Swinney calls for legal referendum if SNP secures majority at Holyrood election
He said the UK economy is 'fundamentally failing to deliver for ordinary people' as well as generating insufficient funding for public services.
The SNP leader called for the May 2026 Holyrood elections to be 'a springboard for Scotland taking charge of our own destiny'.
He said the situation had got worse since the 2014 referendum, and wrote: 'Think what could have been achieved had we not been forced to spend so much time and money trying to mitigate the ongoing damage of Brexit.
First Minister of Scotland John Swinney during First Minister's Questions (Jane Barlow/PA Wire).
'Or the carnage unleashed by Liz Truss's mini-budget. Or the years of austerity, or Westminster cuts like the Winter Fuel Payment.
'We were told we didn't need independence and we just needed a Labour government – but look how that has turned out.'
He wrote that 'independence is the catalyst that will deliver a better future for us all' and that 'with Scotland's energy resources in Scotland's hands, we can reduce bills for consumers and cut costs for businesses'.
We must be ready to follow the path which we know can lead us to an independent state First minister John Swinney
Mr Swinney revealed he hoped to deliver an SNP majority similar to 2011 in a bid to 'secure a legal referendum recognised by all' and had submitted a motion to the SNP conference proposing that 'we work to deliver a majority of SNP MSPs in the Scottish Parliament to secure that referendum'.
He pledged to unveil 'radical policies that we know will transform Scotland' in the coming months, and to 'break the logjam and end this frustration that we all feel'.
Mr Swinney added: 'We must be ready to follow the path which we know can lead us to an independent state.'
Scottish Conservative deputy leader Rachael Hamilton said: 'John Swinney is like a broken record. In a bid to silence internal critics of his weak leadership, he has thrown diehard nationalists some more red meat on the one issue they all agree on: independence.
'Ordinary Scots are sick and tired of the SNP's obsession with breaking up the UK.
'The public want John Swinney to focus on fixing the damage his government has done in decimating essential services such as schools and the NHS at the same time as making Scotland the highest taxed part of the UK.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
Edinburgh emerges as one of UK's top co-working markets
Scotland is home to 279 flexible workspaces as of Q2 2025 — with Glasgow (61), Edinburgh (55), and Aberdeen (26) all ranking among the UK's top 15 coworking markets. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Together, these three cities anchor Scotland's position as a key player in the UK's expanding flexible office landscape. That's according to CoworkingCafe's Q2 2025 State of the Coworking Industry Report, which draws on proprietary data as of July. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The report provides a detailed breakdown of flexible workspace supply at both national and local levels — highlighting the top 15 coworking markets, the largest operators, and median pricing for monthly memberships, day passes, virtual office packages, and meeting rooms. Median Subscription Prices by Country Q2 2025 Median Subscription Prices by Country Q2 2025 Scotland is home to 279 co-working spaces as of Q2 2025, with more than half of them concentrated in the country's three largest markets: Glasgow (#4), Edinburgh (#5), and Aberdeen (#11) in the UK-wide rankings. This urban clustering highlights the regional demand for flexible work solutions, particularly in cities with strong business, academic, and innovation ecosystems. Across Scotland, co-working pricing remains competitive compared to UK averages. The median monthly membership is £150, notably below the UK median of £180. Day passes average £23/day, and virtual office packages are priced at a median of £95/month, aligning with the national median. Meeting rooms in Scotland cost £25/hour on average. Among operators, Wasps is a key player in the region, with 18 co-working locations across various Scottish cities. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Distribution of Coworking Spaces — UK & Ireland Q2 2025 With 61 flexible workspaces, Glasgow ranks #4 in the UK and leads Scotland in co-working availability. It offers a balanced pricing profile: monthly memberships are priced at £160, above the Scottish median but still below the UK benchmark. Day passes cost £23/day, tying Glasgow for the most affordable rate in the UK alongside Newcastle, Nottingham, and Brighton. Virtual office subscriptions, however, are relatively high at £119/month, well above both Scottish and UK medians. Meeting rooms are priced affordably at £23/hour, one of the lowest rates nationwide and comparable to Cardiff. Edinburgh ranks #5 in the UK and second in Scotland, offering 55 co-working locations across the city. As Scotland's capital, it commands some of the highest pricing in the region. Monthly memberships average £192, well above both the Scottish and UK medians. Day passes are priced at £30/day, placing Edinburgh among the UK's top-tier markets, alongside Greater London, Oxford, and Belfast. Virtual offices cost £99/month, slightly above the national median of £95, while meeting rooms are priced at £40/hour, among the highest in Scotland and the UK overall. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Aberdeen ranks #11 in the UK and third in Scotland, with 26 co-working spaces as of Q2 2025. Pricing in the city reflects a mid-range profile: monthly memberships are £160/month, above the Scottish average but still below the national median. Day passes cost £28/day, higher than both Scottish and UK medians, while virtual offices are priced at £95/month, matching the national figure. Meeting rooms in Aberdeen are typically £30/hour, aligning with the UK-wide median. As of Q2 2025, the UK and Ireland collectively host 4,199 co-working spaces, reflecting a broad and mature flexible office landscape. The UK accounts for 3,949 of these locations, with 3,456 in England, 279 in Scotland, 124 in Wales, and 90 in Northern Ireland. Greater London remains the epicenter of activity, with 1,202 coworking spaces, followed by other major hubs such as Manchester (118), Birmingham (68), Glasgow (61), and Bristol (61). In Ireland, there are 250 co-working spaces, with nearly half concentrated in Dublin (119) — firmly positioning the capital as the country's dominant flex office market. You can read the full report at
Spectator
an hour ago
- Spectator
Kate Forbes showed real bravery
There is a certain worldly cynicism aroused by the announcement that a politician is stepping down to spend more time with their family. It was for a long time the refuge of MPs who had earned themselves an entry in the News of the World, the Who's Who of romeos, rogues and reprobates, for their activities with ladies – or young gentlemen – of the night. Less commonly, it was regarded as an admission that someone could not hack it or was frustrated by their slow progress up the greasy pole. After all, no one wants to quit politics. Contra the cynics, Kate Forbes. Scotland's deputy first minister will stand down from Holyrood at next May's elections, having somehow crammed a whole political life into ten tempestuous years. In that time, she has been a backbencher, public finance minister, finance secretary, leadership candidate, backbencher again, and finally deputy first minister and economy secretary. In her letter to first minister John Swinney, she acknowledges that 'quite rightly this job entails long days far from home' but 'I do not wish to seek re-election and miss any more of the precious early years of family life'. Forbes married her husband Alasdair, a widower, in 2021 and became stepmum to his three daughters. The following year the couple had a daughter, who is turning three. (Some men go to war, others jump out of planes, but living with five women is true bravery.) Forbes was never meant to get where she did. Upon her election to the Scottish parliament in 2016, her religious views were known and they marked her as an apostate in an era of secular progressivism. A member of the Free Presbyterian Church, Forbes's religion is not an identity category but a living faith. She believes in it all: birth, death, resurrection and salvation. The happy-clappy bits and the fire and brimstone alike. There was little chance of her progressing beyond the outer ministry in the modern, uber-liberal SNP, and she had to settle for a junior ministerial post in the Scottish government's finance department. Unfortunately for the party leadership, events overtook. The night before the 2020 budget speech, finance secretary Derek Mackay was forced to quit after a newspaper learned of his text messages to a 16 year old. Forbes, who had been allowed no real input into the budget, was thrust onto the floor of Holyrood to deliver – and be interrogated on – a speech she had only been handed hours before. She did so with such confidence and composure that even the SNP's most loyal critics commended her. That performance made her promotion to the cabinet finance post inevitable, though some more glumly considered it unavoidable. By the time Nicola Sturgeon resigned in February 2023, Forbes had established herself as a moderate, pro-business Nationalist who wanted the Scottish government to focus on prosperity rather than gender ideology, an agenda she opposed. Yet the prospect of the party moving to the centre, and especially of it being led by an evangelical Christian, prompted the SNP establishment to throw its weight behind Humza Yousaf, who was well-meaning but plainly not up to running a devolved government. In a straight fight, he would have been no match for Forbes, but instead the leadership contest was shaped by her internal enemies and the media into an inquisition on her religious beliefs. Journalists well-laden with secular prejudices delighted in making her answer for those verses of Scripture which scandalise modern sensibilities. To her credit as a Christian, but disastrously for a politician, she refused to lie or be evasive about her beliefs. When they asked her views on abortion, she told the truth. When they enquired as to her thinking about gay marriage, she did the same again. When they tried to corner her on trans rights, she was honest and took the punishment that came with it. Compelled to bear witness, she did so with her head held high, fighting the good fight and keeping the faith. It is one of the most personally admirable and politically suicidal decisions I have ever seen. In the end, she lost, though only narrowly, and was vindicated when her opponent swiftly proved as unequal to the challenges of office as she had warned. He inflicted so much damage with a programme of Continuity Sturgeon progressivism that, just 14 months later, his successor was drafting in Forbes as deputy head of the government to repair relations with the business sector, steer economic policy back to growth, and serve as the symbol of a new pragmatism. Despite our fundamental disagreements, I rate Forbes as a politician and a public official and said so regularly on Coffee House and elsewhere. This did nothing for her reputation among Nationalists. In fact, I know that it was used against her, and I'm sorry for that. Some regarded with bemusement, others horror, the sight of a gay Catholic Unionist simping for a Wee Free separatist, but the simping was not for Forbes so much as for the fleeting possibility that a leader of her calibre could get her hands on the controls. In a way, I should be relieved that she was sabotaged by the liberal bigots in her own party. If she had been half the first minister I reckon she might have been, she could have broadened the SNP's electoral coalition to the point at which independence became the consensus view across the electorate. She was a very dangerous woman for a time there, and might be again if she were to return after her children have grown up. The cynics will reassert themselves in the coming days, pronouncing that Forbes has seen the writing on the wall, that the SNP is finished, that she is hinting at her lack of faith in Swinney, that she had risen as high as she would be allowed to in a party thoroughly in the grips of identity politics progressives. Or, and I will tread lightly here, perhaps she truly values motherhood above career, one of the few remaining mortal sins in a non-judgemental age. Her fellow Nationalist Gail Ross did the same in 2021, admitting that five days a week away from her son was just too much. Not coincidentally, she too was a Highlands MSP, where constituencies rival small countries for square mileage. Labour's Jenny Marra, a considerable talent, walked away after ten years darting up and down the vast North East Scotland region. Family had to come first. Anglo culture is hardly alone in associating labour with fortitude and moral uprightness, but it is noticeably unforgiving of those who opt out in favour of raising children. Try to balance work and family but say you find it impossible, and you can expect to be chastised for failing at something so many parents do. The resentment is not for admitting you cannot manage but for forcing others to reconsider how well they are managing. I have sat in many a newsroom well into the evening, hearing bedtime stories read over the phone by loving parents who were wanted at home, and wanted to be there, but who were working late to give their children the best start in life. I'm not a parent, and maybe it's not my place to comment, but I know too many people whose fathers and mothers worked those hours, provided abundantly for their offspring, but now have no relationship with them. Their material needs were more than met but at the expense of other, deeper needs. No doubt Kate Forbes has made the right decision for her family but I can't help but wonder how many more families would have benefited from her making it to Bute House. Yes, she's hopelessly wrong about the constitution, but there's more to politics than policy. There's talent and character and leadership. We will have to settle for much less.
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Scottish ministers overrule advice and approve Cairngorms hotel plans
A letter published by the Scottish Government's Planning and Environmental Appeals Division (DPEA) reveals that ministers have opted to green-light proposals for 22 self-catering apartments, shops, a hotel, and underground parking at 111 Grampian Road in Aviemore. It comes more than two years after SNP ministers took the decision to 'call in' the planning application and rule on it themselves – which happened on May 3, 2023. Later that month, the Cairngorms National Park Authority said it had been minded to approve the proposals. However, a Government planning reporter then recommended that the proposal be refused, submitting their initial report on the development on November 23, 2023, with a supplementary report following on January 17, 2025. The primary issues of concern were flood risk, transport impacts on B9152 Grampian Road, and design. However, SNP ministers have gone against the recommendations and approved the development, recognising that it will be on 'brownfield land set within a built up area'. Work on development will be allowed to go ahead after a series of conditions have been met. These include: Developers must contribute fairly (cash or in-kind) to active travel measures to offset traffic impact on B9152 Grampian Road. Updated reptile and otter surveys must be completed before starting work. An updated Flood Risk Assessment (FRA) must be conducted based on latest Scottish Environment Protection Agency climate data. Owners must install and maintain bat and bird boxes across the site. Four ensuite rooms must be kept permanently as hotel staff accommodation. The DPEA letter outlining the SNP ministers' decision states: 'On balance, and subject to conditions and planning obligation, the Scottish Ministers are satisfied there is sufficient development plan support to outweigh the conflict with flood policies, and they consider that the proposed development overall is in accordance with the development plan, and there are no material considerations which would outweigh that. 'In reaching this conclusion, the Scottish Ministers have given due consideration to the aims of the National Park as required by Section 9.6 of the National Parks (Scotland) Act 2000.'
