logo
Government needs the can-do mindset I experienced in the Army to push change through fast

Government needs the can-do mindset I experienced in the Army to push change through fast

Independent9 hours ago

Government moves too slowly. That's not just the fault of the current government or the last one – it's the system. Slowed down by bureaucracy. Paralysed by 'can't-do' figures. Obsessed with process over progress.
I come from a background of delivery. In the Army, working in a 'human intelligence unit' – liaising with agents and special forces – we had to move from first gear to fifth in an instant. Lives depended on it. Getting ahead of the enemy, protecting our people and achieving results was the mission – not talking it to death.
Confirming the location of a high-value target, whilst also ensuring they were alone and targetable, or identifying the precise site of an improvised explosive device factory, required creativity and a determined mindset – a willingness to take calculated risks to save lives and win.
When I worked in counterterrorism at the Ministry of Defence, delivery wasn't optional. We built a culture of 'can-do'; creative, risk-aware and focused on action. It wasn't about perfection. It was about progress.
Government could learn a lot from the mindset of the finest military in the world and the departments that work every day to protect the public from the threat of terrorism. An unstoppable political will must go hand in hand with a mindset of delivery.
I think back to our counterterror planning meetings. The mission? To stop terrorists attacking our great country. No timewasters. Just serious professionals putting ideas on the table, pulling them apart, war-gaming every outcome, then locking in a plan and going all-out to deliver. That mindset – challenge, rigour and rapid execution – is what the system of government has desperately lacked for decades.
Too often, it's delay by design. Endless consultations. Five-year strategies that take ten. Pet projects blocked by internal turf wars. Take the Lower Thames Crossing: more than £1.2 billion spent before a single spade in the ground – all because of drawn-out decision-making and red tape. Or the A9 dualling project in Scotland – promised by 2025, now pushed back to 2035. Ten years of drift.
These delays are not acts of God. They are failures of will.
The truth is, Whitehall needs reform. There are dedicated, brilliant people across the civil service – but too many are trapped in a system built to say 'no'. Risk aversion is often rewarded, not challenged. Delivery is too often deprioritised in favour of process, and meaningful reform is blocked by a sprawling web of arms-length bodies and quangos that diffuse responsibility and stifle urgency.
We need a leaner, more focused state – one that empowers departments to move at pace and is held accountable for outcomes, not paperwork. That means streamlining quangos where appropriate, ending duplication, and changing the mindset within government itself. Ministers must be prepared to challenge officials – not to attack, but to sharpen decision-making and force clarity on delivery.
Wes Streeting 's approach to the NHS offers a blueprint. He's made clear that, as health secretary, he expects faster delivery, more accountability, and a culture that doesn't settle for 'this is just how things are done'. Abolishing NHS England shows a steely commitment to the change he expects. But reforming structures is only half the battle – changing the culture is the real prize. Government must operate with a sense of mission, not maintenance.
The British public doesn't care whether a successful policy comes from Bevan or Thatcher. They care that it works. That it's delivered.
We need to strip out the ideology and face complex problems with a solutions-based mindset. Let the evidence lead. Move fast. Be willing to make mistakes in the name of making progress. And above all, get things done.
Because there's serious work to do.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UK proposes wider ban on destructive bottom trawling
UK proposes wider ban on destructive bottom trawling

BBC News

time5 minutes ago

  • BBC News

UK proposes wider ban on destructive bottom trawling

A ban on a "destructive" type of fishing that drags large nets along the seafloor could be extended across English waters, the government has proposal would expand the the prohibition of bottom trawling fishing to a further 30,000 km2 (around 11,500 sq miles) across 41 Marine Protected Areas (MPAs). The plan is subject to a 12-week industry announcement comes as a UN Ocean Conference begins on Monday in France, and amid warnings from Sir David Attenborough that bottom trawling is destroying areas of the seabed and marine Secretary Steve Reed said "without urgent action our oceans will be irreversibly destroyed". Speaking before the summit, Sir David told Prince William he was "appalled" by the fishing method. The naturalist's latest documentary Ocean With David Attenborough showed new footage of a bottom trawling net bulldozing through silt on the seafloor and scooping up species week, MPs on the Environmental Audit Committee renewed calls to ban bottom trawling, dredging and mining for aggregates, on the seabed in offshore government says the proposed measures would protect rare marine animals and the delicate seabeds they rely upon. It says it has carried out detailed assessments into the harms caused to habitats and species.A 12-week consultation will run until 1 September and will seek the views of the marine and fishing industry. Ariana Densham, head of oceans at Greenpeace UK, said the consultation was "ultimately a long-overdue completion of a process started by the previous government".The Wildlife Trust said it hoped the extended ban would be put in place "rapidly". It would be a "win-win for both nature and the climate," added the trust's director of policy and public affairs, Joan Edwards. Pressure is also building for more countries to ratify the High Seas Treaty at the Ocean Conference in Nice. The treaty was agreed by 193 countries two years ago to put 30% of the ocean into protected areas. The treaty will not come into force until it is ratified by 60 countries, with the current number standing at 28. The UK is among those countries that has yet to ratify.

Tariffs: US and China set to meet for trade talks in London
Tariffs: US and China set to meet for trade talks in London

BBC News

time2 hours ago

  • BBC News

Tariffs: US and China set to meet for trade talks in London

A new round of talks aimed at resolving a trade war between the US and China is set take place in London on President Donald Trump announced on Friday that a senior US delegation would meet Chinese representatives. Over weekend, Beijing's Ministry of Foreign Affairs confirmed that Vice Premier He Lifeng will attend the announcements came after Trump and China's leader Xi Jinping had a phone conversation last week, which the US president described as a "very good talk".Last month, the world's two biggest economies agreed a temporary truce to lower import taxes on goods being traded between them, but since then both countries have accused the other of breaching the deal. Writing on his Truth Social platform on Friday, Trump said US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer would meet Chinese officials in London on Saturday, China's foreign ministry said Vice Premier He would be in the UK between 8 and 13 June, and that a meeting of the "China-US economic and trade mechanism" would take new round of negotiations came after Trump said his phone conversation with Xi on Thursday mainly focused on trade and had "resulted in a very positive conclusion for both countries".According to Chinese state news agency Xinhua, Xi told Trump that the US should "withdraw the negative measures it has taken against China".The call was the first time the two leaders had spoken since the trade war erupted in Trump announced sweeping tariffs on imports from a number of countries earlier this year, China was the hardest hit. Beijing responded with its own higher rates on US imports, and this triggered tit-for-tat increases that peaked at 145%.In May, talks held in Switzerland led to a temporary truce that Trump called a "total reset".It brought US tariffs on Chinese products down to 30%, while Beijing slashed levies on US imports to 10% and promised to lift barriers on critical mineral agreement gave both sides a 90-day deadline to try to reach a trade deal. But since then, relations appeared to have soured. Last month, Trump said China had "totally violated its agreement with us", and then a few days later China said the US had "severely violated" the US accused China of failing to restart shipments of critical minerals and rare earth magnets vital to car and computer Saturday, the Chinese Ministry of Commerce said it had approved some applications for rare earth export licences, although it did not provide details of which countries announcement came after Trump said on Friday that Xi had agreed to restart trade in rare earth speaking on Sunday, White House National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett told CBS News that "those exports of critical minerals have been getting released at a rate that is, you know, higher than it was, but not as high as we believe we agreed to in Geneva".

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store