Best savings interest rates today, March 6, 2025 (top account pays 4.50% APY)
Savings account rates are now trending down following the Fed's recent rate cuts.
The good news is that many high-yield savings accounts still offer rates of around 4% APY. The best rates are typically offered by online banks, although you may be able to find comparable savings interest rates at some credit unions and community banks.
Today, the highest savings account rate available from our partners is 4.50% APY. This rate is offered by Jenius Bank and there is no minimum opening deposit required.
Here is a look at some of the best savings rates available today from our verified partners:Following several years of near-zero interest rates, the Federal Reserve began raising the federal funds rate in 2022 in order to combat rapidly rising inflation. As a result, savings interest rates skyrocketed as well, reaching a 15-year high.
However, in late 2024, the Fed implemented a series of cuts to the federal funds rate, and savings account rates have started dropping. It's also expected that the Fed will implement more rate cuts in 2025.
It's difficult to predict exactly how and when interest rates will change going forward, but one thing is for sure: Today's high savings account rates won't last forever. So, if you're hoping to give your savings a boost and take advantage of the best rates on the market, there's no better time than now.
The requirements involved in opening a savings account vary by financial institution. However, if you're ready to open an account, you can follow these general steps:
Research savings account rates: Of course, when choosing a savings account, one of the most important factors to evaluate are the interest rates. Be sure that you select a savings account with a competitive rate to help your money grow.
Figure out your must-haves: Although savings account interest rates should be top of mind, that's not the only factor to consider. You'll also want to think about what else you need from your account, whether it's no minimum balance requirement, low fees, or other perks. Finding a savings account with a solid rate that also helps you achieve your goals is key.
Prepare documentation: Opening a bank account requires you to provide a few important personal details and documents. Before you start your application, be sure you have your Social Security number, driver's license or passport number, and proof of address.
Fill out the application: In many cases, you can apply for savings account online. However, some financial institutions may require you to visit the branch in person to apply. Either way, the application for a new savings account should only take a few minutes to complete. In many cases, you'll get your approval decision instantly.
Fund your account: Once your savings account application is approved, you'll need to add funds to the account. Be sure you're aware of any minimum opening deposit requirements and timeline for funding.
Read more: Step-by-step instructions for opening a high-yield savings account
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
7 minutes ago
- CNBC
Our top 3 gainers and laggards over the past month as the S&P 500 hits record highs
The stock market has been on a tear over the past month, as Wall Street mulled over quarterly earnings reports, President Donald Trump 's tariff moves, and the Federal Reserve's next monetary policy decision. Since last month's third annual meeting of the CNBC Investing Club, the S & P 500 and Nasdaq hit nine and 14 record closing highs, respectively. Both stock benchmarks hit those milestones again Wednesday. From our July 11 gathering at the New York Stock Exchange to Wednesday's market close, the S & P 500 advanced more than 3.3% and the tech-heavy Nasdaq gained roughly 5.5%. The market lost some ground Thursday morning after the July producer price index came in hotter than expected. That PPI followed Tuesday's rather benign July consumer price index , which boosted stocks and raised expectations for a Federal Reserve interest rate cut during its September meeting. Despite the hot PPI, a rate cut next month still remains pretty much a lock, according to the CME FedWatch tool . The odds, however, did dim slightly on the prospect of two more rate reduction before the end of 2025. The big questions for investors and the Fed have been whether Trump's tariffs will rekindle worrisome inflation and hurt the labor market. After all, fostering price stability and maximum employment are the pillars of the central bank's dual mandate. Back on Aug. 1, the government's jobs report was released and showed some signs of cracks as July non-farm payroll growth was much weaker than expected, and the additions taken together from the prior two months were revised sharply lower. Over the past month, we picked our spots in over a dozen trades — both taking profits and adding to positions. The Club started a new position in Cisco Systems on July 17 and made two subsequent buys of the computer networking equipment powerhouse's shares. Cisco reported its fiscal 2025 fourth quarter after Wednesday's close, beating estimates on both the top and bottom lines with a slightly better-than-expected guidance kicker. We're going to talk more about Cisco and the Club's other 30 positions during Thursday's monthly meeting, which will be livestreamed at noon ET. The recorded video will be available to members later in the afternoon. The reaction to earnings reports was behind the portfolio's best and worst-performing names over the past month. GE Vernova , for example, can thank its blowout earnings release for sending the industrial stock to No. 1. Conversely, the biggest laggard was Eli Lilly, which had its worst session in years following disappointing results for a key late-stage trial. Here's a breakdown of our three best and three worst-performing stocks over the past month ahead of Thursday's August monthly meeting. Winners GE Vernova up 17.6% GEV YTD mountain GE Vernova (GEV) year-to-date performance Shares surged after the power equipment maker posted a strong quarter and raised guidance last month. GE Vernova makes products to support the energy grid, which needs more juice to support all the AI data centers being built. The stock hit a record high that session, and several more since the July 23 earnings release. Jim Cramer described the industrial name as "maybe the best story in the entire market" as a result. The Club raised its GE Vernova price target by $150 to $700 per share due to the company's growing backlog and strong demand. Still, we reiterated our 2 rating, which means we would want to wait for a pullback before adding to our position. On July 17, the Club booked some profits in a small sale of GE Vernova just in case ahead of the Street's lofty quarterly expectations. Broadcom up 12.7% AVGO YTD mountain Broadcom (AVGO) year-to-date performance Broadcom led the recent rally in chip stocks. Nvidia was our fourth-best performer since July's annual meeting. The group, in part, received a boost after Trump said he would exempt companies from his planned semiconductor tariffs if they committed to invest in U.S. manufacturing. News such as Samsung's $16.5 billion deal to supply semiconductors to Tesla improved investor sentiment around the AI trade as well recently. We did, however, sell some Broadcom last week after the stock's big run and ahead of its quarterly earnings report. The trim doesn't reflect a change in our conviction. Instead, we're anticipating some profit-taking after Broadcom's quarterly report on Sept. 6, and we wanted to get ahead of that. That's been a trend amongst its peers, at least. Advanced Micro Devices shares dropped 7% in a session following its earnings report last week despite management issuing upbeat guidance. Apple up 10.5% AAPL YTD mountain Apple (AAPL) year-to-date performance Rounding out our top three performers was Apple. Shares of the iPhone maker saw an initial boost following quarterly earnings report in late July. Investors cheered Apple's biggest revenue growth since 2021, and CEO Tim Cook's remarks about more generative AI investments. But the bulk of Apple's gains came last week. Apple announced an additional $100 billion investment into domestic manufacturing, bringing the company's total U.S. investment to $600 billion over the next four years. The news showcased Cook's ability to get on a better footing with the Trump administration to mitigate tariff headwinds. Laggards Eli Lilly down 16.7% LLY YTD mountain Eli Lilly (LLY) year-to-date performance The drugmaker has had a rough month. Eli Lilly stock initially moved lower in late July after rival Novo Nordisk, the company's main competitor in GLP-1s, lowered its 2025 sales growth outlook. The Club made a sale of Eli Lilly as a result, locking in big profits. The bulk of Lilly's losses, however, came in early August. Alongside its earnings release on Aug. 7, the company revealed subpar results from a late-stage trial on its weight loss pill. The stock, in turn, had its worst session in years. As a result, we lowered our Eli Lilly price target to $800 from $1,000 and downgraded the stock to our 3 rating. That view shifted Wednesday, with our double upgrade back to our buy-equivalent 1 rating after CEO David Ricks and several other company insiders bought lots of shares of the depressed stock. CrowdStrike down 9.7% CRWD YTD mountain CrowdStrike (CRWD) year-to-date performance Shares have experienced a consistent decline amid broader weakness in the cybersecurity sector. CrowdStrike stock, for example, shed 5% in a single session earlier this month following negative commentary from peer Fortinet's management team regarding the highly anticipated firewall refresh cycle. That didn't make sense to us because CrowdStrike is cloud-native and doesn't sell traditional firewall equipment. The negative sentiment spread to fellow Club holding Palo Alto Networks , too, as shares fell despite management never hyping up the refresh cycle. That's because sometimes when a stock in a certain sector plunges, it can bring down its peers, even if the others have nothing to do with the reason why it's down. Palo Alto stock has recently been digging itself out of the big hole left following the July 29 rumors of a CyberArk deal and the official announcement by the company a day later. Salesforce down 8.2% CRM YTD mountain Salesforce (CRM) year-to-date performance Shares have slumped with the rest of the enterprise software names. Part of the stock's weakness can be attributed to investor concerns about generative AI's impact on software-as-a-service (SaaS) companies like Salesforce. The emerging technology poses a risk to Salesforce's seat-based licensing models and, in turn, its sales growth. This week's "AI ate software" note from Melius Research outlined these worries, prompting us on Monday to downgrade Salesforce to a hold-equivalent 2 rating. Still, we're holding on to see if Salesforce's Agentforce, its set of AI tools, will help the stock in the long run. (See here for a full list of the stocks in Jim Cramer's Charitable Trust.) As a subscriber to the CNBC Investing Club with Jim Cramer, you will receive a trade alert before Jim makes a trade. Jim waits 45 minutes after sending a trade alert before buying or selling a stock in his charitable trust's portfolio. If Jim has talked about a stock on CNBC TV, he waits 72 hours after issuing the trade alert before executing the trade. THE ABOVE INVESTING CLUB INFORMATION IS SUBJECT TO OUR TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND PRIVACY POLICY , TOGETHER WITH OUR DISCLAIMER . NO FIDUCIARY OBLIGATION OR DUTY EXISTS, OR IS CREATED, BY VIRTUE OF YOUR RECEIPT OF ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED IN CONNECTION WITH THE INVESTING CLUB. NO SPECIFIC OUTCOME OR PROFIT IS GUARANTEED.
Forbes
7 minutes ago
- Forbes
Why ‘Regulatory Pullback' Could Be Fintech's Biggest Risk In 2025
Most fintechs think 2025 is shaping up to be their year. After a decade of expanding regulatory reach, aggressive enforcement, and agency interpretations that stretched statutory language to its breaking point, the tide seems to be turning. Last week, a federal court struck down the Federal Reserve's Regulation II debit interchange fee cap, upending a framework that defined payment economics for more than a decade. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) paused its open banking rule under Section 1033 of Dodd-Frank and delayed small business lending data collection under Section 1071, both responding to litigation. The Supreme Court's Loper Bright decision eliminated Chevron deference, sharply curtailing agencies' ability to interpret ambiguous laws. From a distance, this looks like a deregulatory moment. For many fintech business models, it creates a high-risk period of uncertainty that can be more damaging than the rules themselves. When Winning In Court Breaks Your Business Model The Regulation II ruling illustrates the problem. Companies that built their economics around debit interchange fees now face uncertainty. Some use those fees to fund rewards programs. Others share them with banking-as-a-service partners or use them to offer zero-fee accounts. The Fed could rewrite the rule to favor merchants, which would slash interchange rates. But that process could drag on for years, with appeals and maybe even congressional hearings. Meanwhile, companies are trying to plan budgets and investor presentations without knowing what their core revenue stream will look like. This pattern extends beyond payments. Credit card rewards, routing rules, and data rights all face similar risks. When a business model depends on a particular legal framework, and that framework gets sent back to the drawing board, companies operate in uncertainty until something new emerges. Open Banking Goes From Simple To Fragmented Section 1033 was supposed to create order. The CFPB would set national standards for APIs, data fields, and dispute handling. Banks and fintechs would know exactly what they had to do. Consumers would get better data access. Instead, the rule is on hold while the Bureau starts over. What's likely to emerge is fragmentation. Private companies will cut bilateral data-sharing deals. Different states will write their own rules. Banks will use different technical standards depending on who's asking for data. For fintechs that need bank data, the complications are significant. Integration costs increase. Product launch timelines extend. And there's always the risk that key data sources will change terms or cut access entirely. Recent developments illustrate this risk, with major banks beginning to charge fintechs for customer data access through aggregators. Industry executives warn these fees could be devastating for early-stage startups and make certain financial transactions economically impossible for consumers. Without clear federal rules, banks can essentially set their own terms for data access. Small Business Lending: When Federal Vacuum Invites State Action The CFPB's 1071 rule, designed to create uniform small business lending data requirements, sits in limbo. While federal enforcement pauses, states may fill the gap by either adopting their own data reporting mandates or using unfair and deceptive acts and practices statutes to police perceived discrimination. For fintech lenders, especially those serving niche or underserved markets, this raises the risk of multiple, overlapping compliance regimes. The absence of a single federal framework doesn't eliminate rules. It creates more of them, with more variation. States Are Already Moving In Federal enforcement isn't simply disappearing. While agencies pull back, state enforcers are getting more aggressive. Massachusetts provides a clear example. This summer, the state's AG settled a case against a student loan company that used AI for underwriting. The state alleged disparate impact discrimination under both federal and state law. This is exactly the kind of case federal regulators have been backing away from. But Massachusetts imposed detailed requirements: annual AI model reviews, documented fair lending tests, comprehensive governance protocols. This pattern is becoming common. Federal regulators step back, state AGs step forward. The rules don't disappear. Companies face 50 different versions of them. Even at the federal level, not every enforcement trend is fading. Redlining cases continue working through courts, and judges sometimes refuse to unwind prior settlements despite joint requests from regulators and defendants. In other instances, the CFPB has terminated consent orders, but only after full compliance with monetary and conduct obligations. This hardly signals that underlying conduct is now acceptable. Post-Chevron: More Litigation, Less Predictability The Supreme Court's Loper Bright decision, overruling Chevron deference, represents perhaps the most significant regulatory shift in decades. By giving courts, rather than agencies, the final word on statutory ambiguities, it invites more challenges to rules, more venue shopping, and more divergent interpretations. In theory, this limits regulatory overreach. In practice, it means a fintech product cleared under one circuit's interpretation could be non-compliant in another. Multi-state operations now carry not just operational complexity but legal risk tied to geography. For fintechs, losing a single authoritative agency interpretation also complicates partnerships. Banks and vendors may adopt the most conservative reading available to mitigate risk, raising the compliance bar across the board. What Companies Should Do Now After years of aggressive enforcement, any pullback feels like relief. But smart executives are taking concrete steps: Map legal dependencies. Companies should catalog every statute, regulation, and agency interpretation that their revenue model relies on. Track the court cases. Know when rulemaking deadlines are coming. Most organizations have little visibility into their actual regulatory exposure until something changes. Plan for different outcomes. What happens if interchange rates get cut significantly? What if data sources get regulated differently across states? What if AI models have to meet the most stringent state standards everywhere? Develop actual contingency plans, not just optimistic projections. Monitor state developments. Companies need systematic tracking of what each state AG is prioritizing. When federal enforcement slows down, state enforcement typically accelerates. The enforcement doesn't stop. It becomes more complicated. Update partnership agreements. Most fintech contracts were written assuming stable regulatory frameworks. But what happens when those frameworks change mid-contract? Agreements should include mechanisms to renegotiate or exit if compliance becomes impossible or uneconomical. The Bottom Line Fintech has always been about finding gaps where technology moves faster than regulation. But today's gaps are different. They're not gaps created by innovation. They're gaps created by the deliberate unwinding of established rules. These gaps don't stay open forever. They get filled by state regulators, by federal courts applying different standards in different circuits, by agencies writing new rules under new administrations. Regulatory pullback isn't a victory lap. It's a signal to prepare for what comes next. Because something always comes next. And in 2025, it's likely to be more fragmented and harder to predict than what came before.
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fed seen sticking to regular-sized rate cuts after inflation data pops
(Reuters) -A jump in U.S. wholesale prices last month looks to have all but erased the possibility that the Federal Reserve will deliver a jumbo-sized half-point interest-rate cut in September, though expectations for a quarter-point cut next month, followed by another in October, remain intact. U.S. producer prices increased a more-than-expected 0.9% in July from June amid a surge in the costs of goods but also of services like machinery and equipment wholesaling, the Labor Department's Bureau of Labor Statistics said on Thursday. The increase may get passed on to consumers, who so far have not experienced a strong overall increase in prices even as the Trump administration has ratcheted up tariffs. "We expect a stronger pass-through of levies into consumer prices in coming months with inflation likely to climb modestly over the second half of 2025," Nationwide Senior Economist Ben Ayers said. The rise in services inflation will be particularly worrisome to Fed policymakers like Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee, who said on Wednesday that he's on alert for signs that inflation is seeping into prices beyond those for goods affected directly by tariffs. An increase in services inflation, also evident in the consumer price data released on Wednesday, suggests that inflation could become more of a persistent problem, he said. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who is leading the search for a replacement for Fed Chair Jerome Powell, has been pushing for a bigger rate cut next month, citing tame inflation, though on Thursday he said the Fed could start with a quarter-point move. Before the data, traders put about a 3% probability on the idea of a half-point rate cut, with most bets firmly on a quarter-point cut. After the data, traders erased bets on a 50-basis-point reduction in rates. San Francisco Fed President Mary Daly, who signaled earlier this week that she is increasingly open to the idea of a rate cut given the softening in the labor market, told the Wall Street Journal in a story published on Thursday that a 50-basis-point rate cut would signal an urgency about the job market that she does not feel. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
