Two Republicans, one Democrat running in HD 11 special
One Democratic candidate and two Republicans have qualified for the House District 11 special election, scheduled for August.
Democratic candidate Alex Braswell, an American Sign Language interpreter, will face the winner of the Republican primary in May between Heath Allbright, a lumber business owner and a former member of the Cullman County Board of Education, and Don Fallin, a retired U.S. Army colonel.
The seat, taking in eastern Cullman and northern Blount counties, became vacant after Rep. Randall Shedd, R-Fairview, resigned last month to become constituent services director for Senate President Pro Tem Garlan Gudger, R-Cullman. The seat is solidly Republican. Shedd never faced general election opposition after winning a special election for the seat in 2013.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Braswell, 35 moved to Cullman in 2012 and worked as a pharmacy technician. She later went to Troy University to get a Bachelor's degree in interpreter training. Since then, she said she has traveled across the state interpreting for the deaf and hard of hearing community using American Sign Language.
'I know that I'm a Democrat, and I know that that could be a disadvantage, but whomever you voted for for president is between yourself and God,' she said in a phone interview last week. 'I just looked around my community, and I saw we needed an advocate. It's what interpreters do.'
Braswell said she wants to advocate for the protection of Section 504 of the federal Rehabilitation Act of 1973, which prohibits entities that receive federal funding from discriminating based on disability.
The law covers a wide range of disabilities, including vision and hearing impairments, autism, diabetes, Down syndrome, dyslexia and ADHD. A group of Republican attorneys general sued the federal government in September over the Biden administration's addition of a gender identity-related disorder to the disabilities protected under Section 504. Disability advocates said the suit could weaken protections for all people with disabilities.
'It would have disastrous side effects on not just our district, but the state as a whole,' she said. 'I wanted to speak up and help advocate for those communities that would suffer under the lack of Section 504.'
Her experience as a pharmacy technician also motivates her candidacy. Braswell supports SB 99, sponsored by Sen. Larry Stutts, R-Tuscumbia, which would create new state regulations on the prices and and purchases that pharmacy benefit managers can charge pharmacies.
'They provide genuine, one-on-one care. But for the last decade, they have really been suffering under prescription benefit managers,' she said. 'They're not getting proper reimbursement for the cost of drugs, and these pharmacies are taking a huge toll.'
Braswell also prioritizes opposition to SB 110, sponsored by Sen. Jack Williams, R-Wilmer, which would allow for the increased weight per axle when traveling with large loads. She said it would impact the Cullman community directly by making the roads less safe.
'If you add extra loads to 18-wheelers, or any company that is allowed to carry a larger load on their trucks, you're going to decrease the safety of our roads. That would be detrimental to the infrastructure of Cullman County,' Braswell said.
Allbright, 39, said in an interview Tuesday he is running for office to make a positive impact on his community.
'Being in business my whole life and being on the board of education, I've always wanted to have a positive impact on people,' he said. 'People have approached me about seeking higher office, and we just felt that everything lined up.'
He said education, traditional family values and cutting taxes and regulations for Alabama businesses are his top priorities if elected.
'I'm a conservative Christian. I have a family, a wife of 18 years, a 16-year-old and a 14-year-old daughter,' he said. 'Supporting traditional family values and defending those values against big big government, investing in local education.'
He said his values and leadership ability make him qualified for the job.
'My ability to lead people, … and knowing how things work and being able to get things accomplished,' he said, referring to his time on the Board of Education.
In his candidacy announcement on social media, Allbright promised to listen to his constituents' concerns with dignity and determination.
'I'm not your candidate, where I'm going to beat my podium, and say 'I'm going down there and going to fix this,'' he said. 'That's not me. However, I've always enjoyed leading people and having a positive impact on them.'
The Business Council of Alabama, a major force in Republican politics, has endorsed Allbright for the seat.
Fallin, 60, announced his candidacy via social media, and said in an interview Tuesday he prioritizes transparency and being a voice for the people of District 11.
'My number one priority is to be a voice for the people. I've talked to a lot of folks in the community, so I'm listening to what their concerns are,' he said.
According to a statement, Fallin served in the U.S. Army for 30 years and went on eight combat tours. He said he wants to run for office to continue to serve.
'Why I'm running is to continue to serve and be a voice for the people,' he said. 'That's kind of my message, and it seems to resonate well with all the people.'
He said he wants people to vote for the best candidate for them.
'If that's not me, then I will fully support whomever they they choose. But I believe, I think I bring a fresh look,' he said. 'I will represent the people, and that's really it to me. It's not overly complicated right now.'
After Fallin retired, he partnered with the Johnny Mac Soldiers Fund, a nonprofit that funds scholarships for children of fallen military.
'I look forward to continuing my commitment to service to my state and district with honesty and integrity, bringing a grounded perspective to the district and serving the people of District 11,' he wrote on Facebook.
The qualifying period for the election ended Tuesday at 5 p.m. The special primary election will be on May 13, and the special general election will be on Aug. 26.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
24 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
‘He's trying to rig the election.' Newsom bashes Trump as redistricting campaign kicks off
SACRAMENTO — Moments after California lawmakers passed a plan designed to undercut attempts by the president and fellow Republicans to keep control of Congress, Gov. Gavin Newsom said the state's proposed partisan redistricting that favors Democrats is a necessary counterweight to President Trump's threat to American democracy. Trump's assault on vote by mail and decision to send the military into U.S. cities are evidence of his authoritarian policies, and California must do its part to keep him in check, Newsom said. By deploying federal immigration agents in roving street raids and activating thousands of members of the National Guard in Los Angeles and Washington, D.C., Newsom said, Trump is amassing 'a private army for Donald Trump.' 'He's trying to rig the election, he's trying to set up the conditions where he can claim that the elections were not won fair and square,' Newsom said. 'Open your eyes to what is going on in the United States of America in 2025.' The argument is a preview of the messaging for the ballot measure campaign that Newsom and his Democratic Party allies will be running over the next 74 days. On Thursday, California lawmakers signed off on a Nov. 4 special election that will put partisan redistricting in front of California voters. The ballot measure, called Proposition 50, will ask voters to discard the congressional boundaries drawn by the state's independent redistricting commission in 2021 in favor of partisan districts that could boot as many as five California Republicans out of Congress. 'When all things are equal, and we're all playing by the same set of rules,' Newsom said, 'there's no question that the Republican Party will be the minority party in the House of Representatives next year.' California is 'responding to what occurred in Texas, we're neutralizing what occurred, and we're giving the American people a fair chance,' Newsom said. National Republican Congressional Committee Chair Rep. Richard Hudson of North Carolina accused Newsom of trying to 'rig' the system to advance his own political career. 'Instead of fixing the homelessness, crime, drug, and cost crises crushing the Golden State, Gavin Newsom is tearing up California's Constitution to advance his presidential ambitions,' Hudson said in a statement. California's new lines would neutralize efforts in Texas to redraw their congressional district maps to help elect five more GOP candidates in 2026. The Texas Legislature is expected to approve new district lines this week. The other option, Newsom said, is for California and Democrats to 'roll over and do nothing.' 'I think people all across the country are going to campaign here in California for this,' Newsom said. 'They recognize what's at stake. It's not just about the state of California. It's about the United States of America. It's about rigging the election. It's about completely gutting the rules.' Times staff writer Seema Mehta contributed to this report.
CBS News
an hour ago
- CBS News
Judge blocks Trump administration from expanding Florida's "Alligator Alcatraz" over environmental concerns
A federal judge on Thursday ordered an indefinite halt to new construction at an immigration detention facility that Florida officials have dubbed "Alligator Alcatraz," and barred any new detainees from being brought to the site, siding with environmental groups who said the facility is endangering the Everglades and its wildlife. The decision is a setback for Florida's Republican-led state government and its aggressive efforts to aid the Trump administration's hardline immigration agenda, including by deputizing thousands of state police as federal immigration officers. The order by U.S. District Court Judge Kathleen Williams did not require Florida officials to completely cease operations at Alligator Alcatraz, allowing the state to continue using existing structures there to detain immigrants suspected of being in the U.S. illegally. But Williams barred any more detainees from being transferred to the site — dashing plans to expand the detention center. The makeshift detention facility — located in what was largely an abandoned airfield — is one of several locations and prisons that Republican-led states have offered the Trump administration so they can be converted into immigration detention centers. Officials in Indiana and Nebraska have also allowed facilities in their states to hold immigrants facing deportation. Thursday's ruling stems from a lawsuit filed by the Miccosukee tribe and environmental activists who challenged operations at Alligator Alcatraz on environmental grounds. They've argued environmental reviews mandated in federal law should have been completed before the site was set up. Florida officials have argued Alligator Alcatraz is not subject to those federal environmental requirements because the facility is run by the state. The Trump administration has said it will reimburse Florida for the effort using federal funds. Williams had paused further construction at Alligator Alcatraz earlier this month, but only for two weeks. A separate lawsuit over the legal rights of those held at the Everglades facility is also playing out. That case was partially dismissed by the U.S. District Court Judge Rodolfo Ruiz earlier this week, since the Trump administration had designated an immigration court to hear the claims of those detained at Alligator Alcatraz, one of the main concerns raised by the lawsuit. But Ruiz allowed another part of the case centered on detainees' right to in-person and confidential legal consultations to proceed, transferring the lawsuit to another federal judge.
Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
Californians' love-hate relationship with high-speed rail
Presented by With help from Camille von Kaenel and Noah Baustin HOPE SPRINGS ETERNAL: California voters aren't confident the state's high-speed rail project will ever be finished, but they're not ready to give up on it either. Nearly two-thirds — 62 percent — of voters say that California should continue bankrolling the planned rail line from the Bay Area to Los Angeles after the Trump administration clawed back $4 billion in federal grants last month, according to an exclusive POLITICO-Citrin Center-Possibility Lab poll. The poll revealed a clear partisan divide among the more than 1,400 registered voters surveyed, as just 21 percent of Democrats said it's time to pull the plug, compared to 45 percent of independents and 62 percent of Republicans. But that doesn't mean liberal Californians believe it's any more likely that they'll be able to ride from Southern California to San Francisco in their lifetime. Just 27 percent of Democrats said there's a high likelihood the project will be completed, roughly matching the 23 percent of their conservative counterparts who believe California officials can finish the first high-speed rail line in North America. That seemingly counterintuitive outcome offers a lesson for Gov. Gavin Newsom and the candidates vying to replace him who've doubled down on their support: It's time to put up or shut up. 'There definitely is this sense that the state can't do big things,' said Andrew Acosta, a veteran California Democratic campaign consultant. 'Californians would like to see it happen, but show me the last project that came in on time or under budget.' That sentiment is reflected in the poll, as 38 percent of Democrats said their support is contingent on the project keeping to its current budget. But, in the short term, President Donald Trump's incessant hammering of a project beset with construction delays and cost overruns could be doing California officials a favor. His Federal Railroad Administration yanked $4 billion in Obama- and Biden-era grants last month, following a barrage of attacks from Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy, congressional and state Republicans. 'This project was Severely Overpriced, Overregulated, and NEVER DELIVERED,' Trump wrote on his social media platform Truth Social, the day the federal funding was revoked. 'Not a SINGLE penny in Federal Dollars will go towards this Newscum SCAM ever again.' Jack Citrin, a political science professor at University of California, Berkeley, and partner on the poll, said the partisan divide over whether California should continue the project reflects a broader trend on issues that have federal connections, like electric vehicle policies. 'Any of these questions that smell of Trump, the Democrats are going to be pushed in the opposite direction,' Citrin said. Newsom and high-speed rail backers, including powerful labor unions, have countered the Republican crackdown with a proposal to guarantee $1 billion in funding annually through the state's cap-and-trade program. Democratic voters' continued support for state funding could bolster their argument as negotiations over how to divvy up revenue generated by cap-and-trade auctions heat up with less than a month before the end of the legislative session. Those are signs that even without federal help, high-speed rail isn't going anywhere in the short term. Democratic lawmakers will likely face another reckoning sooner rather than later over a project that was originally slated for completion by 2020 and is now expected to open its initial line connecting Bakersfield to Merced in 2033, with no projected date for final completion. The rail line's price tag is now estimated to cost up to $128 billion, nearly four times its original $33 billion projection. But Citrin said the results show that Democrats remain hopeful about high-speed rail, even if they have doubts. 'I think a lot of this support shows that hope springs eternal,' he said. Did someone forward you this newsletter? Sign up here! PASS 'EM IF YOU'VE GOT 'EM: Kids are back in school, Labor Day plans are locked in, and it's hot enough to cook an egg on the sidewalk in Sacramento. All signs of one undeniable fact: It's almost the end of the session. Since recess ended, redistricting and a slew of major energy packages have dominated the conversation. But there's still some perfectly good legislation to pass outside the center of those dueling storms. At least so says a coalition of renewable energy business groups and advocates. The group — including former state Sen. Fran Pavley, Advanced Energy United and The Climate Center — sent a letter Thursday to Newsom and the leadership of both legislative houses and their appropriations committee making the case for giving some lower-profile energy bills some love. 'These common-sense bills will have a big impact on lowering energy costs, expanding access to clean energy, and strengthening grid reliability,' said Edson Perez, California lead with Advanced Energy United. 'But because they've faced no big controversy and advanced quietly, they risk slipping under the radar in this crowded legislative session.' So what's on the list? THE CLIMATE MONEY: Remember Proposition 4, the $10 billion climate bond voters approved last November as one of the year's big climate wins? The groups that championed it sure do — and now they're angling for their payday. Water, wildfire, conservation and renewable energy groups urged budget leaders in a Thursday letter to detail and pass a spending plan for at least $2.7 billion of the money this year. 'Given the cuts to and uncertainty around federal funding for natural resources, state investments are more important than ever,' wrote the groups, including The Nature Conservancy, American Clean Power-California and the Association of California Water Agencies. In its own letter, ACWA detailed 'shovel-ready' dam safety and recycled water projects that were originally slated to get money from the general fund but were cut in an agreement between Newsom and lawmakers to instead fund them with the bond money. Sen. Ben Allen and Assemblymember Steve Bennett, who chair the budget subcommittees overseeing environmental spending, have said in interviews they're interested in passing a spending plan for the bond money. But negotiations around the pot of money are tangled with negotiations over how to distribute cap-and-trade revenues as part of the program's reauthorization. — CvK SOAK IT UP: One reservoir's loss is another's gain. The California Water Commission voted unanimously this week to redirect $218.9 million in Prop 1 bond money it had allocated to the Los Vaqueros Reservoir expansion, which stalled last year over disagreement over who should pay for what, to the Sites Reservoir project, bringing the total state contribution to $1 billion for the proposal to store enough American River water to supply 3 million households per year. The money comes at a good time for Sites, the state's biggest new reservoir in decades, because a brand new cost estimate hiked its ten-year-old price tag of $4.5 billion up to $6.8 billion — but it's not enough. Filling in the gap will be the water agencies who've signed up to get some of the water but have yet to finalize their contribution — most notably the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, which has preliminarily signed up for a 22 percent share. The federal government, coming in at 9 percent right now, has also expressed interest in getting more of the water. If the State Water Resources Control Board signs off on its water permit as expected this year and, crucially, the cost-share is figured out, construction could start as soon as next year — making Sites a major test of California's ability to build large-scale water infrastructure in a changing climate. — CvK NUCLEAR BY THE BAY: Bay Area startups and tech veterans appear to be the earliest winners in the Trump administration's push to loosen nuclear regulations and speed up the development of small reactors. Eight of 10 companies chosen by the Department of Energy last week to compete for safety design approvals were founded in the San Francisco Bay Area or have former tech industry leaders in executive positions, as Francisco 'A.J.' Camacho reports for POLITICO's E&E News. That program aims to quickly advance nuclear technology and have at least three new pilot plants operating by July 4, 2026. The development comes after Trump signed a May executive order that allows safety designs for new reactors already tested and certified either by DOE or the Defense Department to avoid scrutiny from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Industry watchers say that change benefits startups, which are less eager to work with the NRC than are established nuclear developers like Westinghouse Nuclear and GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy. — AN RAISE A GLASS: How do you wrap up a day of lobbying legislators, many of whom are on the brink of rolling back major environmental regulations? You drink on it. The EnviroVoters Ed Fund (the group's 501(c)3 arm) hosted the Green CA Reception on Wednesday evening at Cafeteria 15L. POLITICO spotted Assemblymember Alex Lee in the crowd, plus a slew of environmental advocates including: Resource Renewal Institute Director of Advocacy and Engagement Scott Webb, Environmental Defense Center Chief Counsel Linda Krop, BlueGreen Alliance Senior California Policy Organizer Franki Gracey, Fearless Advocacy Inc. President Jennifer Fearing and, of course, California Environmental Voters Executive Director Mike Young. — NB SETTING THE AGENDA: On Wednesday, Aug. 27, POLITICO is hosting its inaugural California policy summit: The California Agenda. We're thrilled to announce our panel: 'California's Energy Policy at a Crossroads,' featuring state Senate energy and environment policy adviser Kip Lipper, Western States Petroleum Association CEO Catherine Reheis-Boyd, Newsom senior climate adviser Lauren Sanchez and environmental justice consultant Katie Valenzuela — and moderated by our editor Debra Kahn. The live event is currently at capacity, but will be streamed. Advance registration is required — request an online invite here. — Sammy Roth at the Los Angeles Times pins California's climate backsliding on Newsom. — Southern California is facing a triple threat of extreme heat, wildfire risk and thunderstorms. — A leading expert on energy affordability has a new book on the implications of solar getting cheaper.
