US economy rebounds in second quarter
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AllAfrica
2 hours ago
- AllAfrica
China happily and aggressively filling Trump's climate vacuum
When President Donald Trump announced in early 2025 that he was withdrawing the US from the Paris climate agreement for the second time, it triggered fears that the move would undermine global efforts to slow climate change and diminish America's global influence. A big question hung in the air: Who would step into the leadership vacuum? While it's still too early to fully assess the long-term impact of the United States' political shift when it comes to global cooperation on climate change, there are signs that a new set of leaders is rising to the occasion. The US first committed to the Paris Agreement in a joint announcement by President Barack Obama and China's Xi Jinping in 2015. At the time, the US agreed to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions 26% to 28% below 2005 levels by 2025 and pledged financial support to help developing countries adapt to climate risks and embrace renewable energy. Some people praised the US engagement, while others criticized the original commitment as too weak. Since then, the US has cut emissions by 17.2% below 2005 levels – missing the goal, in part because its efforts have been stymied along the way. Just two years after the landmark Paris Agreement, Trump stood in the Rose Garden in 2017 and announced he was withdrawing the US from the treaty, citing concerns that jobs would be lost, that meeting the goals would be an economic burden, and that it wouldn't be fair because China, the world's largest emitter today, wasn't projected to start reducing its emissions for several years. Scientists and some politicians and business leaders were quick to criticize the decision, calling it 'shortsighted' and 'reckless.' Some feared that the Paris Agreement, signed by almost every country, would fall apart. But it did not. In the US, businesses such as Apple, Google, Microsoft and Tesla made their own pledges to meet the Paris Agreement goals. Hawaii passed legislation to become the first state to align with the agreement. A coalition of US cities and states banded together to form the United States Climate Alliance to keep working to slow climate change. Globally, leaders from Italy, Germany and France rebutted Trump's assertion that the Paris Agreement could be renegotiated. Others from Japan, Canada, Australia and New Zealand doubled down on their own support of the global climate accord. In 2020, President Joe Biden brought the US back into the agreement. Amazon partnered with Dominion Energy to build solar farms, like this one, in Virginia. They power the company's cloud-computing and other services. Photo: Drew Angerer / Getty Images via The Conversation Now, with Trump pulling the US out again – and taking steps to eliminate US climate policies, boost fossil fuels and slow the growth of clean energy at home – other countries are stepping up. On July 24, 2025, China and the European Union issued a joint statement vowing to strengthen their climate targets and meet them. They alluded to the US, referring to 'the fluid and turbulent international situation today' in saying that 'the major economies … must step up efforts to address climate change.' In some respects, this is a strength of the Paris Agreement – it is a legally nonbinding agreement based on what each country decides to commit to. Its flexibility keeps it alive, as the withdrawal of a single member does not trigger immediate sanctions, nor does it render the actions of others obsolete. The agreement survived the first US withdrawal, and so far, all signs point to it surviving the second one. From what I've seen in international climate meetings and my team's research, it appears that most countries are moving forward. One bloc emerging as a powerful voice in negotiations is the Like-Minded Group of Developing Countries – a group of low- and middle-income countries that includes China, India, Bolivia and Venezuela. Driven by economic development concerns, these countries are pressuring the developed world to meet its commitments to both cut emissions and provide financial aid to poorer countries. Diego Pacheco, a negotiator from Bolivia, spoke on behalf of the Like-Minded Developing Countries group during a climate meeting in Bonn, Germany, in June 2025. Photo: IISD / ENB via The Conversation | Kiara Worth China, motivated by economic and political factors, seems to be happily filling the climate power vacuum created by the US exit. In 2017, China voiced disappointment over the first US withdrawal. It maintained its climate commitments and pledged to contribute more in climate finance to other developing countries than the US had committed to – US$3.1 billion compared with $3 billion. This time around, China is using its leadership on climate change in ways that fit its broader strategy of gaining influence and economic power by supporting economic growth and cooperation in developing countries. Through its Belt and Road Initiative, China has scaled up renewable energy exports and development in other countries, such as investing in solar power in Egypt and wind energy development in Ethiopia. While China is still the world's largest coal consumer, it has aggressively pursued investments in renewable energy at home, including solar, wind and electrification. In 2024, about half the renewable energy capacity built worldwide was in China. China's interest in South America's energy resources has been growing for years. In 2019, China's special representative for climate change, Xie Zhenhua, met with Chile's then-ministers of energy and environment, Juan Carlos Jobet and Carolina Schmidt, in Chile. Photo: Martin Bernetti / AFP via Getty Images / The Conversation While it missed the deadline to submit its climate pledge due this year, China has a goal of peaking its emissions before 2030 and then dropping to net-zero emissions by 2060. It is continuing major investments in renewable energy, both for its own use and for export. The US government, in contrast, is cutting its support for wind and solar power. China also just expanded its carbon market to encourage emissions cuts in the cement, steel and aluminum sectors. The British government has also ratcheted up its climate commitments as it seeks to become a clean energy superpower. In 2025, it pledged to cut emissions 77% by 2035 compared with 1990 levels. Its new pledge is also more transparent and specific than in the past, with details on how specific sectors, such as power, transportation, construction and agriculture, will cut emissions. And it contains stronger commitments to provide funding to help developing countries grow more sustainably. In terms of corporate leadership, while many American businesses are being quieter about their efforts, in order to avoid sparking the ire of the Trump administration, most appear to be continuing on a green path – despite the lack of federal support and diminished rules. USA Today and Statista's 'America's Climate Leader List' includes about 500 large companies that have reduced their carbon intensity – carbon emissions divided by revenue – by 3% from the previous year. The data shows that the list is growing, up from about 400 in 2023. The Paris Agreement isn't going anywhere. Given the agreement's design, with each country voluntarily setting its own goals, the US never had the power to drive it into obsolescence. The question is whether developed and developing country leaders alike can navigate two pressing needs – economic growth and ecological sustainability – without compromising their leadership on climate change. This year's UN climate conference in Brazil, COP30, will show how countries intend to move forward and, importantly, who will lead the way. Shannon Gibson is professor of environmental studies, political science and international relations, USC Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences Research assistant Emerson Damiano, a recent graduate in environmental studies at USC, contributed to this article. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
South China Morning Post
2 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
South Korea pledges $150 billion to help US restore its shipbuilding industry
Read more on this story: South Korea has pledged US$150 billion to help its shipbuilders enter the US market as part of Seoul's new trade deal with Washington. The move will aim to help America revive its shipbuilding industry and counter China's dominance in the sector. US President Donald Trump announced on July 30, 2025, that the United States and South Korea had agreed on a 'full and complete' trade deal, which would see the US impose a 15 per cent tariff on South Korean goods and receive US$350 billion of investments from its Asian ally.
South China Morning Post
2 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Hong Kong advocacy group focused on protecting Victoria Harbour disbands after 30 years
An advocacy organisation that has fought to protect Hong Kong's Victoria Harbour for nearly 30 years has announced its disbandment more than two months after the government amended a law which the group said could pave the way for large-scale reclamation. Advertisement The Society for Protection of the Harbour said on Friday it had ceased operations the day before, after the Legislative Council approved changes to the Protection of the Harbour Ordinance in May 'Our society is aiming to protect the harbour under its legal basis, but that has disappeared with the legal amendment,' Winston Chu Ka-sun, the group's founder and vice-chairman, said. 'I am not sure about the future of the harbour,' the 85-year-old lawyer lamented, adding that it was now in the hands of the younger generation to continue efforts to push for the harbour's protection. Chu founded the society in 1995 to protect the harbour against excessive reclamation, leading to the enactment of the Protection of the Harbour Ordinance in 1997. Advertisement The existing legal regime bans reclamation in Victoria Harbour unless the government proves to a court that a project has an 'overriding public need' and is supported by 'cogent and convincing materials'.
