
Property Tax Change To Affect 800,000 Americans
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Almost 800,000 homeowners in Utah are set to face higher property tax bills as a result of an 11.11 percent increase voted for by the Jordan Valley Water Conservancy District board on Monday.
The tax increase, which the board said would help the company stay afloat in the coming years, is estimated to add more than $12 a year for the average homeowner in Salt Lake County and $21 a year for businesses.
It is a relatively small sum, but it comes on top of years of property tax increases for homeowners across the U.S. Between 2019 and 2024, nationwide property taxes surged by almost 30 percent, according to Redfin, reaching a yearly median of $3,500. In Utah, where the effective tax rate is 0.46 percent and the average home value is $530,250, according to Bankrate, the average property tax on a typical home is $2,439 a year.
But the increase is about more than higher housing costs. Local activists say the tax increase will make Utah's municipal water even cheaper than it is now, exacerbating the issue of water waste in the drought-prone state and accelerating the collapse of the Great Salt Lake.
Newsweek contacted the Jordan Valley Water Conservancy District board and Utah Rivers Council for comment by email on Tuesday.
Why Are Utah Homeowners Facing an Increase?
The Jordan Valley Water Conservancy District board—one of the largest water districts in the state—said that higher revenues would allow it to strengthen its footing in the next five years and implement much-needed changes.
This has to do with the way Utah charges residents for their water use. While Utahns receive a monthly water bill, a significant part of their consumption is paid for through homeowners' and businesses' property taxes. Jordan Valley said the increase in property taxes would not only allow it to keep the cost of water low but also to maintain and build infrastructure vital to keeping taps running in the state.
A "Welcome to Utah" sign near Glen Canyon National Recreation Area in Page, Arizona, on July 10.
A "Welcome to Utah" sign near Glen Canyon National Recreation Area in Page, Arizona, on July 10."The benefit of it is having a strong financial ability for Jordan Valley because we're growing and building new facilities for future generations," Alan Packard, the general manager of the Water Conservancy District, said in a statement reported by ABC4.
"It's important we have good credit rating and having some of our revenue come from a reliable source like property taxes helps that credit rating and lowers our interest cost we pay when we issue bonds," he added.
According to Packard, higher revenues from property tax bills will allow the district to do things like "expanding out water treatment plants and building major new aqueducts."
Higher property taxes would allow the company to "manage a loss of revenue of $3.1 million not only this year but each year into the future because that's how much revenue will be generated annually and going forward," Packard said.
What Do Local Residents Think?
Many Utahns have voiced strong opposition to the property tax increase in the lead-up to its approval on Monday, and not only because it adds to the financial burden carried by many homeowners already struggling with higher housing costs.
According to Utah Rivers Council, a nonprofit protecting the state's watersheds, property taxes in Utah are used to subsidize municipal water—making it so cheap "that Utahns aren't incentivized to save it, which is why we constantly see sprinklers watering sidewalks and gutters," the group wrote on Facebook.
Stats shared by the group show that the average Utah city consumes 245 gallons of municipal water per capita per day, compared to the U.S. average of 138—placing locals among the more wasteful water users in the country.
For the Utah Rivers Council, the state's property tax should be written off entirely, and the system changed so that residents pay the price of the water they consume. Some tax experts and local homeowners are of the same opinion.
Stephen Kenyon, a longtime Utah resident living on a fixed income with his wife, Julie, told KUTV: "We get nothing out of this. We don't get any part of any increase—just an increase in taxes. We would like to see those in charge look at where you can cut and do better."
In July, The Salt Lake Tribune published an editorial calling for Utah to "stop using property taxes to hide the cost of water" and to change the taxing system to charge for every gallon of water consumed in the state.
Criticism against Utah's property tax system is growing, and it has clearly reached the Jordan Valley Water Conservancy District board itself—even if the hike ultimately slipped through.
Two board members of Jordan Valley were against Monday's increase. "Before we, as government, go and ask them for more taxes, we need to do everything possible to cut costs and tighten our belts," Riverton City Council Member Andy Pierucci, one of the two dissenting votes on the Jordan Valley Water Conservancy District board, told KUTV.
He added, "I don't feel like we've done that enough yet."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
7 hours ago
- Newsweek
Student Loan Update: Major Change Likely To Impact Career Decisions
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A provision in President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill has barred federal student loans for degree programs whose graduates did not meet new earnings thresholds. It also has imposed new lifetime borrowing caps for graduate and professional students, a move that analysts and educators said could change which fields students choose to pursue. Why It Matters Federal student loans have been a primary financing channel for millions of students, and tightening eligibility based on post-graduation earnings could narrow program access and influence career paths. Nearly 6,000 institutions provide federal loans and 30 percent to 40 percent of undergraduates borrow federally each year, representing roughly 7 million students who rely on federal loans, according to Forbes. Graduates, faculty, and family gather in front of the statue of John Harvard in Harvard Yard on May 28, 2025, at Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Graduates, faculty, and family gather in front of the statue of John Harvard in Harvard Yard on May 28, 2025, at Harvard University in Cambridge, To Know The law, signed last month, requires undergraduate programs to show graduates' median earnings exceeded state median earnings for 24- to 35-year-olds with a high school diploma, and it required graduate and certificate programs to exceed the state median earnings for bachelor's degree holders in the state. "Sounds reasonable, right? Here's the problem: It completely ignores the market reality that many essential careers pay poorly not because they lack value, but because they're undercompensated," Michael Ryan, a finance expert and the founder of told Newsweek. "This creates a feedback loop. Fewer people can afford to study education or social work, so we get teacher shortages, which will drive up demand, which eventually increases wages. But only after years of crisis." The legislation also sets new borrowing caps for graduate students, including a $100,000 lifetime cap for graduate loans and a $200,000 lifetime cap for professional degree borrowers, and it phased out Grad PLUS for new borrowers starting July 1, 2026. Early childhood education leaders warned that the earnings threshold could shut off loan access for many early-childhood programs and deter prospective teachers amid staffing shortages in child care, according to PBS NewsHour. Medical and other professional students also face an elevated risk of funding gaps because many graduate professional degrees already exceeded the new federal caps. CNBC reported that average medical school costs often exceed federal caps, leading to a potential deterrent effect for future doctors. "We're essentially telling 22-year-olds to optimize for immediate earnings rather than long-term career satisfaction or societal contribution. That's a recipe for a workforce full of regrets," Ryan said. "The unintended consequence? Students from wealthy families can still pursue these careers without federal loans, while working-class kids get funneled exclusively into STEM and business. We're not making education more efficient, we're making it more elitist." Academic research also shows that student debt shaped career choices in fields with lower and more variable pay. A 2023 peer‑reviewed analysis found that "student loan debt reduces the probability of arts graduates working in related fields by over 25 percent and working as artists by over 30 percent." What People Are Saying Drew Powers, the founder of Illinois-based Powers Financial Group, told Newsweek: "There is a long-held belief that any degree in any major will set you on the path of financial success, and over the past 30 years we have seen that is no longer true. However, that does not mean a broad subject education is not valuable, nor does it mean holders of that diploma cannot pay back their loans. But student loans have become hyper-politicized, and a liberal education diploma holder has become the scapegoat." Michael Ryan, a finance expert and the founder of told Newsweek: "This earnings threshold rule sounds good on paper, but it's creating a two-tiered education system where only 'profitable' degrees get federal backing. We're about to price out teachers, social workers, and counselors. you know, the very people we desperately need." Kevin Thompson, the CEO of 9i Capital Group and the host of the 9innings podcast, told Newsweek: "This is the problem when businesspeople run the government: Value gets measured purely in profit and cost, not in how an industry pushes the economy forward. I don't think this will rock the overall job market—people chasing higher pay will flock to the industries making the most money right now. The bigger concern? Industries at the top today can become tomorrow's laggards in just a few years." What Happens Next Implementation steps and timelines will determine immediate effects. Grad PLUS is scheduled to be phased out for new borrowers starting July 1, 2026, and the new caps and earnings-based loan eligibility are also set to take effect for future enrollment periods. "We'll have to wait and see what the actual effects are, but it does feel as if this policy risks steering students toward higher-paying fields at the expense of broader educational diversity and purpose, which has pros and cons," Alex Beene, a financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek.


Newsweek
8 hours ago
- Newsweek
ChatAndBuild Founder Christel Buchanan Wants to Make You an App Developer
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. What started out as an advertising slogan for Apple more than 15 years ago has morphed into somewhat of a modern day colloquialism: There should be an app for that. Who hasn't—ticked off by an inconvenient annoyance or inspired by a stroke of midnight genius—thought, "If only I knew how to code?" Meet Christel Buchanan. Buchanan, the founder and CEO of ChatAndBuild, is on a mission to create a world where anyone, regardless of their ability to code, can turn their app dreams into a reality. "Why can't a grandmom in Thailand chat and build? Why can't my dad, who speaks Mandarin, chat and build?" Buchanan asked during a private interview following her panel discussion at Newsweek's Women's Global Impact forum. "Why is that only someone with a Stanford [computer science] degree in the Bay Area gets to build something and then walk away as a multibillionaire?" The Singaporean tech founder told Newsweek that while her dad isn't a multibillionaire yet, he's already built two games with her AI-driven platform. After seeing the mahjong game and Pac-Man game he built, Buchanan realized, "This could be big." Christel Buchanan, the founder and CEO of ChatAndBuild, joined Newsweek at the Women's Global Impact forum in New York earlier this month. Christel Buchanan, the founder and CEO of ChatAndBuild, joined Newsweek at the Women's Global Impact forum in New York earlier this month. Newsweek Illustration/Canva Using a conversational interface, ChatAndBuild empowers users to "chat" their software ideas into real products. Prompts like, "create an AI-powered horoscope quiz" or "build me a to-do app," are answered with products that are ready for use. The rapid ascent of AI has been likened to everything from the rise of the internet to the industrial revolution, but, to Buchanan, the potential of her platform feels closer to Instagram, a tech tool that offers everyone a chance to create. "If you think about social media, it kind of empowered anyone to take a photo and share it," she said. "This is going to be the next wave." She foresees that app-building and coding will change the same way that photography did with the introduction of smartphones. "Right now, there's maybe 5 million coders," Buchanan said. "How do we make it so that 1 billion people are able to code and talk to a computer?" As of today, about 150,000 users around the world are using ChatAndBuild to create their own tech products, she said. To put those figures into perspective: Buchanan began working on the platform only earlier this year, and it wasn't until May that the product was ready for the public. With ChatAndBuild, users "don't have to worry about code dependencies, code packages, which programming language [to] use," she explained during last week's Tech Savvy: Leveraging AI to Exceed Expectations panel. "Chat and build, and everything is done for you in one platform," she said. Buchanan's goal to democratize coding stems from her own path. Just a year into university, she abandoned a coveted government-sponsored scholarship in search for something more. It led her to a job at Twitter, where she eventually became the regional head of content for Asia, Middle East and Africa, and later to software company Brandwatch and blockchain platform Zilliqa. "I've always loved technology," she said with a massive smile. "Because, for me, technology was the great equalizer. It lifted me." "With AI, we're really at the most fundamental change. ... Everything [will] be disrupted in the next 10, 20 or 30 years," she continued. The AI revolution feels fairly recent for most, but there are already new concerns being raised. Buchanan—who staunchly believes that the future of tech is better understood through hackathons than thought-leadership conferences—said she's already beginning to see questions pop up about how generative AI models are storing data, with some worried that any intellectual property entered into a chatbot might no longer belong to the user. "This is something that we need to take note about, which is why I'm developing this idea that you can train and trade your AI agent," she said. "You should have ownership of your data." "I think it's going to become a very big topic in the next one, two years," she said. "It'll be a different kind of doomscrolling." It's why Buchanan has turned her attention to non-fungible agents (NFAs), a decentralized digital entity that would establish unique digital ownership. "Right now, there is no graphical user interface for AI," she explained. "It's a very bare bones kind of thing. We don't know what the operating system is going to look like, which is why it's going to be very interesting to see what happens."


Newsweek
10 hours ago
- Newsweek
Rental Market Starts to See Effects of Trump's Immigration Crackdown
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The sharp about-turn in immigration levels since January looks set to have an impact on the U.S. housing market — particularly when it comes to rentals — though its wider effects could take longer to be felt. New analysis from economic and housing experts shows that the surge in demand for housing seen over the past four years is easing slightly, as fewer immigrants arrive in the U.S., and President Donald Trump's mass deportation plan is put into action. "The big thing that had happened the past few years is we saw a huge burst in immigration on a net basis into the United States, much of that through the southern border," Lance Lambert, founder of the housing-market research site Resi Club, told Newsweek. "So, what that did to the housing market is it created more demand, rental demand in particular, at the bottom of the market." Lambert said the markets that will see the biggest impact of lower migration numbers will be those metropolitan areas which saw high numbers of legal and illegal new arrivals in recent years, such as New York City, Miami and Houston. These cities have seen demand for housing surge, with data regularly showing soaring rental costs and a lack of available units. In Manhattan, rents steadily climbed after a pandemic-era low to a median asking price of $4,745 in July, with a total rental inventory of 18,936 units, compared to 21,317 the year before, per StreetEasy. Not all of this would have been driven by immigration, but it was likely a contributing factor in the city's ever-present housing shortage. Miami saw similar surges in costs, despite an ever-expanding metropolitan area, as Florida's immigrant population grew. Migrants Blamed for Housing Squeeze During the 2024 presidential election campaign, Vice President JD Vance was among those on the right who put the blame for America's housing squeeze squarely on immigrants. In a speech at the Republican National Convention last July, the then-VP nominee spoke about U.S. homebuilders that went out of business during the financial crisis of 2008, putting a dent in new-home construction that has continued. "Then the Democrats flooded this country with millions of illegal aliens," Vance said. "So citizens had to compete with people who shouldn't even be here for precious housing." This messaging was one of the factors driving support for mass deportations and other stricter immigration measures. Since President Trump and Vice President Vance took office, there has been a noticeable shift in immigration patterns. Stan Veuger, a senior fellow at the center-right American Enterprise Institute (AEI), told Newsweek that net migration was likely to dramatically fall in 2025, potentially by as much as 650,000. "That's mostly driven by a reduction in flows both at the southern border, but also various legal pathways that have been cut off or reduced, including the Refugee Resettlement Program and humanitarian programs for Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans, Venezuelans, Ukrainians, and Afghans," Veuger said. "So that, in turn, will have an impact on various macro-outcomes." The Impact of Trump 2.0 Policies Veuger and his colleagues predict that GDP growth will be reduced by 0.3 to 0.4 percentage points this year, partly because of the reduction in migrants leading to a loss of in employees in sectors like construction. In the months leading up to and following the 2024 election, others also made similar predictions, warning that a loss of immigrants, both legal and illegal, would have a drastic effect on the U.S. economy. When it comes to housing, those impacts may not be felt just yet, Lambert told Newsweek, with the market not necessarily reflecting the drop in net migration or the effects of tariffs on building materials. "At the moment, builders are not seeing any meaningful increases in material cost nor labor cost," said Lambert, of Resi Club. "If we potentially see a long sustaining pullback in immigration through the border, could that over time create some tightening impact to the labor market and the residential construction sector? Yeah, potentially. He added: "But at the end of the day, right now, the bigger macro features of the housing cycle are playing a much bigger role to builders." Construction workers build homes at a new housing development on August 08, 2025 in Henderson, Nevada. Construction workers build homes at a new housing development on August 08, 2025 in Henderson, pointed to an overall slowdown in the housing market since the pandemic, including affordability issues, a rising number of available units sitting for longer and a drop in demand as the real issues facing housing rather than immigration policies. "Keep in mind that immigration essentially had a pull-forward where there was more immigration the past few years than would have otherwise occurred," Lambert said. "So even with a pullback or a net decline in immigration this year, we still have more people who immigrated the past few years than the trend expected. "So it would take several years of very little immigration through the southern border or even net declines to fully smooth out that big burst that we saw in 2023-2024." Veuger said that AEI is predicting a dramatic slowdown in migration numbers over the next two years, which could impact the economy more widely, but those levels could return to normal soon after depending on federal policy and who wins the White House in 2028 — meaning only time will tell how big an impact the administration's policies will have on long-term housing and construction. "Part of what drives the very low net migration number now is that there are millions and millions of people in the country who arrived relatively recently," Veuger said. "If you are a recent arrival, you're much more likely to leave, either voluntarily or through extradited removal. "Two, three years from now, after we will have had a number of years with many fewer arrivals, we will have fewer recent arrivals who are so likely to leave."