&w=3840&q=100)
'Purposeful' deergha ayush: Long life is no virtue for an incapable company
Deergha ayush must be both biological and operating with a deep purpose
R Gopalakrishnan
Listen to This Article
The debate about family-managed versus professional companies is fruitless. The debate is between well-managed and poorly managed companies. The future leader will be a 'professional entrepreneurial manager'.
I participated in a panel discussion on 'long-life companies' in the 2024 Drucker Forum in Vienna. One fellow-panelist was Adrian Wooldridge, who writes for Bloomberg and The Economist. Adrian strongly refuted my plea for long-life companies by quoting the Schumpeter creative destruction principle that companies without capability or purpose should be allowed to die, that long life is no virtue for an incapable company. Of course, that is true. Adrian readily accepted the
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
How there has been a shift in companies that use H-1B visas in the US, they are no longer technology companies
Representative Image Silicon Valley's drive for innovation has long relied on the H-1B visa program to attract top-tier global talent in science and engineering. However, new data obtained by Bloomberg News reveals that a wider range of industries, including banks and telecommunications companies, are among the largest users of the programme -- often through staffing and outsourcing companies that secure nearly half of the 85,000 new H-1B visas issued annually. These companies, acting as visa middlemen, are reshaping the programme's purpose, raising questions about its impact on wages and U.S. workers. According to Bloomberg's analysis, covering new H-1B hires from May 2020 to May 2024, Citigroup Inc. added 3,000 H-1B workers, outpacing tech giants like Nvidia, Oracle, and Qualcomm. However, unlike the high-skill researchers and engineers typically associated with tech companies, about two-thirds of Citi's H-1B workers were IT contractors sourced through staffing and outsourcing agencies. These workers, often reportedly paid significantly less than direct hires, highlight a growing trend where non-tech companies leverage the visa program for lower-cost labor. 'This is the tip of the iceberg,' said Susan Houseman, a senior economist at the W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, in an interview with Bloomberg. 'While there's been a national debate about the U.S. reliance on imported goods, not enough attention has been paid to the offshoring of service jobs -- not because it doesn't happen or isn't important, but because we don't have good data on it.' Lottery fraud in H-1B visas by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Sharp Design, Smoother Drives. Toyota Glanza Learn More Undo The H-1B visa, established by Congress in 1990 to bolster U.S. competitiveness in emerging tech industries, has become oversubscribed, leading to annual lotteries for the limited visas available. Staffing and outsourcing firms, functioning as visa middlemen, have exploited this system. These firms provide corporations with lower-level IT workers or facilitate the offshoring of back-office functions. Bloomberg's data, obtained via a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against the Department of Homeland Security, identifies major U.S. companies like Capital One Financial Corp., Verizon Communications Inc., AT&T Inc., and Walmart Inc. as heavy users of these visa middlemen. Until recently, some middlemen manipulated the visa lottery through a practice known as 'multiple registration,' where they submitted numerous applications for the same worker to increase their odds. The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) labeled this practice fraudulent in a 2023 report and implemented rule changes last year to curb it. Bloomberg's investigation also identified 13 staffing firms flagged by USCIS for such tactics, with at least six supplying workers to Capital One. Over half of Capital One's 905 H-1B contract workers during the four-year period were linked to multiple registrations, the highest proportion among the top 10 companies analyzed. Capital One relied on 429 staffing firms, 361 of which used multiple registrations. In response, a Capital One spokesperson told Bloomberg that the company was unaware of any government accusations of visa fraud by its vendors but would 'take appropriate action' if such issues arose. Verizon and Capital One emphasized that they require suppliers to comply with applicable laws, while AT&T, Walmart, and USAA declined to comment. What the shift in H-1B visas mean for salaries The data also reveals significant pay disparities. H-1B contractors are often paid far less than direct hires, even for similar roles. Bloomberg's analysis of the top 10 end-clients shows that among nearly 5,300 H-1B 'software developers' hired from 2020 to 2024, over 75% were contractors, earning roughly $48,000 less on average than direct hires, even when controlling for education and age. One in three contractors received the minimum salary required by the Department of Labor. Steve Hall, Chief AI Officer at Information Services Group Inc., told Bloomberg that part of the pay gap reflects contractors performing less technical roles, such as liaising between U.S. clients and offshore teams. However, critics argue that the reliance on visa middlemen distorts the H-1B program's original intent. Labor advocates contend that it undercuts U.S. workers, creates a vulnerable workforce with fewer protections, and tilts the labor market in favor of employers. The lack of comprehensive data on pre-existing H-1B contractors and offshored jobs complicates efforts to assess the program's full impact. As Houseman noted, the offshoring of service jobs remains understudied, yet its implications for the U.S. labor market are significant. With companies across industries increasingly turning to visa middlemen, the H-1B program's role in shaping the workforce continues to spark debate. AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Economic Times
5 hours ago
- Economic Times
AI doing up to 50% of work at Salesforce: CEO Marc Benioff
Reuters Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff, in an interview with Bloomberg, said that the company is using artificial intelligence (AI) to do 30% to 50% of the statements have been made by other tech leaders, including Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and Google chief Sundar Pichai, who have said that AI does a significant portion of work like coding in their companies. Benioff continued, 'All of us have to get our heads around this idea that AI can do things that before, you know, we were doing, and we can move on to do higher-value work.' When the interviewer Emily Chang asked if AI could replace him one day, Benioff joked, 'I hope so. I mean, of course, I'm partially kidding. You know that, but we're becoming more automated.'According to Bloomberg, Salesforce has already let go of over 1,000 employees this year. While some may be moved into new roles, large-scale job cuts like these are becoming more common with the growing adoption of month, Salesforce acknowledged that its adoption of AI tools has enabled the company to scale back on recruitment. During an analyst call, chief financial and operations officer Robin Washington said the company is reducing hiring, with 500 customer service staff to be moved into other roles, an adjustment expected to save $50 million.A few months ago, Benioff went so far as to say that the company wouldn't be hiring any more engineers this year due to significant productivity gains from it is worth noting that despite the slowdown in technical hiring, the company is expanding its sales of January 31, Salesforce had a workforce of around 76,500. Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. The bike taxi dreams of Rapido, Uber, and Ola just got a jolt. But they're winning public favour Second only to L&T, but controversies may weaken this infra powerhouse's growth story Punit Goenka reloads Zee with Bullet and OTT focus. Can he beat mighty rivals? 3 critical hurdles in India's quest for rare earth independence HDB Financial may be cheaper than Bajaj Fin, but what about returns? Why Sebi must give up veto power over market infra institutions These large- and mid-cap stocks can give more than 23% return in 1 year, according to analysts Are short-term headwinds from China an opportunity? 8 auto stocks: Time to be contrarian? Buy, Sell or Hold: Motilal Oswal initiates coverage on Supreme Industries; UBS initiates coverage on PNB Housing
Mint
7 hours ago
- Mint
Goldman ICBC Wealth JV CEO Leaves Amid Growth Pains, Competition
(Bloomberg) -- Goldman Sachs Group Inc.'s top executive at its wealth venture with China's biggest bank has resigned, people familiar with the matter said, as foreign firms struggle to gain a foothold in the country's asset management market amid deepening economic strains. Alex Wang, chief executive officer of Goldman Sachs ICBC Wealth Management, is leaving after almost 15 years at Goldman's asset management affiliate in China, the people said, asking not to be identified because the matter isn't public. He is in discussions to join Nomura Holdings Inc. with a similar title to run its securities business, the people said, asking not to be identified. Goldman will replace Wang with Zhang Yumeng, who took up a job as managing director at investment research firm Morningstar Inc. in January, one of the people said. He was formerly head of China at Legal & General Group, having also worked at Ping An Asset Management and Mercer International. Goldman Sachs' spokeswoman in Hong Kong declined to comment. Wang, who was also previously head of private wealth management in China onshore at Gao Hua Securities Co., didn't respond to requests for comment. Zhang and Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd. couldn't be reached for comment outside business hours. Wang's departure comes three years after Goldman's 51%-owned venture was allowed to roll out wealth management services in 2022. Although the tie-up with ICBC will aid product distribution on the mainland, it remains unclear how much it will overlap or compete with the Chinese lender's own wealth management unit, one of the people said. Global firms have launched wholly-owned fund management units in China, but scaling up has proved difficult amid a sluggish stock market and intense competition from powerful domestic players that offer tailored, lower-cost products. Western firms may find it challenging to match the deep-rooted networks and regulatory rapport that the local incumbents have enjoyed, while a regulatory push to lower management fees has further squeezed margins. New York-based Goldman's China wealth push was built on expectations of rising demand from a growing affluent class. It previously estimated Chinese households will have 450 trillion yuan ($63 trillion) in investable assets by 2030, with around 60% flowing into non-deposit products such as securities, mutual funds, and bank wealth management, according to a 2021 announcement when it established the venture with ICBC. But demand has waned as consumers hoard cash amid a prolonged property slump and mounting US–China tensions, sharply curbing investment appetite. Meanwhile, Nomura has scaled back its original focus on China wealth, cutting staffing by about two-thirds in the business over the past two years to prioritize an expansion in brokerage and asset management in the world's second largest economy, people familiar said earlier. The Tokyo-based firm has been seeking a new chief executive officer for its securities business in China for months as its joint venture faces pressure to revive its performance after posting losses every year since it was formed in 2019. While it was confident that its expertise of catering to rich Japanese would help give it an edge in China, its wealth business push has teetered under President Xi Jinping's 'common prosperity' drive, a slowing economy and stiff competition. Rival UBS Group AG last year also postponed plans to build its own mutual fund business in China due to the large capital commitment and a dim profit outlook, people familiar with the matter have said. The bank had been contemplating a stand-alone fund platform after China lifted foreign ownership restrictions in 2020. More stories like this are available on
