Shareholder approval sought for Alliance sale
Yesterday, Alliance — the wholly farmer-owned co-operative — confirmed the rumour the Irish company was planning to take a majority stake.
The deal is subject to shareholder approval and will require a minimum of 75% shareholder acceptance of those who vote, and greater than 50% of all shareholders voting yes at a special general meeting in Invercargill on October 20.
If shareholders did not support the investment, the Alliance board would be obliged to enter into a process led by its banking syndicate which might involve possible asset sales, site closures and further cost-reduction initiatives, the co-operative said.
Alliance is a major employer in the South with plants at Pukeuri, Mataura and Lorneville, along with Nelson, Dannevirke and Levin. It is owned by more than 4000 shareholders.
If approved, the investment would reduce Alliance's short-term working capital facility by about $200m, accelerate the board's strategic capital expenditure programme and enable the distribution of up to $40m to the co-operative, subject to shareholder livestock supply, it said.
Alliance chairman Mark Wynne said the announcement came after a two-year process to reset and recapitalise the business.
Last year, Alliance appointed Craigs Investment Partners to explore external capital-raising options after posting a full-year after-tax loss of $95.8m for the year ending September 30, which followed a $70.1m loss the previous year, yet a record $116.3m profit in 2022.
Established by three farming families in 1980, Dawn Meats has 24 facilities and more than 8000 employees in 10 countries, processing more than 3.5 million sheep and 1 million cattle per annum, with a core annual turnover of more than $5.8 billion.
Speaking to the Otago Daily Times yesterday afternoon, Alliance chief executive Willie Wiese said feedback on the proposal included mixed views but was predominantly supportive.
The business had been built up over generations and that was valued. Farmers had questioned if the company could trade its way out.
Despite the challenges it had faced, it would be profitable this year. But an issue was the debt it was dragging along.
When the record profit was announced in 2022, the company also had $107m debt at that time.
It had taken two years but the company was now in a very different space and was a very different business.
"We can trade our way out of it but the time it will take is far too long from a banking perspective," Mr Wiese said.
While Alliance would be working hard for a yes vote, Mr Wiese said he would also be relentlessly working on "what if" the proposal was rejected. It would be up to the banks to determine what that would look like.
Yesterday, James Anderson, who with fellow Waikaia farmer David Pinckney implored shareholders attending Alliance's last annual meeting in Gore in December to support 100% farmer ownership, said he was now "trying to drive down the middle line".
While canvassing support to retain farmer ownership, Mr Anderson spoke with fully paid-up Alliance shareholders who were "disgruntled" with the co-operative's management.
They had gone to competing companies, either with all or some of their stock and they wanted change.
These were younger farmers from intergenerational farming families and they were "disgruntled about this very stoic attitude of why we have to be 100% farmer-owned".
"What I know is bankers and our young farmers are seeing the business in a different light than what I am," he said.
Mr Anderson, who started supplying Alliance shortly after starting farming in 1987, said the "elephant in the room" had been the drop in livestock numbers and the government's slow response to landuse change.
Federated Farmers meat and wool industry group chairman Richard Dawkins urged farmers to attend farmer roadshow meetings — which begin on September 29 — to understand what was proposed so they could make an informed decision.
"Apathy is not a solution," he said.
sally.rae@odt.co.nz
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
19 hours ago
- Scoop
Three of New Zealand's biggest emitters no longer have to reveal their climate impact
, Climate Change Correspondent Three of the country's biggest greenhouse gas emitters no longer have to reveal how much planet-heating gas they produce. For the first time, the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA)'s company-level emissions data doesn't include agriculture, after the government ended compulsory reporting for the farming sector. The change means companies responsible for around half the countries' greenhouse gases no longer have to supply information to the EPA every year giving a rough total of their methane emissions, unless they happen to be captured by other disclosure rules (for example climate disclosure rules covering stockmarket-listed companies). Meat processors Affco and Alliance no longer have to supply emissions data. Nor does Open Country Dairy, the country's second biggest milk exporter after Fonterra. All three were previously among the country's top ten emitters. RNZ asked Affco, Alliance and Open Country Dairy for their totals, but none had responded by deadline. The two biggest greenhouse gas producers in the farming sector - Fonterra and Silver Fern Farms - still disclose their emissions tallies in their own annual reports, as well as listing measures to reduce their impact. "It's critical that everyday people are able to find out who is responsible for New Zealand's climate pollution," said climate advocate Alex Johnston, of the Don't Subsidize Pollution campaign. "To not have big corporate from agriculture, the sector responsible for more than half of the country's emissions, required to report their emissions footprint is not responsible governing. "It's like closing the door on your kid's bedroom when they've left the heater on and then wondering why the power bill is so high." The change came about because the government removed farmers from the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS). Agriculture was previously included in the scheme as a backstop in case voluntary discussions between farmers and government didn't result in an agreement to price methane. The backstop provision was removed and voluntary pricing talks were scrapped and re-started after the last election. Farming companies never had to pay for their methane emissions under the ETS the way petrol importers, coal miners and gas producers pay for their carbon dioxide emissions. However, until this year, they had to submit annual totals giving a rough estimate of their climate impact. ETS emissions reports were the only public information available for comparing individual companies, because some companies choose not to voluntarily disclose emissions. Climate Change Minister Simon Watts told Newsroom last year that officials had prepared an option to keep compulsory reporting while otherwise removing farming form the ETS. The government decided not to take it. He said the government was pursuing farm-level reporting instead. The change means reported emissions in the report have halved compared with last year, down from 65.7 million tonnes to 32.5 million tonnes. The difference is almost entirely because of the removal of the 33 million tonnes previously reported by the agriculture sector. When Fonterra is included, top 10 emitters collectively produce more than half the country's emissions, with Fonterra in the top spot followed by big petrol companies Z Energy, BP and Mobil. Farming companies - or their fossil fuel suppliers - still have to report and pay for any coal, gas or other fossil fuel they use in New Zealand under the ETS, for example coal used to dry milk or process meat. Affco reports its energy related emissions on its website, but not the larger total that comes from methane produced by farming the meat it processes. Alliance's website also discusses progress at reducing coal at its processing plants and said it completed a full lifecycle assessment of all its emissions last year, however doesn't appear to list the total. Open Country's website also discusses successful conversion of coal boilers to clean heat and said it is committed to reducing emissions from agriculture through the He Waka Eke Noa programme. He Waka Eke Noa was the programme scrapped by the coalition government after the election and replaced by direct engagement with farming groups through the government's Pastoral Sector Group. The new group is yet to announce a pricing plan or targets.
Otago Daily Times
2 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
Co-operating with overseas firms
A new era is dawning for Alliance Group and how that plays out now lies in the hands of its 4000-odd shareholders. On Tuesday, the red meat industry's worst-kept secret was confirmed; Irish company Dawn Meats Group would take a 65% stake in the wholly farmer-owned co-operative for $250 million, subject to shareholder and regulatory approvals. Alliance says the investment will reduce its short-term working capital facility by about $200m, accelerate the board's strategic capital expenditure programme and enable the distribution of up to $40m to the co-operative, subject to shareholder livestock supply. In many ways, it is a repeat of 2016 when China's Shanghai Maling (now Bright Food Group) took a 50% stake in Silver Fern Farms for $267m. Just like then, one has to ask if shareholders do not give the international investment a tick at a special general meeting in October, then what? For Silver Fern Farms, there was no other option and it is looking very similar for Alliance. It was 1948 when a collective of Southland farmers came together to establish Alliance Freezing Company Ltd. In 1980, the company underwent a change in ownership structure, transitioning into a co-operative. Since then, it has proudly lauded its farmer-owned status, particularly — and rather smugly — following the Silver Fern Farms' Chinese deal which left it the only true 100% farmer-owned red meat co-operative. Alliance farmers have now been forced between the proverbial rock and hard place. The future of their co-operative lies with them; say yes to the deal and 65% of ownership of what has been a traditional proud southern company goes offshore. Chief executive Willie Wiese says it could trade its way out but the time it would take was far too long from a banking perspective. So say no, and the bankers will be banging on the door. There appears to be little room for sentiment or tradition. It is somewhat inexplicable that Alliance finds itself in this position, with many questioning how a company can go from a record $116.3m profit in 2022 to two thumping losses in the following years. Last year, experienced agribusiness leader Mark Wynne was appointed chairman of Alliance and he did not mince words when it came to the task at hand. "I'm not doing this for a good time or a long time. This is damn hard work. We've got an enormous amount to do to turn this big super-tanker around," he said at the time. So why was the super-tanker ever grounded in the first place? And where is the accountability from those who allowed it to get so far off course? The future ownership of the co-operative might lie with its farmers but it is not those folk who got their company into such a perilous position that selling 65% of it is the only way forward. Mr Wynne has previously said that remaining a 100% farmer-owned co-operative was a choice and if farmers wanted it to remain that way, then the company needed their livestock. That was their clearest way of showing their support. But loyalty is a two-way street and Alliance used to have that in spades from its suppliers. Over time, it has eroded. For farmers already battling with rising on-farm costs, a few dollars more on their killing sheet from selling to a competing company offering a better price makes a substantial difference. Dollars and service can quickly replace any misty-eyed values around tradition and 100% farmer ownership when it comes to paying the ever-present stack of bills. Alliance has signalled site closures and asset sales are possible if the Dawn Meats deal is not inked. The company is a large employer, particularly in the South, and that would have huge ramifications for both rural and urban communities. But as livestock numbers continue to fall amid pine-tree studded farmland, the long-standing wider issue of over-capacity in the country's red meat sector continues to be the elephant in the paddock, and plant closures appear inevitable. What is guaranteed is that more change is coming in the sector — to be sure, to be sure.
NZ Herald
4 days ago
- NZ Herald
Listen to The Country: Prime Minister Christopher Luxon talks polls and popularity
Today on The Country radio show, host Jamie Mackay catches up with Prime Minister Christopher Luxon to talk about everything from the proposed Alliance Group deal, high-vis vests, Winston Peters, urgent economic action, and his gloomy poll results. On with the show: Christopher Luxon:
