logo
Omnilux Vs. CurrentBody: Which LED Face Mask Is Better?

Omnilux Vs. CurrentBody: Which LED Face Mask Is Better?

Forbes19-05-2025
LED face masks have exploded in popularity over the past few years, and a growing number of beauty companies now offer red light therapy masks that are designed to treat visible signs of aging—like fine lines, wrinkles and discoloration—and stimulate collagen production. I put two of the most popular FDA-cleared LED masks—the Omnilux Contour Face and the CurrentBody LED Light Therapy Mask Series 2—to the test in a side-by-side comparison.
During testing, I compared the Omnilux Contour Face and the CurrentBody LED Face Mask Series 2, ... More evaluating their setup, ease of use, comfort and overall capabilities.
These at-home LED devices are a big investment—prices range from about $100 to more than $1500—and they're intended to produce similar results as those available during in-office treatments. While many red light therapy masks look similar at first glance, they feature design differences that can affect their overall comfort and ease of use (read our evaluation of the best LED face masks here). Over the course of weeks, I carefully evaluated the Omnilux and the CurrentBody LED face masks, gauging how easy each one was to set up and use, as well as its comfort level, battery life and overall performance.
Amazon
Forbes Vetted
Forbes Vetted ratings are based on thorough evaluations by our editorial team to help you choose the best products with confidence.
Target areas: Face | Light modes: Red, near-infrared and deep near-infrared | Skin concerns: Fine lines, wrinkles, hyperpigmentation, dullness | Wireless: Yes (with connected controller) | Number of LEDs: 263 | Usage: 10 minutes a day, three to five times per weekBest for:
Skip if:
Planet Beauty
Forbes Vetted
Forbes Vetted ratings are based on thorough evaluations by our editorial team to help you choose the best products with confidence.
Target areas: Face | Light modes: Red, near-infrared | Skin concerns: Fine lines, wrinkles, redness, discoloration | Wireless: Yes (with connected controller) | Number of LEDs: 132 | Usage: 10 minutes, three to five times per week
Best for:
Skip if:
At first glance, the Omnilux and CurrentBody face masks are quite similar. Both are made from soft, flexible silicone that molds closely to the face, which allows for the optimal amount of light to reach areas of concern. They are both wireless and have an attached controller that charges via a USB connector. Both devices feature pre-programmed, 10-minute treatments, and they automatically turn off at the end of each session so you don't have to worry about setting a timer.
Regarding safety, both devices are FDA-cleared and have been subjected to clinical studies. Those who participated in Omnilux's clinical studies reported brighter, plumper skin with less redness. According to CurrentBody Skin, the Series 2 LED mask has been proven to reduce wrinkles by 30% and improve skin plumpness by 57%.
The CurrentBody Skin LED Light Therapy Face Mask Series 2 and the Omnilux Contour Face are both made ... More of flexible silicone and are powered by an attached controller.
Setup: Setting up both masks is extremely easy. For the CurrentBody mask, the brand recommends plugging it in for 4.5 hours for a full charge, so I charged it overnight. (To note: I had to use my own wall charger for the supplied USB-C power cord.) For the Omnilux mask, I plugged it in for about three hours until the three indicator lights were all illuminated, indicating a full charge. Per the company's instructions, I ensured the mask was not attached to the controller while charging. The only other part of the setup was attaching the Velcro straps to the back of each mask, which was intuitive and quick.
Ease Of Use: I was relieved that neither LED mask required a huge learning curve, which can be the case with some beauty tech devices. I used the same steps for both masks: I washed and dried my face and then affixed the Velcro straps behind my head to secure each mask for a close fit. I pressed and briefly held each mask's controller button to begin the 10-minute session. When the treatment is done, it automatically shuts off so there's no potential for exceeding the recommended time.
I like that the CurrentBody mask has a secure fit and good face coverage.
Comfort: Both masks are constructed from soft, flexible silicone, so there are no annoyingly sharp or rigid edges; they are both quite comfortable overall. Neither felt particularly heavy (the CurrentBody device plus its cord and controller weighs 16.5 ounces, and the Omnilux with its attached cord and controller weighs 12.05 ounces). However, I have a larger bridge on my nose, and I found that the nose area of the CurrentBody would cause slight irritation by the end of each session and leave a red mark.
They both feature stretchy, adjustable Velcro straps, with some differences. I preferred the straps on the CurrentBody mask because the main, back-of-the-head strap was wide, supportive and easy to fasten. The additional over-the-head strap kept the mask secure and prevented it from shifting when I got up and moved around, adding to its comfort. Conversely, the Omnilux mask straps were thin and difficult to feed through the mask's holes and ultimately fasten. I would sometimes have to hold my head at an awkward angle to keep the mask from tipping or shifting. While the CurrentBody version has more LED lights (263 vs. Omnilux's 132), the eye inserts—which function a little bit like rubber inserts in swim goggles—blocked out most of the brightness, making it overall more comfortable than the Omnilux.
LED Lights And Coverage: The Omnilux Contour Face has 132 light-emitting diodes (red and near-infrared), while the CurrentBody Series 2 LED Face Mask has 263 (red, near-infrared and deep near-infrared). I liked that the CurrentBody device has 16 strategically placed deep near-infrared LED lights that offer targeted treatment around the eyes and mouth, which are the primary areas I fixate on in the mirror and where I see most of my fine lines. While both masks offer good facial coverage, the CurrentBody one has an added chin area that better addresses the front of my face and under my chin.
The interior of both the CurrentBody LED face mask and the Omnilux Contour Face is soft and ... More flexible, although the CurrentBody has more LED lights, eye inserts and a chin coverage area.
Accessories: Each mask includes basic accessories—a drawstring storage bag, controller and USB cable. However, there were a few key differences between the two models: The Omnilux model has universal voltage and four different electrical adapters, making it a great choice if you want to use it while traveling internationally. The CurrentBody device features a clip to attach the controller to your waistband so you can be mobile while wearing the device, and it comes with pop-in eye inserts to shield your eyes from bright LED lights. I liked that this allowed me to check emails and do other tasks around the house while wearing it, and it made the wearing the CurrentBody mask less irritating for my eyes.
The Omnilux Contour Face was lightweight and felt soft on skin.
Battery Life: During my testing, both masks had equivalent battery life. I used each one ten times over the recommended period of time and did not have to recharge either.
The Omnilux and the CurrentBody devices are high-quality LED face masks in the $400 range, with the CurrentBody priced higher and featuring a larger number of LEDs as well as an additional light mode. They are both easy to use and wear, and offer similar anti-aging benefits. While the Omnilux mask was slightly more comfortable on my face shape, the CurrentBody mask came out on top for its optimized details. I liked that it has more powerful and targeted LED lights, fuller face coverage due to the additional chin strap area, more secure head straps, and eye inserts to shield eyes from light. However, if you travel often and want to use the mask internationally, the Omnilux device may be a better choice.
I've reported on lifestyle topics for twenty years, with much of that time spent covering beauty. I've written for magazines including Self, Women's Health, Glamour and Cosmopolitan, and I've authored product reviews for Consumer Reports' ShopSmart and NBC Shop Today. I've covered skin topics such as the best skincare for women over 50, the best neck-firming creams and the best microcurrent devices. I find LED face masks to be especially appealing because they are non-invasive, require no downtime, and have clinically proven results.
This story was assigned, edited and produced by Forbes Vetted deputy editor Jane Sung, a beauty journalism veteran who heads the beauty and grooming vertical. She also spearheaded our roundup of the best LED face masks. Prior to testing the CurrentBody LED Light Therapy Mask Series 2 and the Omnilux Contour Face, I spoke with board-certified dermatologist Dr. Rhonda Q. Klein of Modern Dermatology for her expert insights.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Buffett's Berkshire acquires 5 million shares in UnitedHealth
Buffett's Berkshire acquires 5 million shares in UnitedHealth

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Buffett's Berkshire acquires 5 million shares in UnitedHealth

(Reuters) -Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway has acquired 5 million shares in UnitedHealth Group, a regulatory filing showed on Thursday, sending the health insurer's stock up 7% in extended trading. Billionaire investor Buffett owned about 1.18 million shares in UnitedHealth between 2006 and 2009, before selling his entire stake in 2010 amid a broader retreat from health insurers. The investment comes as UnitedHealth faces soaring medical costs, federal investigations, the fallout of the killing of a top executive and a cyberattack last year. The healthcare conglomerate has signaled prolonged pain with a new, far lower profit forecast as it sees billions of additional costs in the upcoming quarters. Shares of the Dow component have slumped 46% so far this year. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Nike co-founder Phil Knight and wife give record $2B to Oregon cancer center, university says
Nike co-founder Phil Knight and wife give record $2B to Oregon cancer center, university says

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Nike co-founder Phil Knight and wife give record $2B to Oregon cancer center, university says

PORTLAND, Ore. (AP) — Nike co-founder Phil Knight and his wife Penny Knight have pledged to donate $2 billion to Oregon Health & Science University's Knight Cancer Institute, the university announced Thursday, describing it as a record-breaking gift. 'This gift is an unprecedented investment in the millions of lives burdened with cancer, especially patients and families here in Oregon,' OHSU President Shereef Elnahal said in a statement. The donation will help ensure patients have access to various resources, including psychological, genetic and financial counseling, symptom management, nutritional support and survivorship care, the university statement said. 'We couldn't be more excited about the transformational potential of this work for humanity,' the Knights said in the statement. The university described it as the 'largest single donation ever made to a U.S. university, college or academic health center.' It surpasses the $1.8 billion given by Michael Bloomberg to Johns Hopkins in 2018, described by that university at the time as the largest single donation to a U.S. university. Knight, Oregon's richest man, donated $500 million to the cancer institute in 2013 on the condition the gift be matched within two years. Universities across the country are struggling with moves from President Donald Trump's administration to cancel or freeze research grants at universities. Solve the daily Crossword

RxSight, Inc. to Present at the Wells Fargo Healthcare Conference
RxSight, Inc. to Present at the Wells Fargo Healthcare Conference

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

RxSight, Inc. to Present at the Wells Fargo Healthcare Conference

ALISO VIEJO, Calif., Aug. 14, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- RxSight, Inc., an ophthalmic medical device company dedicated to providing high-quality customized vision to patients following cataract surgery, today announced plans to participate in the upcoming Wells Fargo Healthcare Conference in Boston. RxSight's management is scheduled to present on Thursday, September 4, 2025, at 7:15 a.m. Pacific Time / 10:15 a.m. Eastern Time. A live and archived webcast of the presentation will be available at: About RxSight, Inc. RxSight, Inc. is an ophthalmic medical device company dedicated to providing high-quality customized vision to patients following cataract surgery. The RxSight® Light Adjustable Lens system, comprised of the RxSight Light Adjustable Lens® (LAL®/LAL+®), RxSight Light Delivery Device (LDD™) and accessories, is the first and only commercially available intraocular lens (IOL) technology that can be adjusted after surgery, enabling doctors to customize and deliver high-quality vision to patients after cataract surgery. Additional information about RxSight can be found at Company Contact:Shelley B. ThunenChief Financial Officersthunen@ Investor Relations Contact:Oliver MoravcevicVP, Investor Relationsomoravcevic@ in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store