'Rising Uncertainty In Nature Of Future Threats': Chief Of Defence Staff
New Delhi:
As "we navigate the stormy geopolitical arena" of the 21st century, there is a "rising" uncertainty in the nature, type and timing of future threats, Chief of Defence Staff (CDS) Gen Anil Chauhan says this in his new book. The book, titled "Ready, Relevant and Resurgent: A Blueprint for the Transformation of India's Military", was released by Defence Minister Rajnath Singh here on Thursday.
It is rare that a four-star general has written a book while in service.
The book offers deep insights into the ongoing transformation of the Indian armed forces, driven by jointness, integration and self-reliance, to meet the demands of 21st century warfare and secure national interests.
"It reflects marking a new era in India's Higher Defence Organisation. Through a series of compelling articles, the book articulates a clear vision for building a #FutureReady force committed to the national goal of a Sashakt, Surakshit, Samridh and #ViksitBharat by 2047," the Headquarters Integrated Defence Staff said in a post on X.
"India aspires to be a developed nation -- Viksit Bharat -- by 2047. The foundation of an economically vibrant and politically stable Bharat must rest on a strong military. The four instruments of National Power that are Diplomatic, International, Military and Economic must work in unison towards a common vision for Bharat to realise its desired destiny," the CDS writes.
Gen Chauhan in his book recalls that during the Combined Commanders' Conference in the closing days of March 2023, the theme chosen was 'Ready, Relevant and Resurgent'.
"Penning down the various chapters of this book, I have realised that these three terms signify the future of our forces," he said.
The armed forces have always been the "first responders" facing challenges to the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the nation and have demonstrably acquitted themselves with aplomb, the CDS says in the book.
"However, as we navigate the stormy geopolitical arena of the 21st century, there is a rising uncertainty in the nature, type and timing of future threats. To put this in context, one must turn to the notion of security which has diffused and proliferated across domains and fields," he said.
The CDS said addressing the senior hierarchy of India's three armed services in New Delhi in 2014 during his first Combined Commanders' Conference, Prime Minister Narendra Modi had "presented his vision for India's security imperatives in the coming years".
"One of the most critical components of the Hon'ble PM's vision was the transformation of the three services into a modern force capable of pursuing India's national interests across multiple domains, including traditional and emerging ones. The process of transformation was to be premised on laying a strong foundation of jointness and integration at all levels among the three services," he says.
The aim was to prepare the Indian armed forces for meeting future threats and challenges. Turning words into deeds, six years down the line, the government created the Department of Military Affairs (DMA) and the post of the Chief of Defence Staff, Gen Chauhan says in the book.
The objective of this reform in the higher defence management was to bring about jointness among the armed forces and to foster expertise in military affairs, he said.
The CDS in his book provides a roadmap for the armed forces and also says that "like the proverbial phoenix, we need to shed certain vestiges and predilections, go back to the basics and see what our ancestors knew, wrote and spoke about warfare, statecraft and diplomacy".
"Resurgence will lead to resilience, which is what we aspire for," he adds.
In his book, Gen Chauhan also touches upon the relevance of self-reliance in India's growth.
"The conceptual and intellectual moorings of India's military need the anchorage of Indian ideas and thoughts. The geo-political environment which we face and the challenges and opportunities that lay before us are unique to us. We need to find Indian solutions to Indian problems. Our ancient wisdom is a source of motivation and inspiration," the CDS writes.
Gen Chauhan in his book emphasises that the armed forces need to build capabilities to conduct integrated multi-domain operations across the spectrum of conflict.
"Our organisational structures, capabilities and strategies must be dovetailed into our understanding of the future. Articles such as 'Preparing for the Third Revolution in Military Affairs', 'Evolving Barlefield Architecture, 'The Nature of War and Types of Conflicts' and 'Tactics Led Force Modernisation' are an expression of my thoughts on what lies ahead in the domain of warfare," he says.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
7 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Rhodes scholarship for studying at University of Oxford to be available to more Indians from 2028
New Delhi, The Rhodes Scholarship Trust, which offers the prestigious scholarship for studying at University of Oxford, is aiming to increase number of scholarships for Indians from 2028 to align with the country's population strength, according to Sir Richard Trainor, the trust's CEO. Trainor, who was in India ahead of the announcement of applications for 2026 academic session, told PTI in an interview that presently six scholarships are offered to Indian candidates annually. "The priority now is to try to get some additional scholarships for places where the number of scholars per head of population could be higher and India is one of those places. So, we have six scholarships a year for India, which is good, but there are a billion and a half people in this country, as you know, so there should be more scholarships," Trainor, who is also the interim warden of the Rhodes House, said. "We are trying to raise money for additional scholarships, because the trust needs to have that money in the endowment in order to pay the fees to the University of Oxford and to pay the living expenses of the scholars," he said. The other countries on radar for increasing the number of scholarships are China and Africa. At present four scholarships are offered to candidates from China and 21 from Africa. "We would like to have some additional scholars in each of these three areas by the time of the 125th anniversary of the scholarship scheme, which is 2028. We are going to have a big push on fund raising between now and the 125th anniversary," he said. Trainor, who himself was a Rhodes Scholar back in 1970, says people often talk about the Rhodes Scholarship transforming their lives. "...it also transformed mine. I had barely been out of the United States at the time that I took up the scholarship and, you know, it broadened my view of the world and led to my becoming a historian of another country and then making my career in another country and so on. "So, and then having this series of academic leadership jobs which have been very international in scope. Scholarships was totally beyond my background and aspirations at that stage," he said. The Rhodes Scholarship is given to outstanding students to undertake two to three years of study, depending on the academic curriculum taken, at the University of Oxford. Students aged 18–23 are eligible to apply. The Rhodes Scholarship is among the world's pre-eminent and oldest graduate fellowships, based at the University of Oxford since 1903. Administered by the Rhodes Trust in Oxford, the programme awards 106 fully funded scholarships to students from anywhere in the world with proven academic excellence who also show exceptional character, leadership, achievement in extra-curricular activities and a commitment to solving humanity's challenges. The applications for the 2026 session began on June 3 and are open till July 23. Noted Rhodes Scholar from India include economist Montek Singh Ahluwalia, writer Girish Karnard, environmental law expert Lavanya Rajamani, political commentator and psephologist Mahesh Rangarajan and Olympian Ranjit Bhatia among others.
Mint
11 minutes ago
- Mint
Manu Joseph: Why we must love the nation—other options are risky
A national secret is normally guarded by the government. But there is an Indian national secret that is held by India's people—probably thousands of them, or maybe millions. We can never be sure of the number. And the secret is that they may not be patriotic. It has to be a closely guarded secret because today every Indian is expected to be a patriot. The other option is simply not available. Whether you are in the government or opposed to it, everyone is expected to be patriotic. Even activists, 'rebels' with tattoos and long hair, posh avocado-eaters, rebellious teenagers and people who 'don't love anyone." Patriotism has become a foundational virtue. You can say you don't have some qualities, that you can't love, that you are greedy, that you do not think monogamy works. You can even say you are an atheist. But you cannot say you don't love the nation. Also Read: Manu Joseph: Where our freedom of speech came from and where it went Today, when people are critical of India, they add that they are critical because they so love the nation. Nobody has other reasons. A few days ago, Ali Khan Mahmudabad, an associate professor of political science at Ashoka University, was arrested. He had suggested that India's media briefings of Operation Sindoor, given by two women officers of the armed forces with Hindu and Muslim names, was important as 'optics" but needed to translate into ground reality for women and Muslims. In his defence, he stated that his views were 'entirely patriotic statements." Not long ago, intellectuals who challenged the state narrative were not expected to clarify that they were patriots. In fact, in the artistic and intellectual world, 'patriotism' is not a high ideal—rather, it is often seen as an emotion of the masses; even as one of the great dangers in the world. For instance, Rabindranath Tagore said, 'Patriotism cannot be our final spiritual shelter; my refuge is humanity." And George Bernard Shaw said, 'You'll never have a quiet world till you knock the patriotism out of the human race." And Bertrand Russell said: 'Patriotism is the willingness to kill and be killed for trivial reasons." Also Read: How India's middle-class came to be so patriotic Indian intellectuals or artists, it seems, do not say such things anymore. Some of them might be true patriots. Many of them may not be—just that they have to succumb to the expectation of being patriotic. Their public posture needs to be patriotic. I first noticed it when the writer Arundhati Roy faced sedition charges and imminent arrest in 2010, and she issued a brief statement saying, 'In the papers some have accused me of giving 'hate-speeches,' of wanting India to break up. On the contrary, what I say comes from love and pride." At the time, I felt it was uncharacteristic of her to use the words 'love' and 'pride' as emotions she felt for India. I did notice that for a writer of great clarity, she did keep the sentence a bit vague. Every major political party in India, including in Tamil Nadu, professes unconditional love for the nation. It is almost like time travel (and these days 'time travel' chiefly means a journey into the past, not the future), where a public moral is so sacred that everybody is expected to have it—and those who don't must keep quiet. When India wants our love, what does it mean, practically? We are among the most corrupt nations, our air is poisonous in many cities, our roads are congested, this is one of most unsafe places on earth for women, our quality of life is among the worst, and, according to the World Happiness Report, the average Indian is among the most unhappy people on earth. This is a country bereft of street joy—but we are expected to love it. Also Read: Manu Joseph: Just how 'innocent' are civilians during times of war? Yet, it makes sense. That is the nature of love, at least in most people. Like loveable people, a nation need not be filled with excellent qualities. A nation is not just pretty rivers and extraordinary bridges and skyscrapers and clean lanes. In fact, people struggle to define what a nation is—what unites all people. A nation is primarily a habit. A habit shared by diverse people. Nothing else binds a nation apart from this, and a love for this habit. So it is reasonable for a nation to expect its people to have that love as a fundamental attribute that cannot be questioned—and prudent for those who don't feel it to keep mum. Also, not loving a nation makes you a cultural orphan. There was a time, not long ago, when a few Indians—disenchanted with India or unable to respect it—assumed they were 'global people,' by which they almost never meant they belonged in Somalia, but that they belonged in the West. Also Read: Manu Joseph: We had more shame in the 1980s: Recall Bofors? But a lesson that this generation of India's upper class has learnt is that you primarily belong to your own people, because no one else cares enough. You need a home because everyone else has one. Without patriotism, a person is in the limbo of cultural orphanhood. Most people are patriots—including the new upper-middle-class and affluent Indians—because they do not belong outside India. Many are uncomfortable outside India. Everything about places outside India tends to make them suffer, probably after an initial one week of excitement. Even the chaos of India comforts them more than the tranquillity of a rich-world town. Even so, there are many people who value their emotions so much that they don't give them away easily. Or they value the words that come out of their mouth—the meaning of those words. People who want to attach a certain substance to what they say. And they are unable to say that they love India—partly because they are unable to say this aloud anymore. The author is a journalist, novelist, and the creator of the Netflix series, 'Decoupled'.
Mint
13 minutes ago
- Mint
India will protect farmers interest in US trade talks: Shivraj Singh Chouhan
New Delhi, Jun 8 (PTI) India will prioritise protecting its farmers' interests while assessing potential gains and losses in the ongoing trade negotiations with the United States over agricultural market access, Agriculture Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan said. "Our priority is to protect the interest of our farmers. India will not work closing its eyes. We will assess our gains and losses. Keeping that in mind, an agreement will be finalised," Chouhan told PTI in an interview. He was responding to a query on how India would safeguard farmers amid US pressure for greater market access for American agricultural and horticultural products. The negotiators are expected to agree on the framework for the broad contours of the first phase of the bilateral deal, expected to be signed by fall (September-October) 2025. "The discussions are ongoing between India and the US. One thing is clear, we will protect the interest of our farmers. When we talk about two nations, we need to see the overall trade," the minister added. According to a NITI Aayog report, "Promoting India-US Agricultural Trade under the new US Trade Regime", the value for US agriculture and allied product exports to India was about USD 2.22 billion in the triennium ending 2024. In the same period, India exported USD 5.75 billion worth of agricultural products to the US. India's main agricultural exports to the US include frozen shrimp, basmati rice, spices, processed cereals, and other value-added products. The US wants to export more agricultural products such as corn, soybeans, and animal feed, but faces high Indian tariffs -- especially in agriculture, where average tariffs can reach up to 39-50 per cent. The minister's comments come as India and the US continue negotiations on expanding agricultural trade, with Washington seeking reduced tariffs and improved market access for its farm products in the Indian market. India is cautious about fully opening its agriculture and dairy markets due to concerns about potential backlash from rural communities and the need to protect domestic producers from global price volatility.
