Biden was ‘general failure' and Kamala ‘ran away' says Michigan Democrat vying to be first Muslim senator
For the three leading candidates vying to win the Democratic nomination to succeed retiring Sen. Gary Peters of Michigan, providing an answer could determine their political futures.
At least one already has: Abdul El-Sayed argued on Monday that his party ran away from its voters — not towards them.
Polling within the margin of error against Rep. Haley Stevens, El-Sayed, 40, is very well positioned to pull off the historic feat of becoming the first-ever Muslim member of the United States Senate.
A poll conducted by the NSRC, the GOP's Senate campaign arm, put him within the margin of error against Rep. Haley Stevens, a Democratic congresswoman and reportedly the Democratic party establishment's favorite to win the seat. Mallory McMorrow, a state senator, trailed both but was nearing striking distance.
'Democrats still haven't learned this lesson,' El-Sayed insisted on Monday. 'It's frustrating because these people made a calculated decision about who they needed and who they didn't. And it turns out that that decision was way off.'
El-Sayed spoke to The Independent two days before he was set to visit a Yemeni coffeeshop in Dearborn Heights for a meet-and-greet with voters, an area of Michigan that saw one of the sharpest drop offs among Democratic-leaning voters last year.
Across the state, El-Sayed is running the exact opposite kind of campaign as an increasingly frail Joe Biden ran in 2024. In some ways, his strategy contrasts with Harris,' too, in ways which clearly didn't sit well with the former Detroit health commisioner.
On a recent interview with Twitch streamer Hasan Piker (HasanAbi), the two discussed the Israel-Hamas war and starvation crisis in Gaza, which El-Sayed labels a genocide. But in the hourlong conversation — the likes of which Harris avoided to some dismay from Democrats — the two also bro'd out, chatting about fitness as well as the YouTube and Twitter 'shorts' seemingly consuming social media and transforming it into slop.
'I watched this campaign actively run away from certain groups of voters because they did not want to take questions that would expose the inconsistency of their values,' said El-Sayed. 'Whether that was Joe Rogan's audience, whether that was Hasan's audience, there are just groups of people that Democrats have said, 'you know what? We're going to give up on you, because we don't think we need you to win an election.
'That's not how you do politics,' he continued. 'Your job is not about just trying to architect a winning coalition. Your job is about trying to identify the issues that all people need, and then being able to be clear, specific and direct about how you solve them in an effort to win an election, because your agenda would deliver for the most people in the ways that they need.'
He pinned much of the blame for the party's stiffness in 2024, exemplified in both Biden and Harris' campaigns, on a steady stream of donor money the two-time Bernie Sanders-backed candidate argued was poisoning the party. Democratic policies were being winnowed down through a narrow lens of what would be palatable to both the party's base and their corporate-backed financiers, El-Sayed argued.
The devastation in Gaza and the Democratic Party's complicity in not pressuring Israel over it under Biden highlighted a gulf between those two groups he argued was growing for years. The man who could very well be the Democratic Party's champion in a crucial Senate race spared no criticism for those Democratic elites he argued were responsible for the mess within which the DNC was now mired.
"Joe Biden's handling of Gaza was indicative of a general failure to be able to do the job,' El-Sayed told The Independent.
"I wasn't in those rooms,' said El-Sayed. 'What I can tell you is what I watched, and what I think the American public watched, [which] is an American president who was struggling to give a coherent statement, to get through a debate, [and] ... to manage a extremely complicated situation in Gaza.
'I also know that there was this effort to silence those voices who were willing to state what was obvious before our eyes,' he added.
A disrupting voice in the party, El-Sayed is pledging to shake up the geriatric halls of the Senate as well should he become his party's nominee.
As senator, El-Sayed says he'd back leveraging Democratic votes on legislation to fund the government: the kind of shutdown politics Chuck Schumer refused to play earlier in 2025. He also supports ending the filibuster, according to a staffer. El-Sayed also would not commit to supporting Schumer for another term as leader of the caucus, telling The Independent he wanted to look at his options as 2027 came into view.
First he'll have to win the 2026 primary as well as a general election against Mike Rogers, the Republican Trump-supporting congressman on a path to be crowned the GOP nominee. With a unified Republican Party backing Rogers, El-Sayed is well aware that his Muslim background and stance on Gaza could be weaponized by Republicans in an attempt to overshadow a Zohran Mamdani-like focus on affordability and Michiganders' financial stability.
Republicans see Michigan as a path to expanding a majority and giving Donald Trump the breathing room he needs to further his legislative agenda in 2027. The loss of Michigan would be a massive blow for a battle-weary DSCC, and a pro-Israel site has already attacked El-Sayed over his sitdown with Hasan Piker.
El-Sayed argued that the momentum was on his side, and that Democrats needed to be ready to brawl.
'I think we need to stop being afraid,' he said. 'I just think we need to punch back harder, right? They want to come after us on this issue, punch back harder.
'I don't back down, I don't pull my punches, and I am more than happy to go at this issue or any other issue with lying MAGA types,' El-Sayed continued. ' I think we can win the American public, but we gotta stop being afraid of our own shadow.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
22 minutes ago
- Reuters
Exclusive: Trump administration formally axes Elon Musk's 'five things' email
WASHINGTON, Aug 5 (Reuters) - The Trump administration on Tuesday formally axed a program launched by billionaire former Trump adviser Elon Musk requiring federal employees to summarize their five workplace achievements from the prior week, as first reported by Reuters. The Office of Personnel Management, the federal human resources agency that implemented Musk's push to slash the federal workforce, announced the end of the "five things" email via a memo that rescinds guidance instructing workers to comply with the initiative. "At OPM, we believe that managers are accountable to staying informed about what their team members are working on and have many other existing tools to do so," OPM Director Scott Kupor said in a statement, adding the agency told government HR representatives that OPM would no longer manage the process nor use it internally. While many federal agencies had already phased out compliance with the weekly email, the move signals the Trump administration is turning the page on one of Musk's most unpopular initiatives following a falling out between the two men in early June. The White House did not respond to a request for comment. Musk, who spent over a quarter of a billion dollars to help Trump win November's presidential election, led the Department of Government Efficiency's efforts to slash the budget and cut the federal workforce until his departure in May to refocus on his tech empire. Musk initially received a warm White House sendoff from Trump, but then incurred the president's wrath by describing Trump's tax cut and spending bill as an abomination. Trump pulled the nomination of Musk ally and tech entrepreneur Jared Isaacman to lead NASA and later threatened to cancel billions of dollars worth of federal contracts with Musk's companies after the blowup between the two men. The "five things" email, launched by Musk in February to boost accountability, sparked tensions with department chiefs who were blindsided by the weekend email mandating the move. It also fueled confusion among government workers who received mixed messages about whether and how to comply. Reuters reported in March that the White House installed two Trump loyalists at OPM to ensure better policy coordination between the White House and the agency. Scott Kupor, a venture capitalist who took the helm at OPM in July, foreshadowed the end of the initiative last month, describing processing of the weekly response emails as "very manual" and "not efficient." It is "something that we should look at and see, like, are we getting the value out of it that at least the people who put it in place thought they were," he said.
The Independent
24 minutes ago
- The Independent
Watch Donald Trump walk on top of White House roof: ‘Taking a little walk'
Donald Trump took an unexpected walk across the White House roof on Tuesday (5 August), announcing that he was "taking a little walk" when asked why he was up there. The US president emerged from a door connected to the State Dining Room and stepped onto the roof above the press briefing room and west colonnade, spending almost 20 minutes surveying the rooftop and grounds below, including the newly-paved Rose Garden. In July, the White House announced that construction on a huge, new $200m ballroom would begin in September. It is the first structural change to the Executive Mansion itself since the addition of the Truman balcony in 1948.
The Independent
24 minutes ago
- The Independent
Texas families offered just $3,000 by the government in exchange for building Trump's wall on their land
The Trump administration has become embroiled in legal battles with families in Texas as it tries to take their land to finish off the president's border wall pet project. In a renewed effort to finish the $46 billion wall , Trump has started seizing land, mostly in the state's Starr County, and paying just thousands of dollars for it. Nearly all the land in the state of Texas is privately owned, including the land adjacent to Mexico's northern border. The Trump administration is now threatening to proceed with eminent domain-empowered land seizures if the homeowners don't play ball. Dozens of eminent domain lawsuits have been filed this year by the government. In many cases, the land at the center of those lawsuits is land that families have worked for generations, the Wall Street Journal reports. One man under the gun, Alejo Clarke, 76, told the WSJ that Trump is trying to take his land, and that if successful, the president will run a wall through his property that separates him from hunting and fishing grounds he's used for decades. Clarke lost his land to Trump's border wall aspirations during his first term, but regained it under President Joe Biden. The government is offering Clarke just $3,000 for his land. Raquel Olivia, 75, is also facing the potential loss of her land, telling the outlet that while the wall only requires three acres, it would cut her off from more than 100 acres she used for crops, hunting, and a gas well. As Trump insists his extreme border policies are necessary to fight an invasion of illegal immigrants, Olivia said the only invasion she sees is the federal government onto her property. "Now it feels like an invasion of the government on us," she told the WSJ. Eminent domain battles under Trump will be interesting to watch play out. Courts could rule in favor of the landowners, but court rulings have only sometimes stopped Trump from doing whatever he wants. The Trump administration took an opposing view on the use of eminent domain in June when it pushed back against Cranbury, New Jersey, after the city tried to seize a family farm. U.S. Department of Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins threatened that the administration was looking into the seizure and insisted that "we must protect family farms at all costs," according to Fox News. "Whether the Maudes, the Henrys or others whom we will soon announce, the Biden-style government takeover of our family farms is over," she wrote in a now-deleted June 17 post. "While this particular case is a city eminent domain issue, we @usda are exploring every legal option to help."
