![[Yoo Choon-sik] Uncertainty rises as AI law decrees miss schedule](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwimg.heraldcorp.com%2Fnews%2Fcms%2F2025%2F07%2F06%2Fnews-p.v1.20250706.6242a3149f1140fbb7a84430839a0c1d_T1.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
[Yoo Choon-sik] Uncertainty rises as AI law decrees miss schedule
The National Assembly overwhelmingly passed the AI Basic Act — officially the Framework Act on the Development of Artificial Intelligence and Establishment of Foundation for Trust — in late December 2024. It took markets around the world by surprise, given that the country was quickly slipping into one of the worst political turmoils in years after then-President Yoon Suk Yeol's failed attempt to impose martial law triggered widespread unrest.
The subsequent promulgation of the law by the Cabinet Council in January this year also came as a surprise, given that the government was being run by an acting president.
The Ministry of Science and ICT said at that time that it would disclose draft versions of enforcement decrees and rules by the end of June for public comment so that they could be finalized early enough for companies and users alike to prepare for the January 2026 implementation of the law and ensure smoother compliance.
On the surface, the delay is understandable, given that President Lee Jae Myung, who is just over a month into his tenure, has yet to get his administration completely into shape. Lee started work without the usual transition period because the election was held to fill the presidency vacated by the forced removal of Yoon by the Constitutional Court after his impeachment a few months earlier.
However, companies are growing nervous as the period of darkness is extended regarding the subordinate legislation process, because they have to prepare strategies for what will emerge as one of the region's major markets for AI business opportunities, with limited clarity and time to act accordingly.
The delay also comes amid complaints among many stakeholders within and outside South Korea that the country, while enacting the law later than the European Union, will be the first jurisdiction in the world to implement regulatory obligations. The EU is not due to enforce its provisions until several months after South Korea shows its hand.
For instance, while South Korea's AI Basic Law is set to take effect in late January 2026, most regulatory provisions of the EU AI Act — such as those on high-risk systems, general-purpose models, governance, penalties and national authorities — are due to take effect from August 2026 in multiple steps, with staggered deadlines.
By the time South Korea's government and National Assembly hurriedly passed the law in late 2024, policymakers and industry experts alike thought having the law in place would help the country's AI companies doing business in major markets, where they expected authorities to introduce tough regulations.
However, earlier this year, the global AI policy landscape took a dramatic turn toward prioritizing the development of AI innovation, especially since the announcement by DeepSeek and other Chinese developers of the successful development of world-class AI systems.
Major countries including the United States, Britain, Canada and Germany have recently taken bold steps to foster AI development, with some of them explicitly shifting their policy stance away from regulation. This change in the global landscape has raised concerns that South Korea may have moved too hastily, locking itself into a regulatory-first approach.
Uncertainty is worse than anything
These concerns even led to the then-opposition Democratic Party of Korea — now the ruling party — proposing a revision bill in April to suspend regulatory provisions for three years, emphasizing that 'the AI-related trends in the US, the EU, and Japan, have been shifting away from regulation toward promotion and industry growth.'
There is no indication of the revision bill proceeding swiftly, with the leader of the proposing lawmakers acknowledging that the revision may not be approved quickly, according to media reports. However, these concerns apparently have prompted the Ministry of Science and ICT to seek ways to effectively delay full implementation of the bill's obligations to avoid stifling innovation.
'(The ministry) is considering introducing a grace period on the provision imposing fines for some time after the enforcement of the law so that there will be an effect similar to a delay in the regulatory measure,' the ministry recently told President Lee's state affairs planning committee, according to media reports published recently.
The ministry was referring to Article 43 of the law, stipulating that the Minister of Science and ICT could levy a fine of up to 30 million won ($22,000) for those in violation of obligations listed in Articles 31, 36, and 40. However, the same article delegates further details to a presidential decree, allowing flexibility in enforcement.
The planning team has been receiving briefings from the outgoing government's ministries, so this plan may still change when the new minister takes office. Bae Kyung-hoon, head of LG AI Research, was nominated to be the first minister of science and ICT under the Lee administration, but has yet to take office after confirmation hearings held last month.
All issues related to subordinate legislation also remain highly uncertain because Lee has yet to unveil how to implement his election pledges, including one to revamp the Presidential Committee on AI — launched in late 2024 by his predecessor to review and coordinate AI policy issues but inactive for several months, mainly due to the political turmoil of that period.
It remains to be seen how many of the tentative plans prepared by the outgoing government will be upheld by the Lee administration and how soon South Korea will clear the remaining uncertainty regarding some conflicting regulatory obligations between different laws and guidelines, experts said.
In stark contrast to the heightened uncertainty continuing, there is one thing that everyone agrees always makes sense: Uncertainty is worse than anything for the business world as well as for the investor sentiment toward South Korea, especially in the fast-moving domain of artificial intelligence.
Yoo Choon-sik worked for nearly 30 years at Reuters, including as the chief Korea economics correspondent, and briefly worked as a business strategy consultant. The views expressed here are the writer's own. — Ed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Korea Herald
15 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Lee urges citizens to dine out as part of efforts to boost domestic demand
President Lee Jae Myung said Saturday that he hopes citizens would join a move to dine out as part of efforts to boost domestic demand. On Friday, Lee had dinner at a restaurant in central Seoul with his staff in a way to promote dining out to help small-sized brick-and-mortar restaurants and small merchants, overcome a slump amid sluggish domestic demand. "I personally hope citizens would visit nearby restaurants to promote and cheer on their businesses ... which will in turn revive the local economy and become an impetus for a bright future of South Korea," Lee said in a social media post. Lee's remarks came as the country will begin distributing cash handouts to all citizens on July 21 as part of a government initiative aimed at stimulating domestic consumption. All South Korean citizens residing in the country will receive a one-time payment of 150,000 won, depending on their income levels. Lee earlier instructed senior aides to draw up measures to maximize the effects of cash handouts, which is a part of an extra budget as a stimulus package to boost private consumption. (Yonhap)
Korea Herald
15 hours ago
- Korea Herald
ASEAN, regional partners call for 'complete denuclearization' of Korean Peninsula
Southeast Asian countries and Indo-Pacific partners, including South Korea and the United States, have called for efforts to achieve the "complete denuclearization" of the Korean Peninsula, a joint statement showed Saturday, as they concluded this week's multilateral gathering led by the Association of Southeast Asian Nations. The chair's statement from the ASEAN Regional Forum, released Friday, also underscored the need to resume dialogue among concerned parties for peace and stability, a call that comes at a time when South Korea is seeking to improve inter-Korean relations under the new government of President Lee Jae Myung. "The Meeting called for the full implementation of all relevant UNSC Resolutions and noted international efforts to bring about the complete denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula," the statement read. "The Meeting ... stressed the importance of resuming peaceful dialogue among all concerned parties in order to realize lasting peace and stability in a denuclearized Korean Peninsula," it said. The use of the word "complete" to describe the North's denuclearization contrasts with last year's statement that called for "complete, verifiable and irreversible" denuclearization -- language seen as carrying a stronger tone. The ARF statement released every year following the ASEAN meetings draws attention for how it reconciles the differing positions on key security issues among participating countries, which also include China, Russia and North Korea. The changes in the latest statement possibly suggest Seoul's softer approach in its inter-Korean policy. Lee has called for easing tensions between the two Koreas and pursuing dialogue with Pyongyang, while continuing to respond firmly to the North's nuclear and missile threats in coordination with the international community. First Vice Foreign Minister Park Yoon-joo, who attended this week's ASEAN meetings as the top representative, highlighted these calls throughout the venue. North Korea has severed all communication with the South amid the stalled nuclear talks, which collapsed without a deal in Hanoi in 2019. The participating countries also again voiced "grave concern" over North Korea's increasing missile launches that destabilize the Korean Peninsula, urging Pyongyang to fully comply with all relevant U.N. Security Council resolutions. The ARF is an expanded security forum joined by the 10 ASEAN member states, the United States, China, Japan, the European Union and other countries in South Asia and the Pacific, as well as North Korea. However, North Korea did not attend this year's session, its first absence from the forum since joining the gathering in 2000. (Yonhap)
Korea Herald
16 hours ago
- Korea Herald
S. Korea, US continue joint efforts to 'make progress' toward OPCON transition: Pentagon official
South Korea and the United States continue cooperation to "make progress" toward the transition of wartime operational control to Seoul, a Pentagon official said Friday, indicating that discussions on the major alliance issue are ongoing. The official made the remarks as new South Korean President Lee Jae Myung's administration seeks to retake it at a time when US President Donald Trump's administration has been urging allies to take a greater security burden while prioritizing deterring Chinese threats. "The U.S. and ROK continue to work together to make progress toward OPCON transition," the official told Yonhap News Agency. ROK is short for South Korea's official name, the Republic of Korea. The official added that the Pentagon has nothing to announce at this time. Seoul and Washington have been working on the "conditions-based" OPCON transfer. Conditions include South Korea's capabilities to lead combined Korea-US forces, its strike and air defense capabilities, and a regional security environment conducive to such a handover. During an interview with Yonhap News Agency in May last year, Elbridge Colby, currently under secretary of defense for policy, expressed his backing for the swift OPCON transition, saying the Asian ally should undertake "overwhelming" responsibility for its own defense. Retaking OPCON from Washington was among Lee's campaign pledges. On Wednesday, Wi Sung-lac, Lee's top security adviser, reiterated that the OPCON transition is one of Lee's pledges, while noting that past governments had also pursued the transfer. The public has been divided over the timing of the OPCON transition. Opponents have raised concerns that the OPCON transfer could lead to a weakening of America's security commitment at a time of deepening North Korean threats, while supporters agrue the transfer would bolster efforts to enhance South Korea's independent military capabilities and greater autonomy in the security alliance. South Korea handed over operational control of its troops to the US-led U.N. Command during the 1950-53 Korean War. Control was then transferred to the two allies' Combined Forces Command when the command was launched in 1978. Wartime operational control still remains in the U.S. hands, while South Korea retook peacetime OPCON in 1994. The OPCON transfer was supposed to occur in 2015 but was postponed, as the allies agreed in 2014 to a conditions-based handover -- rather than a timeline-based one -- due to Pyongyang's advancing nuclear and missile threats. (Yonhap)
