
Electric passenger aircraft could take flight with sodium fuel cells
Electric-powered aircraft and zero-emissions flights may be a step closer after scientists unveiled a new fuel cell they believe has 'revolutionary' potential.
In laboratory tests, the cell — which runs on the realtively cheap fuel of sodium and air — was able to deliver far more energy than a conventional battery of the same weight. As an added bonus, it produces a chemical by-product that could be used to remove CO₂ from the atmosphere.
In aviation, the energy density of a power source — the amount of energy stored per unit of weight — is critical.
Aircraft must be as light as possible to achieve lift and to maximise range, and the lithium-ion batteries used in electric cars have too low an energy density to power most aircraft. Without a large boost in energy density, electric-powered flight remains impractical for all but the smallest aircraft over short distances.
In laboratory tests the prototype fuel cell delivered more than five times as much energy per kilogram as the lithium-ion batteries currently used for cars.
In a study published in the journal Joule, a team from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology reported that a prototype version achieved energy densities of more than 1,500 watt-hours per kilogram — far beyond the 250 to 300 Wh/kg typical of lithium-ion batteries. In a real-life system, they believe that would translate to more than 1,000 Wh/kg – a threshold seen as necessary to make electric-powered regional aviation viable.
'People have been aware of the energy density you could get with metal-air batteries for a very long time,' Professor Yet-Ming Chiang of MIT, a senior author of the study, said. 'It's been hugely attractive, but it's just never been realised in practice.'
The device is based on well-established electrochemical principles. Unlike conventional batteries, which must be recharged, it is designed to be refuelled, with its energy-rich material being replaced as it is consumed.
At the simplest level, it works by combining liquid sodium metal with oxygen drawn from the air. On one side of the fuel cell, sodium atoms give up electrons, generating an electric current. Sodium ions — positively charged atoms missing an electron — pass through a solid ceramic electrolyte, while the electrons travel through an external circuit to do useful work.
On the opposite side, the sodium ions meet oxygen from the air, completing the circuit. As long as sodium is supplied and air is available, the reaction continues.
One striking feature of the system is that its chemical byproducts could absorb CO₂ from the air. As sodium reacts with oxygen, it forms sodium oxide, which converts into sodium hydroxide in the presence of moisture. This compound readily absorbs carbon dioxide, producing sodium carbonate and ultimately sodium bicarbonate — the same substance found in baking soda.
'There's this natural cascade of reactions that happens when you start with sodium metal,' Chiang said. 'It's all spontaneous. We don't have to do anything to make it happen — we just have to fly the airplane.'
If the final product, sodium bicarbonate, were to end up in the ocean, it could help to de-acidify the water. This could counter one of the damaging effects of excess carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.
Using sodium hydroxide to capture CO₂ has previously been proposed as a method of mitigating the effects of emissions, but has not been economically viable on its own. 'Here, it's a byproduct,' Chiang said. 'It's essentially free, producing environmental benefits at no cost.'
The team has developed two laboratory-scale versions of the device. A start-up company, Propel Aero, has been established to advance the technology. The first goal is to produce a brick-sized fuel cell capable of delivering around 1,000 Wh/kg, enough to power a large drone.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
12 minutes ago
- The Guardian
23andMe back on the auction block after former CEO makes 11th-hour bid
DNA testing company 23andMe is back up for sale, throwing a purchase agreement reached last month into chaos, court filings show. The board of directors of 23andMe, which filed for bankruptcy in March, had agreed to sell the company and its assets to pharmaceutical firm Regeneron for $256m after conducting an auction in April. However, the founder and former CEO of the genetics company, Anne Wojcicki, put in a $305m bid through a newly formed non-profit, TTAM Research Institute, after the auction ended and pushed the bankruptcy court to re-open the sale process. She tried to buy the company multiple times during its long decline and bankruptcy but was rejected by the board. TTAM's offer of $305m will serve as a starting price for the secondary sale process, and Regeneron will be permitted to submit a competing bid that is at least $10m more. Both companies will be able to then submit a final offer. Whoever loses will qualify for a $10m breakup fee, according to the Wall Street Journal, which first reported the news. Sign up to TechScape A weekly dive in to how technology is shaping our lives after newsletter promotion The reopening of the auction puts the valuable trove of DNA data that 23andMe has accrued back on the market. Consumer concerns over who will control their data after a sale and what they would do with it prompted hundreds of 23andMe customers to delete their DNA info from the site. As part of its acquisition, Regeneron said it would comply with 23andMe's privacy policies and applicable laws with respect to the use of customer data. In the weeks since the acquisition was agreed upon, Regeneron said that it had already started to work with a consumer privacy ombudsman and was 'preparing to work with regulators, among others, to assure all interested stakeholders that 23andMe will be in safe hands and will not face the data breach issues that plagued it in the past', according to court filings. Regeneron agreed to the terms of the secondary sale but in court filings lamented that TTAM was permitted to submit the bid after the auction closed in spite of rules that prohibited such late bids. The company accused both TTAM and 23andMe of violating the court-ordered bidding procedures, including the deadline for bids and overbids. 'Since the auction ended, Regeneron has been subject to remarkably unfair treatment,' court filings read. 'Despite auction rules that unambiguously prohibit bids after the auction, and that likewise prohibit bidders from seeking to reopen the auction, TTAM—a vehicle controlled by the Debtors' former CEO, which participated at every stage of the auction—has submitted a flurry of new bids and has pressed non-stop to reopen the auction.' Regeneron further pointed to an eighth circuit ruling that warned against allowing buyers to 'bide[] its time during the auction, taking an opportunity to survey the landscape of the sale, only later to submit an upset bid at the lowest possible price'. The company also cited Wojcicki's previous failed attempts to purchase the company or take it private. 'In short, and given that history, no bidder would ever voluntarily participate in an auction in which the Wojcicki Parties, who led the company into this proceeding, could use the auction process as a vehicle for price discovery, with a one-way option to reopen the process—and to bid again—after the auction concludes,' Regeneron's attorneys wrote in court filings. 23andMe, Regeneron and TTAM did not respond to requests for comment.


The Independent
39 minutes ago
- The Independent
Tesla stock plunges as Musk's feud with Trump over GOP tax bill spooks investors
Shares of Elon Musk's electric vehicle maker are falling sharply Thursday as investors fear his dispute with President Donald Trump could end up hurting the company. Tesla plunged more than 10% in the afternoon as a disagreement over the U.S. president's budget bill turned nasty. After Musk said that Trump wouldn't haven't gotten elected without his help, Trump implied that he may turn the federal government against his company. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' Trump wrote on his social messaging service Truth Social. 'I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' The drop on Thursday wiped out more than $100 billion from Tesla's market value, partially reversing a big runup in the eight weeks since Musk confirmed that Tesla would testing an autonomous, driverless 'robotaxi' service in Austin, Texas, this month. Investors fear Trump might not be in such a rush to usher in a future of self-driving cars in the U.S., and that could slam Tesla because so much of its future business depends on that. 'There is a fear that Trump is not going to play Mr. Nice Guy when in come to autonomous,' said Wedbush Securities analyst Dan Ives. 'The whole goal of robotaxis is to have them 20 or 25 cities next year. If you start to heighten the regulatory environment, that could delay that path.' Tesla shares doubled in the weeks after Trump was elected, hitting an all-time high on Dec. 17. They gave back those gains and more during Musk's time as head of a government cost-cutting group. In April, Musk vowed to focus much more on Tesla and its upcoming launch of driverless taxis, pushing up the value of the company on the market by more than $400 billion.


Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Google fends off part of textbook publisher lawsuit over ads
June 5 (Reuters) - Google (GOOGL.O), opens new tab has convinced a Manhattan federal court to dismiss part of a lawsuit from a group of top educational publishers that accused the tech giant of unlawfully promoting pirated electronic versions of their textbooks. U.S. District Judge Jennifer Rochon said on Wednesday, opens new tab that Cengage Learning ( opens new tab, McGraw Hill, Macmillan Learning and Elsevier failed to support their allegations that Google committed vicarious copyright infringement or violated New York state law. The judge also found, however, that Google could not escape the publishers' trademark infringement claim at an early part of the case. Rochon also allowed a separate publisher claim for contributory copyright infringement to continue, which Google had not yet asked the court to dismiss. The publishers said in a statement on Thursday that they were pleased with the decision to allow some of their claims to move forward, and that dismissing their other claims "will not save Google from having to explain why a company with its resources decided to side with blatant piracy, rather than with creators and copyright holders." A Google spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Thursday. The publishers sued Google last year, arguing that Google searches for their textbooks feature heavily discounted, pirated e-book versions at the top of the results and "drown out" results for the legitimate versions. They said Google ignored thousands of copyright infringement notices and profited from sales of pirated books. Google denied the allegations and said the e-books "are not sold through Google's platform and Google does not share in revenues from such sales." Rochon said in her ruling on Wednesday that the publishers' vicarious copyright infringement claim failed because Google could not control the pirate sellers' alleged misconduct. The judge also rejected Google's request to dismiss the publishers' trademark infringement claim, finding that the tech giant could be responsible for the pirate sellers' misuse of the publishers' trademarks. The case is Cengage Learning Inc v. Google LLC, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, No. 1:24-cv-04274. For the publishers: Matt Oppenheim and Michele Murphy of Oppenheim + Zebrak For Google: Sy Damle, Alli Stillman, Joe Wetzel and Sarah Tomkowiak of Latham & Watkins Read more: Google sued by top textbook publishers over ads for pirated e-books