Rabbits, switch-ups and highway robbery: Politicians, economists react to Budget 25
Finance Minister Nicola Willis and Prime Minister Christopher Luxon address the media.
Photo:
RNZ / REECE BAKER
Budget Day is a
bit of a whirlwind
.
Opposition politicians, journalists and economists have just three-and-a-half hours to pore over the books, before presenting reports and analysis on what's on offer, what it means to people and, of course, come up with a hot take or two.
The government found $2.7 billion a year through its changes to pay equity, cut its own contributions to KiwiSaver, told 18 and 19 year olds it would
no longer pay them to sit on the couch
and introduced a new Investment Boost tax incentive, which is tipped to increase New Zealand's GDP by 1 percent over the next 20 years.
It was
dubbed the 'Growth Budget' by the government
, although the finance minister was fond of calling it the 'No BS Budget'.
Economists and MPs had their own nicknames and thoughts to share.
Bagrie Economics managing director Cameron Bagrie called it the 'Rabbit Budget', as the pay equity changes allowed the government to pull the rabbit out of the hat and generate savings.
"Looking forward, we need a few more rabbits to pull out of a few more hats in the 2026 and 2027 Budgets, because we're still a long way away from returning to surplus."
The books are
not expected to return to surplus until 2029
and, even then, it will be a modest surplus of $200 million.
Bagrie said New Zealand still had not seen the hard yards.
"The savings are all backloaded into 2027, 2028 and 2029, and those savings to be delivered are going to require that we need tight expenditure control in the 2026, 2027 and 2028 Budgets. We know that spending pressures, including the funding of the defence force, are going to be pretty intense."
Council of Trade Unions economist Craig Renney, who is also on Labour's policy council, said it was a 'Highway Robbery Budget' with the changes to pay equity.
The Budget pledged to return to a surplus by 2029.
Photo:
RNZ / Samuel Rillstone
"It's not a Budget that's delivering for working people and it doesn't appear to be a Budget with working people in mind," he said. "We're taking money straight out of the pockets of low-income workers.
"We're taking benefits of 18-19 year olds, we're taking money from the education budget. We're taking money of Vote Māori Development, Vote Pacific Peoples and we're spending it on defence."
On the KiwiSaver changes, Renney wanted assurances that employers would not put pressure on low income workers to deliberately take the 3 percent level, so their own costs did not go up.
He praised the Investment Boost scheme, saying New Zealand was "way behind" in capital investment and the state had a big role to play.
Baucher Consulting tax expert Terry Baucher was also a fan of the scheme, saying it was more generous than many predicted. He was less impressed with what was in the Budget for low-income families.
"The government has increased the Working for Families threshhold to $44,900, but that's still below what someone on minimum wage would earn annually and it's $10,000 lower than it should be, if it had been increased in line with inflation since June 2018," he said.
"Arguably, you could say that the burden for that Investment Boost is being paid by low-income workers and I don't agree with that. It's a disappointment in that regard."
He said New Zealand faced a "demographic crunch", and there was not enough in the Budget to encourage families to work and raise their children in New Zealand.
"We're taking money from our younger working people to give to older, richer property-owning people and long-term, in my view, that's not a recipe for a growth economy."
Baucher said he understood why the government was means-testing KiwiSaver at higher levels, although did not support reducing the government contributions overall.
Inequality reseacher Max Rashbrooke said the
KiwiSaver changes were mean-spirited
.
"It is the state increasingly saying, 'If you're going to save, you're on your own. We're putting the burden on you to save out of your pay and we're putting the burden on your employer, rather than collectively, the state, trying to ensure that people are saving well for their retirement'."
Infometrics chief executive Brad Olsen said it was the 'Switch-up Budget' as the government tried to spend more, while cutting back.
"There are some big trade-offs that the government has had to make in Budget 2025 and I think, definitely for some groups, they'll be saying that's probably the wrong trade-off," he said.
Olsen was "fairly relaxed" on the KiwiSaver changes and did not believe the current government contribution rate stimulated a huge amount of further investment that otherwise would not happen.
"I don't think it'll shift the dial in terms of more or less investment from Kiwis by getting rid of that government contribution, but by increasing both the employer and employee contribution rates, that will stimulate more savings over time and I think that's positive."
He was also onboard with cutting the government contribution rate entirely for those earning more than $180,000, saying the government needed to get its books in order and it did not need to give those earning good money that much support.
New Zealand Initiative chief economist Eric Crampton said the government was making slow progress towards the smaller structural deficit in 2029 and needed sort it before the demographic changes really started to bite in the 2030s.
"At some point, we have to wonder about the fiscal responsibility provisions in the Public Finance Act matter, because those effectively say you should not be running structural deficits for a decade, and we will have been running structural deficits for a decade. The ones during Covid were excusable - now, not so much."
Crampton agreed that greater means-testing and targeted assistance to those in need made sense.
"[It] can help towards fiscal consolidation," he said. "I don't need to be getting a subsidy towards my KiwiSaver.
"It's better to target these sorts of things. Similarly, a bit tighter targeting in Working for Families can make a lot of sense.
"It's good that they are stopping the inflation indexing of repayment threshholds for student loans. It would be nice if they took a few other measures."
He pointed to re-instating interest on student loans as a measure that the government could take, while at the same time, increasing scholarships that are means-tested.
Labour leader Chris Hipkins committed to reversing pay equity changes.
Photo:
VNP/Louis Collins
Fresh from delivering their speeches to the House, a rolling maul of MPs from government and opposition came across Parliament's tiles to take questions.
First up was Labour leader Chris Hipkins, who continued to
denounce the pay equity changes
, particularly now there was a number put on them.
He committed to reversing the changes, should Labour return to the government benches, but couldn't be nailed down on the exact amount.
Primarily, that was because he was unsure how the government had arrived at its figures.
"They still haven't released their calculations on how they arrived at the savings they've delivered today, so I can't give you numbers," he said.
"I can give you the principle, which is the principle is very clear for us. We don't believe that women should be paid less than men."
He also said the Working for Families changes were "a measly amount, won't even pay for a block of butter" and the government cutting its KiwiSaver contributions "raided the future retirement savings" of New Zealanders.
"I think most Kiwi families will be feeling that any advantage they got from tax cuts last year has been well and truly absorbed by increased costs in other areas," Hipkins said. "Their power bills are still going up, their rents are still going up.
"Prices of food are still going up and they're finding other forms of government support are now being cut, like Working for Families, BestStart, KiwiSaver, and so on."
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said Hipkins "has flip-flopped all over the place" and
questioned how he would pay for reinstating pay equity
as it had been.
"Is he going to tax for it or is he going to borrow for it, if he wants to unroll all those changes?"
Luxon said it was a "balanced Budget", which was focused on growth, and supporting people with the cost of living and on frontline services.
Meanwhile, Winston Peters said he was proud with the SuperGold rates relief, and money for railways and
defence
.
"Everybody's going to make that statement, they're proud of this and proud of that," he said. "Most of them will say they're proud of their portfolio, but I suppose the fact is we could have made a big mistake and done what I've seen in the past.
"We have some revolutionary Budget we pay for for the next 15 years and I've seen a couple of those in my time."
He hinted, over the next few months, New Zealanders would see other changes that would assured "a better economic outcome", thanks to his party's influence, although stayed coy on what those were.
ACT leader David Seymour said "the numbers speak for themselves", as a result of Brooke van Velden's pay equity changes.
He also said the
increased funding for private school subsidies
would make things "vaguely fair" and that he agreed to the Incentive Boost scheme, once he saw evidence it would be effective.
"If you're going to give any kind of target a tax break, then acquiring capital equipment and goods is probably the most powerful thing you can do, if you just want to see increased capital intensity."
The Green Party came out swinging, with co-leader Marama Davidson nicknaming the Budget the "no-ambition Budget, it's the child-poverty Budget, it's the we-don't-care-about-women Budget, it's the 'we-don't-care-about-rangatahi Budget, it's the we-don't-care-about-disabled-people, we-don't-care-about-Māori, we-don't-care-about-Pasifika".
"Who do we care about? Wealthy and fossil fuel companies."
Chlöe Swarbrick contined the government investment in gasfields.
Photo:
RNZ
Davidson said the JobSeeker changes for 18-19 year olds was the government saying "with their full hearts, their full chests, they are really happy to be cruel and mean to people who are already having a hard time".
Chlöe Swarbrick said the $200m towards co-investment in new gasfields was
potentially a breach of the UK and EU free trade agreements
.
Finance Minister Nicola Willis said the KiwiSaver changes would ensure the scheme was sustainable into the future, insisting it struck the right balance.
"New Zealand faces rising costs from superannuation from an ageing population and we need to make sure that we have our house in order."
She said officials were unable to advise on how many people would opt down to the current 3 percent rate, as it involved making guesses on people's behaviour.
"That is something we'll have to see in due course. I expect there will be many New Zealanders who, until they are feeling more financially secure, may not increase their contributions.
"I think many New Zealanders will, because the default will be that you instantly go to that higher rate and people will have to think very carefully about whether they want to save less."
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter
curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Immigration NZ alerted to child smuggling, families adopting more than 10 kids
Some New Zealanders have adopted more than 10 children from overseas. Photo: 123RF Warning: This story contains content some may find disturbing. Some New Zealanders have adopted more than 10 children from overseas and one woman with previous convictions smuggled children into the country, government briefings have revealed. Internal intelligence reports and warnings to Labour and National immigration ministers show concerns about the motives of some parents in adopting children from abroad, but being powerless to act. A Swedish commission recommended last week that international adoptions be stopped after an investigation found a series of abuses and fraud dating back decades. In New Zealand, too, the abuses - and the unchecked pathway for adoptees coming from countries which have not ratified the Hague Convention - have been known about for decades . It has included adoptive parents with previous convictions and children being held as house-slaves or sexually assaulted . Oranga Tamariki and the Family Court here do not need to be consulted - or even notified - before the children are adopted and arrive in New Zealand, which has also prompted fears the lack of oversight could mean other abuses remain undiscovered. An immigration and customs report from June last year, which analysed threats to the New Zealand border, said fraud involved in "non-genuine adoptions" included falsifying family relationships to gain residence or citizenship. A briefing to immigration minister Erica Stanford in January said the majority of intercountry adoptions were genuine, but some young people may be adopted out by birth parents who see it as a way for their children to access New Zealand's better "education, services and labour market". "Several cases of harm to international adoptees, perpetrated by their adoptive families, have been identified in recent years, and there is a risk that the incidents may rise in future. "While the risk of exploitation and abuse exists in both genuine and non-genuine adoptions alike, the latter presents a much higher risk, both at an individual and systemic level. MBIE intelligence evidence, for example, indicates that children and young adults entering New Zealand as a result of a non-genuine adoption are at higher risk of sexual abuse, labour exploitation and domestic servitude, as well as reports of physical abuse, neglect and preventing school-age adoptees from participating in education." The number of such adoptions was expected to increase over time, "potentially exponentially as cohorts of previous adoptees come of age" it said, seeming to suggest adopted children could later adopt children themselves from their home country. Immigration Minister Erica Stanford. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone The dependent child category residence visa extends to the age of 24 and a "large proportion" of those adopted overseas were over the age of 18 when they were brought to New Zealand, officials said. A 2021 intelligence report said 65 percent of dependent child category applicants in 2020/21 from one unnamed (redacted) country were aged from 18 to 25, totalling 224 young adults. "While the issues cited above can arise for adoptees of any age, adoptions initiated at a relatively older age tend to present higher risk of some types of harm, such as financial exploitation, and are also more likely to raise questions in respect of their genuineness, with associated risks to the integrity of the immigration system. "While New Zealand law sets age restrictions for domestic adoptions, there is no upper age limit for recognising international adoptions, which creates a situation where adoptees well past the age where standard arguments for genuine adoptions, eg, for the care and protection of a child in the nature of a parent child relationship, may no longer be as applicable, and it is likely that secondary gains, such as securing residence may be the primary motive in many of these cases." Some adoptions over a certain age would be genuine - "Officials do, however, consider that there are likely to be very few situations where adoption at older ages (especially 20+) would be truly genuine." Protection from child welfare services did not extend to the older cohort, who were considered vulnerable because they were young adults in an unfamiliar country. The warnings have been known to ministers for many years. "Once in New Zealand, the children are placed under a high level of control by their adoptive parents," officials told then-immigration minister Iain Lees-Galloway in 2019. "They have their passports taken and movements controlled. They are placed into paid work. However, their wages are controlled by the adoptive parents and they are frequently required to take out substantial loans. The adoptive parents would control these funds, with the children required to pay off the debt." New Zealand-resident parents have "often" adopted more than 10 children or young adults each from overseas, said the same briefing, indicating some appeared to have been physically, sexually or emotionally abused. And in an August 2023 report, MBIE Intelligence said Immigration New Zealand (INZ) reported a woman "alleged to have been adopting children and smuggling them into New Zealand". "INZ has additional concerns around offences against the New Zealand Citizenship Act 1977, convictions of welfare fraud, and family harm incidents with New Zealand Police. INZ has concerns around the welfare of these nationals and has requested additional information to inform decisions on their residency applications." It found she had "highly likely" provided false and misleading information to INZ to secure residence for her adopted children, had a history of misleading government agencies and was unlikely to be a suitable adoptive parent. It said she "occasionally resorts" to violent behaviour towards children under her care, and a redacted section referred to a conviction for which she was discharged. "Given [her] history of violent behaviour, she is unlikely to be an appropriate sponsor to adopt children under her care ... there is no information on the frequency of [her] violent behaviour towards her children. It is unknown whether [she] uses physical discipline against her children on a regular basis." Stanford asked for more policy information after she was alerted to a concerning dependent child category residence visa application in a "no surprises" item in December. The adopted children would be classed as victims of people trafficking if they were later forced into work or unpaid labour, domestic servitude, coerced marriages or suffered sexual exploitation, she was told. Other adverse outcomes ranged from neglect, emotional abuse, limited access to schooling, and trauma and loss from being removed from their biological families and their home countries. "While there are concerns about the nature of the adoption, the Immigration Act and relevant immigration instructions do not provide a pathway for legally declining the application." If it is an emergency and you feel like you or someone else is at risk, call 111. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
Cutting superannuation costs without setting off political landmines
Photo: 123RF Means testing is being introduced on a wide range of benefits. Questions are being asked over how long it will be before superannuation is targeted. Whatever age we're at, means testing for benefits is creeping into our lives. From the Best Start allowance for parents of newborns, to the parents of teens applying for Jobseeker, and those in Kiwisaver earning over $180,000. But when it comes to the old age pension, means testing is too touchy politically, says NZ Herald political editor Thomas Coughlan. He tells The Detail why the pension is off limits, for now. "There are things we get universally. Universal free education, a lot of health services are free. But cash payments, those are mostly means tested with one big exception." Every New Zealander who hits 65 is entitled to NZ Superannuation. "You could be a billionaire or you could have absolutely nothing and you will get it. "Culturally, politically we tell ourselves that we earn superannuation, we work hard we pay taxes our whole lives and when you retire you deserve to get the benefit from the government that you have paid for for your entire working life. That is the political bargain, I guess, at the heart of superannuation." Means testing superannuation is also not as straight forward as other benefits where Inland Revenue knows exactly how much beneficiaries or their parents earn. But most superannuitants don't work, making a means test on income difficult to manage. That leaves asset or wealth testing "which is just uranium wrapped in barbed wire". Coughlan says raising the retirement age is seen as the better of "two horrible options" and National has already signalled plans to gradually raise it to 67. But that is also fraught. The Retirement Commissioner Jane Wrightson doesn't like either option but is "more keen on the consideration of means testing than I am of raising the age". "But if that became a thing (raising the retirement age) then I would be arguing that it's a really comprehensive and well thought through policy change that considers a retirement system as a whole, not just about NZ Super, not just about Kiwisaver but the impact overall on future citizen New Zealand pensioners," Wrightson says. She calls the debate around superannuation a gender issue. "The commentators are mainly men. The issues around NZ Super, and who gets it and when, need to be looked at with a really strong gender lens because women are the ones who get disproportionately affected." The Detail also talks to pensioner Doug Beever in Australia where the pension kicks in at 67 and is means tested. Beever says he's happy with the arrangement because all of his working life he has been paying into a private retirement fund, a compulsory version of a Kiwisaver scheme that has been in place for decades. Wrightson says that is the difference between the two countries and why we can't copy Australia's pension model. The historic superannuation plan is a reason why the country is quite well off, "because those funds are in the billions and billions now. And secondly, people have got a decent pot themselves, so when you get that you can absolutely then talk about means testing, you can talk about raising the age ... you've got more levers to your bow when your citizens have been protected by a decent regulatory environment. "This is not what's happened here." Check out how to listen to and fol low The Detail here . You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on Facebook or following us on Twitter . Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
'Nothing short of disastrous': Seabed mining project another 'muru raupatu' for Taranaki
No seabed mining written on the beach with boards and canoes Photo: supplied / Tania Niwa About 300 people braved icy waters off the New Plymouth coast on Sunday to protest against the Pātea seabed mining project in South Taranaki. It was a part of a nationwide stand on World Oceans Day opposing fast-tracked seabed mining applications around the country. Australian company Trans-Tasman Resources (TTR) plans to mine 50 million tonnes of South Taranaki seabed every year. The project last month cleared its first hurdle in the fast-track process with the application accepted as being complete . Te Pāti Māori co-leader Debbie Ngarewa-Packer said there are other applicants waiting to "take sand and make it sludge".' "To the left of it and to the right of it, inside of it and outside of it. My point being, if we think that TTR are the only people lining up, we're extremely naive." Some people stood in solidarity Photo: RNZ / Emma Andrews Ngarewa-Packer compared the project to the Parihaka land wars . "We've had the lessons of what confiscation and muru raupatu looks like - we don't need to see them repeated again. "There's more whenua (land) under our ocean and we are really fortunate as children of resistance, as communities of resistance, as tangata tiriti beside us who have seen the resistance to what it is, to have confiscation of our land." At the break of dawn, Ngarewa-Packer was amongst the Pātea group who met up and took to the water, then drove to Ngāmotu to do it again at midday. "The biggest power that you have is when I was out in the moana and I turned around and I looked at everybody, there's this kotahitanga," Ngarewa-Packer said. "If there's anyone that can show the rest of Aotearoa what unity looks like, it's got to be Taranaki." some of the more colourful protesters Photo: RNZ / Emma Andrews The West Coast paddle-out was repeated elsewhere - a group from Pātea currently in Tahiti also joined in solidarity. Pātea's Joanne Peacock said the fast-track greenlight will cause devastation to the community. "That's where we get kai from, recreational, our fishermen, and we've got a beautiful reef out there, and all the pygmy whales and the dolphins that are coming out there every year now, they're migrating around through the South Taranaki Bight. So, it's huge for us." John Niwa taking some washed up seaweed for a 'hangī' he reckons Photo: RNZ / Emma Andrews Pip Ngaia from the Waitara Bar Board Riders Club surfs every day, and Sunday's event made him emotional. "Tangaroa has nurtured all of us, all life, and we just need to take care of them, so this is very important. My heart and soul is into this." Pip Ngaia chucking a hangloose Photo: RNZ / Emma Andrews He first surfed in South Taranaki "around 50 years ago" and said it was sad to see what was happening. "It's time for us to take heed of what's happening on our planet, and what's happening in our backyards. "If the government will get off their arses and actually think about the people, and take care of what we have, they'll stop selling everything." Waka ama paddlers departed Ngāmotu beach at 12pm on Sunday. They paddled 5km to reach East End beach by karakia. Photo: RNZ / Emma Andrews Anaru Wilkie was one of those paddlers. "[TTR] have been tested and found wanting in terms of their application, in terms of everything that's been put through the most rigorous tests. For them to come through and then apply through the back door as an abuse of power, an abuse of decency in terms of their application. "So, who's going to speak for the moana? Our tangata, people. We speak for the moana because its voice has been ignored by statute, by our House of Parliament. So, we're the people, that's why we're here." Not all people who took part in the protest had boards or vessels. Some also didn't have wetsuits. Surfers holding hands at East End beach, New Plymouth Photo: RNZ / Emma Andrews Soraya Ruakere-Forbes did not need either, and did not hesitate before jumping in the water. The longstanding environment kaitiaki said this protest should extend to all of Aotearoa and to the Pacific Islands. "If [TTR] go through here and start here in our rohe, this opens the door for this to happen all up and down our coast and all up the Pacific. So, we need all of our whanau behind us." Some people stood in solidarity Photo: RNZ / Emma Andrews RNZ approached TTR for comment. The company reissued a statement released 16 April which said the project was a transformative opportunity for the country's economy. It said there would be comprehensive environmental safeguards, and the operation would generate more than 1300 jobs as well as $850 million annually, making it one of New Zealand's top 12 exporters. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
