Vanguard just issued a warning for future retirees — here's why ‘retirement is changing' and how to prepare
A near-record number of Americans are grappling with $1,000 car payments and many drivers can't keep up. Here are 3 ways to stay ahead
5 ways to boost your net worth now — easily up your money game without altering your day-to-day life
Cost-of-living in America is still out of control — use these 3 'real assets' to protect your wealth today
That's not what retirement looks like for many, though, and it's not what a growing number of future retirees want.
Vanguard recently published an article titled "Retirement is changing – Are you prepared?" which addresses how people are changing their mindset about retirement.
While it was written by one of the company's European executives and is based on a survey of British savers and investors aged 50 to 70, many American retirees will be able to relate.
So, what is the big change Vanguard is talking about? Retirees no longer want to quit working cold turkey. They want to retire gradually for a mix of financial and social reasons.
Unfortunately, while this may be the dream for many, it's not always the reality.
Nearly 60% of American retirees stopped working earlier than they had planned, according to one study. Future workers must be prepared in case it turns out their ideal retirement ends up being off the table.
Vanguard said that the majority of future retirees are not interested in just completely stopping work on a set date. Only 24% intended to adopt the cliff-edge view of retirement, working one day and then being retired the next.
Most either planned to scale back hours slowly at their existing job (27%), "mostly" stop work on a set date (21%), or switch to a different job (14%). The reasons cited included not feeling ready to completely retire, to top up their income, and social reasons.
This finding is very similar to that reported by TransAmerica Center, which said that 54% of U.S. workers plan to keep working in some capacity in retirement, including 16% who plan to work full-time and 38% who plan to work part-time. Forty-seven percent of workers also said they plan to reduce hours and phase down gradually, while just 24% immediately plan to stop working at a certain age or after saving a specific sum.
These plans for part-time work mean that life could look very different for tomorrow's seniors — but it's also worth noting that making your financial plans based around this dream could lead to problems.
Read more: Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead
Vanguard has an important warning for those who plan to retire gradually — it's not always going to happen.
It found that of those who had already retired, only 38% retired gradually, much lower than the 62% of non-retired people who plan to retire gradually. Pew Research also noted that only around 19% of adults ages 65 and over in the U.S. were working either full-time or part-time in 2022.
This means it becomes very important to prepare for the reality that you may not be able to retire gradually as planned. To make sure you're prepared:
Save enough money to support yourself by the traditional retirement age of 62 even if you hope to retire later
Consider your health status and job skills when deciding whether a phased-in retirement is likely to be possible
Focus on finding an "age-friendly" employer who has plenty of older workers on staff and who appears to value experience as much as youth
Take good care of your health with exercise and regular preventative care to maximize the chances you'll be healthy enough to phase into retirement gradually
Set realistic expectations for your retirement, which likely means working until 70 is probably not in the cards
Retirement doesn't have to look like it once did — you can try to set yourself up for the gradual retirement so many dream of. However, you must be ready in case that doesn't happen and proactive about saving the money you need for a secure future even if you retire at a younger age.
I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 5 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast)
'Savers are losers': Robert Kiyosaki warned that millions of 401(k)s and IRAs will be 'toast' — here's his advice for older Americans who want to protect their wealth
Suze Orman: If you think you're ready to retire, think again — 4 critical money moves to avoid a financial crisis in retirement
This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Buzz Feed
6 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
This Senator Made A Very, Very Good Point About Trump's Weird Comment About Gold
A bunch of Donald Trump's new tariffs went into effect on August 7. But there's one thing that won't be hit with a tariff, and that's gold. Yep, gold is off the table! Some people pointed how that this could be because of all of the gold in the Oval Office. Other people compared him to an Austin Powers villain. And this person said, "I miss when the federal government wasn't a meme." But one reply to Trump's post is going more viral than the rest, and it's from Senator Chris Coons of Delaware. Here's what he said: "Trump could have cancelled tariffs on groceries, clothing, back-to-school supplies – any one of a number of things that would have reduced costs for American families. Instead, he chose gold." NextGen America responded to that comment, "Trumponomics, simplified: More golden ballrooms for him, more tariffs for the rest of us." Thoughts?
The Hill
6 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump administration invalidates California's emissions reduction agreement with truck manufacturers
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has declared that an emissions agreement between California and four major truck makers is 'unenforceable' — paving the way for noncompliance with the Golden State's pollution rules, which are stricter than federal standards. The FTC made this determination as the agency closed an investigation into whether several truck and engine manufacturers violated antitrust laws by engaging in a voluntary ' Clean Truck Partnership ' with the California Air Resources Board (CARB). Truck manufacturers, in the July 2023 partnership, agreed to abide by California's emissions standards in exchange for certain concessions. Among those standards is the Advanced Clean Trucks rule, which requires 7.5 percent of heavy-duty vehicles to be emissions-free by 2035. The Omnibus Regulation, meanwhile, has sought to slash nitrogen oxide emissions by 90 percent and update engine testing protocols. The FTC said on Monday that it was closing the antitrust investigation after receiving commitments from four truck manufacturers — Daimler Truck, International Motors, PACCAR and Volvo Group — that they would abandon the Clean Truck Partnership. Specifically, the commitments agreed that 'the Clean Truck Partnership is unenforceable and that none of the manufacturers has ever or will ever attempt to enforce the Clean Truck Partnership's terms against another manufacturer,' according to the FTC. 'CARB's regulatory overreach posed a major threat to American trucking and, in our view, presented serious antitrust concerns,' Taylor Hoogendoorn, deputy director of the FTC's Bureau of Competition, said in a statement. 'The Bureau is pleased that the leading heavy-duty truck manufacturers agreed to a course correction,' Hoogendoorn continued, adding that the reversal would put the partnership 'squarely in the rearview mirror and prevent repeats of CARB's troubling regulatory gambit.' The FTC's announcement came a day after the same four truck makers filed a lawsuit against California regulators, arguing that the Golden State lacks the authority to enforce its heavy-duty vehicle emissions rules. The complaint alleges that the federal government had rendered the standards 'unlawful' in June. At the time, President Trump signed off on three congressional resolutions that upended the rules, which previously received the approval of the Biden administration. In closing the antitrust investigation, an FTC statement referred to past concerns causing the agency to launch the case. Criticizing the structure of the Clean Truck Partnership, the FTC expressed concern that the agreement 'forced manufacturers to produce 'zero emissions' engines' even if CARB rules were later overturned. The agency also expressed concern that 'the agreement did not foreclose one truck manufacturer from enforcing its restrictions against a competing truck manufacturer.'
Entrepreneur
6 minutes ago
- Entrepreneur
Where Retirees Are Most and Least Likely to Run Out of Money
Seniors in states with high projected incomes and moderate expenses may enjoy more security in retirement. How much money do you really need to retire with peace of mind? Americans believe the "magic number" for a comfortable retirement is $1.26 million, down $200,000 year over year, according to recent research from Northwestern Mutual. Still, despite the slight decrease, the anticipated figure for retirement security remains out of reach for many people in the U.S. Related: About 45% of Americans Will Run Out of Money in Retirement, Including Those Who Invested and Diversified. Here Are the 4 Biggest Mistakes Being Made. One in five Americans over the age of 50 has no retirement savings, and more than half worry they won't have enough money to last in retirement, per an AARP survey. New research from Seniorly, a platform that helps family and older adults find senior living options, unpacks where seniors are most and least likely to outlive their retirement savings. Seniorly used the latest available data on life expectancy at age 65, Social Security income, household net worth and cost-of-living metrics in its analysis. The research found that across the U.S., the average projected retirement income from benefits, savings and investments is $762,000, while projected living expenses over 18.2 years are $877,000, which translates to a $115,000 shortfall. Related: The National Average Salary Is About $65,000. Here's What Americans Are Saving for Retirement — How Do Your Stats Compare? However, the average savings gap retirees face varies significantly depending on their state. New York emerged as the state where retirees are most likely to outlive their retirement savings: Due to high expenses that even substantial incomes don't always offset, the average senior in New York will need about $448,000 more than they have, per the study. Seniors in Hawaii, Washington, D.C., Alaska and California are the next most likely to see retirement income gaps, with average shortages ranging from $417,000 to $337,000, according to the research. Related: Is Early Retirement Really Out of The Question For You? Here Are 10 Money-Saving Tips That Can Help Make It Happen. Retirees who want a better chance at financial comfort during their golden years might consider states where, on average, people have enough income and assets to cover their expected expenses. Thanks to relatively high projected incomes and moderate expenses, seniors in Washington, Montana and Utah are the least likely to outlive their retirement savings, with average surpluses of $146,000, $121,000 and $43,000, respectively, per the data. Check out Seniorly's full ranking of the states where seniors are most and least likely to outlive their retirement savings here.
