Northern Ireland's First Minister welcomes intention to lower voting age to 16
Teenagers aged 16 or over can already vote in Holyrood, Senedd and local government elections in Wales and Scotland, but not in UK parliamentary elections.
I welcome the news that the British Government is to introduce votes from the age of 16 for elections.
This is a step forward for democracy and will enable young people to have a say in their future.
I'll now be contacting the British Prime Minister, Keir Starmer, urging him to…
— Michelle O'Neill (@moneillsf) July 17, 2025
It is not known yet whether the legislation will be in place before the next election to the Northern Ireland Assembly and the local government elections in the region set to take place in 2027.
Michelle O'Neill described a 'step forward for democracy'.
'I'll now be contacting the British Prime Minister, Keir Starmer, urging him to ensure that the right to vote at 16 applies to the 2027 Assembly and Council elections in the north,' she said in a post on the social media network X.
SDLP leader Claire Hanna said voting rights should be changed at all levels.
'Enfranchising 16 and 17-year-olds has been a long held SDLP position and we welcome confirmation from the Government today that this will be in place for the next general election,' she said.
'There are many young people in Northern Ireland actively engaged in politics and I know that for generations there has been frustration that they could not play a full role in the democratic process.
'The SDLP believes that these voting rights must stretch beyond general elections and be extended to voting for the Assembly and local councils.
'We will continue to make the case for that at Westminster and push for change to secure voting at all levels for 16 and 17-year-olds.'
There was also a call to ensure the legislation is in place by 2027 from the Alliance Party.
North Antrim MLA Sian Mulholland said: 'We have long-argued that the disenfranchisement of our society's young people is a major democratic deficit here in Northern Ireland.
'However, time is of the essence and we need urgent clarification that it will be a priority to see this implemented in time for the next NI Assembly election in 2027. We cannot afford any further delay.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ITV News
22 minutes ago
- ITV News
Minister called for MoD resignations over Afghan data leak
I said on News at Ten, it was extraordinary that after the government learned of the egregious Afghan data leak, no official or minister resigned. I have now learned that on August 23 2023, at the first meeting of the government's emergency Cobra meeting to discuss the security disaster, the then foreign office minister responsible for the Indo-Pacific, Anne-Marie Trevelyan, said to the MoD's representative on the committee, General Sir Gwyn Jenkins, that obviously he would be resigning. He was, in her view, the responsible official, I am told, because at the time he was Director of Special Forces. The UK's special forces were in charge of the evacuation of Afghans who had helped British forces and were therefore at risk of being tortured and killed by the Taliban regime. Also, the massive data leak, which involved the names of 19,000 at-risk Afghans and around 100 British spies and special forces personnel, was the result of an email sent by a special forces told her that it was not going to happen; he would not be quitting. He didn't resign, and in fact he was chosen subsequently by the then prime minister Rishi Sunak to be National Security Adviser - though he never took up the post because Sir Keir Starmer preferred to appoint Jonathan Powell, who had worked in Tony Blair's Downing Street. Today, Jenkins is First Sea Lord and chief of the naval also said at that first Cobra meeting that there was a case for the chief of defence staff, Admiral Sir Tony Radakin, to resign. He, too, remained in place. At that first meeting, ministers and officials were told of the catastrophic security breach, which risked the lives of Afghan aides to Western forces and British referees for their asylum applications. Around 100 of these referees were members of MI5, MI6, the Special Air Service (SAS), and the Special Boat Service (SBS). Despite the horror of what was revealed, a member of the committee told me that the prevailing view at the Ministry of Defence was that this was just an unfortunate accident that needed clearing up, and that no one was to blame. So, Cobra at that meeting, and subsequent ones, never included the most senior members of the government, such as Sunak, or the then-foreign secretary, James Cleverly. It was largely composed of officials, who regarded the challenge as an administrative one. Initially, officials on the committee argued that there was no obligation for the UK to evacuate many of the Afghans on the leaked list, because they had already been rejected for inclusion on the existing ARAP relocation scheme. 'It was extraordinary,' said a Cobra member. 'There was no recognition that simply by dint of being on the leaked list, these people were now in harm's way, and we had a responsibility to get them out.' Eventually, a decision was taken to set up a new evacuation scheme for those Afghans affected by the leak. Re-settling them to the UK was painfully slow because Sunak did not want them in hotels, and the MoD had difficulty finding other relevant properties. In the event, 6,900 Afghans, who were not eligible for other evacuation schemes, are being resettled in Britain as a direct result of the leak, under a plan called the Afghan Response Route. It was kept totally secret thanks to a controversial court super-injunction requested by then-defence secretary Grant defence secretary John Healey has said that just this scheme will cost £850m, though the total cost of resettling 18,500 Afghans is up to £7bn.
Western Telegraph
34 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Senedd cross-party support for backbench sign language bill
Mark Isherwood formally introduced his British Sign Language (BSL) bill in the Senedd on July 16, nearly seven years after calls were first made for legislation in Wales. Mr Isherwood, a disability rights campaigner for decades, explained the bill would introduce legal requirements to promote and facilitate the use of BSL in Wales. He warned: 'Too often, deaf people are unable to access vital public services because they cannot communicate in their first language. 'This denies them their rights and places them at a significant disadvantage – whether in health care, education, employment, transport or otherwise." He told the Senedd: 'BSL plays a crucial role in enabling communication and promoting inclusivity in everyday life – for many deaf individuals, BSL is their primary language. 'Deaf BSL signers in Wales cannot access services in their first language and this is unacceptable. As one individual undergoing major surgery shared 'throughout the whole time, I did not understand anything'.' He added: 'If passed, therefore, this will be the most progressive BSL law in the UK.' Jane Hutt welcomed and supported the bill on behalf of the Welsh Government, which recognised BSL as a language more than 20 years ago in 2004. Wales' social justice secretary, who has worked with Mr Isherwood on developing the proposed legislation, described the bill as a step towards lasting change. The backbench bill would be the first passed by the Senedd in a decade, with bills on mental health, food, education, autism and older people's rights rejected or withdrawn in that time. Concerns have been raised about the Senedd's capacity for legislation brought forward by backbench members who are not a part of the Welsh Government. The BSL bill, as an example, was accompanied by a 113-page explanation and impact assessment. If passed, it would be a first since Liberal Democrat Kirsty Williams introduced a bill on safe nurse staffing levels in 2014, which became law two years later. Labour's Jenny Rathbone chairs the Senedd's equality committee, which she said had 'cleared the decks' to focus on seeing the BSL bill become an Act by May 2026.
The National
40 minutes ago
- The National
Keir Starmer 'hasn't responded' to John Swinney on Gaza child evacuations
Writing in The National earlier this month, the First Minister said Scotland's NHS was ready to treat injured Palestinian children. Swinney said that the Scottish Government is looking to medically evacuate children suffering from injuries caused by Israel's ongoing genocide in Gaza, but that this "requires the support of the UK Government". First Minister John Swinney (Image: PA) The First Minister revealed that he had written to Keir Starmer urging him to support the evacuations to hospitals in Scotland. However, Swinney said on Sunday that he is yet to receive a response from the Prime Minister. The First Minister said in a statement: 'It is deeply saddening that so far the UK Government has refused to even enter into a dialogue about medical evacuations for children in Gaza who, without proper medical attention, will be left to die. READ MORE: Palestine Action co-founder set to challenge UK Government terror ban 'That is the frank reality of life in Gaza under Israeli bombardment and blockade. 'The healthcare system in Gaza is on the brink of total collapse, with surgeons working day and night under artillery fire, with inadequate supplies and often no electricity. 'We know that many hospitals have been targeted and decimated by the IDF.' The First Minister added that Scotland is prepared 'to do what is required to save the lives of as many of these kids as we can'. Swinney's letter to Starmer was sparked by a meeting he had held with UN agency Unicef to discuss medical evacuations. The SNP leader wrote in The National at the time: 'With hospitals destroyed and medical supplies running out, this is an emergency and a race against time to provide specialist medical care for the children and babies suffering from injuries caused by the war. 'Scotland's world-class National Health Service stands ready to play our full part in supporting these medical evacuations and the treatment of injured Palestinian children.' He added: 'This requires the support of the UK Government, and I have asked the Prime Minister to support facilitating a transfer of these children, who need medical care to survive, to Scotland.' Swinney's predecessor, Humza Yousaf, previously said that Scottish hospitals can help treat injured Gaza civilians if they are medically evacuated. He added, however, that 'no request has been made' for the UK to receive medical evacuations from Gaza at that time. READ MORE: 3 women charged under Terrorism Act after breaching Edinburgh arms factory Since then, Israel has killed more than 58,000 Palestinians, more than half of them women and children, according to Gaza's health ministry. On Sunday, at least 73 Palestinians were killed while trying to reach desperately needed aid in Gaza. In northern Gaza, 67 people were killed near the Zikim crossing with Israel as aid trucks had just arrived. According to the UN World Food Programme (WFP), 25 trucks carrying supplies for "starving communities" entered the area but were met by large crowds that came under gunfire. A UK Government spokeswoman said: 'Since the start of the conflict, UK support has provided essential healthcare to over 430,000 people in the Occupied Palestinian Territories. 'We have helped several children with complex paediatric conditions access privately funded medical care in the UK, supporting an initiative by Project Pure Hope. 'We have been clear the situation in Gaza is intolerable and that there must be an immediate ceasefire. 'We urge Israel to let vital humanitarian aid in and allow Gazans to receive urgent healthcare, including allowing the sick and wounded to temporarily leave the Gaza Strip to receive treatment.'
