logo
Alarm over defence agreement giving US ‘unhindered access' to Danish airbases

Alarm over defence agreement giving US ‘unhindered access' to Danish airbases

The Guardian19-05-2025

When Copenhagen signed a new defence agreement giving the US 'unhindered access' to Danish airbases in December 2023, the idea of granting sweeping powers to US forces on Danish soil was quite a different proposition to what it is today.
The US, then under the Biden administration, was an unwavering Nato ally that Denmark had followed into wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and Nordic neighbours Sweden, Finland and Norway had similar agreements with the US.
But then Donald Trump returned to power, making an unprecedented push to acquire or seize Greenland, a strategically vital part of the Danish kingdom. He has refused to rule out using military force to take over the island, and US intelligence agencies have reportedly been ordered to increase espionage in the territory.
Now, little more than a year on, as Denmark prepares to adopt the agreement next month after a vote in parliament on 11 June, when it is expected to be approved, fears are growing about its potential implications.
The deal means US soldiers will be in Denmark under US jurisdiction, meaning that if they were to commit a crime anywhere in Denmark they would in the first instance be punished under the US, not Danish, legal system.
It also gives US soldiers access to Danish air bases in three Danish cities – Karup, Skrydstrup and Aalborg - and gives American soldiers and military police powers over Danish civilians at these locations and outside them.
And it allows the US to carry out military activities in and from Denmark – including stationing personnel, storing military material and equipment, maintenance, training and exercise activities.
'If the bill is passed, we risk that American soldiers will have the right to crack down on a demonstration outside one of their bases, in order to maintain security and control of the base,' Peter Vedel Kessing, a senior researcher at the Danish Institute for Human Rights, which has advised the defence committee on legal issues, told the Guardian. 'If armed American soldiers use excessive force against demonstrators, Denmark will not have the possibility to prosecute them.'
He added: 'If the bill is passed and American soldiers carry out illegal acts in Denmark, it will be beyond Danish control and outside the reach of the Danish legal system to prosecute such actions.'
The bill should not be passed, said Vedel Kessing, until there is 'certainty' that the agreement does not violate 'the unwritten constitutional prohibition that forbids other states, including the US, from exercising official authority on Danish territory'.
Alarm bells were raised last month when a ministry of defence consultation note said that Americans would be given the right to 'exercise powers over civilians on Danish territory if necessary for the use, operation and defence of, and control over, the agreed facilities and areas by the American forces'.
At the time, the Danish unity party called the new US powers 'alarming'. The party's foreign affairs spokesperson, Trine Pertou Mach, told Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten: 'It is quite far-reaching that we are handing over law enforcement powers to a foreign country's military police.'
According to the agreement it is irrevocable for 10 years. But last week, the Danish foreign minister, Lars Løkke Rasmussen, said that if the US were to take over Greenland, Denmark would be able to pull out early.
'It goes without saying that a complete or partial American annexation of Greenland would entitle Denmark to terminate the defence cooperation agreement,' he wrote in a parliamentary response.
The Danish ministry of defence told the Guardian that the new agreement will 'authorise the US forces to exercise all rights and authority necessary for US forces' use, operation, defence or control of agreed facilities and areas.' It would, they said, include 'taking proportionate measures to maintain or restore order and to protect US forces, US contractors, Danish contractors and dependents'.
The spokesperson said these rights and authorities must be exercised in accordance with security plans that have been coordinated with appropriate authorities of Denmark.
'The Danish authorities will oversee how the security plans are implemented in practice in cooperation with US forces. The authority given to US forces on Danish territory according to article 6 is therefore not unlimited,' the spokesperson added.
'Finally, it is important to mention that the agreement specifies that, as a general principle for the agreement in its entirety, all activities under it are to be conducted with full respect for the sovereignty, constitution and constitutional practice, laws, and international legal obligations of Denmark.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Reeves pours cold water on Nato demands for more defence spending making clear it WON'T go over 2.5% of GDP before 2029 and hinting 3% will be the limit in the next Parliament
Reeves pours cold water on Nato demands for more defence spending making clear it WON'T go over 2.5% of GDP before 2029 and hinting 3% will be the limit in the next Parliament

Daily Mail​

time24 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Reeves pours cold water on Nato demands for more defence spending making clear it WON'T go over 2.5% of GDP before 2029 and hinting 3% will be the limit in the next Parliament

played down the prospects of ramping up defence spending today despite mounting pressure from Donald Trump. The Chancellor stressed that Labour had only committed to hitting 2.5 per cent of GDP in the current Parliament. And she suggested the 'ambition' after 2029 remains to reach a level of 3 per cent - even though Nato states are being asked to agree a target of 3.5 per cent at a summit later this month. The blueprint being pushed by Mr Trump and the military alliance's secretary general Mark Rutte would see countries pledge to hit the higher spending by the early 2030s. A further 1.5 per cent of GDP would be required for 'defence-related expenditure'. A timetable could be set for gradually increasing their allocations. However, there are questions about how the UK would fund such an huge increase - roughly equivalent to an extra £30billion annually. Britain allocated 2.33 per cent of GDP to defence last year, and is set to reach 2.5 per cent by April 2027. The Labour Government has an 'ambition' of increasing that to 3 per cent in the next parliament - likely to run to 2034. In a round of broadcast interviews this morning, Ms Reeves said the Spending Review she laid out yesterday included the 'biggest sustained increase in defence spending since the end of the Cold War'. 'The commitment on defence in our manifesto was 2.5 per cent… we've said 3 per cent in the next Parliament,' she told Sky News. The Chancellor said the spending plans only covered this 'this Parliament'. She said: 'We will set out costed and funded plans in due course, but in this Parliament the commitment was to get to 2.5 per cent.. ' The generous fiscal envelope set by the Chancellor last Autumn has been put under massive pressure by the economy slowing down and Mr Trump 's trade war. That has led analysts and political rivals to argue that more tax increases are 'inevitable' - although the funding gap will not crystalise until the next fiscal package. The US itself missed the proposed Nato target by spending 3.38 per cent of GDP on defence last year - although the sheer size of its economy meant that dwarfed contributions from the rest of the alliance. Countries such as Germany face finding upwards of $60billion a year more for the military. The increase in Italy would be equivalent to around $46billion, Canada $45billion, France £44billion and the UK roughly $40billion. Spain - which has not invested heavily in defence up to now - could need to allocate an additional $36billion despite its economy being much smaller. The UK's Strategic Defence Review, published last week, recommended sweeping changes, including a greater focus on new technology, including drones and artificial intelligence based on rising budgets.

European foreign ministers meet in Rome to discuss defence and security plans
European foreign ministers meet in Rome to discuss defence and security plans

The Guardian

time32 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

European foreign ministers meet in Rome to discuss defence and security plans

Update: Date: 2025-06-12T07:39:24.000Z Title: Morning opening: What's Europe's plan for Ukraine? Content: European foreign ministers – from Italy, France, Germany, Poland, UK, Spain, Ukraine – meet in Rome today for talks in the Weimar+ model. They will be joined by Nato's secretary general Mark Rutte and the EU's foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas. Their meeting will be a chance to discuss Europe's defence and security plans ahead of the Nato summit in The Hague later this month and coordinate their positions on Ukraine, ahead both Nato and G7 summits. Separately, German defence minister Boris Pistorius is in Kyiv this morning, on his first trip to Ukraine since the new government of Friedrich Merz took office. But as there is no progress in talks with Russia, and their lethal attacks on Ukraine continue daily, there is a big question looming over the meeting: what is the plan for Ukraine? Let's see if we get any clarity on this today. I will bring you all the key updates here. It's Thursday, 12 June 2025, it's Jakub Krupa here, and this is Europe Live. Good morning.

Israel ‘fully ready' to strike Iran as Trump warns Middle East about to get ‘dangerous' & US withdraws embassy staff
Israel ‘fully ready' to strike Iran as Trump warns Middle East about to get ‘dangerous' & US withdraws embassy staff

Scottish Sun

time38 minutes ago

  • Scottish Sun

Israel ‘fully ready' to strike Iran as Trump warns Middle East about to get ‘dangerous' & US withdraws embassy staff

ISRAEL is reportedly "fully ready" to launch a military strike against Iran within days - and without the backing of the United States. It comes amid the Trump administration's efforts to secure a deal with Tehran aimed at curbing Iran's nuclear programme. 7 Iranian troops firing a missile in the Makran sea, south of Iran Credit: Rex 7 Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government is reportedly ready to blitz Iran Credit: Reuters 7 Israeli soldiers on the frontline of ground operation in northern Gaza Strip Credit: Rex 7 Donald Trump is said to be in advanced talks with Iran over a preliminary agreement that could include provisions on uranium enrichment - terms Israel finds unacceptable. A Capitol Hill aide and other insiders told NBC News that Benjamin Netanyahu's government is "fully ready" to act unilaterally as hopes of influencing the US-Iran negotiations diminish. Such a strike would represent a serious rupture in US-Israel coordination and carries the risk of igniting a broader conflict in the already volatile region. One senior diplomat in the Middle East told The Washington Post: "We are watching and worried. Read more world news MACHINE OF DEATH Putin's Ukraine toll tops 1M Russians dead & wounded 40 months into war "We think it's more serious than any other time in the past." In anticipation of potential retaliation by Iran, the US has moved to scale back its presence in the Middle East. The State Department has ordered the departure of non-essential staff from its embassy in Baghdad and authorised voluntary departures of personnel and military dependents from Bahrain and Kuwait. White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly said: "The State Department regularly reviews American personnel abroad, and this decision was made as a result of a recent review." President Trump, speaking to reporters on Wednesday, confirmed the move: "They are being moved out because it could be a dangerous place and we'll see what happens." How Iran's Trump assassination plot would trigger full-scale invasion by the US and topple Ayatollah's evil regime He reiterated the administration's red line: "They can't have a nuclear weapon, very simple, they can't have a nuclear weapon, we're not going to allow that." Posting a video of US military in action, Trump wrote on Truth Social on Wednesday: "I am more confident than ever that in the days ahead and every generation to come, the U.S. Army will heap glory upon glory. "You will summon inexhaustible courage. You will protect every inch of U.S. soil—and you will defend America to the ends of the earth!" The heightened alert stems not just from fears of Iranian retaliation, but also from growing intelligence assessments that Israel may be preparing for a direct strike on Iran's nuclear facilities - bypassing Washington's diplomat track. 7 Israel's reported military strike on Tehran would be done without the backing of its closest ally, the United States Credit: Reuters 7 President Trump told reporters the US are removing staff form its Baghdad embassy as he attended the opening night of 'Les Misérables' in Washington DC Credit: Getty Iran, meanwhile, has warned of severe consequences if it is attacked. Defence Minister Aziz Nasirzadeh said Iran would respond by targeting American bases in the region. Iran's mission to the UN added: "Threats of 'overwhelming force' won't change facts: Iran is not seeking a nuclear weapon and U.S. militarism only fuels instability." US negotiator Steve Witkoff is still set to meet Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi in Muscat, Oman on Sunday for what would be the sixth round of nuclear talks. But sources caution that the meeting may not go ahead if the situation worsens. A senior Iranian official told Reuters: "Any military action against Iran, whether by the US or Israel, will have serious consequences." 7 Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei speaks during a meeting in Tehran Credit: Shutterstock Editorial

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store