EXCLUSIVE BBC star accuses Met cop of using false identity to start 'coercive' relationship with her - and to hide he secretly had another family
A BBC presenter has told how she was left feeling suicidal after being duped into an 'abusive' relationship with an undercover Met Police officer, only to discover he had a wife and family.
Jackie Adedeji, 31, had just graduated from university and moved to London when she met the officer, who called himself Dan, during a night out in Shoreditch.
But Dan was a fake name - the officer was actually married and had a son, yet he pursued a years-long relationship with Jackie in which he alleges she was subject to coercive control and abuse.
When years later she reported him to police, she discovered he had already been reported for gross misconduct after he texted a 17-year-old girl he helped get home from a party back in 2010.
Regardless of Jackie's accusations of sexual misconduct, one of the officers involved had formerly stood trial for rape, something she said broke her trust in the system.
She alleges the investigating officer on her case then told her not to pursue her complaints through the police, adding she could always 'have your own Me Too moment' online.
After waiting nearly two years after first reporting the officer who manipulated her, Jackie says she has been told there is little evidence to continue with a criminal case because the officer's shift records are unable to be located.
Describing the heartbreaking impact of her ordeal, Jackie told MailOnline: 'I didn't want to be here anymore.'
Jackie first met Dan while on a night out in Shoreditch with a friend. She told how, while lost in the city, having only just moved to London, two men approached them and identified themselves as undercover police officers.
After a brief conversation, Jackie said the Met Police officer - who told her he was 34 but was actually closer to 40 - told her: 'I won't let you leave without getting your number first'.
The officer then pursued a romantic relationship with Jackie that lasted more than two years, and saw the officer frequently call her to meet him and have sexual contact with her while he was on duty.
Jackie told MailOnline how Dan initially raised concerns by refusing to take photographs with her and even telling her to duck and hide when in his car on their first date.
A pattern of 'manipulative' behaviour soon emerged, she said, including him confiscating her phone to delete all messages between them and frequently texting her to find out where she was.
She said the officer would interrogate her about what she had told her friends and family about him, and told her to stop listening to them.
'The relationship became really coercive and sexually exploitative,' Jackie said.
'He stripped me of my innocence and preyed on my naivety. He took advantage of me.
'He was constantly asking me for naked photos of myself, telling me he was a police officer and I could trust him.
'He would ask to meet me all the time when he was out working and would make sure to meet out of sight of CCTV cameras to perform sex acts.'
As well as meeting in the Shoreditch area while Dan was on duty, she said he would often book hotels for them to stay in - and she never went to his home, although he came to hers.
'He was very manipulative, our relationship was very confusing,' Jackie told MailOnline.
'If I ever asked to see his police ID he'd refuse and make out I was a 'firecracker' who 'had a temper'. I was scared.
'He was making me feel like what he wanted me to do was what I wanted too. He kept telling me he couldn't trust me and made me question myself and what I was feeling.
'I tried to leave him loads of times but he always found a way to make us get back together.'
Jackie said when she found out the officer had been using a fake name and actually had a family, she was so shocked she collapsed on the floor.
'I exploited myself for him, and he lied to me and psychologically manipulated me for years,' she said.
'He was basically a stranger. It was like I was a game to him.'
The discovery marked the end of the relationship, and after undergoing therapy she decided to report his behaviour in 2023. By that time, Dan had moved from the Met to the City of London Police, so his behaviour was investigated by them.
Dan was arrested by police for misconduct in a public office, and Jackie was informed she was the second woman to come forward about him in six months.
The second woman reported how, after attending a party and being victim to a crime there in 2010, the officer took photos with her before initiating a relationship with her, despite her being just 17.
'Dan' - then 32 - had added her on Facebook and messaged the teenager, saying: 'You still OWE me a drink for that missy!!'
Jackie said he also called her 'missy' throughout their relationship.
Dan resigned as a police officer before the 2024 panel found him guilty of gross misconduct in the then-teenager's case, describing his behaviour as 'a type of coercion' and 'an abuse of power and authority'.
But her ordeal was far from over. After her case had been passed to an investigating officer, she told MailOnline how the investigator took her out for coffee and began complimenting her appearance.
'It was so weird,' Jackie said. 'He had seen the contents of my phone, all the naked photos I had sent to Dan.
'He said I looked well and was very photogenic. He told me he had sent a photo from my initial interview to his colleagues to show them.
'He said I'd be better off having my 'own Me Too moment' than moving forward with reporting Dan to police.'
After the meeting, Jackie said she didn't sleep for two days and was left with suicidal thoughts.
'I felt like I couldn't challenge him. I was back in the same position, I felt like I was screaming into a box and no-one could hear me,' she said.
Jackie went to London's Victims' Commissioner Claire Waxman, who advocated for the officer's removal from the case. An officer from Professional Standards was assigned to take her statement - but when Jackie googled him, she found that he had previously stood trial for rape. He was not convicted.
Jackie says she has not had an update on the criminal investigation for around three months, and has lost faith in the police.
Describing the impact Dan's behaviour, and the reporting process, has had, Jackie told MailOnline: 'I had anxiety and was frequently calling the Samaritans. It had me questioning my entire life, I didn't want to be here anymore.
'I was not sleeping, I wasn't eating, I was crying every single day, I was losing it basically.
'I'm still confused about my own self and I'm sensitive to my emotions. But now I get to show up and be who I am.
'I've not had a voice in this but now I do. He can't step on me anymore and make me feel small.
'There's no right way to be a victim.'
In the summer of last year, Jackie was told by City of London Police that the case file had been sent to the Crown Prosecution Service for a charging decision, but officers later admitted this wasn't the case.
The case had instead been sent for early advice, and almost a year later it has still not been sent for a charging decision.
City of London Police told MailOnline the criminal investigation into Dan is still ongoing.
Misconduct proceedings into the second officer, who is said to have discouraged Jackie from pursuing the case, are ongoing and being carried out by British Transport Police.
A spokesperson for City of London Police said: 'Last year a criminal investigation began following the arrest of an officer for Misconduct in a Public office.
'A separate complaint against the same officer was also investigated under Police Conduct Regulations, resulting in him being found guilty of gross misconduct. He is no longer a serving officer.
'We cannot disclose details of the criminal investigation that may prejudice the case but accept the victim's complaints and fully recognise the importance of trust and confidence in how our investigations are carried out.
'We referred all of the victims' concerns to the Independent Office for Police Conduct for consideration, and after receiving their advice it should continue to be investigated locally, we have listened to the concerns raised and passed the complaint to a separate force (British Transport Police) for independent review.'
The Met has been contacted for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Baroness Bra and her billionaire husband net a £2million profit as they sell two more UK homes... with friends suggesting they want to start a new life in Miami
Michelle Mone and her billionaire husband Doug Barrowman are offloading some of their British properties as friends say they want to start a new life in Miami, The Mail on Sunday can reveal. Records show Baroness 'Bra', 53, and Mr Barrowman, 60, have sold two Glasgow townhouses to celebrity friends in the last 12 months – making £2 million in profit. A mews house in Chelsea, west London, linked to Ms Mone's son Declan's firm has also been sold for £2.185 million to a senior member of a Middle Eastern Royal Family. And last year the couple sold their £19 million London home and the £6.8 million Lady M yacht. Ms Mone's friends last night said she had told them she is seeking to start afresh in Miami, Florida. The couple are at the centre of an anti-corruption probe by the National Crime Agency which saw £75 million of their assets frozen. The agency is investigating PPE Medpro, led by Mr Barrowman, which was awarded a government contract to supply protective equipment during Covid after being placed in a priority lane on the recommendation of Ms Mone. Paperwork suggests the firm paid Mr Barrowman £60 million in 'profit', prompting him to put £29 million into a trust benefiting Ms Mone and her children. Soon after they received the cash boost, firms registered on the Isle of Man and linked to Mr Barrowman's Knox Group – Breck Ltd, Bagshaw Ltd and Praeban Ltd – bought a series of properties on Park Circus in Glasgow's West End costing £10,025,000. Between December 2020 and August 2022 the firms bought nine homes in the area. Yet in December 2023, a number of the properties were frozen under the Proceeds of Crime Act. Now a Mail on Sunday investigation shows the couple have begun to offload some of their empire. There is no suggestion that any of the sales breached existing orders. One house has been bought by Ms Mone's friend Nick Haddow, a photographer who shot her Ultimo bra campaign with supermodel Helena Christensen in 2006. The house was bought in 2020 for £1.7 million by a firm co-owned by Mr Barrowman's Knox group but records show it was sold to Mr Haddow's company Haddow and Lobjani Ltd last year for £2 million. Another nearby home bought in July 2020 for £1.425 million was sold to a Scottish rock star for £2.8 million earlier this year. Firms linked to the couple are thought to have made around £2 million in profits on the homes. Our probe shows they could be earning around £21,500 a month by letting some of the other homes. The Department of Health is suing PPE Medpro over claims that gowns supplied by the firm were not fit for use.
Evening Standard
an hour ago
- Evening Standard
The Gold Season 2 on BBC One review: still a criminally good time
Even with only scattered historical references here and there, it's a romp. We return to the bowels of the Met Police, where DCS Brian Boyce (Hugh Bonneville) and his loyal deputies have been slogging away trying to chase down a trail that's gone very cold indeed. They narrowly missed nabbing convict John Palmer (Tom Cullen, suave as ever) at the end of season one; now, he's living the high life in Tenerife, swindling British tourists by selling them timeshare flats.
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Post Office victims offered ‘pathetic' payouts: 0.5% of their claims
Dozens of postmasters caught up in the Post Office Horizon scandal have been offered compensation of just a fraction of their original claims, according to a forensic accountant working on their cases. Kay Linnell, a former chief investigating accountant at the Inland Revenue, now HM Revenue & Customs, described the offers made to victims as 'pathetic' and argued that the compensation schemes seemed 'designed to fail'. She is aware of about 30 subpostmasters who have received offers of between half a per cent and 15 per cent of their original claim. While many are reluctant to speak out while their claims are still being processed, The Sunday Times has been told of one former subpostmistress who has been offered just 0.56 per cent of what she believed she was entitled to. Linnell, 70, has been fighting alongside Sir Alan Bates for 12 years to secure justice for hundreds of subpostmasters who were wrongly fired and prosecuted by the Post Office due to financial shortfalls in their branch accounts. Those shortfalls were found to be the fault of the Horizon IT system — yet the Post Office continued to prosecute victims even after it was alerted to potential problems. Linnell, who was appointed OBE in January for services to justice, worked with Bates's Justice For Subpostmasters Alliance (JFSA) free of charge and was one of the figures portrayed in the ITV drama series Mr Bates vs the Post Office. She became involved through her business partner, Barbara Jeremiah, who got to know Jo Hamilton, one of the most high-profile victims, because she bought lunch at her Post Office in their small Hampshire village every day on her way to work. More recently, Linnell has been helping with compensation claims for the 555 subpostmasters who secured a High Court ruling against the Post Office in 2019. They are eligible for compensation via the group litigation order (GLO) scheme, which is one of four schemes being administered by the Department for Business and Trade. Claimants can opt for a fixed sum of £75,000 or to seek an individual settlement of their losses, likely to require a higher payout. The claims are initially assessed by the business department but if there are disputes the cases can be referred to an independent panel for review and ultimately to the independent reviewer, who is a retired High Court judge. As of March, 282 of the 446 claims made had been paid, although 155 of those settled accepted the £75,000 fixed payment. However, growing numbers of subpostmasters believe the scheme is denying them the compensation they deserve. Last month, Bates said the government had turned it into a 'quasi kangaroo court', and assurances that the scheme would be 'non-legalistic' had turned out to be 'worthless'. Officials have been demanding documents from claimants that many had lost years ago. Bates also revealed he had been presented with a 'take it or leave it' offer amounting to less than half his original claim. Linnell said she had been contacted by about 45 to 50 claimants whose offers appeared to be 'substantially undervalued'. She added about 30 of those had received offers worth less than one sixth of their claim, adding these were the cases 'I get most upset about'. Linnell said that 'when you boil down the patheticness of the offers', they were the result of the scheme administrators putting a much lower value on the loss of investments that subpostmasters suffered when they were forced to sell assets to cover their account shortfalls. She added that a similar approach was being taken towards loss of future earnings — the amount subpostmasters should be compensated for losing their livelihoods. Linnell cited the case of one subpostmistress who has been offered 0.56 per cent of her claim. While the woman wishes to remain anonymous, she became a victim of the Horizon scandal shortly after purchasing a small Post Office branch that had generated low profits under the previous owner. She took out a substantial bank loan to add a café and shop. However, when the branch reopened after renovations, she was unable to pay suppliers because the Post Office had taken funds to recoup shortfall losses that were, in fact, the result of Horizon. This forced her to close the branch just six weeks later, at which point the bank demanded full repayment of her loan. The former subpostmistress contacted Linnell when putting together her compensation claim. 'Her claim had gone through all the checks Alan and I agreed should be in place, before the department started moving the goalposts,' Linnell said. 'It came back with an offer that was so pathetic.' Linnell said the dispute arose because the officials assessing her claim did 'not accept her trading and profit forecasts'. Instead, they cited the previous owner's revenue streams, despite the fact that the investments made by the subpostmistress would have meant that the business probably would have generated higher returns in future. 'I've gone back to her lawyers and suggested they submit the business plan that the bank happily accepted when issuing the loan,' Linnell said. Linnell, like Bates, believes the GLO scheme has become overly bureaucratic and legalistic, pointing out that three law firms are involved in the process. 'This is a pro bono scheme, it doesn't need to be following strict legal principles,' she said. She also believes that despite promises made by ministers, the officials involved in the schemes are attempting to reduce the total amount paid out in compensation. Labour has set aside £1.8 billion to settle claims. Linnell added: 'They are finding every legal loophole they can think of, under civil litigation rules, not to pay. It's designed to fail. What they are trying to do is to keep a handle on cashflow.' The government disputes this characterisation. A Department for Business and Trade spokesman said: 'We recognise the suffering that sub-postmasters have endured, which is why this government developed our compensation arrangement in discussion with Sir Alan Bates as well as Dr Kay Linnell and their lawyers, with £964 million having now been paid to over 6,800 claimants across all the Horizon schemes. 'Victims who are unhappy with their offer have access to legal support and an independent panel to review their claim.'
