logo
Colorado Congressmen Joe Neguse, Jason Crow part of lawsuit against Trump administration over ICE facility access

Colorado Congressmen Joe Neguse, Jason Crow part of lawsuit against Trump administration over ICE facility access

CBS News2 days ago
Colorado Congressmen Joe Neguse and Jason Crow are among a dozen Democratic members of Congress filing a lawsuit against President Trump's administration, claiming a new policy is obstructing congressional oversight of Immigration and Customs Enforcement facilities.
The lawsuit claims that the administration is preventing members of Congress from accessing information and conducting visits to ensure the Department of Homeland Security is complying with federal law. They say this policy includes a seven-day waiting period and restrictions on visiting detention sites, which violates a federal law allowing them access without prior notice.
On July 20, Crow, who represents Colorado's 6th Congressional District, said he was denied entry into the ICE detention facility in Aurora.
The complaint says, "As part of its campaign of mass deportation, the Trump-Vance administration has stretched the U.S. immigration detention system far beyond its capacity. More people are being held by the United States in immigration detention than ever before, with many facilities housing more individuals than they were built to contain." Representatives cited many concerns as the reason for needed oversight, including overcrowding, sanitation, lack of medical care, mistreatment and lack of access to counsel.
In two statements released after Crow's visit, ICE said requests need to be made with enough advanced notice to prevent interference in the President's Article II authority to oversee executive department functions. They suggested that a week would be enough notice and that the security protocols were for the safety of the staff and detainees.
"Blocking Members of Congress from oversight visits to ICE facilities that house or otherwise detain immigrants clearly violates Federal law—and the Trump administration knows it," said Neguse, the U.S. House Assistant Minority Leader who represents Colorado's 2nd Congressional District. "Such blatant disregard for both the law and the constitutional order by the Trump administration warrants a serious and decisive response, which is why I'm proud to lead the lawsuit we proceeded with earlier today."
The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, demands that the administration comply with the law. Neguse is one of a dozen representatives who are part of the lawsuit who argue that blocking Congress hinders accountability and threatens democracy.
"Today, I filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration after they illegally denied me access into a federal immigration detention facility," said Crow. "Oversight is a fundamental responsibility of Congress. Under law, Members of Congress have the right to do unannounced oversight visits of federal immigration detention facilities. Since President Trump was elected, this administration has denied Members of Congress access to immigration detention facilities and tried to intimidate us from doing our jobs. I will not be deterred from conducting lawful oversight, and I'll continue fighting to hold the administration accountable, including in Congress and the courts."
Department of Homeland Security Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin released the following statement about the lawsuit:
"These Members of Congress could have just scheduled a tour; instead, they're running to court to drive clicks and fundraising emails.
"Here are the facts. As ICE law enforcement have seen a surge in assaults, disruptions, and obstructions to enforcement - including by Member of Congress themselves - any requests to tour processing centers and field offices must be approved by the Secretary of Homeland Security. These requests must be part of legitimate congressional oversight activities. ICE officers have seen an 830% surge in assaults.
"As for visits to detention facilities, requests should be made with sufficient time to prevent interference with the President's Article II authority to oversee executive department functions-a week is sufficient to ensure no intrusion on the President's constitutional authority. To protect the President's Article II authority, any request to shorten that time must be approved by the Secretary."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Very risky business': John Bolton reacts to Trump's nuclear subs order
‘Very risky business': John Bolton reacts to Trump's nuclear subs order

CNN

time16 minutes ago

  • CNN

‘Very risky business': John Bolton reacts to Trump's nuclear subs order

President Donald Trump issued a rare threat of nuclear escalation on Friday, saying he had ordered two nuclear submarines to be strategically positioned near Russia in response to what he said were aggressive remarks by Dmitry Medvedev, the country's former president and current deputy chairman of its Security Council. Former Trump national security adviser John Bolton joins CNN's Kaitlan Collins to discuss his take.

‘Very risky business': John Bolton reacts to Trump's nuclear subs order
‘Very risky business': John Bolton reacts to Trump's nuclear subs order

CNN

time17 minutes ago

  • CNN

‘Very risky business': John Bolton reacts to Trump's nuclear subs order

President Donald Trump issued a rare threat of nuclear escalation on Friday, saying he had ordered two nuclear submarines to be strategically positioned near Russia in response to what he said were aggressive remarks by Dmitry Medvedev, the country's former president and current deputy chairman of its Security Council. Former Trump national security adviser John Bolton joins CNN's Kaitlan Collins to discuss his take.

American Eagle Defends Sydney Sweeney Ad Campaign Amid Controversy: ‘Her Jeans. Her Story… Great Jeans Look Good on Everyone'
American Eagle Defends Sydney Sweeney Ad Campaign Amid Controversy: ‘Her Jeans. Her Story… Great Jeans Look Good on Everyone'

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

American Eagle Defends Sydney Sweeney Ad Campaign Amid Controversy: ‘Her Jeans. Her Story… Great Jeans Look Good on Everyone'

American Eagle is standing by its controversial ad campaign featuring Sydney Sweeney, which includes various commercials with the tagline: 'Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans.' The campaign creates a pun around 'great genes,' which ignited outrage online over American Eagle glorifying the Emmy nominee's white heritage and thin physique. Some users on social media even compared the ads to 'Nazi propaganda.' 'Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans' is and always was about the jeans. Her jeans. Her story,' the company said in a statement posted on social media. 'We'll continue to celebrate how everyone wears their AE jeans with confidence, their way. Great jeans look good on everyone. More from Variety JD Vance Urges Democrats Angry Over Sydney Sweeney Jeans Ads to Keep It Up: 'Continue to Tell Everybody' Who Thinks She Is Attractive That They're 'a Nazi' White House Says Liberal Outrage Over Sydney Sweeney's American Eagle Jeans Commercial Is 'Moronic' and a 'Big Reason Americans' Voted for Trump Katy O'Brian Says Sydney Sweeney 'Didn't Care' About Getting Hurt During Fight Scenes in Christy Martin Biopic: 'She Was Like, "If You Break My Nose, That's Fine"' Sweeney's American Eagle campaign caused so much chatter online that even Trump's White House weighed in on the backlash, with communications manager Steven Cheung calling the backlash a prime example of 'cancel culture run amok.' 'This warped, moronic and dense liberal thinking is a big reason why Americans voted the way they did in 2024,' Cheung added. 'They're tired of this bullshit.' Vice president JD Vance also mocked liberals for creating a hysteria around the American Eagle campaign, saying on an episode of the 'Ruthless' podcast: 'My political advice to the Democrats is continue to tell everybody who thinks Sydney Sweeney is attractive is a Nazi. That appears to be their actual strategy.' Vance continued, 'I mean, it actually reveals something pretty interesting about the Dems, though, which is that you have, like, a normal all-American beautiful girl doing like a normal jeans ad, right? They're trying to sell, you know, sell jeans to kids in America and they have managed to so unhinge themselves over this thing. And it's like, you guys, did you learn nothing from the November 2024 election? I actually thought that one of the lessons [Democrats] might take is we're going to be less crazy. And the lesson they have apparently taken is we're going to attack people as Nazis for thinking Sydney Sweeney is beautiful.' Even Stephen Colbert, who frequently speaks out against Trump and the White House, called the backlash against Sweeney and American Eagle overblown 'Now, some people look at [the ads] and they're seeing something sinister, saying that the genes-jeans denim wordplay in an ad featuring a white blond woman means American Eagle could be promoting eugenics, white supremacy and Nazi propaganda,' Colbert said this week on 'The Late Show.' 'That might be a bit of an overreaction.' Sweeney has yet to publicly comment on the outcry over the advertisements. Best of Variety New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week What's Coming to Disney+ in August 2025 What's Coming to Netflix in August 2025

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store