
The lowdown on inherited IRAs
Answer: The SECURE Act largely eliminated the so-called stretch IRA that allowed non-spouse beneficiaries to take distributions over their lifetimes. IRAs inherited on or after Jan. 1, 2020, must typically be drained within 10 years.
That likely would be the case for your wife. Special rules allow a spouse to treat an inherited IRA as their own, but only when they inherit from the original IRA owner, says Mark Luscombe, principal analyst for Wolters Kluwer Tax & Accounting.
There are a few exceptions. Your wife may be able to spread the distributions over her lifetime if she is disabled or chronically ill, for example.
If that's not the case, she's back to draining the account within 10 years. Many inherited IRAs require annual distributions. Since this is a Roth IRA, however, the original owner would not have been required to start distributions. Therefore, the spouse of the inherited Roth IRA beneficiary does not have a requirement to distribute annually over the 10-year period but may wait until the end of the 10-year period to do the full distribution, Luscombe says.
Dear Liz: I am in my late 50s, married and woefully unprepared financially for my later years. I was a stay-at-home mom for many years. I now work almost full time but my employer has no 401(k) or profit sharing or really any benefits at all. I just started putting $8,000 (the catch-up amount) into my Roth IRA. What else can I do now to make up for lost time?
Answer: You can't really make up for the decades of compounded returns you missed by not investing earlier. But you can make some smart decisions now for a more comfortable retirement.
Your most important decision likely will be how you and your spouse claim Social Security. Your spouse almost certainly should wait to claim until age 70 to maximize their lifetime benefit and to lock in the highest possible survivor benefit. If you outlive your spouse, this benefit could comprise the bulk of your income. Consider reading 'Get What's Yours,' a book about Social Security claiming strategies by Laurence J. Kotlikoff and Philip Moeller. Just make sure to get the updated version that was published in 2016, since earlier versions refer to strategies that Congress eliminated.
Delaying retirement is another powerful way to compensate for a late start, since you'll have more years to work and save. Consider finding an employer who will help you secure your future by providing a 401(k) with a generous match. You'll be able to contribute substantially more to a workplace retirement plan than you would to a Roth.
You and your spouse should consider hiring a fee-only financial planner to review your situation and offer customized advice.
Dear Liz: You recently responded to an elderly couple who planned to move into assisted living, but were concerned about capital gains taxes on the sale of their home. You suggested an installment sale or renting out the home as possible options. While not for everyone, another possibility is a home loan or a reverse mortgage to cash out tax free.
Answer: Reverse mortgages have to be repaid if the borrowers die, sell or permanently move out of their homes. If one of the spouses planned to stay in the home, a reverse mortgage might work, but not if both plan to move to assisted living.
A home equity loan or home equity line of credit might be options if the couple have good credit, sufficient income to make the payments and a cooperative lender. A tax pro or a fee-only financial planner could help them assess their options.
Liz Weston, Certified Financial Planner®, is a personal finance columnist. Questions may be sent to her at 3940 Laurel Canyon, No. 238, Studio City, CA 91604, or by using the 'Contact' form at asklizweston.com.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
Trump's tax law will mostly benefit the rich, while leaving poorer Americans with less, CBO says
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump 's tax and spending law will result in less income for the poorest Americans while sending money to the richest, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office reported Monday. The CBO estimates that the 10% of poorest Americans will lose roughly $1,200 a year as they experience restrictions on government programs like Medicaid and food assistance, while the richest 10% of Americans will see their income increase by $13,600 from tax cuts. Overall, American households will see more income from the tax cuts in the legislation, including middle income households, but the largest benefit will go to the top 10% of earners. The CBO's report comes as lawmakers are away from Washington, many taking their messages about the bill to voters. Republicans muscled the legislation — deemed 'the big, beautiful bill' by Trump — through Congress in July. Democrats all vehemently opposed the legislation, warning that its tax cuts and spending priorities would come at the expense of vital government aid programs and a ballooning national debt. 'This really is a big, beautiful bill for billionaires, but for the poor and the working class in this country, you are actually poorer,' said Rep. Brendan Boyle, the top Democrat on the House Budget Committee, in an MSNBC interview on Monday. Changes to eligibility for government food assistance under the law will impact millions of Americans, the CBO found. Roughly 2.4 million people won't be eligible for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program under new work requirements for many recipients. Low-income Americans could also see their income reduced through further restrictions on food aid and other types of assistance included in the law. Already, more than 10 million Americans are expected to be without health insurance by 2034 due to changes to Medicaid under the law. Following release of the report, Rep. Jason Smith, the Republican chair of the House Ways and Means Committee, said he took issue with CBO's methodology, repeating criticism he has made in the past. 'CBO has a troubled track record of getting its estimates incorrect and, like Democrats, is biased in favor of more federal spending and higher taxes,' Smith said on social media. 'Don't buy it.' Republicans have been eager to sell the upsides of the legislation — arguing that the tax cuts will spur economic growth — while they are on a monthlong summer break from Washington. But those who have held townhalls in their home districts have often been greeted by an earful from voters and activists. 'Tax the rich,' the crowd in Lincoln, Neb. chanted last week as Republican Rep. Michael Flood attempted to defend the bill. Still, Trump has been undeterred.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump Taps BLS Skeptic To Replace Leader He Fired Over Grim Jobs Report
President Donald Trump announced on social media Monday he's nominating E.J. Antoni, a rightwing economist who criticized the Bureau of Labor Statistics data-collecting, to head that very department. If confirmed by Congress, Antoni, the chief economist at the Heritage Foundation, will replace former BLS Commissioner Dr. Erika McEntarfer, who Trump fired earlier this month after she issued a damning report on poor job growth under his presidency. 'Our Economy is booming, and E.J. will ensure that the Numbers released are HONEST and ACCURATE,' said Trump. When Trump fired McEntarfer, he claimed without any evidence that she had manipulated the jobs data to make him look bad. A HuffPost analysis of Labor Department data found that Trump delivered the worst three months of job growth since the pandemic. Antoni has been critical of the BLS, posting on X days after McEntarfer's ousting that the bureau should change how it collects jobs data. 'There are better ways to collect, process, and disseminate data — that is the task for the next BLS commissioner, and only consistent delivery of accurate data in a timely manner will rebuild the trust that has been lost over the last several years,' he wrote last week. During an appearance on Steve Bannon's podcast earlier this month, Antoni called for McEntarfer to be fired. When Bannon asked him whether a 'MAGA Republican that President Trump knows and trusts' had been installed at BLS, Antoni replied, 'Unfortunately we still haven't gotten there, and I think that's part of the reason why we continue to have all of these different data problems.' In a later episode of his show after McEntarfer's firing, Bannon said he was 'pushing' for Antoni to head the BLS, praising him as 'the guy that almost single-handedly took it down by going through their numbers.' Jason Furman, a top economic adviser in Barack Obama's White House who is now an economics professor at Harvard University, was highly critical of Antoni's nomination. 'I don't think I have ever publicly criticized any Presidential nominee before. But E.J. Antoni is completely unqualified to be BLS Commissioner,' he wrote on social media. 'He is an extreme partisan and does not have any relevant expertise. He would be a break from decades of nonpartisan technocrats.' Antoni's work at the Heritage Foundation includes authoring some of Project 2025, the conservative blueprint for a second Trump administration. The Heritage Foundation was also instrumental in propping up Trump's baseless claims that the 2020 election was stolen from him and has shared false reports of noncitizens registering to vote. Related... Trump Fires Labor Statistics Head In Meltdown Over Grim Jobs Report Former Labor Secretary Calls Absolute 'Bulls**t' On Trump's Jobs Report Claims Donald Trump Just Delivered The Worst Three Months Of Job Growth Since The Pandemic


Politico
2 hours ago
- Politico
Trump-backed judge rules administration's withholding of funds illegal
Trump and his aides have made clear he believes he has the power to 'impound' — or decline to spend — some congressionally required funding if he feels it does not align with his priorities. But that view conflicts with a 51-year-old law known as the Impoundment Control Act, which bars presidents from withholding federal dollars without congressional approval. Friedrich's ruling also comes at a tense moment in the standoff between the White House and Capitol Hill. There, many members of Trump's own party are increasingly nervous about the possibility that budget chief Russ Vought will soon ask lawmakers to codify a second package of funding cuts after insisting on a vote last month to nix $9 billion for public broadcasting and foreign aid. Meanwhile, Vought has openly floated the prospect of submitting a 'pocket rescission' request, which is when the administration sends Congress a clawback request less than 45 days before the end of the fiscal year on Sept. 30 — and regardless of whether Congress decides to act, the White House would treat the funding as expired beginning Oct. 1. The National Endowment for Democracy, founded in 1982 to promote democracy abroad, received a $315 million appropriation for the current fiscal year, and every year since its founding had received access to the full amount of its funding as soon as it was approved by Congress. But that changed in January, amid a blitz by the new Trump administration — backed by Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency — to terminate federal programs and contracts en masse. The Endowment sued the Trump administration in March as the organization was unable to access congressionally appropriated funds. Shortly after filing the suit, the Trump administration released a large portion of the withheld dollars, taking the sting out of the organization's legal fight. But in recent weeks, the group said the administration had again started to slow-walk the disbursement of money, including some funds designated as 'no year' funds — meaning they are available to be used without a deadline until they are expended.