Dublin's €70bn infrastructural upgrade: how it breaks down
M50
,
Luas
,
Dart
and the Port Tunnel,
Dublin
has outgrown its infrastructure and needs a €70 billion investment in housing, transport, water and energy (over 15 years) to catch up.
That's according to
KPMG
.
While the figure was used to showcase the consultancy's Dublin 2040 report, published on Wednesday, highlighting what Dublin-based businesses see as the city's strengths and challenges, it wasn't actually contained in the report.
KPMG's corporate finance partner Hazel Cryan, however, told The Irish Times that its €70 billion estimate accompanying the report was derived from an analysis of various Government strategies in housing, transport and other sectors.
READ MORE
[
Dublin needs €70bn investment in infrastructure by 2040
Opens in new window
]
'We've applied an extrapolation out to 2040 based on those reports and what the known big projects are...it's very much an estimate,' she said.
It breaks down as follows: €30 billion is needed to upgrade the city's transport network as per the Greater Dublin Area Transport Strategy, which includes mega projects like the proposed MetroLink underground rail project.
A further €26 billion is earmarked for housing, mainly on the social and affordable projects and targets contained in current Housing for All strategy and beyond.
KPMG also reckons that a further €10 billion is needed to upgrade the city's water infrastructure (which is highlighted as a key block on housing development).
An additional €6 billion is also necessary to upgrade the city's energy infrastructure to meet the growing demand for electricity and to support the transition to a low-carbon economy, it says.
A further €500 million is also needed to upgrade the city's climate risk and flood defence system.
All in, a hefty outlay to get the city fit for purpose.
KPMG's Dublin 2040 report is based on a survey 300 Dublin-based businesses and what they see as the key priorities.
Unsurprisingly the survey found almost 9 in 10 (87 per cent) believe Dublin is doing poorly in the area of housing, reflecting what the report describes as 'the persistent and ubiquitous nature of the issue'.
Housing is flagged as the top concern with 60 per cent of businesses seeing affordable accommodation as a critical infrastructure issue ahead of healthcare (20 per cent), public transport (15 per cent) and technology (5 per cent).
'Dublin is beyond an inflection point in a number of critical areas,' said Ryan McCarthy, managing partner at KPMG in Ireland.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Kilkenny Design back in profit in spite of ‘headwinds that were beyond our control'
The Kilkenny Design, the Irish fashion and design retailer owned by the O'Gorman family, last year returned to an operating profit despite revenues dipping by 5 per cent. Consolidated accounts filed by Clydaville Holdings Ltd show that the group recorded an operating profit of €504,244 after sustaining an operating loss of €865,603 in 2023 - a positive swing of €1.36 million. Revenues decreased by €1.7 million to €31.36 million in the 12 months to January 28th 2024. Kilkenny Design Group operates 17 bricks and mortar outlets here, including its flagship store on Dublin's Nassau Street, opposite Trinity College in Dublin. READ MORE Clydaville recorded a pre-tax profit of €171,294 after various expenses - including €125,230 in reorganisation costs. Numbers employed last year decreased from 283 to 219 while staff costs reduced from €9.67 million to €8.25 million. The profits take account of combined non-cash depreciation and amortisation costs of €1.07 million. Directors' pay declined from €770,062 to €580,825. After incurring a corporation tax charge of €101,930, the group recorded a post-tax profit of €69,364. In accounts signed off on July 31st, the directors state that 'operating in an environment of economic volatility, Kilkenny Design faced headwinds that were beyond our control'. They state that 'the ongoing global cost of living crisis added pressures on our cost structures posing additional challenges to the performance of the business'. They state that the business 'delivered a turnaround in the current year, returning to profitability compared to a loss in the prior year'. 'This improvement reflects the positive impact of strategic initiatives and decisive actions taken by management, including operational restructuring, and proactive cost-saving strategies, margin-enhancing activities and the successful introduction of new brands and new Own brand ranges into the portfolio,' the accounts add. 'The company successfully restructured its debt during the year, resulting in improved financial flexibility. As a result, the company is now well-positioned to meet its debt obligations as they fall due.' The directors state that 'a loan facility of €2.48 million, which was due to expire in August 2025, was refinanced in July 2025'. Shareholder funds at the end of last year totalled €7.34 million.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Have your say: are you a student struggling to find accommodation?
As the academic year comes around again, a lack of accommodation options has left university students scrambling to find a place to live during their studies. The Irish Times reports this morning that University College Dublin has the State's most expensive on-campus room again in 2025/26 as students face waiting lists in many places amid the annual rush to secure accommodation. The university with the second highest top-end on-campus accommodation cost is Trinity College Dublin , with prices starting at €6,066 and rising to €10,085. Dublin City University charges between €6,035 and €6,872, while TU Dublin does not have any on-campus student accommodation. READ MORE If you are a student or parent trying to find suitable accommodation at an Irish university this year, The Irish Times would like to hear about your experience. Are you finding it difficult to find somewhere to stay? Are the costs steeper than you imagined? Do you face sharing a room and what is the quality of the accommodation like? Has the accommodation situation impacted your decision-making around which university you hope to attend, or has it led to the prospect of a very long commute? We would like to hear your views. You can let us know what you think using the form below. Please limit your submissions to 400 words or less. Please include a phone number for verification purposes only. If you would prefer to remain anonymous, please indicate this in your submission – we will keep your name and contact details confidential. We will curate a selection of submissions for an article but please note we may not publish every submission we receive.
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
Judge warns litigants to undergo ‘reality check' before suing
A High Court judge said litigants should undergo a 'reality check' before proceeding with claims where lawyers end up the 'only winners'. Mr Justice Michael Twomey encouraged potential litigants to engage in mediation, rather than litigation, because it 'offers a crucial opportunity' for 'reality checking' claims before they reach court. The judge made the remarks when throwing out a multimillion euro claim brought by V Media and First Click Marketing Operations Managament Limited against Techads Media Ltd. He also rejected Techads's €1.5 million counterclaim. He said the case, which involved estimated legal fees of more than €1 million, 'would have benefited from mediation/reality checking'. READ MORE 'Litigation should be the option of last resort, rather than first resort, when it comes to resolving disputes,' he said. Techads was based in the Dublin City University Alpha Campus but now 'exists solely for the purposes of this litigation', the judge said in a recently published written judgment. V Media, with a registered address in Montenegro, and First Click, incorporated in the Abu Dhabi Free Zone, sought about $2.5 million (€2.1 million) from Techads for alleged unpaid invoices from 2022. However, Techads claimed it was not obliged to pay because, it said, V Media and First Click agents breached the terms of their respective digital marketing agreements. Between 2018 and 2021, Techads went from having sales of €5.86 million to €119.81 million, the judge said. However, in mid-2022 its business 'disappeared almost overnight, when it was blacklisted by its two main clients' – Ask Media Group LLC and CBS Interactive, Inc – which are not a party to the case, he said. Mr Justice Twomey said Techads's business 'involved sourcing website traffic and then driving that web traffic' to its clients' websites via marketing agents such as V Media and First Click. Ask and CBS 'terminated their agreements with Techads in mid-2022 because of the 'unusual' nature of the web traffic provided to them' on behalf of Techads via agents. The judge said website owners do not want to 'pay for robots clicking on their sites or indeed individuals clicking on their sites who have no likelihood of spending money'. Techads brought a counterclaim, suing V Media and First Click for $1.8 million (€1.5 million) for amounts allegedly clawed back by Ask and CBS from Techads. The case was listed for an eight-day hearing commencing on June 24th, with costs estimated by the parties as likely to exceed €1 million. However, the court found 'neither the plaintiffs, nor the defendant, are entitled to any award'. 'As a result, the only winners in this case are the lawyers,' said Mr Justice Twomey. 'Human nature is such that persons who undertake litigation, like any other task, will often seek to be as successful as possible, which often means portraying the damage that they have suffered, or the amounts they have lost, at their absolute height,' the judge wrote. 'However, the downside of such an approach is that litigants can end up 'believing in their own publicity', as they repeat and provide evidence for their claims, and so reinforce their own belief in their claims.' Mr Justice Twomey said 'the problem' with this approach is that it 'can reduce the likelihood of a settlement, particularly if the first 'reality check' of the claims and counterclaims occurs when it is too late, as appears to have happened in this case'.
