
Jevon McSkimming probe: Police watchdog reveals nature of investigation into former deputy commissioner
In response to questions from RNZ on Wednesday, IPCA investigations manager Stu Graham said in a statement it was conducting an investigation 'into the way police handled allegations made against former Deputy Commissioner McSkimming'.
'We therefore have no further comment at this time.'
It is the first time the IPCA has commented on what its investigation was focused on. The investigation was launched before McSkimming was suspended.
Police declined to comment on the investigation on Wednesday.
Police Commissioner Richard Chambers said in a statement on Tuesday that he appreciated that the resignation of McSkimming raised questions, but said the criminal investigation couldn't be 'compromised by commenting on the circumstances of it at this point'.
'However, I can say that I have always made it very clear that trust and confidence in police is a top priority for me as commissioner,' Chambers said.
'I take very seriously anything that puts trust and confidence and the reputation of police at risk and will act to address it.
'I have high expectations of all police staff and will address it if those standards are not met, irrespective of rank or role.'
Police Minister Mark Mitchell on Monday said McSkimming resigned before he could be dismissed.
In a statement released on Monday he said: 'I can confirm a process had been under way for the Prime Minister to consider recommending the Governor-General immediately remove the Deputy Commissioner of Police from office.
'I instructed the Public Service Commission to commence the process to remove Mr McSkimming from office after allegations of a very serious nature recently came to light, separate to the investigation that led to him being suspended.'
He did not say what the allegations were. Mitchell said the Policing Act was 'very clear'.
'A deputy commissioner of police must be a 'fit and proper' person. They are rightly held to the highest standards of conduct and this new information called into serious question Mr McSkimming's fitness for office.
'When Mr McSkimming was invited to respond to these allegations he chose to resign. Mr McSkimming's resignation has confirmed my view that his continuation in the role was untenable.'
Police advised Mitchell that their investigations into McSkimming would continue, notwithstanding his resignation.
'As the latest information remains subject to ongoing police investigation, I am unable to provide further comment at this time.'
In January, McSkimming released a statement through his lawyer confirming he had been suspended since before Christmas.
'He remains on full pay, pending a criminal investigation. When any police officer faces an investigation of this nature, they are typically suspended from duty,' the statement said.
'Mr McSkimming is co-operating fully with police and looks forward to the investigation being concluded swiftly, after which he expects to resume his duties as deputy commissioner.'
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has not said why McSkimming resigned.
Luxon was asked multiple times by the media on Monday afternoon for comment, but did not offer any explanation.
'I'm not going to get into any of this,' said Luxon.
'The reality is I'm aware of the resignation, aware of the circumstances around it.
'We can say as much as we can say at this point... ongoing investigation, nothing further to say.'
He said there will be more to say later on.
Labour leader Chris Hipkins said there were no red flags raised about McSkimming when he was appointed deputy police commissioner under the previous Government.
Hipkins said both the police commissioner and the public service commissioner recommended McSkimming's appointment at the time.
'Things have obviously subsequently come to light. I can't comment on those because I don't know anything of the detail of any of those, but I can say categorically none of them were raised during the appointment process,' he said.
Hipkins said he had not been told anything about what the allegations were against McSkimming.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Gang shootings spark escalated police presence in Levin
Police won't need a search warrant to inspect cars or houses. Photo: RNZ / REECE BAKER Levin will see a tripling of police numbers this week, after four gang shootings in three days. A Gang Conflict Warrant has been put in place for Ōtaki, Shannon, Foxton and Levin. Inspector Ross Grantham, the Manawatū area commander, said normally search warrants would be needed for individual cars or addresses. "This warrant allows us to stop vehicles which we believe, on reasonable grounds, have links to the groups involved, so we can stop them and we can search them." Grantham said extra officers were coming from around the central district - Taranaki, Whanganui, Ruapehu and Palmerston North - tripling the number of officers patrolling the streets and investigating the crimes. About 11.20am Monday, a man turned up to a Liverpool Street healthcare centre with a gunshot wound to his thigh. He was taken to Palmerston North Hospital in a serious condition. Then, about 8.55pm Monday, police were called, after a firearm was discharged from a vehicle on Hinemoa Street, hitting a house. Grantham said no occupants were injured, but they and neighbours were shaken. Shortly after 6am Tuesday, five shots were heard on Mabel Street and police found a shed that appeared to have been shot. At 12pm Wednesday, a person was found on Bartholomew Road with serious injuries from a gunshot wound and was taken to hospital. While the conflict appeared to be between members of the same gang, Grantham was concerned the public or gang member's families could be caught in the crossfire. The Mongrel Mob and the Nomads both had a presence in Horowhenua, he said. Horowhenua District Mayor Bernie Wanden told RNZ he understood the shootings were linked and gang related, involving the disgruntled member of one gang. "From what I understand, [it's] an internal gang-related issue, where someone is not happy with whatever is going on within their organisation." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.


Otago Daily Times
10 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Bill banning protest outside homes passes first hurdle
By Giles Dexter of RNZ Legislation to make protesting outside someone's home an offence has passed its first reading at Parliament. The bill would apply to demonstrations directed at a specific person outside their private residence, considering factors including how 'unreasonable' the protest is. Labour, the Greens and Te Pāti Māori opposed the bill, expressing concerns it could override the right to freedom of protest, and there were existing tools police could use. Standing in for Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith, James Meager said the bill would be a welcome relief to many MPs, officials and other individuals who had been targeted. He said the bill was a balance of rights and freedoms. "The protection of New Zealanders' privacy is fundamentally important in our society, as is the ability to protest. The government upholds both of these values." Meager said the public's right to protest was protected by the Bill of Rights Act, but demonstrations outside homes could impede on someone's right to privacy. "Unreasonable, disruptive intrusions into people's private spaces are simply unacceptable." The government believed existing legislation did not clearly reflect the importance of privacy in the context of demonstrations, meaning police had difficulty in applying offences like disorderly behaviour. The offence would only apply if the protest was targeted at a specific person outside their private residence, meaning marches that passed by someone's house would not be covered. Time of day, duration, the demonstrators' actions, noise levels and distance to the premises would also be factors in determining the offence. Despite Labour leader Chris Hipkins earlier expressing his concerns that protest had become personalised, his party did not support the bill. Labour's justice spokesman Duncan Webb said the bill "chips away" at free speech rights, and New Zealand could not call itself a liberal democracy while passing legislation that prohibited demonstration. "The point of political action is to disrupt. It is not to be nice, it's not to be convenient. Protest is disruptive, that's what a protest is." Webb acknowledged other MPs have experienced people acting inappropriately outside their residences, but the legislation was targeted to suppress political action. "If that's your problem, the easy fix is actually to fix the offence of disorderly behaviour, and make it clear that disorder that flows into a private premise can in fact still amount to that offence." The Green Party also opposed the bill. MP Celia Wade-Brown said threats to people's safety or their families' safety were unacceptable, but the new offence had a disproportionate punishment. "Three months in prison, $2000 fine, this is not a parking ticket." Te Pāti Māori MP Mariameno Kapa-Kingi said if police felt they could not apply existing legislation to remove someone behaving unreasonably outside another's home, then police should "check their practice." Speaking in support of the bill, ACT's Todd Stephenson accepted there were two competing rights in the legislation, but the Select Committee phase would be a chance for a discussion about how the balance could be struck. "It's worthwhile at least going through the Select Committee process and uncovering what powers the police do or don't have currently, but they're saying they don't have sufficient powers." Casey Costello from New Zealand First said it was a "sad, sad indictment on our democracy" that the legislation was even needed. "We know we have politically motivated groups who will purposely release private residential addresses of elected officials, of businesspeople, in order to invoke an intimidatory approach to dealing with decisions." She disagreed it was a limitation on protesting, but a protection for people's privacy. "It is absolutely reasonable to say that we will ensure that voices can be heard, but my children, my mother, my family will not have to bear the price of the decisions or the public position that I hold," she said. The Justice Committee will now consider the bill and report back within four months.


NZ Herald
10 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Auckland Anniversary floods inquest: What officials discussed hours before state of emergency
When a controller is contacted, a situation – in this case, the worsening weather conditions – will have escalated to the point where a broader co-ordinated response may be required. An urgent online (Teams) meeting with key personnel, including emergency services, was set up just after 5pm as he continued to drive home to the North Shore from the city centre. 'During this call, it very quickly became clear that there was a serious situation requiring activation of emergency functions. 'During the call, I chose to activate the emergency response and I formally took over as controller.' Clark said that before the Auckland Anniversary flooding event, a local state of emergency hadn't been declared in the city. The decision to declare a state of emergency in Auckland that day – particularly the timing of that declaration – has been a key topic in the inquest this week. Clark said in deciding whether to recommend a declaration to then-Auckland Mayor Wayne Brown, he considered the criteria in the Civil Defence Emergency Management Act of 2002. Evacuations were part of the Auckland-wide Anniversary Weekend flood response action amidst record rainfall, but Whangārei Mayor Vince Cocurullo says the district would cope well if a similar storm hit. That included getting information from emergency services, namely Fire and Emergency NZ, Police and Hato Hone St John, as to whether they were able to deal with the situation or response. He also considered the practical effect of a declaration, in that it would enable the use of particular emergency powers such as compulsory evacuations, entrance to properties and the closure of roads and public places. 'I had no hesitation about the prospect of recommending a declaration of a state of emergency,' he said. 'If it was clear the additional powers the declaration enabled were needed, I was willing to recommend a declaration.' Then-Auckland Mayor Wayne Brown and then PM Chris Hipkins front media a day after unprecedented heavy rain and flooding in Auckland in January 2023. Photo / Dean Purcell At that first meeting, Clark said, he did not see that a declaration was required to improve co-ordination of the response. Emergency service personnel attending that meeting also expressed they were coping at that time, he said. Clark said the concern was about first responders needing additional powers to enable their work. Fire and Emergency NZ's main concern was ensuring there were evacuation centres available for people who had been affected. It was made clear in that first meeting, however, that a declaration of a state of emergency could happen at short notice. Police would eventually make the first move, calling for a declaration minutes before the next scheduled meeting with officials and emergency service personnel at 8.30pm that night. Members of the Police, St John, Fire and Emergency and the Rescue Co-ordination Centre expressed they were all under 'extreme pressure' at that point. 'Having heard from emergency services, I was satisfied that a declaration was required,' Clark said. It was at that second meeting that police notified those attending that there had likely been a fatality. A body had been found on the North Shore. 'This was the first notification of a fatality that evening. Although we were aware that the situation was dangerous at the first ... meeting, the report of a possible fatality was very upsetting news.' Mayor Brown declared a state of emergency in Auckland just before 9.30pm, but it would not be made public until 10.22pm. The inquest continues. Family members are due to give evidence in the coming weeks. Sign up to The Daily H, a free newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.