UAE, Jordan Conduct 69th Humanitarian Aid Drop Over Gaza
The shipment, prepared with the support of UAE-based charities, was part of Operation Gallant Knight 3 — a relief mission directed by President Sheikh Mohamed to deliver food and essential supplies to Gaza's most affected areas.
In addition to the airdrop, 20 lorries carrying around 500 tonnes of food entered Gaza through land crossings. According to state news agency Wam, the UAE has now parachuted more than 3,924 tonnes of aid, including food and other essential items, since the start of the operation.
The Palestinian death toll since the conflict began on October 7, 2023, stands at 61,599, with 154,088 injured.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Etihad
14 minutes ago
- Al Etihad
President of Arab Parliament condemns Israel's approval of 3,400 new settlement units in West Bank
15 Aug 2025 17:56 CAIRO (WAM) Mohammed Ahmed Al Yammahi, President of the Arab Parliament, condemned the announcement by Israel's Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich approving the construction of 3,400 new settlement units in the E1 area, located between Jerusalem and the West a statement issued on Friday, Al Yammahi said this announcement constitutes a blatant challenge to international law and relevant international legitimacy resolutions, foremost among them the UN Security Council resolutions affirming the illegality of reaffirmed the Arab Parliament's categorical rejection of the policy of escalating settlement activity aimed at liquidating the Palestinian cause and eradicating the Palestinian held the occupation entity fully responsible for such actions, describing the move as a dangerous escalation of illegal settlement policies, within a systematic plan to impose a fait accompli on the ground. Such actions, he warned, completely undermine the prospects for achieving a just peace and destroy the internationally recognised two-state Yammahi called on the international community, particularly the UN Security Council and the sponsors of the peace process, to shoulder their legal and moral responsibilities, take effective measures to halt these violations, and ensure the occupation entity is held accountable for its crimes against the Palestinian people, their land, and their holy sites. He also urged immediate action to stop the dangerous escalation of settler terrorism, which will only lead to further escalation, tension, and instability.
Middle East Eye
25 minutes ago
- Middle East Eye
Indonesia cannot claim solidarity with Palestine while sending students to Israel
In April, I warned that Indonesia's quiet pipeline of students into Israeli institutions was not just diplomatically incoherent, it was morally indefensible. That pipeline remains open, even as Indonesia amplifies its support for Palestine at the United Nations, sends thousands of tonnes of humanitarian aid and stages massive protests across the country. This contradiction is no longer subtle. It is a full-blown alarm. In late July, another group of Indonesian agriculture students from East Nusa Tenggara departed for Israel as part of a nearly year-long internship at the Arava International Centre for Agricultural Training (Aicat). This is not a fringe programme. It is part of a formal agreement signed in 2014 between Chinese-Indonesian businessman Agus Suherman and the Israeli-based training centre. A total of 100 Indonesian students were enrolled in the 2024-2025 cohort. The Indonesian government may not officially recognise Israel, but this programme is recognition by another name. These students enter on Israeli visas, train at Israeli institutions and work on Israeli land - even as Palestinians are starved, bombed, displaced and imprisoned by the same state. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters This is not an agricultural exchange but complicity masquerading as pragmatism. Hollow stance On 3 August, thousands of Indonesians gathered at Jakarta's National Monument, waving Palestinian flags and holding placards demanding justice for Gaza. The protest was peaceful yet powerful - a collaboration between civil society groups and the Indonesian Ulama Council, supported by thousands of ordinary citizens. A day earlier, demonstrators had rallied outside the Egyptian embassy, calling for the opening of the Rafah crossing. No amount of rice or aid Indonesia contributes can offset the political damage done by sending even a single student to Israel These rallies were not symbolic acts. They reflected real rage, grief and solidarity. And yet, they also revealed something deeply uncomfortable: that even as Indonesians mobilise in the streets, the country's institutions are quietly undermining that resistance - making decisions that normalise and legitimise the very regime responsible for Gaza's devastation. Indonesia has sent substantial amounts of humanitarian aid to the Palestinian people. Just last week, Foreign Minister Sugiono announced an additional 10,000 tonnes of rice, along with a long-term cultivation initiative in Sumatra and Kalimantan to support Palestinian food security. These are meaningful contributions. But no amount of rice can offset the political damage done by sending even a single student to Israel. It is impossible to condemn apartheid while enrolling in its institutions, or wave the Palestinian flag in Jakarta while validating the systems that trample Palestinian lives. These contradictions do not cancel each other out but instead expose the entire framework of Indonesia's pro-Palestine stance as hollow. Whitewashing apartheid Some argue that academic exchange programmes are apolitical, and that students are simply there to learn agriculture, not endorse an apartheid regime. But that is a fiction. War on Gaza: Universities that resist BDS are at risk of losing legitimacy Read More » Israeli agricultural "advances" are not developed in a vacuum. They are achieved on stolen land, with stolen water and through an economy built on occupation. While Indonesian students irrigate crops in the Arava desert, Palestinian farmers watch their orchards wither under blockade and bombardment. Education, in this case, is not neutral. It is a tool of whitewashing. Moreover, Aicat is not a Unesco facility. It is a cog in a machine built to showcase Israel's technological prowess while obscuring the brutality of its policies. Every Indonesian student who participates becomes - knowingly or not - a testimonial: proof that even critics of Israel are willing to engage, given the right incentives. What otherwise would have been a knowledge exchange is simply a trade of principle for access. No excuse Indonesia's policy of non-recognition was never just bureaucratic. It was a moral line that has been crossed, marked not by headlines but by quiet departures to Tel Aviv airport and internships stripped of political context. This is how normalisation happens: not through embassies, but through loopholes, internships and the slow erosion of outrage by routine. Follow Middle East Eye's live coverage of Israel's genocide in Gaza Indonesia has alternatives. If the goal is agricultural advancement, countries such as Japan, South Korea, India, Turkey and Brazil offer high-tech training without compromising their values. There is no excuse for choosing a country that demolishes homes in Jenin, bombs hospitals in Rafah, and jails children from Hebron to Nablus. Palestine does not need charity from Indonesia. It needs solidarity, and solidarity requires sacrifice Palestine does not need charity from Indonesia. It needs solidarity, and solidarity requires sacrifice - even if that means giving up access to cutting-edge irrigation systems, especially when that technology is soaked in injustice. Indonesia must decide: is Palestine a political cause or a branding tool? Is the occupation a red line or a grey area? Is the suffering in Gaza just another headline - or a moral call to action? If Indonesian leaders want their protests to matter, their donations to mean something and their statements at the UN to carry weight, then the country must stop enabling a system it claims to oppose. No more students should be sent to Israel - not now, not ever, not under any excuse. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
What is 'Greater Israel'?
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said he 'very much' identifies with the vision of Greater Israel during an interview on Tuesday, as he accepted an amulet of the 'promised land' from former right-wing MP Sharon Gal. His comments have sparked condemnations from many Arab states, who viewed his words as a threat to their sovereign territory. The concept of Greater Israel, which has various interpretations, has long been invokved by ultra-nationalist Israelis. It is often understood as a vision of territorial expansion to encompass Palestine, Lebanon and Jordan, along with significant parts of Syria, Iraq, Egypt and Saudi Arabia. It has also sometimes been used more narrowly to refer to the territories occupied by Israel in 1967: the Palestinian territories, the Golan Heights in Syria, and Egypt's Sinai Peninsula. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters While Netanyahu's remarks are recent, the idea of Greater Israel is neither new nor clearly defined, and for some, it now appears increasingly relevant in light of Israel's ongoing genocide in Gaza. Where did it start? The concept of Greater Israel was explored by Theodor Herzl, the father of political Zionism, who wrote in his diaries that the Jewish state should stretch 'from the Brook of Egypt to the Euphrates'. The phrase is taken from Book of Genesis, where God grants Abraham and his descendants a vast expanse of land stretching "from the Brook of Egypt to the Euphrates." Some Israelis refer to a narrower vision mentioned in the Book of Deuteronomy, where God instructs Moses to lead the Israelites in taking possession of Palestine, Lebanon, and parts of Egypt, Jordan and Syria. Others invoke the Book of Samuel, which describes lands secured by Kings Saul and David, including Palestine, Lebanon, and sections of Jordan and Syria. For those who hold this belief, the pursuit of Greater Israel is not merely political, it is the fulfilment of a divine mandate, a reclamation of land they see as rightfully theirs. How has Greater Israel changed? Following the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948, the country's borders remained undefined. In 1967, during the Six-Day War, Israel occupied the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, along with the Golan Heights in Syria and the Sinai Peninsula in Egypt. It was the first major military effort by Israel to expand its territorial control. Sinai was later returned to Egypt as part of a peace treaty, while the Golan Heights were formally annexed by Israel. The war brought renewed attention to the idea of Greater Israel, particularly among religious Zionists. By the late 20th century, the term had become political shorthand, embraced by some Israelis as the realisation of a historical and religious destiny. The "Movement for Greater Israel", a political party founded in the aftermath of the Six-Day War, was active until the late 1970s. It advocated for retaining the captured territories and settling them with Jewish citizens. How does the current government view the vision? Since the current Israeli gonvment was sworn in in 2022, refernce to Greater Israel became more common. Last year, in a documentary, Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich was filmed advocating for the expansion of Israeli borders to include Damascus. He suggested that Israel would gradually grow to encompass not only all Palestinian territories but also parts of Jordan, Lebanon, Egypt, Syria, Iraq and Saudi Arabia. 'It is written that the future of Jerusalem is to expand to Damascus,' he said, invoking the 'Greater Israel' ideology. Smotrich had previously raised similar ideas during a 2023 memorial service for a Likud activist in Paris. Speaking from a podium adorned with a map of Israel that included Jordan, he controversially stated that 'there is no such thing' as the Palestinian people. Other ministers and MPs have opennly advocated for "taking land" from Palestinians in in the Gaza Strip. During the ongoing genoicde, an Israeli soldier was pictured with a patch of map of Greater Israel in on his uniform. The latest incident came earlier this week, when Netanyahu explicitly reaffirmed his commitment to the vision. His comments came amid ongoing Israeli military occupation of the West Bank, Gaza Strip and parts of southern Lebanon and southern Syria.
