logo
FTSE eases on weak US data as Ukraine peace summit looms

FTSE eases on weak US data as Ukraine peace summit looms

Independenta day ago
The FTSE 100 fell back after hitting a new all-time high to close lower on Friday amid caution ahead of the US-Russia peace summit, hints of more tariffs and weak US consumer sentiment.
The index closed down 38.34 points, 0.4%, at 9,138.90. It had earlier reached an all-time intra-day high of 9,222.07.
The FTSE 250 ended down 43.43 points, 0.2%, at 21,758.24, and the AIM All-Share finished 0.86 of a point higher, 0.1%, at 759.80.
For the week, the FTSE 100 rose 0.5%, the FTSE 250 fell 0.9% and the AIM-All Share declined 0.3%.
In Europe, the Cac 40 in Paris rose 0.7%, while the Dax 40 in Frankfurt closed down slightly.
US President Donald Trump and Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin will meet later on Friday in Alaska in a summit that could prove decisive for the future of Ukraine.
Mr Putin will step on to western soil for the first time since he ordered the invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.
Mr Trump extended the invitation at the Russian leader's suggestion, but the US president has since warned that the meeting could be over within minutes if Mr Putin does not compromise.
Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One en route to Anchorage, the US leader sounded a more positive note, saying: 'There's a good respect level on both sides and I think something's going to come out of it.'
'Investors will be watching closely for signs a credible peace deal is in the offing and any outcomes could set the mood music for next week,' said AJ Bell investment director Russ Mould.
Mr Trump also said he will be setting new tariffs on steel, semiconductors and computer chips from next week, but declined to say what rate would apply, according to AFP.
The US president said he would keep the new levies 'lower at the beginning' to give companies 'a chance to come in and build' in the US.
'And if they don't build here, they have to pay a very high tariff, which doesn't work. So they'll come and build,' he said.
In New York, the Dow Jones Industrial Average was up 0.1%, the S&P 500 was 0.2% lower, and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 0.4%.
Figures showed US retail sales growth decelerated in July, although the number was in line with hopes.
The US Census Bureau said retail sales grew 0.5% monthly in July from June, when they had grown 0.9%, which revised up from 0.6%.
But separate data from the University of Michigan showed the preliminary August sentiment index fell to 58.6 from 61.7 a month earlier. FX Street consensus had forecast an improvement to 62.0.
The report showed US consumers are scaling back spending plans amid concerns about inflation and weakening job prospects.
The pound climbed to 1.3566 dollars late on Friday afternoon in London, compared with 1.3541 at the equities close on Thursday.
The yield on the US 10-year Treasury was at 4.31%, widened from 4.28%. The yield on the US 30-year Treasury was 4.90%, up from 4.87%.
On the FTSE 100, mining stocks rose despite weak data from China.
Anglo American rose 2.1%, Glencore climbed 1.8% and Antofagasta 1.2% on hopes the soft figures will spark action from Chinese authorities.
'Chinese economic activity slowed across the board in July, with retail sales, fixed asset investment, and value added of industry growth all reaching the lowest levels of the year,' ING said.
'After a strong start, several months of cooling momentum suggest that the economy may need further policy support,' the broker added.
Asia-focused bank Standard Chartered slumped 7.2% after a US politician asked the country's attorney general to investigate the bank.
Republican Elise Stefanik, in a post on X, said she has asked Pam Bondi to investigate the bank for 'illicit payments to known terrorists'.
Ms Stefanik shared a letter on X in which she alleged Standard Chartered had made 9.6 billion dollars from such payments.
'China has been using Standard Chartered to purchase sanctioned Iranian oil,' she claimed.
On a quiet day for company news, Associated British Foods ended up 0.2% after confirming the acquisition of Hovis Group from private equity firm Endless.
AB Foods plans to combine Hovis with its existing Allied Bakeries division to create a 'profitable UK bread business that is sustainable over the long term'.
Allied Bakeries owns the bread brands Kingsmill, Allinson's and Sunblest. It also produces own-label bakery ranges for major UK supermarkets.
Clive Black, retail analyst at Shore Capital, said the deal shows AB Foods has been true to its word and taken 'demonstrable action to deal with persistent problem children'.
He said AB Foods and Endless need to overcome any UK antitrust concerns, but he believes there is 'ample' choice for bread shoppers after any Hovis/Kingsmill alliance, providing a 'firm basis' for regulatory approval.
On the FTSE 250, Bytes Technology Group jumped 8.4% after launching a share buyback programme worth up to £25 million.
A barrel of Brent fell to 66.33 dollars late on Friday afternoon from 66.80 on Thursday. Gold rose to 3,343.39 dollars an ounce against 3,339.74.
The biggest risers on the FTSE 100 were Anglo American, up 47.0p at 2,170.0p, BP, up 7.3p at 421.4p, Glencore, up 5.2p at 299.7p, Games Workshop, up 200.0p at 15,680.0p and Antofagasta, up 26.0p at 2,122.0p.
The biggest fallers were Standard Chartered, down 101.5p at 1,305.5p, Rolls-Royce, down 27.5p at 1,074.0p , 3i Group, down 96.0p at 3,971.0p, Airtel Africa, down 4.0p at 216.2p and Rightmove, down 13.8p at 761.0p.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Putin demands Zelensky surrenders Donestsk region as condition for ending war in Ukraine
Putin demands Zelensky surrenders Donestsk region as condition for ending war in Ukraine

The Independent

time24 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Putin demands Zelensky surrenders Donestsk region as condition for ending war in Ukraine

The Russian leader told Donald Trump that he would be prepared to stop fighting on the rest of the frontline if Ukraine gave in to the demand and address 'root causes of the conflict'. The concessions were discussed at the highly-anticipated summit of the two leaders in Alaska on Friday, which ended with no peace deal despite nearly three hours of talks. Sources very close to the meeting told The Independent the dramatic move appears to have been endorsed by Mr Trump as a means to bring an end to the war. They said that Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky would want to 'clarify this on Monday' when he meets with Mr Trump on Monday in Washington DC. Mr Putin's condition for Ukrainian troops to withdraw from Donetsk and Luhansk, which make up the Donbas region, follow circulated reports on the demand ahead of Friday's summit. The Russian president also said he would freeze the frontline in the southern regions of Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, where his forces occupy large territory. However, Putin made clear he would not fall back on core demands to 'resolve root causes of the conflict', that includes Ukraine becoming a neutral state and abandoning Nato aspirations. The Donetsk region has been centre of much of recent fighting, with Russian troops making a sudden thrust near the eastern town of Dobrophillya in the days before the summit. While Russia controls almost all of Luhansk, it holds about 70 per cent of Donetsk. Last week, Mr Zelensky insisted he would reject any proposal to withdraw from the industrial Donbas region, claiming it would 'open a bridgehead' for Russian offensive. All eyes will now turn to his meeting with Mr Trump on Monday. After Friday's summit, the US president said a permanent peace deal was now the best way to end the war, appearing to abandon aims at the summit for a ceasefire agreement. He also told Fox News in an interview that he would advise Mr Zelensky to make a deal. 'Yeah. Look, Russia is a very big power, and they're not,' he said when asked what he would say. Speaking ahead of Monday's meeting, Mr Zelensky said: 'I plan to discuss all the details regarding the end of the killings, the end of the war with President Trump in Washington on Monday. Grateful for the invitation.' On Saturday, Mr Putin, who also plans to visit Washington to meet Mr Trump, said Friday's meeting was 'timely' and 'useful'. The US and Russia are now 'closer to making appropriate decisions', Putin added. Meanwhile, European leaders have been putting piling pressure on Mr Trump not to cave to Putin's demands. They also support Mr Zelensky in his demand for security guarantees as part of a peace deal, to deter Russia from invading again in the future. Sir Keir Starmer and leaders from Italy, France and Germany were also on the call with Mr Zelensky spoke and the US president after Friday's summit. Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni said the security guarantees - inspired by the transatlantic NATO alliance's Article 5 - had been the most interesting development at the summit. Speaking at the press conference after the summit, Mr Putin, who has hitherto opposed involving foreign ground forces, said he agreed with Trump that Ukraine's security must be "ensured". On Sunday afternoon, the coalition of the willing, a group of countries that have pledged to protect Ukraine, including the UK, will meet, with French president Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and Sir Keir expected to lead it. In a statement on Saturday, Sir Keir said: 'President Trump's efforts have brought us closer than ever before to ending Russia's illegal war in Ukraine. His leadership in pursuit of an end to the killing should be commended. 'While progress has been made, the next step must be further talks involving President Zelenskyy'.

Trump's astonishing gamble may pay off spectacularly
Trump's astonishing gamble may pay off spectacularly

Telegraph

time25 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Trump's astonishing gamble may pay off spectacularly

After speaking with Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky and European leaders overnight, Donald Trump changed the dial on what at first seemed like a lacklustre summit. The American president announced that he would be pursuing a peace settlement instead of a ceasefire in Ukraine. Trump justified this shift by highlighting the potential fragility of a Ukraine ceasefire deal. Historical evidence shows that Trump's concerns are well-placed. While the February 2015 Minsk II Accords halted Russian territorial expansion in eastern Ukraine, ceasefire violations by Putin's brutal regime were rampant. By March 2016, the US department of defence estimated that 430 Ukrainian soldiers died after Minsk II's signing and warned that Russia was 'pouring heavy weapons' into Donbas. Despite the inherent logic in Trump's push for a grand bargain solution to the Ukraine War, the devil is ultimately in the details. After Trump's meeting with Putin, there are concerns that he might see the legitimisation of Russia's annexation of nearly one-quarter of Ukraine as the fastest route to further imperialism. This worst-case scenario would tempt Russia to rearm and encourage further aggression against Ukraine, Moldova or the Baltic States. There are reasons to believe that these concerns are overly pessimistic. Tragically, any end to the war would almost certainly require Ukraine to make some territorial this is a bitter pill for Ukraine to swallow, frustrations could be tempered by Trump offering the besieged nation ironclad security guarantees. Even though Trump launched a tirade against Zelensky when he mentioned the need for security guarantees at the Oval Office in February, he has apparently come around to the necessity of these assurances. Trump has offered Ukraine Article 5 Nato-style security guarantees in the event of a peace deal. Ukraine would still be nominally a neutral country and not become a full Nato member; yet it will have most of the protections that are afforded to countries within the alliance bloc. This proposal could gain traction within the US foreign policy community and rare bipartisan support. Based on my past engagements with American experts familiar with the Biden administration's thinking on a peace settlement, a plan consisting of territorial concessions and Nato-style security guarantees was under consideration back then. The main disagreement pertains to the legal status of the Russian-annexed regions. Biden's team was firmer about the need to avoid official recognition of these territories and inclined to support Ukraine's claims to their future reintegration. Trump's team, meanwhile, is more willing to torpedo the principle of Westphalian sovereignty and recognize the regions as Russian to stem Putin's aggression. If the US settles on this formula, Europe and Ukraine are unlikely to mount a fierce resistance campaign against it. Its chances of success hinge on its implementation, and there are two issues that need to be resolved for it to be effectively adopted. The first challenge pertains to settling Ukraine's new de facto borders. These involve extremely difficult decisions for Zelensky. In exchange for abandoning Donbas, Ukraine will almost certainly want a land swap deal that guarantees control over the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant and the occupied half of Kherson. It is unclear whether Putin will accede to these demands, as Russia has officially annexed these areas, but a compromise is possible as they have less resonance to Russian ultra-nationalists than Donbas. Regardless of whether a land swap deal transpires, Ukraine will be forced to tragically dismantle its civilian institutions in Donetsk and potentially integrate hundreds of thousands of internally displaced persons. It will also have to respond in a measured fashion to Putin's imposition of Russian culture on all remaining Donbas residents and the subjugation of more Ukrainians to the totalitarian nature of Russian occupation. Once these challenges are achieved, Ukraine will need to ensure that its new borders are defensible. The 1994 Budapest Memorandum security guarantees unravelled due to a lack of will amongst signatories and denialism about the evil threat of Russian neo-imperialism. While these sources of complacency are much less striking now, there are still reasons for concern. The varying paces of arms deliveries to Ukraine and heated debates about escalation risks suggest that Nato does not have a united post-war plan. Therefore, it will be incumbent on Ukraine's strongest supporters within the alliance to quickly provide security assistance and steer as many of their more reluctant counterparts to follow suit. Britain's pledge to deploy ground troops to Ukraine within a week of a ceasefire and use Royal Air Force jets to patrol Ukraine's skies provides a positive example for its like-minded Nato allies. The US's active participation in the post-war peacekeeping coalition is critical. While Americans are evenly divided on the acceptability of peacekeeper deployments and military retaliations against Russia if peacekeepers are attacked, Trump must transcend politics for the cogency of the Nato alliance. Aside from the deployment of peacekeepers and integration of Ukraine into Nato's military technology supply chains, post-war reconstruction investments are a further guarantor of peace. If Ukraine's economy can attract large-scale capital infusions from both Western powers and Russia-friendly Global South stakeholders, such as the Gulf monarchies and China, the costs of further Russian aggression would rise precipitously. Putin's appalling wars have been driven by his false confidence in easy victories and a belief in Russian impunity. These assumptions need to be unequivocally put to rest. The Alaska summit failed to live up to its billing as a stepping stone for peace in Ukraine right now. Despite this, Trump's newest proposals suggest that it might just be around the corner.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store