TGED-TGEC rivalry hits education sector
The TGEC claims that recommending policies from early childhood education to higher education is in its domain. However, the TGED seems disinterested in the TGEC's workings and recommendations.
Speaking to The Hans India, a senior TGED official stated that the TGEC had been overstepping its mandate and attempting to intrude into departmental affairs.
For instance, the TGED officials regularly attend the Samagra Shiksha meetings convened by the Union Education Ministry. The TGED is also responsible for managing higher education, including matters related to the Board of Intermediate Education (BIE) and universities.
The TGED needs to deal with funding, policies, and laws from the state government and bodies like the University Grants Commission, Indian Council of Agriculture Research (ICAR), All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE), and others. Yet, the TGEC, which is meant be a think tank, is 'conducting seminars or workshops and claiming to prepare policies based on experts' opinions without any consideration of any of these issues.'
For instance, the TGEC conducts public hearings, like gram sabhas, and asserts that it has gathered 'stakeholder views' to support its policy recommendations.
According to TGED sources, to date the TGEC has reportedly submitted seven policy recommendations to the state government. However, none of them has been acted upon. The TGEC's draft recommendation for enacting legislation on private unaided schools and junior colleges has also been shelved, as the TGEC's fee-fixing parameters would not stand legal scrutiny.
Moreover, the TGEC has criticised the state government for making inadequate budgetary allocations for education in the 2025-26 fiscal year, compared to global standards.
Also, the TGEC's proposal to earmark 25 per cent of seats for the underprivileged, as per the Right to Education Act, and its recommendations to extend mid-day meals to junior colleges are viewed as either stirring a hornet's nest or imposing further financial burdens on a state government already grappling with financial constraints.
The latest from the corridors of power suggests that taking exception to the functioning of the TGEC, officials from the TGED have skipped its meeting. Its efforts to rope in state vice-chancellors as the stakeholders to its workshops and seminars evoked a poor response, as the VCs and senior university officials could not make any sense of the activities and the functioning of TGEC.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
United News of India
5 hours ago
- United News of India
SC extends interim relief to Madrasas facing derecognition over RTE compliance
New Delhi, Aug 4 (UNI) The Supreme Court today extended interim protection to madrasas whose recognition was withdrawn following directions from the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) for alleged non-compliance with the Right to Education Act, 2009. The court was hearing a plea filed by Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind challenging the Commission's directives. A bench comprising Justice M.M. Sundresh and Justice N. Kotiswar Singh stated that the interim protection already granted would continue and suggested that the petitioner could approach the concerned High Court for further relief. "We will extend the protection and allow you to approach the High Court," the bench observed, while clarifying that the Court was not entering into the merits of the case at this stage. Senior Advocate Indira Jaising, representing the petitioner, contended that the issue involved broader questions of law and deserved an in-depth hearing. She noted that a prior order by a three-judge bench had stayed similar directions and urged the Court to keep the matter under its consideration. She also requested additional time to decide on whether to move the High Court. Justice Sundresh remarked, 'What is there to file when we are not examining the merits right now?' Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand, Advocate Siddharth Sangal, reiterated that the apex court had already signalled that such issues could be adjudicated at the High Court level. Taking note of the submissions, the Court recorded, 'We put it to the senior counsel for the petitioner that an approach can be made to the High Court with sufficient interim protection. Let her take instructions. List after three weeks.' Earlier, on October 21, 2024, a three-judge bench led by then Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, along with Justices J.B. Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, had granted a stay on letters issued by the NCPCR in June 2024. These letters directed the Centre and state governments including Uttar Pradesh and Tripura, to withdraw recognition from madrasas allegedly violating the RTE Act. The Court also stayed subsequent communications from the Ministry of Education and state authorities, ruling that these directions 'shall not be acted upon.' The petitioner was permitted to implead all States and Union Territories and make necessary amendments within a week, with liberty to serve notices to their respective standing counsel. The matter will now be listed again after three weeks, pending further instructions from the petitioners. UNI SNG RN
New Indian Express
3 days ago
- New Indian Express
Parents in Bengaluru seek 90-day age relaxation for Class 1 admissions in 2026–27
BENGALURU: A group of parents whose children are currently in Upper Kindergarten (UKG) have appealed to the Commissioner of Public Instruction, seeking a 90-day relaxation in age eligibility cut-off for admission to Class 1 for the academic year 2026–27. As per current state policy, children should have completed six years of age by June 1 to qualify for Class 1 admission. However, many children born between June 2 and August 31 fall just short of this requirement, despite completing UKG and being developmentally ready to enter primary school. These parents are requesting that the age cut-off be extended to August 31, to prevent their children from having to repeat UKG solely due to date of birth. In their letter, the parents pointed out that a similar exception was made during the 2025–26 academic year, when the state Education department had allowed children who had completed 5 years and 5 months by June 1 and finished UKG, to enrol in Class 1. That one-time relaxation, granted following widespread concern and consultation with the State Education Policy Commission, had helped thousands of children. Parents fear that without a similar concession this year, children from the next batch will face unequal treatment, despite being in the same learning stage. They have urged the department to maintain fairness by issuing a circular to schools, allowing a 90-day age relaxation for Class 1 admissions in 2026–27. The issue stems from a major policy shift in July 2022, when Karnataka raised the minimum age for Class 1 admission from 5.5 to 6 years, aligning with the Right to Education Act and National Education Policy 2020. To ease transition, implementation of the new rule was deferred until 2025-26.
New Indian Express
6 days ago
- New Indian Express
OPS condemns centre for withholding Tamil Nadu's Samagra Shiksha funds
CHENNAI: Amid speculations about his exit from the NDA, former chief minister O Panneerselvam on Tuesday strongly condemned the Narendra Modi government at the centre for failing to release the Samagra Shiksha (SS) funds to Tamil Nadu. In a statement, Panneerselvam said the delay in the release of funds is affecting students from BCs, MBCs, and SC/STs, as well as teachers. The centre should release the funds immediately, he demanded. 'Accepting the conditions for Samagra Shiksha funds is an issue between the central and state governments. But the centre's refusal to release the funds has adversely affected the education of innocent, underprivileged students and the livelihood of teachers. This deserves strong condemnation. Such an action by the centre is against both the Right to Education Act and the principles of federalism,' Panneerselvam said. Meanwhile, Panneerselvam has convened a meeting of the office-bearers of the AIADMK Cadres Rights Retrieval Committee in Chennai on Wednesday to chalk out the next course of action since he has been ignored by the NDA. Panruti S Ramachandran, advisor to the committee, has almost indicated that Panneerselvam is disillusioned with the NDA.
