Russian propaganda made up personal meeting between heads of Ukrainian and Russian delegations in Istanbul – Center for Countering Disinformation
Source: Center for Countering Disinformation on Telegram
Quote: "Russian propaganda has launched a campaign to discredit the Ukrainian negotiating team. Putin's aide, Vladimir Medinsky, announced an alleged 'bilateral meeting' with Ukrainian Defence Minister Rustem Umierov before the talks in Istanbul. This information is not true".
Details: It is reported that the meeting was actually held in the presence of Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan, who acted as a mediator.
"The statements about the alleged 'secret agreements' reached at this meeting are a manipulation aimed at undermining the credibility of the Ukrainian negotiating team," the Center for Countering Disinformation said.
The Center also warned that Russian propaganda is preparing a two-pronged information attack against Ukrainian representatives at the talks in Istanbul.
In particular, disinformation about the delegation's alleged personal ties with Russians will be spread within Ukraine. Western audiences will be told that Ukraine is "delaying the peace talks". However, it is Russia that systematically avoids ceasefire agreements.
"Russia's goal is to replace reality and impose a narrative in which the aggressor poses as a peacemaker," the Center for Countering Disinformation stressed.
Earlier, the Russian propaganda media outlet TASS reported that Vladimir Medinsky, the head of the Russian delegation, and Ukrainian Defence Minister Rustem Umerov had held a bilateral meeting before the talks.
Background:
The meeting between the Ukrainian and Russian delegations lasted just over an hour and was the second after the negotiations on 16 May.
Prior to the talks with the Russian delegation, Ukraine's First Deputy Foreign Minister Serhii Kyslytsia and Oleksandr Bevz, a member of the Ukrainian delegation, met with representatives of three of Ukraine's European partners – Germany, Italy and the United Kingdom.
Following the talks in Istanbul, the Ukrainian and Russian delegations agreed on an all-for-all prisoner exchange of seriously wounded and young servicemen.
On the evening of 2 June, Russian state news agencies published the text of the Russian "memorandum of settlement", containing proposals for a ceasefire, including Ukraine's neutrality, elections and withdrawal from four oblasts.
Support Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
20 minutes ago
- New York Post
Europe's preening appeasers will recognize a fantasy — not ‘Palestine'
French President Emmanuel Macron and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced this week that their countries would unilaterally recognize a Palestinian state. The first problem with that is 'Palestine' is a fictional place. There never was any such thing. And diplomatic recognition of it no more changes this reality than if Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu decided to recognize the archipelago of Islamic banlieues on the outskirts of Paris as an independent nation. But what exactly are Britain and France recognizing? Mahmoud Abbas, the dictator of the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank, is now 89 years old. What do Macron and Starmer think will happen when he finally dies? The best-case scenario, I suppose, is for another corrupt strongman to take over an independent 'Palestine.' Will these Western European leaders back an autocracy? What happens when a civil war breaks out? Because the prospects are quite high. Since the Oslo Accords, the Palestinian Authority has relied heavily on Israel's security apparatus to stay in power. It would almost certainly implode without it. The French and Brits should recall that the first thing Gazans did when handed a protostate in 2005 was to destroy over 3,000 greenhouses and modern farming systems that American Jews had purchased for $14 million and handed them, gratis. The second thing they did, though, was put Hamas in charge. So, will France and Britain support open elections in this new nation? What if Hamas, or some other iteration of that organization, wins those elections? Will France and Britain recognize such a state? 'Hamas does not represent the Palestinian people,' Macron claimed during a visit to Ramallah with Abbas in 2023. This is Western elitist twaddle: The unpleasant truth is that Islamists far better represent the people than the 'moderate' Fatah party, which is propped up with billions of Western dollars and Israeli assistance. In 2006, Hamas not only won the Gaza elections, but also won a majority of the parliamentary seats in the PA, which it still holds. In 2024, Hamas and Fatah signed the Beijing Declaration, brokered by Communist China, agreeing to form an 'interim national reconciliation government.' Will the French and British 'recognize' a similar arrangement in the future? Is Macron going to send French troops into Jenin to root out Islamist militants firing Iranian- or Qatari-funded missiles into Jerusalem? Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Whether the French could even win such a war, I suppose, is the better question. And what will 'Palestine' look like? Not once in the dozens of attempts to give Palestinians a state have they accepted any arrangement that didn't include 'a right to return' into Israel proper. 'Nakba' itself — Palestinians' bitter term for what they see as the 'catastrophe' of Israel's founding — was the result of a war that was launched by local Arabs and their allies who rejected a Jewish state. Even if a deal could be struck, what makes Macron and Starmer believe Palestinians can run their own nation, anyway? Palestinians in Gaza are unwilling to build the basic infrastructure necessary for themselves. despite receiving hundreds of millions in yearly aid. Every Israeli restriction on Palestinians in Gaza has been put in place to mitigate violence. When you send Gaza concrete, they build tunnels and military installations under hospitals, not schools or businesses. If you build them infrastructure, they dig up water pipes to make casements for rockets. When you allow shipments of necessities, they smuggle in explosives. When you send food, they give it to the terrorist army before the children. Unless, of course, those children have been recruited to the Islamist cause. Will France and Britain send in their citizens to administer this new state and its borders to ensure that the same doesn't happen again? Or will Israel just be forced to invade once more? Now, of course, Macron says Hamas must be 'disarmed' and that Gaza needs to be rebuilt. But the French and British recognition of 'Palestine' incentivizes the opposite. What do they think Israel has been trying to do? Is France or Britain going to disarm Hamas? Is France or Britain going to bring back the more than 50 hostages still being held and tortured in Gaza? Macron and Starmer, like so many apologists for Palestinian violence, lose nothing with this cynical moral preening meant to mollify their domestic Islamists. The real world is a lot more complicated. David Harsanyi is a senior writer at the Washington Examiner. Twitter @davidharsanyi
New York Post
20 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump struck huge trade deals — but tariffs are about to go up on a huge swath of imports as Liberation Day tariffs hit
WASHINGTON — Countries around the world rushed Thursday to negotiate last-minute trade deals with the US before sweeping new tariffs take effect Friday — after President Trump already locked up major agreements accounting for about one-third of American trade. As of Thursday evening, the US had secured framework agreements calling for a 15% tariff on the European Union, a 10% duty on the United Kingdom, a 20% rate for Vietnam, a 19% levy for the Philippines and Indonesia, and a 15% levy on Japan and South Korea — while securing $2.25 trillion in promised investments and purchases of US goods. Trump also allowed extensions for China and Mexico — two of America's top economic partners responsible for 27% of US trade, as he irons out the details and tries to open their markets to more American goods. Countries who account for 40% of US trade were due to receive letters by midnight Eastern Time, informing them of new rates as high as 50%. Sectoral tariffs, including a 50% rate on foreign copper, aluminum and steel and a 20% on overseas pharmaceuticals, will also go into effect. Notably, Canada — America's second largest trading partner and a particular target of Trump's ire — looks set for a new 35% duty. But rates for more than 100 countries were still being negotiated with Trump's trade team Thursday afternoon, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told The Post in her regular briefing. 3 White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said tariffs will be imposed at midnight Eastern Time on Aug. 1, upon an executive order from Trump. REUTERS 'Upwards of 200 countries around the world have reached out to their trade and tariff team,' Leavitt told reporters of the conversations had throughout negotiations, noting that the White House will continue to 'prioritize' key trading partners on the last stretch. Leavitt wouldn't reveal the exact rates countries will be charged — but said Trump's team 'has been working around the clock to try to be in correspondence with as many countries as possible.' It looked unlikely a deal with Canada — which bought $350 billion in American goods last year while exporting $412 billion to the US — could be struck before the tariffs kicked. 'They have to pay a fair rate,' Trump told reporters of the holdup Thursday. 'They have been charging very, very high tariffs to our farmers.' Trump has also been leveraging America's economic power in the trade war by invoking other geopolitical grievances. India was threatened with a 25% tariff, plus an additional penalty for importing Russian weapons and energy. And even though the US has a trade surplus with Brazil, South America's biggest economy will be hit with an astronomical 50% rate due to their treatment of Trump ally and former president Jair Bolsonaro. 3 Trump has threatened countries with tariffs as high as 50%. AP Trump first announced tariff hikes as a part of his 'Liberation Deal' announcement on April 2, threatening to impose high rates at a 'reciprocal' level to account for trade discrepancies and levies charged by trading partners. He then paused his high tariffs a week later and set most rates at 10%, with the expectation that '90 deals' would be done in '90 days.' Since then, Trump has made a number of key deals with major trading partners, and the administration has predicted the Aug. 1 deadline will push others to follow suit in the coming weeks and months. Trump first made a deal with the UK in May, locking in a 10% tariff and securing the promise that the country will 'open up' their market to US goods, notably agricultural products like beef. 3 Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has said he won't accept a 'bad deal' from Trump, so the 35% rate may go forth. REUTERS The president then struck a 20% tariff deal with Vietnam, a 19% rate with the Philippines and Indonesia, a 15% rate with Japan and South Korea — and then announced a 15% rate on the European Union Sunday. The EU deal was particularly impressive, as it significantly raised rates from their previous levels and includes pledges for the EU to buy $750 billion in American energy, invest $600 billion in new money in the US and purchase additional military equipment. China, America's no. 3 trading partner, has separate ongoing negotiations and has a deadline of Aug. 12 to come to a final deal. Mexico received a 90-day extension in a last minute phone call with Trump on Thursday, pushing their talks to a later date while keeping the 25% tariff as punishment for fentanyl crossing the border, a 25% tariff on cars and a 50% rate on the country's aluminum, copper and steel. Other world leaders were calling Thursday asking for possible extensions, Leavitt said, but the ultimate decision rests with Trump, who has indicated that the deadline is firm. 'I think he's done really good work here to expand export opportunities for the US and our producers,' said Richard Stern, acting director of the Thomas A. Roe Institute for Economic Policy Studies at the conservative Heritage Foundation. Stern said the preliminary frameworks for some of the deals will also ensure Americans' intellectual property isn't being stolen — and force a quicker decoupling from China critical for national security. 'We view tariffs as a good tool for statecraft negotiation,' he added. 'The EU is really on this knife's edge of moving closer to China or moving closer to us.' 'As of tomorrow, US tariffs will be higher than they have been in a century — and hundreds of billions of dollars in new taxes will be paid for by American companies and consumers,' warned Scott Lincicome, vice president of general economics at the libertarian Cato Institute. Other unknown variables that could affect the tariffs were upcoming rulings by federal courts on Trump's powers to tax imports without congressional approval. 'The way I've been trying to describe it is there's a lot we still don't know and a few things we know,' Lincicome said. 'The US tariffs system has gone from, almost overnight, simple and transparent to a labyrinth of new requirements.' Mark DiPlacido, a policy adviser at the trade protectionist think tank American Compass disagreed, saying: 'The Trump administration's trade strategy is working.' 'The trade deals struck in recent weeks will help reduce US trade deficits, reshore industry, and generate quality American jobs,' added DiPlacido, who worked in the Office of the US Trade Representative during the first Trump administration. 'While many predicted the worst when higher rates were announced in April, the administration has shown that tariffs can be used effectively to increase market access, revenue, and investment without major price increases, job losses, or economic instability.'
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Anger over starvation in Gaza leaves Israel increasingly isolated
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has responded angrily to the growing skepticism. He has said the reports of starvation are exaggerated, that Hamas must be destroyed, that critics are often antisemites, and that Western recognition of a Palestinian state is a reward to Hamas for the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel that killed more than 1,000 people. 'The usual Israeli view is that this crisis is another temporary problem,' said Natan Sachs, an analyst of Israeli politics. 'But that's a misreading of the world, because it's accelerating a global turn against Israel that has dramatic effects, especially among young people.' Advertisement As anger grows over widespread hunger in Gaza, Israel risks becoming an international outcast. The deadly Hamas-led attack on Israel in 2023 remains a vivid, salient event for many Israelis. But for others around the world, the devastation and hunger in Gaza have become more visible and urgent. Children atop rubble awaited aid in Gaza City, on Sunday. SAHER ALGHORRA/NYT Since Israel cut off aid in March to try to force Hamas to give up hostages, Israel's effort to install its own distribution system has been marred by chaos and casualties while hunger has increased. Scores have been killed as Palestinians rushed to get food. Advertisement And no one has a clear idea of how the war will end, even as Israel has retaken large areas of Gaza several times over. The number of dead in the enclave has reached more than 60,000, a majority of them civilians, according to the United Nations. Netanyahu has not outlined what he has in mind for Gaza or who should try to rule it instead of Hamas. He has refused to engage with the countries most likely to help do that—the Persian Gulf states, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia. Trump remains a strong supporter of Israel in its fight against Hamas, and he has in the past given Netanyahu carte blanche in how to do it. But even Trump has seemed shocked by the televised videos of hunger in Gaza, and some of his most fervent supporters are publicly questioning the relationship with Israel. Trump's envoy Steve Witkoff The increasing debate over whether Israel is committing genocide is also reflective of how 'something fundamental has shifted in how Israel is perceived,' said Daniel Levy, a negotiator under former Labor Party-led governments in Israel and current president of the US/Middle East Project, a nonprofit. Advertisement He points to a sharp cultural shift, with anti-Israel, pro-Palestinian, and sometimes antisemitic demonstrations at places including opera houses and music festivals. Pop stars including Billie Eilish and Ariana Grande have made strong appeals for a cease-fire and for the delivery of aid to Palestinians in Gaza. 'For a long time, Israel thought that if we throw antisemitism and the Holocaust at them loudly enough, it will all go away,' Levy said. 'But the zeitgeist is shifting, and the Israeli attempt at outrage works with an ever-smaller cohort.' Opinion polls reflect the change. A Pew poll in April found that American views of Israel had turned more negative. About 53 percent of US adults now express an unfavorable opinion of Israel, up from 42 percent before the Hamas attack. Of those, the share who voice very unfavorable views of Israel went up to 19 percent of adults this year, from 10 percent in 2022. A demonstrator wore a mask depicting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during an anti-government protest in Tel Aviv on Thursday, calling for the end to the war in Gaza. JACK GUEZ/AFP via Getty Images Another Pew poll, conducted last month, found that in 20 of 24 countries surveyed, half or more of adults had an unfavorable view of Israel. Around three-quarters or more hold this view in Australia, Greece, Indonesia, Japan, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, and Turkey. The figures are higher among younger people—and one of the largest gaps between young and old is in the United States. The largest danger to Israel in the future is not the stances taken by European leaders or its most passionate critics, Sachs argued. 'From the Israeli perspective, the most troubling phenomenon is the people on the fence. Either they don't know about the issue or want to stay away from it, because it's toxic,' he said. 'The average person who might normally support Israel would rather stay away.' Advertisement Netanyahu has been too slow to understand the reality of the shift and its cost to his country, said Chuck Freilich, a former deputy national security adviser in Israel. It is difficult to know the full reality in Gaza, because Israel does not allow foreign journalists to enter independently. But aid groups have described mounting malnutrition and cases of starvation. Israel needs diplomatic support, he said. And it desperately needs good economic relations with Europe and the United States, said Bernard Avishai, an Israeli American professor and analyst. 'Israel made a fantastic bet on globalization, and its economic life depends on its technological elites finding partners in developed countries,' Avishai said. 'What happens when companies like that get a cold shoulder from people around the world?' There is built-up anger in the West at having been pushed for years to keep down criticism over Israeli actions such as the occupation of the West Bank, Avishai said, and that anger is now coming out more strongly over Gaza. 'What's happening in Gaza is appalling,' and it diminishes the willingness of people to travel to Israel and to work with its scientists and companies, he said. 'For the Israeli economy,' he noted, 'this is already devastating.' Pushed by public reaction and by his own frustration, President Emmanuel Macron of France has said that his country will recognize Palestine as a state at the United Nations in September. Canada's prime minister, Mark Carney, said Wednesday that his country would do the same. Prime Minister Keir Starmer has made Britain's recognition conditional, but the moves nonetheless reflect how swiftly views of the war—and of Israel—have changed among Western countries. Advertisement This article originally appeared in .
