Foreign tax provision in Trump budget bill spooks Wall Street
Wall Street is warning that a little-publicised provision in
US President Donald Trump's
budget bill that allows the government to raise taxes on foreign investments in the US could upend markets and hit American industry.
Section 899 of the bill that the House of Representatives passed last week would allow the US to impose additional taxes on companies and investors from countries that it deems to have punitive tax policies.
Investors, US companies with foreign owners and international firms with American branches could all be affected, potentially chilling corporate investment and fuelling a retreat from US assets.
This retreat, hastened by the Trump administration's
tariff
policies, comes as the US is more dependent than ever on foreign investors to buy its growing stock of government debt.
READ MORE
'This is a market-spooking event, hitting already fragile confidence, particularly from foreign investors,' said Greg Peters, co-chief investment officer at PGIM Fixed Income.
'It's all self-inflicted wounds at a time when you have a lot of debt that needs to get financed here. So the timing is really quite poor.'
Ford Chief Lisa Brankin on accelerating the switch to EVs
Listen |
41:35
A senior executive at a major Wall Street bank said: 'This is one of the more worrisome ideas to have come out of DC this year. If it goes forward, it will definitely cool foreign investment in the US.'
Morgan Stanley analysts said Section 899 would probably put pressure on the dollar, adding that it 'disincentivises foreign investment', while JPMorgan noted that it had 'significant implications for both US and foreign corporations'.
[
US-China trade talks 'stalled', says Scott Bessent
Opens in new window
]
The measure targets countries with what the US calls 'unfair foreign taxes'. Most European Union countries, the UK, Australia, Canada and others around the world would be affected, according to law firm Davis Polk.
For foreign investors, Section 899 would increase taxes on dividends and interest on US stocks and some corporate bonds by 5 percentage points every year for four years. It would also impose taxes on the American portfolio holdings of sovereign wealth funds, which are at present exempt.
'The long-term implications [are] going to be quite severe for international companies operating in the United States,' said Jonathan Samford, president of the Global Business Alliance, a trade group representing the largest foreign multinationals investing in the US.
'This provision is not going to impact bureaucrats in Paris or London. It's going to impact American workers in Paris, Kentucky, and London, Ohio.'
Tim Adams, chief executive of the Institute of International Finance, which represents 400 of the world's biggest banks and financial institutions, said that 'at a time when the administration is actively seeking foreign investment in the US to support job creation, capital formation and reshoring of manufacturing capability, this could be counter-productive'.
Mr Adams added: 'Any disruption to the flow of capital and foreign direct investment could have negative unintended consequences for American companies, jobs and economic competitiveness.'
While foreign investors in US stocks and some corporate bonds may face higher taxes, it is unclear whether that tax would extend to treasury debt, according to several analysts and investors. Interest earned on treasuries is usually tax-exempt for investors based outside the US, and making that taxable would represent an enormous change from current policy.
'Section 899 is legally ambiguous regarding a potential tax on treasuries ,' said Lewis Alexander, chief economic strategist at hedge fund Rokos Capital Management. 'Taxing treasuries could be counterproductive as any potential revenues likely would be outweighed by a resulting increase in borrowing costs [as investors sell the debt].'
But even if treasuries were not directly taxed, Section 899 would represent another concern for international holders of US debt when many are wary of the country's gaping deficit and vacillating tariff policies.
'Our foreign clients are calling us panicked about this,' said a managing director at a large US bond fund. 'It's not totally clear whether treasury holdings will be taxed, but our foreign investors are currently assuming they will be.' – Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
6 hours ago
- Irish Times
US judge blocks Trump bid to invalidate work permits for 5,000 Venezuelans
A federal judge prevented the Trump administration from invalidating work permits and other documents granting lawful status to about 5,000 Venezuelans, a subset of the nearly 350,000 whose temporary legal protections the US supreme court last week allowed to be terminated. US district judge Edward Chen in San Francisco in a Friday night ruling concluded that Homeland Security secretary Kristi Noem was likely to have exceeded her authority when in February she invalidated those documents while more broadly ending the temporary protected status granted to the Venezuelans. The US supreme court on May 19th lifted an earlier order Judge Chen issued that prevented the administration, as part of president Donald Trump's hardline immigration agenda, from terminating deportation protection conferred to Venezuelans under the Temporary Protected Status, or TPS, programme. But the high court stated specifically it was not preventing any Venezuelans from still challenging Ms Noem's related decision to invalidate documents they were issued pursuant to that program that allowed them to work and live in the United States. READ MORE Such documents were issued after the US Department of Homeland Security, in the final days of Democratic president Joe Biden's tenure, extended the TPS program for the Venezuelans by 18 months to October 2026, an action Ms Noem then moved to reverse. TPS is available to people whose home country has experienced a natural disaster, armed conflict or other extraordinary event. Lawyers for several Venezuelans and the advocacy group National TPS Alliance asked Judge Chen to recognise the continuing validity of those documents, saying without them thousands of migrants could lose their jobs or be deported. Judge Chen, in siding with them, said nothing in the statute that authorised the Temporary Protected Status programme allowed Ms Noem to invalidate the documents. [ US supreme court allows Trump administration to revoke Venezuelan migrant protections Opens in new window ] Judge Chen, an appointee of Democratic president Barack Obama, noted the administration estimated only about 5,000 of the 350,000 Venezuelans held such documents. 'This smaller number cuts against any contention that the continued presence of these TPS holders who were granted TPS-related documents by the secretary would be a toll on the national or local economies or a threat to national security,' Judge Chen wrote. The Department of Homeland Security did not respond to a request for comment on Saturday. Judge Chen ruled hours after the US supreme court in a different case allowed Trump's administration to end the temporary immigration 'parole' granted to 532,000 Venezuelan, Cuban, Haitian and Nicaraguan migrants under a different Biden-era programme. – Reuters (c) Copyright Thomson Reuters 2025
Irish Times
12 hours ago
- Irish Times
Trump announces 50% steel tariffs and hails ‘blockbuster' deal with Japan
Donald Trump announced on Friday he was doubling foreign tariffs on steel imports to 50 per cent, as the US president celebrated a 'blockbuster' agreement for Japan-based Nippon Steel to invest in US Steel during a rally in Pennsylvania. Surrounded by men in orange hardhats at a US Steel plant in West Mifflin, Mr Trump unveiled the new levies, declaring that the dramatic rate increase would 'even further secure the steel industry in the United States'. 'Nobody is going to get around that,' Mr Trump said, of the tariff rate hike from what was 25 per cent. In a social media post after his remarks, Mr Trump announced that the 50 per cent tariffs on steel would also apply to imported aluminium and would take effect on June 4th. READ MORE 'This will be yet another BIG jolt of great news for our wonderful steel and aluminium workers,' he stated in the post. It was not immediately clear how the announcement would affect the trade deal negotiated earlier this month that saw tariffs on UK steel and aluminium reduced to zero. Mr Trump's Friday tariffs announcement came a day after a federal appeals court temporarily allowed his tariffs to remain in effect staying a decision by a US trade court that blocked the president from imposing the duties. The trade court ruling, however, does not impede the president's ability to unilaterally raise tariffs on steel imports, an authority granted under a national security provision called section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act. The precise relationship between Nippon Steel and US Steel raised questions on Friday, even for some of Mr Trump's allies. The president has thrown his full support behind the deal, months after insisting he was 'totally against' a $14.9 billion bid by Nippon Steel for its US rival. [ Ireland cannot base its economic strategy on the 'Taco' theory – Trump Always Chickens Out Opens in new window ] The United Steelworkers union had previously urged Mr Trump to reject Nippon's bid, dismissing the Japanese firm's commitments to invest in the US as 'flashy promises' and claiming it was 'simply seeking to undercut our domestic industry from the inside'. Speaking to steelworkers, Mr Trump said that US Steel would 'stay an American company' after what he is now calling 'a partnership' with Nippon. But US Steel's website links to a stand-alone site with the combined branding of the two companies that features a statement describing the transaction as 'US Steel's agreement to be acquired by NSC'. On the website touting the deal, there were also multiple references to 'Nippon Steel's acquisition of US Steel' and the 'potential sale of US Steel to Nippon Steel'. Even pro-Trump commentators on Fox expressed bafflement over the exact nature of the deal. 'This is being described as 'a partnership', this deal between Nippon and US Steel – but then it's described as an acquisition on the US Steel website,' Fox host Laura Ingraham pointed out on her Friday night show. [ Trump and the 'nasty' Taco trade Opens in new window ] She asked a guest from another pro-Trump outlet, Breitbart: 'Who owns the majority stake in this company?' When the guest said he did not know, Ms Ingraham suggested Mr Trump might not be aware of the details. 'I don't know if he was fully informed about the terms of the deal. We just don't know.' Mr Trump's predecessor, Joe Biden, had blocked Nippon's acquisition, citing national security concerns, during his final weeks in office. During his remarks at the rally, Mr Trump gloated that the Nippon investment would once again make the American steelmaker 'synonymous with greatness'. He said protections were included to 'ensure that all steel workers will keep their jobs and all facilities in the United States will remain open and thriving' and said Nippon had committed to maintaining all of US Steel's operating blast furnaces for the next decade. The president also promised that every US steelworker would soon receive a $5,000 bonus – prompting the crowd to start a round of 'U-S-A!' chants. Mr Trump told the steelworkers in attendance that there was 'a lot of money coming your way'. 'We won't be able to call this section a rust belt any more,' Trump said. 'It'll be a golden belt.' During the event, Mr Trump invited local members of United Steelworkers on to the stage to promote the Nippon deal, which saw its leader break with the union to support it. Praising the president, Jason Zugai, vice-president of Irvin local 2227, said he believed the investments would be 'life-changing'. But the powerful United Steelworkers union remained wary. 'Our primary concern remains with the impact that this merger of US Steel into a foreign competitor will have on national security, our members and the communities where we live and work,' United Steelworkers president David McCall said in a statement. 'Issuing press releases and making political speeches is easy. Binding commitments are hard.' Mr Trump framed the administration's drive to boost domestic steel production as 'not just a matter of dignity or prosperity or pride' but as 'above all, a matter of national security'. He blamed 'decades of Washington betrayals and incompetence and stupidity and corruption' for hollowing out the once-dominant US steel industry, as the jobs 'melted away, just like butter'. 'We don't want America's future to be built with shoddy steel from Shanghai. We want it built with the strength and the pride of Pittsburgh,' he said. In his remarks at a US steel plant, Mr Trump also repeated many of the false claims that have become a feature of his rallies including the lie that the 2020 election was stolen from him. He gloated over his 2024 victory and, gesturing toward his ear that was grazed by a would-be assassin's bullet last year at a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, said it was proof that a higher power was watching over him. He also called on congressional Republicans to align behind his 'one big, beautiful bill,' urging attendees to lobby their representatives and senators to support the measure. – Guardian service
Irish Times
14 hours ago
- Irish Times
Ireland cannot base its economic strategy on the ‘Taco' theory – Trump Always Chickens Out
The Trump tariff story rolls on and on. Even over the past week or so, we have had threats of 50 per cent tariffs on the EU to apply from this weekend, then a postponement of this deadline till July , then a court ruling that the US president did not have the authority to impose such blanket tariffs at all, followed by an appeal court decision which put a stay on this decision. Confused? Well, join the club. Even the finest legal and political minds are struggling to keep up and identify where, exactly, we are now and what might happen next. The financial markets have been operating on the basis of what has been dubbed the 'Taco trade' – with analysts arguing that investors should keep buying shares because 'Trump always chickens out' on his tariff threats. We can hope this continues and that the worst does not happen. But it would be most unwise to base Ireland's economic strategy on the Taco theory and the hope that all the transatlantic trouble will be sorted quickly. Donald Trump could as easily lash out as chicken out. We just don't know. The odds are that the rocky period we are now seeing is not going to end any time soon. Trump's talk of doing strings of trade 'deals' is based more on Maga promo than reality, judging by the flimsy details which have emerged to date. Treasury secretary Scott Bessent's comment late on Thursday that talks with China are 'stalled' is also significant. READ MORE And the negotiations with the EU do not seem to have made much progress, as a Brussels hierarchy driven by process meets the chaos of Washington. Smarter minds in Dublin worry that the EU may be in a dangerous place, being late in the queue of countries trying to reach some kind of accommodation with Trump. The extent to which Trump can use his tariffs weapons is now in question, after the federal trade court decision that he exceeded his powers with blanket tariffs. But he will appeal – and still has the legal option to use tariffs in specific sectors on national security grounds, like tech and, important for Ireland, pharma . His new budget bill also gives the US the power to target companies and individuals from countries seen to treat US companies unfairly with penal extra taxes. Tax wars could yet join trade wars. So where does this leave Ireland? The Government cannot be hypnotised into inaction by the White House and the risks from what Trump does next. It needs to be seen to get on with it and send out a message that it is going about its business amid the international chaos. And here the next couple of months will be crucial. A review of Ireland's massive State investment plan – the National Development Programme (NDP) – is due for publication over the summer. So is the so-called Summer Economic Strategy, which sets out the game plan for the Budget. After a shaky start, the Coalition needs to use these to try to shape a new narrative. The Government can't remove the uncertainty that has spread through the economy and is now stalling investment and, increasingly, hiring. But it can try to underpin confidence by focusing on doing a few important things. One is approaching the budget in a sane and strategic way – unlike last year's pre-election giveaway – and building Ireland's leeway for a possible hit to corporate tax revenues and what seems now an inevitable general economic slowdown. [ Truth Social diplomacy, a shock court ruling and fashion magnate advice: A week inside the EU-US tariff talks Opens in new window ] This will require a summer battle between the budget ministers Paschal Donohoe and Jack Chambers and the rest of the Cabinet, who will see extra billions and want to spend them. And, for now, extra billions are indeed likely. Ireland's growth figures, and quite possibly corporate tax revenues, are about to get another boost from huge exports to the US so far this year, as pharma and other sectors try to get product across the Atlantic there before tariffs hit. On paper, Ireland's economic boom is about to get boomier. In reality, this is a classic once-off boost which will reverse, sooner rather than later. The other key challenge for Ministers is to start to get to grips with the big infrastructural blockages facing the economy and building some kind of positive narrative, rather than continued talk of failure and a seeming inability to progress anything. This is now urgent. Big US investors here have projects on hold due to the tariff uncertainty. Sooner or later they will have to make a call on where to invest next. Ireland cannot control the impact of whatever Trump does on these decisions. But the State's infrastructural shortcomings are now a big factor in what they do next and here the mood music is poor. This will take years to fix, but the Government needs to get out the message that it has a plan and, crucially, that it can execute it. Of course, it also has to cope as best it can with swings of the Trump-driven agenda. The ongoing exceptionalism of Irish economic data – set to repeat this year – unfortunately keeps the State in the spotlight. There will be tricky territory to negotiate as the focus intensifies on the extent of pharma exports by US companies from their Irish bases to the American market – a big factor in the US trade deficit with the EU – and the tax boost Ireland gets from this, at the expense of Uncle Sam. And as the OECD corporate tax deal, which Ireland hoped would lead to some peace in this area, gradually falls apart, putting a lot back into play in another vital area for Ireland. [ Donald Trump's tariffs setback: the president's policies continue to unravel Opens in new window ] In turbulent times, you always look for the pressure points. Pharma and corporate tax are the key ones for Ireland. But it also has some economic and budgetary strengths to help in trying to pick a way through all this. Relying on a 'Taco' strategy and hoping the transatlantic threat falls away in the months ahead looks unrealistic. But the Government cannot just sit back and be hypnotised by what is happening in the White House – it needs to be seen to get on with it.
