logo
How the Internet of Things impacts everyone's privacy

How the Internet of Things impacts everyone's privacy

Fast Company26-06-2025
Some unusual witnesses helped convict Alex Murdaugh of the murders of his wife, Maggie, and son, Paul.
The first was Bubba, Maggie's yellow Labrador retriever. Prosecutors used a recording of Bubba to place Alex at the site of the murders. Given Alex's presence at the crime scene, other witnesses then revealed his movements, tracked his speed and explained what he had in his hands. Those other witnesses were a 2021 Chevy Suburban and Maggie, Paul and Alex's cellphones, which all provided data. They're all part of the Internet of Things, also known as IoT.
The privacy implications of devices connected to the internet are not often the most important consideration in solving a murder case. But outside of criminal prosecution, they affect people's privacy in ways that should give everyone pause.
The Internet of Things
The Internet of Things includes any object or device that automatically sends and receives data via the internet. When you use your phone to message someone or social media to post something, the sharing is deliberate. But the automatic nature of connected devices effectively cuts humans out of the loop. The data from these devices can reveal a lot about the people who interact with them—and about other people around the devices.
As an assistant professor of law at the University of South Carolina, I have watched as new kinds of connected devices have entered the market. New devices mean new ways to collect data about people.
Connected devices collect information from different contexts. Take your refrigerator. As a non-IoT device, your fridge generated no data about your kitchen, your food, or how often you peeked inside. Your relationship with the fridge was effectively private. Only you knew about that midnight snack or whether you ogled a coworker's lunch.
Now, smart refrigerators can respond to voice commands, show images of the items in your fridge, track who opens it, suggest recipes, generate grocery lists and even contact your car to let you know the milk has expired. All these functions require continuous streams of data.
Device data and your privacy
Connected devices generate lots of data in contexts that have typically produced little data to make those situations 'legible' to whoever can access the data.
In the past, if you wanted to monitor your heart rate, blood oxygenation, sleep patterns, and stress levels, you might have undergone a battery of tests at a hospital. Specialized equipment in a controlled setting would have measured your body and make these parts of you visible to highly trained, licensed professionals. But now, devices such as the Oura Ring track and analyze all that information continuously, in non-health care contexts.
Even if you don't mind sharing data with an Internet of Things company, there are privacy risks to using a device like this. In the health care context, a series of rules enforced by several groups make sure that connected equipment and the data the equipment generates have adequate cybersecurity protections. Away from that context, connected devices that perform similar functions don't have to meet the same cybersecurity standards.
The U.S. Cyber Trust Mark program, administered by the Federal Communications Commission, is developing cybersecurity standards for Internet of Things devices. But the program is voluntary. In some states, such as Washington, state laws set standards for protecting health data from connected devices. But these laws don't cover all data from all devices in all contexts. This leaves the devices, and the data they generate, particularly vulnerable to unwanted access by hackers.
Your inability to control who sees the data that connected devices gather is another privacy risk. It can give advertisers insights about potential customers. Absent a mandated opt-out, each device provider can decide what it does with customer data. Amazon, for example, recently removed the 'Do Not Send Voice Recordings' option from the privacy settings of its popular smart speaker, Alexa.
Some connected-device providers participate in data markets, selling your data to the highest bidder. Sometimes those purchasers include government agencies. So, instead of needing a warrant to track your whereabouts or learn about activity in your home, they can purchase or access Internet of Things records.
A connected device can also compromise the data privacy of someone who just happens to be nearby.
Connected cars
Cars have joined the ranks of the Internet of Things. The 2021 Chevy Suburban that helped convict Alex Murdaugh simply tracked information about the vehicle. This included the vehicle's speed, the turning radius of the steering wheel, and time stamps.
Most modern vehicles also incorporate data from external sources. GPS data and infotainment systems that connect to cellphones also track the vehicle's movements. All of this data can also be used to track the whereabouts and behavior of drivers and other people in the vehicles.
And as vehicles become increasingly automated, they need to make driving decisions in increasingly complex situations. To make safe driving decisions, they need data about the world around them. They need to know the size, speed, and behavior of all the nearby vehicles on the roadway, moment to moment. They need to instantly identify the best way to avoid a pedestrian, cyclist or other object entering the roadway.
If you and I are driving in separate cars on the same roadway, it means my car is collecting information about you. And if my vehicle is connected, then data about you is being shared with other cars and car companies. In other words, if a Tesla had been present at the scene of the Murdaugh murders, its outward facing cameras could have captured footage. Bubba's testimony might not have been necessary.
Spillover data collection
Internet of Things devices generate data from similar situations in a highly structured way. Therefore, what data collectors learn about me from my connected device may also give them insights about someone else in a similar situation.
Take smart meters that share information with the water utility every 15 minutes. Imagine a subdivision with a narrow range of house and yard sizes. Water usage should be relatively comparable for each household. Data from even just a couple of houses can give a good sense of what water use should be for everyone in the neighborhood. Without actually collecting data from each house, data from connected devices reveals potentially private information about similarly situated people.
Data from IoT devices can also fuel insights into people who never use or make contact with these devices. Aggregated data from Oura Rings, for instance, could contribute to decisions a health insurer makes about you.
Connected devices are also changing. In addition to collecting data about the person using the device, a growing number of sensors collect information about the environment around that person.
Some of my research has examined what privacy means for people observed by vehicle sensor systems such as radar, lidar, and sonar. These technologies capture potentially very revealing information about people and their property. Even the most comprehensive privacy laws in the United States offer people little recourse for the impact to their privacy.
Civilian drones are capable of gathering data about other people. But people observed by drones would have a tough time learning that data about them exists and an even harder time controlling how that information might be used.
Meanwhile, artificial intelligence systems are expanding the ways Internet of Things data can affect the privacy of other people by automating the process of training IoT systems. AI chipmaker Nvidia has created a digital environment, or model, where people can upload their connected device data. This environment can help train IoT devices to ' predict the outcomes of the device's interactions with other people,' according to Nvidia.
Models like this make it easy for AI devices that you don't own to collect data or reach conclusions about you. In other words, IoT data processed by AI can make inferences about you, rendering you legible to the AI system even before you interact with an IoT device.
Looking forward
Internet of Things devices and the data they generate are here to stay. As the world becomes increasingly automated, I believe it's important to be more aware of the way connected devices may be affecting people's privacy.
The story of how vehicle data combined with cell data in the Murdaugh trial is a case in point. At the start of the trial, prosecutors came ready to show 'phone call logs and texts, steps recorded, apps asking for information, GPS locations, changes when the phone went from vertical portrait mode to horizontal landscape mode and back, and—key to the prosecution's case—when the camera was activated.'
But that was probably not enough to merit a conviction. During the trial, GM called and said something like ' oh wait, we found something,' according to the prosecution. That vehicle data, combined with the cellphone data, told a story that Alex Murdaugh could not deny.
There are at least two lessons from this story. First, not even GM fully realized all the data it had collected in its vehicles. It's important to be aware of just how much information IoT devices are collecting. Second, combining data from different IoT devices revealed incontestable details of Alex Murdaugh's activities. Away from criminal court, combining data from multiple IoT devices can have a profound effect on people's privacy.
If people's data privacy matters, how do we address this reality? One way of potentially protecting people's privacy is to make sure people and communities observed by connected devices have a direct say in what data the devices collect and how the data is used.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump calls on Federal Reserve governor Lisa Cook to resign, renewing attack on central bank
Trump calls on Federal Reserve governor Lisa Cook to resign, renewing attack on central bank

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump calls on Federal Reserve governor Lisa Cook to resign, renewing attack on central bank

Donald Trump has called on a Federal Reserve governor to immediately resign, renewing his extraordinary attack on the central bank's independence as officials mull next steps on interest rates. A close Trump ally accused Lisa Cook, an appointee of Joe Biden, of 'potentially committing mortgage fraud' and urged the US Department of Justice to investigate. The claims have not been confirmed. The US president has repeatedly broken with precedent in recent months to demand the Fed cut rates and urge its chair, Jerome Powell, to quit after disregarding such calls. On Wednesday, Trump leaped on the allegations about Cook. The governor 'must resign, now!!!' he wrote on Truth Social, his social media platform. Cook and the Fed did not respond to requests for comment. Cook, whose current term on the Fed's board extends until 2038, previously served on the council of economic advisers under Barack Obama. When she took office in May 2022, she became the first Black woman to sit on the central bank's board. This morning, Bill Pulte, head of the US Federal Housing Finance Agency, who has become – beyond the president himself – one of the Trump administration's most vocal critics of Powell and the Fed, published allegations against Cook. In June 2021, Cook entered into a 15-year mortgage agreement on a property in Ann Arbor, Michigan, and declared her intention to use it as her principal residence, according to Pulte. In July 2021, Cook bought a property in Atlanta, Georgia, and also committed to use that property as her primary residence when taking out a 30-year mortgage, according to Pulte. Pulte referred Cook to the justice department for a criminal investigation, and promptly called on her to resign. 'How can this woman be in charge of interest rates if she is allegedly lying to help her own interest rates?' he wrote on X, formerly Twitter. Cook, who has not commented on the allegations, is the latest figure to be targeted by Trump officials over claims of mortgage fraud. Pulte has made similar allegations about the New York attorney general, Letitia James, and the California senator Adam Schiff, both Democrats. The justice department is reportedly investigating. James has dismissed the claims as 'baseless'. Schiff has vehemently denied the allegations, and accused the administration of weaponizing the US justice system. As Trump and his officials continue to pressure the Fed to cut rates, new minutes from the central bank's latest meeting underlined how most policymakers plan to scrutinize data over the coming weeks to gauge the economic impact of the administration's policies. While Fed policymakers again opted to leave its benchmark interest rate unchanged in July, two of its governors opposed the decision – the first time that multiple governors have voted against the majority since 1993. Fed officials 'assessed that the effects of higher tariffs had become more apparent in the prices of some goods but that their overall effects on economic activity and inflation remained to be seen,' the minutes said. 'They also noted that it would take time to have more clarity on the magnitude and persistence of higher tariffs' effects on inflation.' After the meeting, official employment data showed that jobs growth stalled this summer – prompting Trump to fire the federal government official in charge of labor statistics – as inflation continued to rise. The two governors who called for rate cuts, Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman, were each appointed by Trump during his first term. Both have been floated as potential replacements for Powell, whose term as chair will end next May. Powell is due to deliver a highly-anticipated speech at the annual Jackson Hole Economic Policy Symposium in Wyoming on Friday, which will be closely scrutinized for signs of where the Fed plans to take rates over the coming months.

Trump Jr.-Linked Thumzup Expands Into Dogecoin, Litecoin Mining With Dogehash Deal
Trump Jr.-Linked Thumzup Expands Into Dogecoin, Litecoin Mining With Dogehash Deal

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Jr.-Linked Thumzup Expands Into Dogecoin, Litecoin Mining With Dogehash Deal

Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. Thumzup Media Corporation, a digital-asset treasury company backed by Donald Trump Jr., announced Tuesday it will acquire Dogehash Technologies, a Dogecoin (CRYPTO: DOGE) and Litecoin (CRYPTO: LTC) mining firm, in an all-stock transaction. The deal, which will see Dogehash shareholders exchange their holdings for 30.7 million shares of Thumzup, will create a combined entity called Dogehash Technologies Holdings, Inc. The new company will trade on the Nasdaq under the symbol "XDOG" upon closing, expected in the fourth quarter of 2025, the company announced. Trending: The same firms that backed Uber, Venmo and eBay are investing in this pre-IPO company disrupting a $1.8T market — Dogehash currently operates roughly 2,500 Scrypt ASIC miners in North America, with expansion planned throughout 2026. The miner's operations are concentrated in a renewable-energy powered data center with satellite sites being added. The fleet is expected to deliver significant Dogecoin and Litecoin block rewards while maintaining low-cost, high-uptime operations. The transaction follows Thumzup's $50 million all-stock offering in July, which provided capital for mining infrastructure expansion and accumulation of digital assets for its treasury strategy. "This accelerates our evolution from a digital-marketing platform into a diversified digital-asset infrastructure and treasury company," said Robert Steele, CEO of Thumzup. "Dogehash brings world-class mining expertise, low-cost renewable power and access to cutting-edge Scrypt miners."Dogehash CEO Parker Scott said the merger highlights the firm's long-term bet on utility-scale mining. "Unlike many companies that simply used their cash to buy cryptocurrency, we have invested in mining infrastructure," he said. "By owning and operating our own fleet of ASICs, we generate revenue directly from production, creating an ongoing, sustainable source of Dogecoin." The partnership will also leverage Dogecoin's Layer-2 staking infrastructure through the DogeOS ecosystem to amplify miner returns beyond block rewards. If approved by shareholders, the deal positions Thumzup-Dogehash as one of the largest dedicated Dogecoin mining companies with a hybrid focus on digital-asset production and treasury accumulation. Read Next: 'Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. You can invest today for just $0.30/share. If there was a new fund backed by Jeff Bezos offering a 7-9% target yield with monthly dividends would you invest in it? Image: Shutterstock This article Trump Jr.-Linked Thumzup Expands Into Dogecoin, Litecoin Mining With Dogehash Deal originally appeared on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store