'Constitutional': Ex-CJI Chandrachud backs simultaneous polls; flags one concern
NEW DELHI: Former Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud has endorsed the constitutionality of the 'one nation, one election' (ONP) concept, ahead of his appearance before the joint parliamentary panel on simultaneous polls.
Also Read: Govt targeting 2034 to hold 1st 'one nation, one election'
The ex-CJI, and another former chief justice, JS Khehar, are scheduled to appear before the committee later this week, on Friday.
"The Constitution never mandated holding national and state elections separately," Chandrachud mentioned in his opinion submitted to the Joint Committee of Parliament (JPC), headed by PP Chaudhary of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party.
This was Chandrachud's response to the opposition's criticism that the synchronisation of Lok Sabha and state assembly polls "violates" the Constitution's basic structure.
However, he questioned the "sweeping powers" proposed to be bestowed on the
Election Commission
to conduct simultaneous polls. The concern was previously raised by another former chief justice, Ranjan Gogoi.
"Such unbounded authority could enable the poll body to curtail or extend the tenure of a state assembly beyond the constitutionally mandated five years, under the pretext that simultaneous elections with the Lok Sabha are not feasible.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
2025 Top Trending local enterprise accounting software [Click Here]
Esseps
Learn More
Undo
The Constitution must define, delineate and structure the circumstances under which the ECI may invoke this power," Chandrachud, who was the country's 50th chief justice from November 2022-2024, noted.
"The Constitution must define, delineate and structure the circumstances under which the ECI may invoke this power, he added.
Another ex-CJI, UU Lalit, has also not questioned the constitutionality of the concept of ONOP.
Gogoi and Lalit had presented their views before the JPC in February and March, respectively.
'ONOP won't infringe upon voters' right'
Chandrachud also stated in his written opinion that simultaneous elections will not infringe upon the voters' right to elect their representatives, and that the bill ensures that electors remain continuously represented by their duly elected members of Parliament or legislative assemblies.
'Arguments opposing simultaneous elections are based on the premise that the Indian electorate is naive and can be easily manipulated.
The argument that staggered elections are a part of the Constitution's basic structure (or form part of the principles of federalism or democracy) does not hold. Staggered timing of elections cannot be considered as a feature of the original Constitution, let alone an immutable feature,' he said.
However, his opinion is not without notes of caution over some of the bill's features or the likely implications if it is to be enacted.
For instance, Chandrachud has appeared to share the concern that simultaneous elections could "marginalise" smaller or regional parties due to the dominance of better-resourced national parties, saying it is a significant policy aspect that warrants legislative attention.
While the Representation of the People Act, 1951 and the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961, impose ceilings on the amount a candidate may spend during the election campaign, there are no corresponding limits on the expenditure incurred by political parties themselves, he noted.
This gap benefits parties with greater financial resources, he argued.
As the bill says that the term of a House elected after a midterm poll will be only for the remainder of the five year term, Chandrachud has said the ability of the government to take any meaningful project will be "minimised" if its tenure is only of a year or less, as the Model Code of Conduct would come into force around six months before the next polls.
Several JPC members have also raised this point about the likely priorities and strength of a government elected for a short period.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
17 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Crores of workers will join July 9 strike, claim trade unions
About 30-40 crore workers and farmers will participate in the general strike on Wednesday (July 9, 2025), claimed leaders of 10 central trade unions in New Delhi on Monday (July 7, 2025) while addressing a joint press conference. The leaders said preparations for the strike were complete and workers had supported the 17-point charter of demands of the strike, called against the Union government's policies. 'The economic policies are resulting into more unemployment, rising price rise of essential commodities, depression in wages, cut in social sector spending in education, health, basic civic amenities, all this leading to more inequalities and miseries for the poor, lower income group and even middle classes. The government has abandoned the welfare state status of our country and is working in the interest of foreign and Indian corporates and it is so evident from its policies being pursued vigorously,' the trade union leaders said. In a statement, they said the trade unions had been fighting against the privatisation of public sector enterprises and public services, the policies of outsourcing, contractualisation and casualisation of workforce, against the anti-workers, pro-employer four Labour Codes meant to suppress and cripple the trade union movement, increase in working hours, to snatch their right to collective bargaining, right to strike, decriminalisation of violation of labour laws by employers, while criminalising the activities of trade unions etc. 'The government is making false claims on employment and provisions of social security. The existing social security schemes are being weakened and attempts to bring private players into it are pushed,' they said. They added that unions in the coal and minerals sectors, steel, banking and insurance sectors, power, petroleum and telecom industries and the transport sector have given notices for the strike. 'We are making continued efforts forging unity and solidarity between the two major productive forces of the country, the workers and farmers,' they said.
Time of India
17 minutes ago
- Time of India
Emergency by Indira was undemocratic: Joshi
Dharwad: Union minister Pralhad Joshi said the 50th year of the dark days of Emergency in India is being observed throughout the country to inform the younger generation about how the then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi imposed the Emergency and ruled for 21 months without constitutional and moral authority. Speaking at the Viksit Bharat Sankalp Sabha and the inauguration of the 50th year of remembrance of the struggle during the Emergency, organised by the BJP at Karnataka Vidyavardhaka Sangha here, he said Emergency was imposed on June 25, 1975 and during that time, protests were suppressed, many protesters including all the leaders of opposition parties were imprisoned, and several people lost their lives, he explained. "Indira Gandhi was accused of misusing her power during the elections by Raj Narain, who took the matter to court. Justice HR Khanna of the Allahabad High Court had delivered the verdict in favour of Raj Narain and had declared Indira's election null and void. That judgement copy is not available anymore," he added. "Jawaharlal Nehru made the first constitutional amendment. Later, Indira Gandhi made several amendments including to Articles 38, 39, and 42. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Ford&Go. Extra Bonus di € 1.500 e prima rata a ottobre. Ford Italia Scopri di più Undo After imposing the Emergency and causing hardships to the people, the Congress is now claiming that the Constitution is in danger. They are lecturing the nation while keeping the copy of the Constitution in their pockets," he remarked. Joshi stated that under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, the country has developed immensely in the last 11 years. India has now emerged as the fourth largest economic power in the world, he claimed. Retired judge SH Mittalkod presided over the function. Mayor Jyoti Patil, former MLAs Amrut Desai, Seema Masuti, Lakshman Uppar, Sanjay Kapatkar, Vijayanand Shetty, Shankar Kumbi, Shankar Shelke, Raju Topannavar and others were present.
Time of India
22 minutes ago
- Time of India
Dhankhar rakes up cash at Justice Varma's home, post-retirement jobs to judges and CJI on panel to choose CBI Director
Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar raised several questions on Monday about the functioning of the higher judiciary in recent times, raking up the issue of cash found at the residence of Justice Yashwant Varma , the practice of having Chief Justice of India on the panel to choose the CBI Director and the post-retirement jobs given to judges. Addressing students of National University of Advanced Legal Studies at Kochi, Dhankhar the country had seen 'turbulent times in the judiciary' in recent times but a big change has taken place since the present chief justice of India and his predecessor took office, ensuring the start of a 'new era of accountability and transparency'. He said the previous two years were 'very disturbing and challenging'. Referring to the recovery of a huge cache of cash found at the residence of Justice Yashwant Varma, the Vice President said like the Julius Caesar incident of Ides of March, the Indian judiciary had its own experience on the night of March 14-15. '…. A terrible time! Cash in large amounts was found at the official residence of a judge of the High Court. Now, if that cash was found, the system should have moved immediately and the first process would have been to deal with it as a criminal act, find out those who are culpable and bring them to justice. But so far, there has been no FIR,' Dhankhar said. He underlined that the government is 'handicapped' in the matter as an FIR cannot be registered in view of a judgment of the Supreme Court in early 1990s. While the fire incident happened on March 15, the recovery of cash was reported only on March 21, he added. Live Events 'The world looks at us as a mature democracy where there has to be rule of law, equality before law, which means every crime must be investigated. If the money is so huge in volume, we have to find out: is it tainted money? What is the source of this money? How was it stacked in the official residence of a judge? Who did it belong to?' Dhankhar said. He insisted that since several penal provisions have been violated, the FIR should be registered, and the authorities should go to the root of the matter. 'Our judiciary -in which people's faith is unshakable- its very foundations have been shaken. The citadel is tottering because of this incident,' he said. Parliament is likely to move an impeachment motion against Justice Varma in the forthcoming monsoon session and both the government and the Opposition are on board on the matter. The Vice President also raised eyebrows over the rule of having the Chief Justice of India on the panel that chooses the CBI Director. 'I am aghast that a functionary of the executive like the CBI director is appointed with the participation of the Chief Justice of India. Why? Just think... The CBI Director is not the senior most in the hierarchy. He has above him several layers like CVC, Cabinet Secretary, all secretaries. After all, he is heading a department. Is this happening elsewhere in the world? Can it happen under our constitutional scheme? Why should an appointment of the executive be made by anyone else other than the executive?' he said. The Vice President also emphasized that judges should not be given post-retirement jobs. 'Certain constitutional authorities are not permitted to hold an assignment after their office. This was not specified for judges, because judges were expected to be totally away from it. Now we have post-retirement posts for judges. Further, not all can be accommodated- only some can be accommodated. So, when you can't accommodate all but you accommodate some, there is pick-and-choose. When there is pick-and-choose, there is patronage. It is seriously impairing our judiciary,' Dhankhar said.
