logo
Indonesia's rights groups urge parliament not to pass military law

Indonesia's rights groups urge parliament not to pass military law

Reuters19-03-2025

JAKARTA, March 19 (Reuters) - Rights groups in Indonesia on Wednesday urged parliament to reject contentious revisions of military laws, saying they would take the archipelago back to an era of military domination and create legal uncertainty.
Indonesia's parliament is set to pass the law on Thursday in a plenary council after the house committee overseeing military approved the changes, which will allow armed forces personnel to hold more civilian posts.
Rights groups and student organisations called for protests outside the parliament on Thursday.
Rights group Legal Aid Institute said the revision would pull Indonesia back 30 years to an era where the late strongman Suharto used the military to dominate civilian affairs and crush dissent in the world's most populous Muslim-majority country.
"The revision is a legislative crime that threatens Indonesians and the future of democracy," said Arif Maulana, deputy chair of the institute.
Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto, a former special forces commander and Suharto's former son-in-law, has expanded the armed forces' role since taking office in October.
The government defends the bill saying it incorporated concerns and watered it down by stipulating that military officers must first resign before being placed in most civilian roles.
A lawmaker from the opposition Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle, Nico Siahaan, said the government added more agencies where active soldiers could be appointed, including the state secretariat, Attorney General's Office, as well as the counter-terrorism and narcotics agencies.
Active soldiers in the Attorney General Office would affect transparency of legal processes involving military personnel, Arif said, adding that there was a risk of armed forces using violence in civilian roles.
Allowing the military to be more involved in civilian affairs could also lead to abuse of power, human rights violations, and impunity, said Usman Hamid of Amnesty International Indonesia.
Budi Djiwandono, the deputy chief of committee overseeing the military law bill, said the government would ensure that it upholds civil supremacy.
Djiwandono, who is also Prabowo's nephew, added that no active military personnel would be placed in state-owned companies, dismissing concerns they would be involved in business.
The opposition party urged all parties to monitor the implementation of the law to ensure no further expansion of military roles, Siahaan said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Reform MP's burka ban call was dumb, says party chair
Reform MP's burka ban call was dumb, says party chair

BBC News

time23 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Reform MP's burka ban call was dumb, says party chair

Reform UK chairman Zia Yusuf says it was "dumb" for the party's newest MP to call on Sir Keir Starmer to ban the burka at prime minister's Pochin - who won last month's Runcorn and Helsby by-election - urged the prime minister to ban the garment "in the interests of public safety".Her call appeared to go down well with her new colleagues on the Reform benches, even though it was rejected by the Zia Yusuf suggested she should have chosen a different topic for her PMQs debut, writing on social media: "I do think it's dumb for a party to ask the PM if they would do something the party itself wouldn't do". A burka ban was not a Reform UK policy at last year's general suggested the question had been recommended to her during a crowd-sourcing exercise for wrote on social media: "Thank you to everyone who sent in questions for the prime minister."I've chosen one and will be asking it just after 12 noon today in the House of Commons."The burka is a one-piece veil worn by some Muslim women that covers the face and body, often leaving just a mesh screen to see is more concealing than the niqab, a face veil that leaves the area around the eyes clear, and hijab, a term that describes headscarves that in the West most commonly cover the head and neck but leave the face countries have introduced restrictions on where the burka or niqab can be worn. France banned the wearing of veils intended to conceal the face in public in 2010, with similar bans in place in Denmark, Belgium, and Austria. During PMQs, Pochin asked: "Given the prime minister's desire to strengthen strategic alignment with our European neighbours, will he - in the interests of public safety - follow the lead of France, Denmark, Belgium and others, and ban the burqa?"Sir Keir replied that he was "not going to follow her down that line". 'Relevant debate' Shortly afterwards, Reform's chief whip Lee Anderson welcomed Pochin's question, writing on social media: "Ban the burqa? Yes we should"."No one should be allowed to hide their identity in public," he some media outlets quoted a Reform spokesman saying it was "not party policy," although it was an issue that "needs a national debate".Speaking during his GB News show on Wednesday night, Reform UK leader Nigel Farage said Pochin's question had sparked a "relevant debate," adding: "I think people do feel uncomfortable, actually, around people whose faces are covered"."I don't think face coverings in public places makes sense – and I think we do deserve a debate about that, of which I see the burqa as being a part".Pochin, a former Conservative councillor, became Reform UK's fifth MP last month when she narrowly defeated Labour in a by-election in the Cheshire constituency of Runcorn and seized on Yusuf's comments, adding: "Nigel Farage could fit all of his MPs in the back of a cab, yet he can't stop them fighting among themselves".The BBC has approached Reform UK and Pochin for a comment.

Donald Trump travel ban hits Somalia, Eritrea, Libya and seven other African countries
Donald Trump travel ban hits Somalia, Eritrea, Libya and seven other African countries

BBC News

time38 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Donald Trump travel ban hits Somalia, Eritrea, Libya and seven other African countries

Africa is the continent worst affected by the travel ban announced by US President Donald Trump, with seven of the 12 countries on the list, which comes into effect on order prohibits people from Chad, Congo-Brazzaville, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Libya, Somalia and Sudan - as well as Afghanistan, Myanmar, Haiti, Iran and Yemen - from entering the US. In addition, there will be travel restrictions on people from Burundi, Sierra Leone, Togo, Cuba, Laos, Turkmenistan and Venezuela - they will no longer be able to travel to the US on certain visas."We will not allow people to enter our country who wish to do us harm," Trump said in a video posted on X. The US president said the list could be revised if "material improvements" were made and additional countries could also be added as "threats emerge around the world".The White House said these "common-sense restrictions" would "protect Americans from dangerous foreign actors".Live updates: Trump signs ban on travel to US by nationals from 12 countriesWhat we know about Trump's latest travel banIn a video posted to his Truth Social website, Trump said the recent alleged terror attack in Boulder, Colorado "underscored the extreme dangers" posed by foreign nationals who had not been "properly vetted".However, the suspect in that attack is an Egyptian national and Egypt is not one of the affected to the White House explanation of the travel ban, countries such as Libya, Somalia and Sudan lack competent authorities which can issue passports or civil documents and conduct "appropriate screening measures".All are currently embroiled in civil addition, the White House said: "A persistent terrorist threat also emanates from Somalia's territory" and there was a "historical terrorist presence within Libya's territory".The other countries affected had high rates of people overstaying their visas, ranging from 15% in Togo to 70% for some types of visa for nationals of Equatorial immediately pledged to work with the US to address any security a statement, Somali ambassador to the US, Dahir Hassan Abdi, said his country "values its longstanding relationship" with ban takes effect on 9 June, a cushion that avoids the chaos that unfolded at airports nationwide when a similar measure took effect with virtually no notice eight years issued before that date will not be revoked, the order travel ban fulfils a promise Trump made during his 2024 election campaign and is likely to draw swift legal challenges. He signed a similar order in 2017, during his first term in featured some of the same countries as his latest order, including Libya, Somalia and called that a "Muslim ban" as the seven countries initially listed were Muslim White House revised the policy, ultimately adding two non-Muslim majority countries, North Korea and was upheld by the Supreme Court in Joe Biden, who succeeded Trump, repealed the ban in 2021, calling it "a stain on our national conscience". You may also be interested in: Is there a genocide of white South Africans as Trump claims?Unpacking the South African land law that so inflames TrumpTrump's tariffs could be death knell for US-Africa trade pactHow jeans and diamonds pushed Lesotho to the top of Trump's tariffs list Go to for more news from the African us on Twitter @BBCAfrica, on Facebook at BBC Africa or on Instagram at bbcafrica

Now Trump's tariffs hit America's supply of vapes as prices set to skyrocket
Now Trump's tariffs hit America's supply of vapes as prices set to skyrocket

The Independent

time43 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Now Trump's tariffs hit America's supply of vapes as prices set to skyrocket

Shipments of vapes from China to the U.S. experienced a significant downturn in May compared to the previous year, according to official data. The decline has been attributed to the impact of tariffs imposed by former U.S. President Donald Trump, coupled with increased measures against unauthorised e-cigarettes in the United States. Among the affected brands is Geek Bar, a flavoured vape product not approved for sale in the U.S. Despite this, it had previously been widely accessible due to insufficient import controls. One retailer, who asked not to be named because their business sells unauthorised vapes, told Reuters that one of the store's vape suppliers normally receives 100 boxes of Geek Bar vapes per week, but is now getting just ten. Another supplier imposed unprecedented purchase limits. "There were a lot of supply chain issues during COVID-19, the person said. "But I've never seen this." The U.S. supplier limited purchases to five boxes at a time due to "tariff-related price increases and limited market availability", an undated notice to customers seen by Reuters showed. Trump's decision to impose steep tariffs on China, now at 30% after peaking at 145% in April, as well as blockbuster seizures of unauthorised vapes, have constrained the supply of Chinese-owned vape brands and Geek Bar in particular, according to five industry sources and notices from U.S. Geek Bar wholesalers reviewed by Reuters. Between May 1 and May 28 the U.S. Food and Drug Administration recorded just 71 shipments of products labelled as e-cigarettes or vapes from China, compared with nearly 1,200 over the same period last year. Such imports had fallen between 40% and 60% in February, March and April, after Trump came into office, but collapsed in May, the data show. "Due to increased tariffs, rising production costs, and reduced supply chain capacity, the manufacturer has informed us that they will be reducing supply volume in the near-term," one U.S. regional Geek Bar wholesaler wrote to customers on April 22 in an email shared with Reuters. In the meantime, vape distributors expect prices to go in one direction. "With tariffs, it'll definitely go up," said one U.S. vape distributor who asked not to be named. But that might not impact sales much. Unauthorised vape manufacturers enjoy hefty margins, and so can eat some of the cost of tariffs, Luis Pinto, a spokesperson for British American Tobacco 's U.S. subsidiary, said. Meanwhile, consumers hooked on vapes tend to keep buying, even as the price goes up. "If the price goes up, the price goes up. We're talking about nicotine here," the vape distributor said, adding unlike other products, addicted users need their fix. Vapes like Geek Bar - priced around $20 currently - would still be good value even with a $5 increase, the person said. Geek Bar manufacturer, Guangdong Qisitech, did not respond to a request for comment sent to its general email address. Pinto agreed the tariffs will increase prices but probably not to the point "where it is a barrier to usage". Many of the vapes landing on U.S. shelves are manufactured in Shenzhen, which meets the majority of the world's demand for vapes. Some factories there make devices for large tobacco companies with the legal licence to sell their products in the United States, such as Japan Tobacco International. Others fuel a booming market for unregulated devices that U.S. authorities say are illegal to import or sell. To mitigate tariffs, illicit vape producers can mislabel or undervalue their shipments or spoof their origin entirely to make it look like they came from a lower-tariff country like Indonesia, Vietnam or Mexico, Pinto said. Vapes from China are often smuggled into the U.S. disguised as other items entirely, such as shoes or toys, to evade officials hunting for unauthorised vapes at the border, according to public statements from the FDA and Customs and Border Protection. Geek Bar was by far the most popular unauthorised vape brand in the U.S. last year, accounting for around a quarter of sales tracked by market research company Circana in 2024 despite lacking a licence to sell from the FDA, which has struggled to contain illegal imports from China. The brand, as well as thousands of other labels often made in China and lacking FDA permission, are stocked by wholesalers and retailers around the country, often sold alongside authorised labels from big tobacco companies like BAT and Altria . Vape panic buying U.S. tariffs have driven panic buying of vapes by U.S. buyers, higher shipping costs and increased risks at the border, the distributor, a former distributor and a person who used to work for a major Chinese vape company said. Substantial vape seizures were also a big driver of Geek Bar supply issues, two of the sources said. The FDA announced a large seizure in Chicago in February, and new FDA commissioner Marty Makary has pledged to crack down on unauthorised vapes. Government notices on seized goods show further vape seizures in March and April. The growth of Geek Bar and other unregulated vape brands have eaten into the market share of cigarette companies like Altria and BAT, which estimates unauthorised e-cigarettes accounted for some 70% of all U.S. vape sales last year. Altria CEO Billy Gifford told investors in April that he hoped tariffs would lead to "much more enforcement" of vapes at the border. Trump's trade war with China has also seen China-U.S. air freight and shipping capacity collapse limiting shipping capacity for cargo including vapes. The FDA's data only captures shipments properly declared as vapes. As a result, it has recorded declining vape shipments since 2020 even as industry sales have grown. An FDA spokesperson said the agency expects the number of shipments it captures to increase as it ramps up efforts to ensure compliance and prevent illegal imports. Unauthorised vape makers have also been moving production to Indonesia - a shift that prolonged tariffs on China would likely accelerate, the former employee said. Vape makers are "highly adaptable", the person said. "Whatever happens in the U.S., the industry will survive."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store