
Female officer nicknamed ‘hot cop' leaked details about Nicola Bulley
A female police officer nicknamed 'hot cop' leaked confidential information about Nicola Bulley to her friends and family.
Molly Bury, 28, the former police constable, illegally accessed the Police National Computer database to get intimate updates about the missing mother-of-two's case, while it was still ongoing, so she could share them with friends and family.
When one friend kept pressing her for more information, Bury, who worked for Lancashire police at the time, said: 'I will get in s— if they see me checking.'
When pressed again she added: 'I have not checked. I cannot keep checking. I will get into trouble.'
She faced up to two years in jail under sentencing guidelines but was handed six months in prison, suspended for 12 months, after a judge ruled she was 'profoundly immature' and 'not corrupt'.
Gayle McCoubrey, prosecuting, said the unnamed member of the public contacted police in March 2023, after overhearing Bury's mother, Andrea Mercer, sharing information about a rape that had occurred in Lancashire.
'She was heard to say, 'I asked Molly. She checked her police thing and she said it was a rape,'' the court heard.
Police systems then identified that Bury had viewed logs on a police-issued Samsung device while off duty.
Investigations revealed Bury, who was nicknamed 'hot cop' by locals after a crime prevention workshop, had been accessing the police logs between October 2019 and March 2023 to share 'idle gossip' for ''no policing purpose'.
She also obtained information on the death of a baby, a stabbing and a preplanned arrest of a robbery suspect.
She admitted she had been 'stupid and nosey' but insisted she was not 'malicious'.
Most of the information was accessed when she was on annual or sick leave.
Bury resigned from the force while under investigation, Lancashire police said.
Had she not already resigned she would have been dismissed, a misconduct hearing last year found.
Bulley, 45, was found dead in the River Wyre at St Michael's on Wyre in Feb 2023 following a three-week search which provoked wild speculation on social media.
A coroner later concluded she had drowned after accidentally falling into the water while walking her dog.
32 charges of unauthorised access to logs
Bury, a mother-of-one from Accrington in Lancashire, appeared at Chester magistrates' court and admitted to 32 charges of unauthorised access to police logs.
Police raided Bury's home and recovered a mobile phone which showed she had sent confidential information about various police incidents.
In October 2019, she sent details about a stabbing incident which she had attended to a friend named Elliott, saying: 'The lad from [the] stabbing survived.'
She later sent him further messages saying: 'A hit and run just came in. Woman probably going to die. Car drove onto the pavement into this lad and girl.'
In a further message regarding a dead baby found in Dec 2019, Bury said: 'Oh my God, it is a one-year-old child.'
On a day off she sent further texts, saying to Elliott: 'Undercover police are outside your address,' to which he replied: 'F— the feds.'
At 10.59am on Jan 29 2023, Bury was on a sick day when her friend, a woman named Amy Sanderson, asked: 'Any update on Nicky?' to which she replied: 'I will get in s— if they see me checking,' Ms McCoubrey told the court.
Ms McCoubrey added: 'At 11.01am, she accessed the Samsung device and searched again and a further message was sent regarding Nicola Bulley.
'At 6.33pm, Ms Sanderson sent a message saying 'Any update?' and Bury replied: 'I have not checked. I cannot keep checking. I will get into trouble.''
Ms McCoubrey told the court: 'It is difficult to assess the harm as we do not know what the outcome was from accessing that information. She was spreading gossip or sensitive information. There was no policing purposes for this defendant to access the logs on these occasions.'
Bury was also ordered to complete 30 days of rehabilitation activity and pay £154 in costs and surcharge.
Deputy Senior District Judge Tan Ikram said: 'These are not corrupt messages. There is no money involved. There is no suggestion this is a criminal fraternity.
'She clearly knew what she was doing was wrong, but the harm is damage to the reputation of police and confidence in policing. It was immature gossiping throughout. She was doing work without any insight into the job. It was tittle tattle nonsense much of it.'
Det Ch Insp Pete Reil, from the force's anti-corruption unit, said: 'Molly Bury's behaviour fell way below what the constabulary expects and what the public would expect of a serving police officer.
'I want to make it clear that the overwhelming majority of police officers in Lancashire are law abiding, respectful and go to work to make a difference in the communities in which they serve.
'Where there is any evidence of wrongdoing by an officer or staff member, our [anti-corruption unit] will identify it, investigate it and work with the Crown Prosecution Service to take the appropriate action.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
6 days ago
- Daily Mirror
Boy's birthday casino early finish fails to stop neighbour's drastic action
Jamie Obrien, from Hampshire, says his kill-joy neighbour complained about his son's birthday gathering. He says he receieved a phone call from environmental health over the 11-person party A furious dad has slammed a nightmare neighbour after they flagged his son's birthday party to their local council despite it only being three-hours long. Jamie Obrien, from Fareham, Hampshire, threw his son Cain the mini party, which featured a roulette wheel, fake money and a speaker system. The 54-year-old was left stunned after he received a call from environmental health following concerns over the event. But the dad claims the speaker was situated outside of the family's back door from 4.30-6pm on April 26. He blasted the kill joy who reported the casino-themed event and said that only eleven people were invited. The full-time carer says there are more than 40 flats or semi-detached homes in his close and the neighbouring street, which includes many "elderly" residents. He insists the "whirlwind little party" was finished by 7pm and that it was "pathetic" to call the council instead of explaining their annoyance in person. READ MORE: Top tech: Samsung dishes out free Galaxy tablet, smartwatch and earbuds in £600 giveaway Jamie said: "It was quite a whirlwind little party. It was casino-themed and I was the head of the roulette wheel with fake money and card games. I brought the speaker system down from Cain's bedroom, put it in the utility room that backs onto the back garden, and put one of the speakers just outside the back door. "I put the tunes on from 4.30pm and it was loud but it wasn't full blast - it could have gone a lot louder. I thought it was loud but reasonable. I'm an old-school raver from back in the day. I put one of my rave CDs but within 20 minutes they'd switched to teenager music, which is all grime and drum and bass. "Within an hour the volume of that went right down because they were congregating in groups and having chats more than anything. By 6pm the music had been turned off. We've lived here for five years now and it's the first time the stereo has been an issue. We had a disco dome in the garden with music pumping from it last year. "If I had a problem with something the only way to address it is head-on and be civil. It would have looked pathetic but it's even more pathetic that he's had to bring it up (with the council). It's annoying but deep down it makes me laugh because I see it as a form of jealousy. God forbid anyone enjoy themselves and have a good time." Jamie, lives with wife Tammy Obrien, 39, and their three children Cain, Mia, 20, and Kurt, 11. He claims the worker, from Fareham Borough Council, sided with him on the call and insists people should explain what the issue is if they make a complaint, reports Wales Online. Jamie said: "I took the call from environmental health and they said the noise complaint had been raised over the volume of our music. I explained we had the party from 4-7 and it was probably on for an hour tops and she told me 'that's absolutely fine. Even I have a party once in a while. Everyone's entitled to have a party'. "I asked her to tell whoever it is to grow a pair and knock on my door the next time, but she said she can't put it like that. She said she'd make them aware it was a birthday party and there's no foundation for the complaint. "If you've got a baby that's trying to sleep or you've worked a night shift, be logical, explain yourself and then we can all get on. I'd apologise if I offended anybody because my music was that bad or that loud but it genuinely wasn't and that's why they haven't knocked on the door. It's just a problem neighbour. Our house is on an elderly residential plot. There's 44 flats and our house in the close but we've got a really good rapport with all the elderly residents." Jamie says he has not been put off hosting a party at the house in future and would hire a venue if he planned it to run late into the night. His post said: "On Saturday April 26, I had a birthday party for my son and he had a small group of friends attend our home. "Today I received a phone call from environmental health after a noise complaint was made about the music! Firstly, the party was from 4-7pm and as for the music it was probably fairly loud for about an hour tops! "I would just like to reach out to Karen and advise them to grow a pair and come knock my door in future or just to basically get a life of their own instead of hiding behind phones and computers! This was the first noise complaint in five years of living here as we never really have parties." One commented: "I hope your son had the best party ever. Too many sour people these days!" A second said: "Some people need to get a life. What a pathetic thing to do. Music loud at 7pm wow." A third said: "What sound in the whole world could possibly be more wonderful than children enjoying themselves to music? Shame on the miserable soul who couldn't appreciate that sound." However one said: "Quite simple. Turn it down and stop being the 'I'm always right' neighbour from hell." Another said: "Isn't it ironic that you are complaining about Karen not knocking on the door and hiding behind phones and computers and then instead of knocking on their door you put up this post." Jamie replied: "Haha you're funny but not in a funny way. 'Neighbour from hell' please, maybe 20 years ago I would have been." Fareham Borough Council said environmental health officers assess noise by taking into account a range of factors such as frequency, time of day/night, background noise levels and volume so it is unlikely they would take any action for one-off parties.


Metro
7 days ago
- Metro
Meet the business behind the recent Kent 'thought crime' case
You don't need to be locked away to have your future be limited. An act as simple as entering a name into a police database can serve the same purpose. In the United Kingdom, a caution or arrest, without trial, without charge, will remain on the Police National Computer for 100 years. That record becomes a dark cloud that can hover over professionals long after the moment has passed. It may appear in hiring checks, immigration screening, licensing decisions and security clearances. It follows silently but speaks loudly. Legisia, a legal practice founded by solicitor Matt Elkins, challenges this quiet punishment. The company focuses on removing unwanted data and appealing Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) decisions. This work, grounded in law and driven by human consequences, offers not just technical relief but a path to reclaiming dignity. These records extend consequences far beyond the initial incident. Doctors, lawyers, finance workers and healthcare professionals find that a police caution, often misrepresented as merely a 'slap on the wrist', creates a criminal record appearing on background checks, preventing them from obtaining visas or work permits for countries with strict entry requirements. 'If a professional gets a record like this, it can completely ruin a valuable and hard-fought career,' Elkins notes. 'They cannot work overseas. Often clients want to move to the US, so with a caution for, say, possession of cocaine, they are never going to be able to get green cards.' According to Elkins, Legisia's police data removal services directly address these barriers. Professionals seeking international roles often face barriers due to police records, especially in countries like the United States, China and several Middle Eastern nations. Even low-level cautions or simple arrests — regardless of conviction — can trigger visa denials. Though policies vary, these records can quietly block global mobility and career progression. For those in regulated fields such as healthcare, education or law, such disclosures can lead to referrals to professional regulators. Even without proof of wrongdoing, careers can be suspended or permanently halted based on records that remain undisputed. Cautions were once informal warnings. Today, they are formal legal outcomes, digitised and retained on the Police National Computer. Unless successfully deleted or filtered under narrow disclosure rules, they remain disclosable. Police often describe cautions as minor, but their real-world impact is profound. According to Elkins, clients routinely accept cautions without realising they are permanent admissions of guilt. This disconnect between perception and consequence leaves professionals with records they never intended to carry. Legisia's expertise in police data removal becomes crucial in these cases. They help clients understand the full implications of their records and challenge them based on procedural flaws, disproportionality, misinformed consent, and under data protection laws. Most troubling are the circumstances under which some of these records are created. Elkins notes that some clients may have been pressured into accepting cautions without understanding the consequences, or where they were actually victims themselves. 'They might actually be the victim of assault. They might be the victim of a coercive relationship, having been bullied for years,' Elkins says. 'And then they find themselves getting arrested, and they often fold when they are in front of the police and end up accepting a caution.' Legisia's police data removal process involves gathering evidence to demonstrate innocence or procedural impropriety, which can reveal that clients were pressured or misinformed during the cautioning process. In a case that recently received national attention, Elkins represented retired special constable Julian Foulkes, whose caution sparked national outrage. Foulkes, from Gillingham, was detained at his home by six police officers — from the same force he had worked for as a special constable for ten years — after a comment labelled a 'thought crime' was posted on social media. After Legisia's intervention, the record was successfully deleted. The case was viewed by some as a crackdown on free speech, which has fuelled a debate on police powers. Since Legisia's successful application, Chief Constable Tim Smith rang Foulkes to apologise on behalf of Kent Police, and a full review of the case has been commenced. Elkins' focus on police data and DBS cases sets Legisia apart. While other firms offer this as one service among many, Elkins has concentrated on this area for over a decade, with 20 years of experience as a defence lawyer. This specialisation has given him insight into the varying approaches of different police forces. 'Each police force is different; they have a kind of different mentality. They do not all act the same,' Elkins explains. His expertise extends to understanding the nuances of how records are created and maintained. This depth of knowledge allows Legisia to navigate the complexities of police data management with a precision that generalist firms cannot match. The firm's police data removal success stems from this specialised knowledge. Elkins' work goes beyond statutory remedies. Many clients contact Legisia after years of living with the psychological burden of a police record. Some report shame, isolation, or missed opportunities. Others had given up on international roles, teaching careers, or security-vetted positions. Legisia's work offers not only legal redress but personal relief. Clients frequently describe the outcome as life-changing. Deletion restores reputations and opens paths once thought permanently blocked. Awareness of the consequences of police data retention is increasing. Elkins has observed rising demand for police data removal services, especially as individuals learn that records they assumed were closed remain active and disclosable. He also points to the controversy around non-crime hate incidents (NCHIs) — cases where police document behaviour perceived to be hateful but not unlawful, and the rising use of facial recognition technology. This expansion of data collection has created a wider environment in which reputational risk is greater, and police record scrutiny is more essential. In a society where data is increasingly permanent and accessible, people must be able to challenge outdated or unfair records. Legisia offers a mechanism to do so, backed by legal precision and human understanding. Elkins and his team continue to help hundreds reclaim control over their professional identities. Each deletion is not just the removal of a data entry — it is the restoration of potential, confidence, and a future. DISCLAIMER: There is no guarantee of your police record being cleared. Legisia Ltd is registered with the Information Commissioner's Office: Registration Reference ZA338412. Legisia Legal Services is not a solicitors firm but is an unregulated legal practice conducting non-reserved legal services. All cases conducted by Legisia Legal Services are led by qualified and regulated solicitors. All solicitors that are employed by, or are owners of, or are consultants to Legisia Legal Services are regulated by the SRA in their individual capacity.


Scottish Sun
03-06-2025
- Scottish Sun
More than 40 MILLION Brits alerted to switch on forgotten anti-theft mobile feature as phone snatching soars
MILLIONS of mobile users across the UK have been urged to switch on little-known anti-theft settings following a spate of phone snatches. In London alone, two-thirds of thefts now relate to mobile phones, Met Detective Chief Superintendent James Conway told MPs today. 2 Criminal gangs are believed to make £50million a year from stolen phones Credit: PA Police seized more than 1,000 stolen handsets and arrested 230 people in a single week earlier this year in a crackdown on the problem. The Met Police has described it as a colossal £50million-a-year trade. Often, phone thefts have more to do with raiding people's bank accounts than value in the handset itself. A victim recently revealed how they were caught out by crafty crooks who went on to spend hundreds. Tech companies have developed a number of tools to help prevent such incidents. Google has a few for Android users which detect the motion associated with a physical snatch. When a snatch is detected your phone will lock so thieves can't go through all your banking apps and more. Samsung, which uses Android on its phones, alerted more than 40million Samsung Account holders of its anti-theft features. The firm says these features will now also be available to even more devices soon, having started with the launch of the Galaxy S25 series in February. Among Samsung's own added efforts is Theft Protection, a multi-layered suite of features developed to safeguard personal data, even in high-risk situations such as robbery. Google reveals clever trick to prevent thieves from emptying your accounts on the Android 15 "Samsung is deeply committed to working closely with the Home Office on the issue of mobile phone theft and related crimes and we're in constant collaboration with our partners across the industry, to look at new and existing solutions to help combat this complex issue and ultimately help improve the safety of mobile phone users," said Annika Bizon, Mobile Experience (MX) VP of Product and Marketing, UK&I at Samsung. "Our recent One UI 7 update built further on existing protections with new anti-theft features such as identity check, biometric authentication and security delay, all featured in our latest Galaxy S25 series. "These features have now also been rolled out into a range of models across our devices and further updates will follow. "We must do everything we can to ensure the safety and security of our customers when they are using their mobile devices and we will continue to work hard to ensure our customers are aware of the wide range of security features available to them." How to turn on Theft Detection Lock To turn on Theft Detection Lock on a Samsung phone, follow these steps: Go to Settings Select Security and privacy Tap Lost device protection Go to Theft protection Switch the Theft detection option on