India's worst-hit border town sees people return after ceasefire
Over 60 people died in days of days of missile, drone and artillery attacks that came close to all-out war until the ceasefire, which was holding on Sunday despite early alleged violations.
Most of the dead were civilians and the majority Pakistanis.
On the Indian side, Poonch on the Indian-run part of divided Kashmir bore the brunt, with at least 12 people killed at 49 injured, according to officials.
They included 12-year-old Zian Khan and his twin sister Urwa Fatima, hit by an artillery shell on Wednesday as their parents tried to leave the town.
The majority of the 60,000-strong population fled in cars, on buses and even on foot, leaving only a few thousand to brave it out.
Tariq Ahmad arrived back on Sunday bringing back 20 people in his bus as signs of life and activity returned to Poonch's streets.
"Most who fled are still afraid and will wait and watch to see if this agreement holds," the 26-year-old driver told AFP at the main bus terminal.
"Luckily, I managed to pick up 20 people from nearby villages who wanted to check if their homes and belongings survived the intense Pakistani shelling."
Poonch lies about 145 miles (230 kilometres) from Jammu, the second largest city in Indian-administered Kashmir.
Hazoor Sheikh, 46, who runs a store in the main market, was one of the first few people to reopen his shop.
"Finally, after days, we could sleep peacefully," he said.
"It is not just me or my family but everyone around finally had a smile yesterday," he added.
"I nervously returned a short while back to check on my shop," 40-year-old Mushtaq Qureshi said.
"Our families and neighbours were all separated as people fled to villages or relatives' homes for safety. But we are happy to be back today and to see each other again," he said.
Qureshi had left his home with about 20 relatives.
"Buildings around our neighbourhood were hit but luckily nothing has happened to my home," he said.
- 'Worst nightmare' -
Rita Sharma, 51, said she was really looking forward to seeing five children from her extended whom she had sent away for safety.
"They were the first to call yesterday after the (ceasefire) announcement and declared that they'd be back home by Sunday evening," she said.
"We hope it stays peaceful."
Hotel manager Subhash Chandar Raina also stayed put despite "the worst shelling in years".
"I feel sorry for those who've lost lives and belongings but thank God for allowing us to return to our normal lives after the worst phase in the region for years," the 53-year-old said.
Raina was one of only two hotel staff who stayed back as they felt travelling "was risky".
Abdul Razzak, 50, remembers fleeing with four children and two other relatives on two motorbikes with nothing but their clothes.
"It was our worst nightmare... We've seen our people die around us, so none of us want a war," Razzak said.
Hafiz Mohammad Shah Bukhari, was sceptical.
"We are not entirely confident that this ceasefire agreement will hold, based on our experience over the years," the 49-year-old said.
"Every time India has agreed to such an agreement, Pakistan has ended up violating it... It's people like us, the frontier people, who end up suffering and losing everything."
bb/ach/dhw/stu
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
2 hours ago
India's Modi to meet China's top diplomat as Asian powers rebuild ties
NEW DELHI -- NEW DELHI (AP) — Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi will meet with China's top diplomat on Tuesday in a sign of easing tensions between the nuclear-armed neighbors after a yearslong standoff between the Asian powers. Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi, who arrived in India on Monday, is scheduled to hold talks with Modi and other leaders, including National Security Adviser Ajit Doval, about the disputed border in the Himalayan mountains. Reducing the number of troops on the border, and resuming some trade there, is expected to be on the agenda. The rebuilding of ties coincides with friction between New Delhi and Washington after U.S. President Donald Trump imposed steep tariffs on India, a longtime ally seen as a counterbalance against China's influence in Asia. India is part of the Quad security alliance with the U.S. along with Australia and Japan. India and China's decades-old border dispute worsened in 2020 after a deadly clash between their troops in the Ladakh region. The chill in relations affected trade, diplomacy and air travel as both sides deployed tens of thousands of security forces in border areas. Some progress has been made since then. Last year, India and China agreed to a pact on border patrols and withdrew additional forces along some border areas. Both countries continue to fortify their border by building roads and rail networks. In recent months, the countries have increased official visits and discussed easing some trade restrictions, movement of citizens and visas for businesspeople. In June, Beijing allowed pilgrims from India to visit holy sites in Tibet. Both sides are working to restore direct flights. Last week, the spokesman for India's foreign ministry, Randhir Jaiswal, said India and China were in discussions to restart trade through three points along their 3,488-kilometer (2,167-mile) border. Manoj Joshi, a fellow at the Observer Research Foundation, a New Delhi-based think tank, said relations are still at an uneasy level of normalization. 'Settling the boundary issue between the two countries requires political compromise at the highest political level,' said Joshi, who also served as a member of the advisory board for India's National Security Council. He asserted that the countries are "still talking past each other when it comes to the border dispute and issues surrounding it." On Monday, China's Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning said Beijing is willing to take Wang's India visit as an opportunity to work with the Indian side to 'properly handle differences and promote the sustained, sound and stable development of China-India relations.' Mao said Wang's meeting with Modi's national security adviser will 'continue in-depth communication to jointly safeguard peace and tranquility in the border areas.' The thaw between Beijing and New Delhi began last October when Modi and Chinese President Xi Jinping met at a summit of emerging economies in Russia. It was the first time the leaders had spoken in person since 2019. Modi is set to met Xi when he travels to China late this month — his first visit in seven years — to attend the summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, a regional grouping formed by China, Russia and others to counter U.S. influence in Asia. Earlier this year, Xi called for India and China's relations to take the form of a 'dragon-elephant tango' — a dance between the emblematic animals of the countries. Last month, India's external affairs minister visited Beijing in his first trip to China since 2020. The renewed engagement comes as New Delhi's ties with Trump are fraying. Washington has imposed a 50% tariff on Indian goods, which includes a penalty of 25% for purchasing Russian crude oil. The tariffs take effect Aug. 27. India has shown no sign of backing down, instead signing more agreements with Russia to deepen economic cooperation. Trump's renewed engagement with India's arch rival, Pakistan, has also encouraged New Delhi's overtures to China, said Lt. Gen. D.S. Hooda, who led Indian military's Northern Command from 2014 to 2016. In June, Trump hosted Pakistan's army chief for a White House lunch and later announced an energy deal with Islamabad to jointly develop the country's oil reserves. Both followed Trump's claims of brokering a ceasefire between India and Pakistan after the two sides traded military strikes in May. 'China is heavily invested in Pakistan and, practically speaking, you can't have any expectation that Beijing will hold back support to Islamabad," Hooda said. 'But you can't have two hostile neighbors on your borders and simultaneously deal with them also.'
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Korean posts misrepresent Trump's Washington takeover as 'declaration of martial law'
After Donald Trump announced a federal takeover of the police force in Washington, Korean-language posts shared unrelated photos alongside a false claim that the US president had declared martial law in the capital. Some also drew a comparison to former South Korean president Yoon Suk Yeol's brief imposition of martial law in December 2024, but several experts told AFP that Trump's actions do not constitute a suspension of civilian rule. "Martial law has been declared in Washington. It is an exclusive presidential authority and an act of governance," reads a Korean-language post shared August 12, 2025 on Threads. The post includes an image of a military convoy crossing a bridge and a picture showing a group of soldiers riding the metro. A cut-out photo of Trump pointing forward is superimposed over the images. It surfaced after Trump said he would place the US capital's Metropolitan Police under federal control, which would be backed up by 800 DC National Guardsmen, to curb violent crime in the city of 700,000 (archived link). In June, Trump similarly deployed National Guard troops and US Marines in Los Angeles -- the first time since 1965 that a US president deployed the National Guard against the wishes of a state governor. Unlike the 50 states, the District of Columbia operates under a unique relationship with the federal government that limits its autonomy and grants Congress extraordinary control over local matters (archived here and here). The overwhelmingly Democratic city faces allegations from Republican politicians that it is overrun by crime, plagued by homelessness and financially mismanaged. Data from Washington police, however, show significant drops in violent crime between 2023 and 2024 after a post-pandemic surge (archived link). The same images spread elsewhere on Facebook and Instagram. Similar X posts also drew a comparison between Trump's actions and Yoon's, arguing it showed the impeached former South Korean president's martial law declaration did not amount to a crime (archived link). Yoon plunged South Korea into a political crisis when he sought to subvert civilian rule on December 3, sending troops to parliament in a bid to prevent lawmakers from voting down his declaration of martial law. Yoon -- who now faces charges of insurrection and abuse of power -- became the country's first sitting president to be arrested in January 2025. His brief imposition of martial law in South Korea differs from Trump's deployment of military and federal law enforcement to Washington, according to experts in both countries. "The regular civilian laws are in effect in DC," said John Yoo, a law professor at the University of California-Berkeley (archived link). "In fact, there is no federal statute for declaring martial law in DC, not to mention the United States as a whole." He added on August 18: "Someone could think that the use of troops in DC is somehow similar to what happened in Korea. But that would be incorrect as a legal matter." No suspension of civilian rule There is no established definition of martial law in the United States, according to the Brennan Center for Justice, but it "usually refers to a power that, in an emergency, allows the military to take the place of the civilian government and exercise jurisdiction over civilians in a particular area" (archived link). An announcement on the White House website, titled "Restoring Law and Order in the District of Columbia", makes no mention of the military taking the place of Washington's civilian government (archived link). The announcement, signed by Trump, reads: "I must also ensure that all citizens can avail themselves of the right to interact with their elected representatives, and that the Federal Government can properly function, without fear of being subjected to violent, menacing street crime." The District of Columbia filed a lawsuit challenging the Trump administration's moves to install Drug Enforcement Administration chief Terry Cole as "emergency" police commissioner. District Judge Ana Reyes brokered a deal under which Cole agreed to give directives through the mayor's office (archived link). Legal experts in South Korea dismissed comparisons between Trump's actions and those of former president Yoon. Chung Tae-ho, a constitutional law professor at Kyung Hee University, told AFP that "Yoon Suk Yeol's declaration of martial law sought to dismantle the democratic constitutional order by mobilising the military" (archived link). "By contrast, Trump does not appear to have deployed the National Guard to destroy the democratic constitutional order, so the intent itself differs from the outset," he said August 15. Paik Eun-seok, a professor at Handong International Law School and a US-trained lawyer, told AFP there are "clear differences" between Trump and Yoon's actions (archived link). "On December 3, the president not only declared martial law but also sought to restrict or seize control of the functions of the National Assembly, the National Election Commission, and the courts, using military forces -- thus constituting a martial law situation," he said August 15. "While Washington's Metropolitan Police has been placed under federal control, the National Guard has not replaced them, and therefore it can be argued it is not martial law in the usual sense." Misused visuals Reverse image searches on Google also show the photos used in the false posts predate the federal takeover of Washington. The first image of tanks and military vehicles crossing a bridge was taken during a June 14, 2025 parade in Washington to honour the 250th anniversary of the US Army. Trump hosted the event on his 79th birthday, spurring protests across the country accusing him of acting like a dictator (archived link). "A tank drives past the Lincoln Memorial as other vehicles line up on the Arlington Memorial Bridge during the 250th Anniversary of the U.S. Army Grand Military Parade and Celebration on Saturday June 14, 2025 in Washington, DC," reads the photo's caption on the Getty Images website, which credits The Washington Post (archived link). The second image of soldiers sitting on a train was taken January 20, 2021 ahead of former US president Joe Biden's inauguration. "Soldiers with the North Carolina National Guard ride a Metro train that will get them to the station they will guard for the 59th Presidential Inauguration in Washington on Jan. 20, 2021," reads its caption on the National Guard website (archived link). More than 25,000 National Guard members from across the United States were deployed in the capital before and during the inauguration as part of an unprecedented security response after Trump supporters stormed the Capitol on January 6 following a rally denouncing the election results. AFP has previously debunked other claims related to Yoon's declaration of martial law and the situation in Washington.
New York Post
4 hours ago
- New York Post
White House mocks ‘unserious' NJ Dem Rep. LaMonica McIver after she claims ‘Liberation Day' is ‘racist' and code for ‘white power'
The White House slammed New Jersey Democratic Rep. LaMonica McIver on Monday after she argued that President Trump's 'Liberation Day' mantra is code for 'white power.' McIver — who was hit with federal charges in June accusing her of assaulting and interfering with immigration officers outside a New Jersey detention center — leveled the accusation as she railed against Trump's crime crackdown in Washington, DC, which she fears 'will start a civil war' if he tries it in other Democrat-run cities. 3 The White House dismissed McIver's accusations and mocked her alleged role in a 'catfight' outside a Newark ICE facility. 'I think there's an ultimate agenda of this administration to do these types of things,' the congresswoman said of the president's decision to take control of DC's police department and deploy federal law enforcement and National Guard troops in the nation's capital, during an interview on the 'Defending Democracy with Marc Elias' podcast last week. 'Sic the military on the very people that they're supposed to be protecting in these cities and then expect a certain response so that it can escalate – I truly believe that that's what the president hopes for,' McIver argued, before calling the effort – and Trump's 'Liberation Day' for DC label – 'racist.' 'When he says, oh, you know, it's Liberation Day, and all of these things, those are, you know, ways of him saying, oh, it's white power,' McIver said. 'Those are racist remarks,' she argued. 'His number one targets are cities that are led by black mayors.' McIver went on to bemoan that Trump's 'number one targets are sanctuary cities that, you know, support immigration.' The New Jersey Democrat charged that Trump's push to clean up DC and end sanctuary city policies 'show us each and every day how much of a bigot he is.' 3 McIver argued that Trump's actions to tackle crime in the nation's capital demonstrate he is 'a bigot.' REUTERS 3 McIver has pleaded not guilty to three counts of assaulting, resisting, impeding and interfering with federal officials related to her alleged role in the ICE facility dustup. AP The White House brushed off McIver's allegations, mocking her 'attempted catfight' outside the Newark ICE facility that landed her in trouble with the feds. 'LaMonica McIver, whose claim to fame was assaulting federal agents, is an unserious person whose comments are nothing more than a political stunt, much like her attempted catfight in front of an ICE facility,' White House spokesman Harrison Fields told The Post. 'Congress would be better off if she left, and the people of New Jersey would benefit greatly if she pursued her apparent passion for street fighting,' he added. McIver's office did not respond to a request for comment. The congresswoman has pleaded not guilty to three counts of assaulting, resisting, impeding and interfering with federal officials related to her alleged role in the ICE facility dustup.
