
Musk Lambasts Trump's Senate Tax Bill Over Clean‑Energy Cuts
Senate Republicans have advanced a version of President Trump's sweeping tax and spending bill that would accelerate the end of several clean‑energy incentives, prompting fierce criticism from Elon Musk, who warned the proposal threatens millions of jobs and harms future industries.
The legislation aims to eliminate the federal $7,500 tax credit for new electric vehicles and a $4,000 credit for used models by September 30, 2025, and speeds up the repeal of wind and solar tax breaks—undermining incentives originally enacted in the Inflation Reduction Act. Musk described the Senate draft as 'utterly insane and destructive,' declaring on X that the bill grants 'handouts to industries of the past while severely damaging industries of the future'.
The Senate cleared a key procedural hurdle with a 51‑49 vote to formally begin debate, pausing Medicaid rollbacks and other spending cut provisions until a final vote. Republicans have urged swift passage before July 4, though the House must reconcile its version, which retains EV credits through 2025 and 2026 under certain thresholds, before the bill can become law.
ADVERTISEMENT
Energy advocates and industry leaders say the accelerated repeal threatens clean‑energy investments and competitiveness. The revised Senate text not only repeals incentives but also introduces new charges on wind and solar farms that incorporate Chinese materials after 2027. Analysts warn these provisions could jeopardise up to 830,000 clean‑energy jobs by 2030 and elevate electricity bills.
Musk, who briefly led Trump's Department of Government Efficiency, has returned to full public criticism since departing the role, branding the bill a 'disgusting abomination' and cautioning its passage would represent 'political suicide for the Republican Party'. He also highlighted a projected $5 trillion rise in the national debt tied to the legislation.
Republican voices have diverged sharply. Some libertarian‑leaning senators, including Rand Paul and Mike Lee, echoed Musk's warnings about deficit growth, while others accused him of hypocrisy, pointing to earlier statements expressing openness to EV credit elimination.
Trump has defended the measure, branding it historic—claiming it's 'the biggest tax cuts in history'—and dismissed Musk's criticisms, accusing him of being aware of the provisions from the start.
Industry response has varied. Renewable energy companies like NorSun, Qcells, and Talon PV argue the rollback undermines clean-energy momentum and threatens jobs, while proponents of fossil fuel see the bill as redressing a balance skewed by green subsidies. Analysts note that without clear incentives, U.S. firms risk ceding ground to China and the EU in EV adoption and green-tech development.
Economic modelling by the Congressional Budget Office anticipates a $2.4 trillion increase in deficits tied to the bill, with Trump's office arguing tariff revenues will offset some costs.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune is negotiating over state and local tax deductions, but energy provisions have remained largely intact from the committee version—the exclusions are non‑negotiable in the Senate's timeline.
Without bipartisan support, the bill's tight 53‑47 Senate margin leaves little room for defections—making the final outcome unpredictable. Meanwhile, environmental organisations and energy‑sector analysts have labelled the bill a retreat from climate leadership—criticising the sudden reversal away from the objectives of the Inflation Reduction Act.
With the U.S. facing intense global competition in clean technology, the legislation's fate will likely shape the nation's economic and strategic positioning in the coming decade.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Gulf Today
21 minutes ago
- Gulf Today
Deportations alone can't fix US immigration problems
Underlying the demonstrations and street clashes of recent weeks is a dysfunctional system of immigration enforcement that needs to be fixed. With a bit of goodwill — from both the president and his opponents — that shouldn't be too much to ask. To much public outcry, federal immigration authorities have been detaining unauthorized migrants at job sites, courthouses and other public places in recent weeks. They're doing so both to meet the administration's steep deportation quotas and because too many state and local officials are refusing to cooperate. Although this strategy hasn't resulted in a notable rise in deportations, it has created significant disorder. Anxiety has rippled through immigrant communities as job-site raids have picked up. Protests have spread and at times turned violent. Some attention-seeking politicians have attempted to interfere with law enforcement. Those immigration officers just looking to do their jobs are caught in the middle. Amid all this, 'mass deportation' remains the unapologetic goal of the White House. Politics aside, this is hopeless. Resources for the task are limited — Immigration and Customs Enforcement has only about 7,700 field officers nationwide — and practical impediments abound. Public support has already begun to erode as ICE officers are seen breaking up families and ejecting otherwise blameless workers. (The disastrous family-separation policy of 2017 offers a further case in point.) Moreover, as the president himself has conceded, unauthorised migrants — like it or not — are deeply integrated into the US economy. Referring to farmers, he said: 'They have very good workers, they've worked for them for 20 years. They're not citizens, but they've turned out to be great. We can't take farmers and take all their people and send them back.' In a brief acknowledgment of this reality, the administration halted enforcement at farms, restaurants and hotels earlier this month before reversing course. In fact, the original instinct was right. It would be far better — and more popular — to focus on criminals and threats to national security. 'Felons, not families' was the agreeable slogan of President Barack Obama, who deported many times more migrants than this administration has. Adapting this approach would both serve the president's goals and mitigate the risks of the current strategy. One option, which the administration has started to take up, involves so-called 287(g) agreements, under which local police departments alert immigration authorities when they arrest someone who turns out to be subject to deportation, then transfers them to federal custody, usually at a jail. More such agreements should ease demands on ICE while boosting justifiable deportations. Local leaders inclined to resist should remember it will also reduce community disruptions and economic harm. Beyond such measures, a bigger rethink is needed. By now, Republicans should grasp that deportations alone can't resolve America's immigration dilemmas and that wanton raids are disrupting lives and businesses to no productive end. Democrats should accept that refusing to comply with federal immigration enforcement — or actively impeding it — undermines the rule of law, creates needless risks and amounts to political self-harm. The best approach remains a comprehensive immigration deal, of the kind Congress has been trying and failing to enact for decades. Broadly, that should involve a path to legal status for unauthorized workers, stepped-up enforcement on employers, tightened asylum standards, and a more expansive and orderly system of legal immigration, including a guest-worker program. That this is a boring and obvious solution should be a point in its favour. The current chaos serves no one well.


Middle East Eye
27 minutes ago
- Middle East Eye
High Court ruling expected in UK arms to Israel challenge
The British High Court is expected to deliver a verdict on Monday morning in the legal challenge over the UK government's continued supply of F-35 fighter jet parts to Israel. The ruling in the case brought by the UK-based Global Legal Action Network (Glan) and Palestinian human rights group Al-Haq is the most anticipated in the arms control community since the government was taken to court over its arms sales to Saudi Arabia during its bombing campaign in the Yemen war. The challenge over UK arms exports to Israel was first filed in late October 2023, soon after Israel launched an attack on Gaza following the Hamas-led attacks in Israel earlier in the month. Under the Tory government, UK arms exports to Israel continued without any apparent change, despite concerns raised as early as November 2023 by the Foreign Office unit assessing Israel's compliance with international humanitarian law. Last September, the newly elected Labour government suspended around 30 export licenses for UK-made arms that the government assessed could be used in Gaza. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters The legal case then shifted to focus on the UK-made F-35 fighter jet parts sent to a global F-35 programme spare parts pool which the government exempted from suspension. UK-made F-35 components make up 15 percent of every F-35, one of the world's most sophisticated fighter jets which Israel has used extensively in its campaign in Gaza, as well as in Lebanon and more recently in Iran. Israeli and US officials concerned Trump could push F-35 sale to Saudi Arabia Read More » The government has argued that there is no way the UK could unilaterally halt the export of UK-made parts without impacting the worldwide fleet of F-35s and threatening global peace and security. Glan and Al-Haq, and three British human rights organisations which are parties to the case, argue that under the Arms Trade Treaty and the Genocide Convention, the UK, as a state party to both, is obligated to stop sending the parts and that, by failing to follow its obligations, is threatening the rule of law globally. The ruling is expected to appear online on the National Archives website at 10:30am.


Arabian Post
28 minutes ago
- Arabian Post
Asia's First Porsche Design Tower Offers Revolutionary Luxury Living Experience to Bangkok's Vibrant Japanese Community
STUTTGART, GERMANY / TOKYO, JAPAN – Media OutReach Newswire – 24 June 2025 –Porsche Design Tower Bangkokemerges as a defining statement of excellence in luxury automotive-inspired living. As Asia's first and the world's third Porsche Design Tower, this landmark development welcomes Japanese connoisseurs and collectors to an exceptional experience. Redefining Ultra-luxury Rising above Bangkok's sophisticated Thong Lo district the development introduces just 22 masterfully crafted 'Sky Villas'. Each residence, spanning from 525 to 1,135 square meters, is conceived for those who cherish exceptional design. The project's revolutionary concept of 'Passion Spaces' – private luxury garages of 100 to 335 square meters, connected directly to each residence via exclusive private lifts – transforms the way residents experience their carefully curated car collections, elevating personal passions to a true art form. ADVERTISEMENT Where Passion Lives For Japan's discerning Porsche enthusiasts and luxury connoisseurs, this development represents more than an ultra-luxury residence – it's the ultimate expression of design culture and refined living. These versatile spaces offer the flexibility to create sophisticated entertainment venues that celebrate individual excellence. This groundbreaking concept allows residents to integrate their passion seamlessly into daily life, offering a distinctive residential experience that honors premium craftmanship. The project's location in Thong Lo – the city's most refined Japanese enclave known as 'Petite Tokyo' – provides an authentic touch of home, where residents find themselves surrounded by Bangkok's most established Japanese community. Premium Japanese establishments, cultural venues, and lifestyle amenities create a sophisticated environment that perfectly complements the Porsche Design Tower's ultra-luxury offering. Through this distinguished partnership with List Sotheby's International Realty Thailand – part of a global network of more than 25,000 affiliated independent sales associates in approximately 1,000 offices across 81 countries – Japanese connoisseurs receive exclusive representation and personalized consultation services for this transformative residential opportunity. The collaboration offers dedicated multilingual services in Japanese, English, Chinese, and Thai, ensuring a first-class experience for discerning clients. The Sales Center, scheduled to open in Q3 2025, will offer an immersive preview of the visionary Porsche Design Tower Bangkok. For detailed information and to explore this unprecedented opportunity, visit List Sotheby's International Realty and Hashtag: #PorscheDesignTowerBangkok The issuer is solely responsible for the content of this announcement. About Porsche Design In 1963, Professor Ferdinand Alexander Porsche created one of the most iconic design objects in contemporary history: the Porsche 911. Following his vision to take the principles and myth of Porsche beyond the automotive world, he created the exclusive lifestyle brand Porsche Design in 1972. His philosophy and design language can still be seen in all Porsche Design products today. Every Porsche Design product stands for extraordinary precision and perfection, boasts a high level of technological innovation and seamlessly combines intelligent functionality and puristic design. Created by Studio F. A. Porsche in Austria, our products are sold worldwide in Porsche Design stores, high-end department stores, exclusive specialist retailers and the official online store (