Omnilux Vs. CurrentBody: Which LED Face Mask Is Better?
LED face masks have exploded in popularity over the past few years, and a growing number of beauty companies now offer red light therapy masks that are designed to treat visible signs of aging—like fine lines, wrinkles and discoloration—and stimulate collagen production. I put two of the most popular FDA-cleared LED masks—the Omnilux Contour Face and the CurrentBody LED Light Therapy Mask Series 2—to the test in a side-by-side comparison.
During testing, I compared the Omnilux Contour Face and the CurrentBody LED Face Mask Series 2, ... More evaluating their setup, ease of use, comfort and overall capabilities.
These at-home LED devices are a big investment—prices range from about $100 to more than $1500—and they're intended to produce similar results as those available during in-office treatments. While many red light therapy masks look similar at first glance, they feature design differences that can affect their overall comfort and ease of use (read our evaluation of the best LED face masks here). Over the course of weeks, I carefully evaluated the Omnilux and the CurrentBody LED face masks, gauging how easy each one was to set up and use, as well as its comfort level, battery life and overall performance.
Amazon
Forbes Vetted
Forbes Vetted ratings are based on thorough evaluations by our editorial team to help you choose the best products with confidence.
Target areas: Face | Light modes: Red, near-infrared and deep near-infrared | Skin concerns: Fine lines, wrinkles, hyperpigmentation, dullness | Wireless: Yes (with connected controller) | Number of LEDs: 263 | Usage: 10 minutes a day, three to five times per weekBest for:
Skip if:
Planet Beauty
Forbes Vetted
Forbes Vetted ratings are based on thorough evaluations by our editorial team to help you choose the best products with confidence.
Target areas: Face | Light modes: Red, near-infrared | Skin concerns: Fine lines, wrinkles, redness, discoloration | Wireless: Yes (with connected controller) | Number of LEDs: 132 | Usage: 10 minutes, three to five times per week
Best for:
Skip if:
At first glance, the Omnilux and CurrentBody face masks are quite similar. Both are made from soft, flexible silicone that molds closely to the face, which allows for the optimal amount of light to reach areas of concern. They are both wireless and have an attached controller that charges via a USB connector. Both devices feature pre-programmed, 10-minute treatments, and they automatically turn off at the end of each session so you don't have to worry about setting a timer.
Regarding safety, both devices are FDA-cleared and have been subjected to clinical studies. Those who participated in Omnilux's clinical studies reported brighter, plumper skin with less redness. According to CurrentBody Skin, the Series 2 LED mask has been proven to reduce wrinkles by 30% and improve skin plumpness by 57%.
The CurrentBody Skin LED Light Therapy Face Mask Series 2 and the Omnilux Contour Face are both made ... More of flexible silicone and are powered by an attached controller.
Setup: Setting up both masks is extremely easy. For the CurrentBody mask, the brand recommends plugging it in for 4.5 hours for a full charge, so I charged it overnight. (To note: I had to use my own wall charger for the supplied USB-C power cord.) For the Omnilux mask, I plugged it in for about three hours until the three indicator lights were all illuminated, indicating a full charge. Per the company's instructions, I ensured the mask was not attached to the controller while charging. The only other part of the setup was attaching the Velcro straps to the back of each mask, which was intuitive and quick.
Ease Of Use: I was relieved that neither LED mask required a huge learning curve, which can be the case with some beauty tech devices. I used the same steps for both masks: I washed and dried my face and then affixed the Velcro straps behind my head to secure each mask for a close fit. I pressed and briefly held each mask's controller button to begin the 10-minute session. When the treatment is done, it automatically shuts off so there's no potential for exceeding the recommended time.
I like that the CurrentBody mask has a secure fit and good face coverage.
Comfort: Both masks are constructed from soft, flexible silicone, so there are no annoyingly sharp or rigid edges; they are both quite comfortable overall. Neither felt particularly heavy (the CurrentBody device plus its cord and controller weighs 16.5 ounces, and the Omnilux with its attached cord and controller weighs 12.05 ounces). However, I have a larger bridge on my nose, and I found that the nose area of the CurrentBody would cause slight irritation by the end of each session and leave a red mark.
They both feature stretchy, adjustable Velcro straps, with some differences. I preferred the straps on the CurrentBody mask because the main, back-of-the-head strap was wide, supportive and easy to fasten. The additional over-the-head strap kept the mask secure and prevented it from shifting when I got up and moved around, adding to its comfort. Conversely, the Omnilux mask straps were thin and difficult to feed through the mask's holes and ultimately fasten. I would sometimes have to hold my head at an awkward angle to keep the mask from tipping or shifting. While the CurrentBody version has more LED lights (263 vs. Omnilux's 132), the eye inserts—which function a little bit like rubber inserts in swim goggles—blocked out most of the brightness, making it overall more comfortable than the Omnilux.
LED Lights And Coverage: The Omnilux Contour Face has 132 light-emitting diodes (red and near-infrared), while the CurrentBody Series 2 LED Face Mask has 263 (red, near-infrared and deep near-infrared). I liked that the CurrentBody device has 16 strategically placed deep near-infrared LED lights that offer targeted treatment around the eyes and mouth, which are the primary areas I fixate on in the mirror and where I see most of my fine lines. While both masks offer good facial coverage, the CurrentBody one has an added chin area that better addresses the front of my face and under my chin.
The interior of both the CurrentBody LED face mask and the Omnilux Contour Face is soft and ... More flexible, although the CurrentBody has more LED lights, eye inserts and a chin coverage area.
Accessories: Each mask includes basic accessories—a drawstring storage bag, controller and USB cable. However, there were a few key differences between the two models: The Omnilux model has universal voltage and four different electrical adapters, making it a great choice if you want to use it while traveling internationally. The CurrentBody device features a clip to attach the controller to your waistband so you can be mobile while wearing the device, and it comes with pop-in eye inserts to shield your eyes from bright LED lights. I liked that this allowed me to check emails and do other tasks around the house while wearing it, and it made the wearing the CurrentBody mask less irritating for my eyes.
The Omnilux Contour Face was lightweight and felt soft on skin.
Battery Life: During my testing, both masks had equivalent battery life. I used each one ten times over the recommended period of time and did not have to recharge either.
The Omnilux and the CurrentBody devices are high-quality LED face masks in the $400 range, with the CurrentBody priced higher and featuring a larger number of LEDs as well as an additional light mode. They are both easy to use and wear, and offer similar anti-aging benefits. While the Omnilux mask was slightly more comfortable on my face shape, the CurrentBody mask came out on top for its optimized details. I liked that it has more powerful and targeted LED lights, fuller face coverage due to the additional chin strap area, more secure head straps, and eye inserts to shield eyes from light. However, if you travel often and want to use the mask internationally, the Omnilux device may be a better choice.
I've reported on lifestyle topics for twenty years, with much of that time spent covering beauty. I've written for magazines including Self, Women's Health, Glamour and Cosmopolitan, and I've authored product reviews for Consumer Reports' ShopSmart and NBC Shop Today. I've covered skin topics such as the best skincare for women over 50, the best neck-firming creams and the best microcurrent devices. I find LED face masks to be especially appealing because they are non-invasive, require no downtime, and have clinically proven results.
This story was assigned, edited and produced by Forbes Vetted deputy editor Jane Sung, a beauty journalism veteran who heads the beauty and grooming vertical. She also spearheaded our roundup of the best LED face masks. Prior to testing the CurrentBody LED Light Therapy Mask Series 2 and the Omnilux Contour Face, I spoke with board-certified dermatologist Dr. Rhonda Q. Klein of Modern Dermatology for her expert insights.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
ProZenith Launches Natural Supplement Formulated for Weight Management Support
U.S.-Made Product Supports General Wellness Goals with a 60-Day Refund Policy Aurora, June 06, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- ProZenith recently announced the launch of its new wellness supplement developed to assist individuals in maintaining energy, focus, and mindful appetite awareness as part of a balanced and active lifestyle. Manufactured in the United States in a facility that is FDA-registered and GMP-certified, the product is now available through official online channels. ProZenith is intended for individuals pursuing support for general weight management and overall well-being. Its formulation includes select ingredients chosen to align with healthy routines and support individuals seeking help managing non-hunger-related snacking behaviors. Each purchase of ProZenith is covered by a 60-day refund policy, reflecting the company's customer-first return assurance framework. All ProZenith supplements are manufactured without genetically modified ingredients and adhere to U.S. quality standards. Production takes place in an FDA-registered facility that complies with current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP). ProZenith is currently available through the company's official online platform at with multiple purchase options provided for convenience. About ProZenith ProZenith develops nutritional supplements designed to support individuals on their wellness journeys. The company emphasizes high-quality manufacturing, transparency, and customer satisfaction as it continues to expand its product offerings for health-conscious consumers. For customer support inquiries, contact:support@ Disclaimer:This product has not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. Media Contact: Company: ProZenith Address: 19655 E 35th Dr #100, Aurora, CO 80011 Email: support@ Order Phone Support: (925) 217-7353 CONTACT: Company: ProZenith Address: 19655 E 35th Dr #100, Aurora, CO 80011 Email: support@ Order Phone Support: (925) 217-7353Sign in to access your portfolio
WebMD
29 minutes ago
- WebMD
The Next-Gen Sweetener You May Be Eating
June 6, 2025 – It's time to add the word "neotame" to your ingredient label watch list, especially if you vape. It's a relatively new artificial sweetener found in every disposable e-cigarette that researchers tested – and the ultra-sweet substance is increasingly being used in food and drink. You probably have heard of aspartame. But neotame is its lesser-known sibling, with just one molecular difference. It showed up in laboratory tests of 11 top disposable e-cigarette brands when researchers from Duke and Yale Universities were trying to figure out what makes the vapes, like Elf and Geek Bars, so, so sweet. Neotame is between 7,000 and 13,000 times sweeter than table sugar and up to 65 times sweeter than aspartame. The sweetened e-cig study results were published this week in The Journal of the American Medical Association, or JAMA. Neotame wasn't found in JUUL or other cartridge-based devices, which have their own checkered ingredient history, including the 2019 finding that the sucralose used in them was linked to the production of toxic aerosols. Even if you don't vape, you may already be consuming neotame, since it's found in baked goods, candy (Mentos, for example), and gum – plus salad dressing, fruit spreads, dairy desserts, and yogurt. It's also used in some flavored sparkling waters and drinks like Tampico Mango Punch. Some researchers have soured on neotame because its use makes e-cigs appealing to young people, and because lab tests show it may harm our intestines when ingested. Why You've Never Heard of Neotame Maybe you saw it on an ingredient label and passed over it sometime in the past two decades. It has zero calories, no nutritional value, and was FDA-approved as a food additive in 2002. It's not listed on disposable e-cigarette packaging. Researchers track these sweeteners. Havovi Chichger, PhD, a professor at Anglia Ruskin University in Cambridge, England, says that for more than four decades, we have been consuming "traditional" artificial sweeteners like acesulfame potassium (Ace-K), sucralose, saccharin, and aspartame. But newer substances like neotame "herald the next generation of sweet additives," she said. The substance was developed in the 1990s in a quest for a more stable sweetener for processed products, and its use has steadily grown, she said. It's even used now in some lip cosmetics that have a sweet flavor and aroma. Neotame has also become the 21st-century spoonful of sugar Mary Poppins sang about: It's used to make some pharmaceuticals more palatable. According to a website about neotame set up by Georgia-based maker NutraSweet Co., neotame has an "ability to mask the taste of supplements, vitamins, bitter food ingredients and active pharmaceuticals. Moreover, its high sweetness intensity allows formulation at very small quantities, leaving ample room for your pharmaceutical ingredients." Neotame is not, however, approved for use in products that are inhaled. Why Neotame Is Used in E-Cigarettes – and in Baked Goods The liquid vaporized by e-cigarettes is heated sometimes as hot as 800 degrees Fahrenheit, said Sven Jordt, PhD, senior author of the JAMA study and a Duke University professor who is an expert in chemical sensory biology. Heating vape liquid can chemically change its ingredients, and neotame's strong sweetness and heat stability seem to have led to its new use in vapes, he said. If a lot of a sweetener is burned up or chemically changed when heated, the desired taste profile can still be achieved if just a bit of the ultra-sweetness remains. "The FDA also has determined that neotame can be used for baking, for example, because it's more heat stable than many of the other sweeteners," Jordt said. "Sweeteners like aspartame or Ace K, they are basically burned at normal baking temperatures. However, with neotame, a large proportion survives baking and likely also survives being vaporized by e-cigarettes." His team is concerned that the sweetness makes the products particularly attractive to kids. It's not used in the few e-cigarettes that are legal to sell in the U.S. and was just found in the disposable ones that are illegal but widely available amid lack of enforcement. "We did this study specifically because this category of disposable e-cigarettes is seeing an explosive growth in sales and use," Jordt said, noting that their nicotine concentration is higher than in older products, and at a fraction of the price. "You buy this once and then you can use it a whole week. And kids are puffing on these all the time," he said. "Some have like 15,000 or 20,000 puffs [compared to a few hundred puffs in the older JUUL devices]. So if you use this continuously, you become really heavily addicted to nicotine … and now we are asking: Is it just the design or is there something else in it that makes them much more attractive to kids to use and make them taste better? And then we found this neotame." The Damage Neotame Can Cause Approval of neotame for use in food products was based on studies on mice and other animals that didn't show any adverse physical effects. But what about the effects on humans? Findings published last year suggest that neotame can damage the human intestine. "Neotame can cause previously healthy gut bacteria to become diseased and invade the gut wall – potentially leading to health issues including irritable bowel syndrome and sepsis – and also cause a breakdown of the epithelial barrier, which forms part of the gut wall," said Chichger, who is a cell and molecular biologist and senior author of the study, which was published in the journal Frontiers in Nutrition. The study showed that neotame can damage the "intestinal epithelium," or lining, by causing the death of epithelial cells. It also damages bacteria commonly found in the gut, she added. "Despite the smaller quantities used, the impact of neotame on the epithelium-microbiota relationship has the potential to cause poor gut health, which in turn could lead to metabolic and inflammatory diseases." The findings were the latest in a line of studies showing the effects of artificial sweeteners on gut health. Another recent study led by Los Angeles-based endocrinologist Ruchi Mathur, MD, linked artificial sweeteners to changes in the microbial composition and diversity in stool and the small intestine. That research, which was published in the journal Cell, didn't include neotame. Changes observed in the gut microbiome's biochemical activity "raise concerns regarding the potential impacts of non-sugar sweeteners on metabolic and gastrointestinal health," said Mathur, who is director of the Diabetes Outpatient Teaching Education Center and a professor of medicine at Cedars-Sinai in California. All the experts interviewed for this article said that while there's not enough data to say for sure that inhaling neotame is bad for you, the existing research suggests reasons to be cautious. When you vape, some of the "smoke" can mix with saliva and get swallowed – so neotame could reach your gut, Chichger said. "In fact, there are other studies which show that e-cigarette fluid can cause the same level of damage that we noted from neotame." Unanswered Questions About Neotame Big questions about neotame: How does it affect the lungs? How can we keep track of how much we've consumed (eating, drinking, or inhaling)? And how much is too much? "These sweeteners are only approved for use in food, but not for inhalation," Jordt said. "We don't know how safe they are if you inhale them every day." Mathur noted that the lungs have their own microbiome, and past studies have shown that vaping alters saliva as well as the nasal cavity microbiome. A large study published in March showed a significant link between exclusive e-cigarette use and development of COPD. The FDA has set daily intake limits for neotame, which is sometimes referred to by the brand name Newtame, and other sweeteners. But experts say there is no labeling requirement that shows consumers how much is included in a product, whether it's food, drink, or vape liquid. Jordt said it's unlikely someone would reach that limit by vaping alone. But if you also eat products with the sweetener, then exceeding that limit becomes more likely. "I do think it is reasonable to assume that there should be consumer awareness and caution, as there is little if any data on what happens when this substance is inhaled," Mathur said. You should also be aware of artificial sweeteners in food and drink, Mathur said. Make a plan with your doctor, especially if eating artificially sweetened foods is part of how you manage your body weight or diabetes. "There is enough data to suggest it is safe to use these non-sugar sweeteners in moderation," Mathur said. "If someone uses artificial sweeteners in non-traditional ways, such as inhaling it through an e-cigarette, they are doing so without the benefit of any good information on the potential long-term consequences of taking in the substance through their airways and down into their lungs or what byproducts may be created in the process."
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Tampa Police get 300 new lifesaving choking devices from New York-based company
The Brief A company based in New York donated choking rescue devices to the Tampa Police Department. The devices, which are called LifeVac, create a one-way suction to remove lodged food or objects from a choking victim. These devices will be distributed to officers soon. TAMPA, Fla. - A New York-based company donated 300 choking rescue devices to the Tampa Police Department. These devices, called LifeVac, create a one-way suction to remove lodged food or objects from a choking victim. "This is just another tool for us, especially for our youth, to be out there and provide another opportunity to save a life," Tampa Police Chief Lee Bercaw said of the donation. The backstory Last month,a Tampa police officer used back blows to help save a toddler who was choking on a tomato. "That's the reason that we're getting this donation," Bercaw said Friday of the bodycam video. "[LifeVac inventor] Mr. Lih saw that video and said, 'I've got to get that product down here in a generous donation.'" "I knew as a parent, I'd be freaking out. I would be very distressed. So I tried to come up with something really simple. You push it, pull it, and that suction pulls it out," LifeVac President and Creator Arthur Lih said. These devices will be distributed to officers soon. Bercaw told FOX 13 the devices will be placed in patrol cars and will be used in schools and at Police Athletic League youth activities. Dig deeper As shown in LifeVac's online instructional video, the New York-based company said people should first follow choking protocols established by the American Red Cross. That means doing back blows and abdominal thrusts first. And if those actions don't work – or if those actions cannot be completed for whatever reason – then a LifeVac device can come into play. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) encourages people to follow established choking rescue protocols by the American Red Cross and the American Heart Association. In an April 2024 update, the FDA said these protocols do not include anti-choking devices: "The safety and effectiveness of anti-choking devices that are being sold over-the-counter have not been established; they are not FDA approved or cleared." Success Stories Just this week, a Georgia police officer used a LifeVac device to save a driver choking on a water bottle cap. Years ago, LifeVac devices were placed in every school in Sarasota County. The Source The information in this story was gathered by FOX 13's Ariel Plasencia.
