logo
Army pilot took 'evasive action' before fatal crash

Army pilot took 'evasive action' before fatal crash

Perth Now21-05-2025
The pilot of an army chopper that crashed and killed all four on board took action to avoid a mid-air collision with another aircraft, a defence report reveals.
The Aviation Safety Investigation Report into the MRH-90 Taipan helicopter crash on July 28, 2023 was released on Wednesday.
Captain Danniel Lyon, Lieutenant Maxwell Nugent, Warrant Officer Class Two Joseph Laycock and Corporal Alexander Naggs were killed when their helicopter crashed into waters in the Whitsundays during Exercise Talisman Sabre.
The investigation found the primary cause of the tragedy was "spatial disorientation", which happens when a pilot misperceives the position of their aircraft in relation to the surrounding environment.
It concluded that the pilots were likely experiencing a level of fatigue shown to "impede optimal performance" and increase susceptibility to spatial disorientation.
"The estimated level of fatigue ... was considered sufficient to affect their actions and decisions in the event," the report said.
The crew, from the Sydney-based 6th Aviation Regiment, were flying in a helicopter given the call-sign Bushman 83, which was the third in a formation of four aircraft as part of a training exercise.
The report found that after making a turn, Bushman 83 climbed more than 100 feet within 14 seconds.
Cockpit voice recordings revealed there were no communications between the choppers for the period of the climb.
But a recording from inside Bushman 83 heard the co-pilot ask "have you still got ('em)".
The aircraft pilot replied "yeah still got ('em) mate".
It was found the aircraft pilot "almost certainly" lost sight of the helicopter ahead in the formation, Bushman 82.
The report stated the aircraft pilot of Bushman 83 likely didn't know the chopper was facing nose down and combined with a lack of recognition of the aircraft's increasing airspeed "resulted in a very high and unrecoverable rate of descent towards the water".
The two helicopters came within 50m of each other, with Bushman 83's aircraft captain taking action to avoid a mid-air collision.
The report found the helicopters were conducting manoeuvres during rain showers which limited visibility. The chopper was flying with its cabin doors closed which also restricted visibility.
The report identified 196 findings, resulting in 46 recommendations across the Defence Aviation Safety Program.
All of the recommendations have been accepted by the Defence Aviation Authority, which has committed to their implementation.
The aviation safety investigation has been labelled one of the most complex conducted by Defence in recent history.
Defence All-hours Support Line (ASL) - 1800 628 036
Defence Member and Family Support - 1800 624 608
Open Arms – Veterans & Families Counselling - 1800 011 046
Lifeline - 13 11 14
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sydney socialite Vanessa Jacobs Fennell crashed Range Rover, assaulted police officer
Sydney socialite Vanessa Jacobs Fennell crashed Range Rover, assaulted police officer

News.com.au

time10 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Sydney socialite Vanessa Jacobs Fennell crashed Range Rover, assaulted police officer

A Sydney socialite who crashed her Range Rover, refused a breath test and then assaulted a police officer had started taking antidepressants just days prior to the incident, a court has been told. Vanessa Jacobs Fennell, 55, refused a breath test and then crashed her luxury Range Rover into a parked Tesla before assaulting a police officer in Bellevue Hill in Sydney's east on March 21. It is understood bystanders had called police shortly after Fennell was stopped by a good Samaritan who informed her that her car was damaged and had two flat tyres. She was then uncooperative when police arrived, police allege. She was charged with refusing to submit to breath analysis, assault police officer in the execution of duty, not give particulars to owner of damaged property, and negligent driving. Fennell – who was previously short-listed to appear on the second season of controversial reality show Real Housewives of Sydney in 2023 – pleaded guilty to all four charges. She looked glamorous as she attended Waverley Local Court on Tuesday, sporting a brown trench coat and heeled boots. The 55-year-old was listed for sentencing, however, her matter was again delayed, and submissions by both the prosecution and Fennell's lawyer Helen Christinson were instead heard. She is seeking to have the matters dealt with under mental health provisions of the law, or a section 14 application. In the defence's submissions the court was told Fennell had experienced 'some stresses' towards the end of last year, as well as experienced dissociation and in general had 'difficulty coping'. She was prescribed antidepressants just three days prior to the incident, the defence said, which had caused 'adverse reactions and confusion', as well as contributed to 'increased intoxication'. 'The recent stresses, her mental health, the commencement of medication and alcohol combined leads to this egregious decision making which is highly uncharacteristic for this woman,' they said. While they concede it was 'extraordinary conduct', the defence reminded the court it was the first offending of this kind and the socialite had no prior criminal history. However, the prosecution argued the 'serious' offences should be dealt with according to the law via either a conditional release order or a community corrections order while incorporating an ongoing treatment plan. This would give the community 'greater comfort', they argued. The mother of two was previously married to private equity investor Tom Fennell, with reports the couple called it quits about five years ago. She's also regularly been snapped at charity luncheons and events across the Harbour City. She will next appear in court on August 25. Her bail is to continue.

Mad Max director joins battle over Sydney beach booze plan
Mad Max director joins battle over Sydney beach booze plan

News.com.au

time11 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Mad Max director joins battle over Sydney beach booze plan

Hollywood filmmaker George Miller has thrown his weight behind a push to stop a BYO alcohol plan at one of Sydney's most famous beaches. A six-month experiment allowing beachgoers to bring their own alcohol to the Camp Cove Kiosk in Watsons Bay has won the backing of most Woollahra Municipal Council committee members, but the final call will be made later this month. Camp Cove Beach, a small, sheltered spot in Watsons Bay, is known for its calm waters and family-friendly atmosphere, particularly the section locals call 'Kiddie Corner,' where children learn to swim. While alcohol consumption is already legal on the sand, it is not widely publicised. The six-month BYO trial at the kiosk ran from December 2024 to June 2025, drawing strong community support but also fierce opposition from residents concerned about safety, anti-social behaviour, and preserving the beach's tranquil character. Council staff had recommended rejecting the plan after police and a handful of locals raised safety concerns, despite most submissions from Watsons Bay and Vaucluse residents endorsing the changes. Out of 77 public submissions, 48 backed the move, 28 opposed it, and one was unsure. Lawyer Adam Moxon Simpson, acting for Mr Miller and four other Camp Cove residents, urged Woollahra Council to reject the proposal, warning of 'alcohol risks in public spaces' and 'the absence of legislative tools to deal with issues.' 'There's a time and place for everything, but now is not the time for more alcohol on beaches and Kiddie Corner is not the place,' Mr Simpson said. 'It's a precious place for families.' Kiosk operator Omer Farhy said the 35-seat venue's proposal was modest and would not change the beach's peaceful character or spark anti-social behaviour. 'I am not a drinker myself and do not support drunken behaviour,' he said He added that he wanted to offer 'an elegant and relaxed' way to enjoy the beach with a 'sunset BYO drink.' In submissions, supporters praised the arrangement for boosting the community atmosphere and encouraging social interaction, describing it as a perfect fit for the relaxed coastal vibe. Many said there were no adverse incidents during the trial and that patrons acted responsibly. 'This absolutely should be allowed to go ahead,' one supporter wrote. 'Council should take a progressive stance on allowing people to BYO to the kiosk. I support this.' Another likened the idea to popular overseas seaside spots. 'Australia has a positive culture for gathering together for food and sundowners. Neilson Park recent reopening with the ability to have a cocktail or beer felt very community and European in a positive way,' they said. 'A trial at Camp Cove is very welcome.' Opponents were equally passionate, warning of safety hazards, environmental risks, and damage to the beach's family-friendly character. 'I have concerns about the mixing of alcohol, children, and swimming. If we can limit these interactions, then incidents can be avoided,' one opponent wrote. 'The kiosk currently and wisely does not serve anything in glass. Allowing people to bring glass bottles into an area with a concrete floor and where people are often barefoot is a mistake.' Another said Australia had 'poor statistics' regarding the high consumption of alcohol and the behavioural and social problems it causes. Police said they had no reports of anti-social behaviour during the trial but warned that promoting BYO could attract troublemakers, especially in summer, as the beach is not alcohol-free. Liberal councillor Mary-Lou Jarvis, who pushed for a second trial, said the proposal had divided Watsons Bay's 'very close-knit community.' 'You've got to be careful for what you wish. By alerting the public to that fact, in 12 months' time we might find ourselves in a situation where this has gone out of control,' she said. Despite advice from council officers, the majority of council voted to grant the Camp Cove Kiosk a 12-month licence to continue BYO alcohol, with restrictions including plastic cups and no drinking before noon. The decision will go to a full council vote on August 25.

MP tells tribunal Mark Latham's comments about him part of 'abusive obsession'
MP tells tribunal Mark Latham's comments about him part of 'abusive obsession'

ABC News

time12 hours ago

  • ABC News

MP tells tribunal Mark Latham's comments about him part of 'abusive obsession'

Independent Sydney MP Alex Greenwich has told a tribunal Mark Latham has an "abusive obsession" with him which began with a graphic tweet and involves using "tools to the workplace" to continue attacks. In a case before the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal (NCAT), Mr Greenwich alleges four public statements by the former One Nation state leader constituted unlawful homosexual vilification and sexual harassment in the workplace. They include a March 2023 tweet that was previously at the centre of a successful defamation case in the Federal Court, which resulted in Mr Greenwich being awarded $140,000. Mr Greenwich, an openly gay MP, told the tribunal on Tuesday he had been in public life for some 20 years but had never before been "diminished, demeaned [and] dehumanised" by someone to such an extent. "This was the first time in my political career where I have been so fundamentally attacked for who I am, for my sexuality, based on their vile thoughts about me," he said under cross-examination by Mr Latham's lawyer. He told the tribunal the attacks extended to a series of radio interviews, social media posts, interactions Mr Latham engaged in with his followers — and even a recent podcast. "This is a man who has an abusive obsession with me," Mr Greenwich said. He said it began with the tweet and had not stopped. From the public gallery of the small tribunal room, Mr Latham fired back: "It began with you." Mr Latham's tweet was in response to comments Mr Greenwich had provided to a journalist concerning violence against LGBTQIA+ protesters outside a church in Sydney's west, where Mr Latham was scheduled to speak. He referred to Mr Latham as a "disgusting human being". Posting on Twitter, now X, Mr Latham responded with: "Disgusting How does that compare with …" before describing sexual activity in graphic terms. Mr Latham's lawyer, Zali Burrows, suggested Mr Greenwich had delivered a "prepared speech" in his answers and asked for examples of Mr Latham's attacks. Mr Greenwich detailed "an ongoing belittling of me based on my sexuality", including tweets as recent as Tuesday, and described how it had prompted an "avalanche of hate" directed at him. "I wish I didn't have to be here today, but I have to be here because your client keeps on abusing me, keeps on attacking me, in a workplace we share." Mr Latham, who denies breaching the state's Anti-Discrimination Act, is expected to give evidence later on Tuesday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store