice John Roberts temporarily paused the district court's order last month, which allowed the Supreme Court more time to consider the Trump administration's bid for emergency relief. A district judge had ordered DOGE to turn over documents to the group, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, by June 3, and for Gleason's deposition to be completed by June 13. The underlying issue in the case involves whether DOGE is subject to the Freedom of Information Act. CREW argues that the cost-cutting task force wields "substantial independent authority," which makes it a de facto agency that must comply with federal public records law. The Justice Department, however, disagrees and instead claims that DOGE is a presidential advisory body housed within the Executive Office of the President that makes recommendations to the president and federal agencies on matters that are important to Mr. Trump's second-term agenda. DOGE's agency status was not before the Supreme Court, though the high court may be asked to settle that matter in the future. Instead, the Trump administration had asked the justices to temporarily halt a district court's order that allowed CREW to gather certain information from DOGE as part of its effort to determine whether the task force is an advisory panel that is outside FOIA's scope or is an agency that is subject to the records law. The judge overseeing the dispute, U.S. District Judge Christopher Cooper, had ordered DOGE to turn over certain documents to the watchdog group by June 3 and to complete all depositions, including of Gleason, by June 13. Mr. Trump ordered the creation of DOGE on his first day back in the White House as part of his initiative to slash the size of the federal government. Since then, DOGE team members have fanned out to agencies across the executive branch and have been part of efforts to shrink the federal workforce and shutter entities like the U.S. Agency for International Development and the U.S. Institute of Peace. DOGE has also attempted to gain access to sensitive databases kept by the Internal Revenue Service, Social Security Administration and Office of Personnel Management, prompting legal battles. In an effort to learn more about DOGE's structure and operations, CREW submitted an expedited FOIA request to the task force. After it did not respond in a timely manner, CREW filed a lawsuit and sought a preliminary injunction to expedite processing of its records request. The organization argued that DOGE was exercising significant independent authority, which made it an agency subject to FOIA. Cooper granted CREW's request for a preliminary injunction in March and agreed that FOIA likely applies to DOGE because it is "likely exercising substantial independent authority much greater than other [Executive Office of the President] components held to be covered by FOIA." He then allowed CREW to conduct limited information-gathering, which the watchdog group said aimed to determine whether DOGE is exercising substantial authority that would bring it within FOIA's reach. A federal appeals court ultimately declined to pause that order, requiring DOGE to turn over the documents sought by CREW. In seeking the Supreme Court's intervention, Solicitor General D. John Sauer said CREW is conducting a "fishing expedition" into DOGE's activities. He warned that if Cooper's order remains in place, several components of the White House, such as the offices of the chief of staff and national security adviser, would be subject to FOIA. "That untenable result would compromise the provision of candid, confidential advice to the president and disrupt the inner workings of the Executive Branch," Sauer wrote. "Yet, in the decisions below, the court of appeals and district court treated a presidential advisory body as a potential 'agency' based on the persuasive force of its recommendations — threatening opening season for FOIA requests on the president's advisors." But lawyers for CREW told the Supreme Court in a filing that the Justice Department's position "would require courts to blindly yield to the Executive's characterization" of the authority and operations of a component of the Executive Office of the President. They said adopting the Trump administration's approach to DOGE would give the president "free reign" to create new entities within the Executive Office of the President that exercise substantial independent authority but are shielded from transparency laws. "Courts would be forced to blindly accept the government's representations about an EOP unit's realworld operations, unable to test those representations through even limited discovery," CREW's lawyers wrote. "It is that extreme position, not the discovery order, that would 'turn[] FOIA on its head.'"

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store