
New intelligence suggests Israel is preparing possible strike on Iranian nuclear facilities, US officials say
The US has obtained new intelligence suggesting that Israel is making preparations to strike Iranian nuclear facilities, even as the Trump administration has been pursuing a diplomatic deal with Tehran, multiple US officials familiar with the latest intelligence told CNN.
Such a strike would be a brazen break with President Donald Trump, US officials said. It could also risk tipping off a broader regional conflict in the Middle East — something the US has sought to avoid since the war in Gaza inflamed tensions beginning in 2023.
Officials caution it's not clear that Israeli leaders have made a final decision, and that in fact, there is deep disagreement within the US government about the likelihood that Israel will ultimately act. Whether and how Israel strikes will likely depend on what it thinks of the US negotiations with Tehran over its nuclear program.
But 'the chance of an Israeli strike on an Iranian nuclear facility has gone up significantly in recent months,' said another person familiar with US intelligence on the issue. 'And the prospect of a Trump-negotiated US-Iran deal that doesn't remove all of Iran's uranium makes the chance of a strike more likely.'
The heightened worries stem not only from public and private messaging from senior Israeli officials that it is considering such a move, but also from intercepted Israeli communications and observations of Israeli military movements that could suggest an imminent strike, multiple sources familiar with the intelligence said.
Among the military preparations the US has observed are the movement of air munitions and the completion of an air exercise, two of the sources said.
But those same indicators could also simply be Israel trying to pressure Iran to abandon key tenets of its nuclear program by signaling the consequences if it doesn't — underscoring the ever-shifting complexities the White House is navigating.
CNN has asked the National Security Council and the Israeli prime minister's office for comment. The Israeli Embassy in Washington did not comment.
Trump has publicly threatened military action against Iran if his administration's efforts to negotiate a new nuclear deal to limit or eliminate Tehran's nuclear program fail. But Trump also set a limit on how long the US would engage in diplomatic efforts.
In a letter to Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei in mid-March, Trump set a 60-day deadline for those efforts to succeed, according to a source familiar with the communication. It has now been more than 60 days since that letter was delivered, and 38 days since the first round ofv talks began.
A senior Western diplomat who met with the president earlier this month said that Trump communicated that the US would give those negotiations only weeks to succeed before resorting to military strikes. But for now, the White House policy is one of diplomacy.
That has put Israel 'between a rock and a hard place,' said Jonathan Panikoff, a former senior intelligence official specializing in the region. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is under pressure both to avoid a US-Iran deal that Israel doesn't view as satisfactory, while also not alienating Trump — who has already broken with the Israeli prime minister on key security issues in the region.
'At the end of the day, the Israeli decision-making is going to be predicated on US policy determinations and actions, and what agreements President Trump does or does not come to with Iran,' Panikoff said, who added that he did not believe Netanyahu would be willing to risk entirely fracturing the US relationship by launching a strike without at least tacit US approval.
Iran at its weakest in decades
Iran is in its weakest military position in decades, after Israel bombed its missile production facilities and air defenses in October, combined with an economy weakened by sanctions and Israel's decimation of its most powerful regional proxies. Israel, US officials say, sees a window of opportunity.
The US is stepping up intelligence collection to be prepared to assist if Israeli leaders decide to strike, one senior US official told CNN. But a source familiar with the Trump administration's thinking told CNN the US is unlikely to help Israel carry out strikes on Iranian nuclear sites at this moment, short of some major provocation by Tehran.
Israel does not have the capacity to destroy Iran's nuclear program without American assistance, including midair refueling and the bombs required to penetrate the facilities deep underground, a need that is also reflected in previous US intelligence reports, according to a source familiar with the matter.
An Israeli source told CNN that Israel would be prepared to carry out military action on its own if the US were to negotiate what this source described as a 'bad deal' with Iran that Israel cannot accept.
'I think it's more likely they strike to try and get the deal to fall apart if they think Trump is going to settle for a 'bad deal,'' said the other person familiar with US intelligence. 'The Israelis have not been shy about signaling that to us … both publicly and privately.'
A US intelligence assessment from February suggested Israel could use either military aircraft or long-range missiles to capitalize on Iran's degraded air defense capabilities, CNN previously reported.
But the same assessment also described how such strikes would only minimally set the Iranian nuclear program back and wouldn't be a cure-all.
'It's a real challenge for Netanyahu,' Panikoff said.
For now, the US talks with Iran are stuck on a demand that Tehran not enrich uranium, a process which can enable weaponization, but which is also necessary to produce nuclear power for civilian purposes.
Special envoy Steve Witkoff, who is leading the US delegation, told ABC News over the weekend that Washington 'cannot allow even 1% of an enrichment capability' under an agreement. 'We've delivered a proposal to the Iranians that we think addresses some of this without disrespecting them,' he said.
Khamenei said on Tuesday that he does not expect negotiations with the United States over Tehran's nuclear program to 'reach a conclusion,' calling the US demand that Iran not enrich uranium a 'big mistake.' Iran insists it has a right to enrich under the United Nations' Treaty on Nuclear Non-Proliferation and says it will not relinquish that right under any circumstances.
Another round of talks may take place in Europe this week, according to Witkoff. Both the US and Iran have put proposals on the table, but after more than a month of the talks facilitated by Oman, there is no current US proposal with Trump's sign-off, sources said.
US intelligence agencies in February issued warnings that Israel will likely attempt to strike facilities key to Iran's nuclear program this year, CNN previously reported.
It has 'consistently been the Israeli position that the military option is the only option to stopping Iran's military nuclear program,' one US official noted.
CNN's Kylie Atwood, Zachary Cohen, Alex Marquardt and Oren Liebermann contributed to this report.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Egypt Independent
26 minutes ago
- Egypt Independent
Putin's wins leave Trump with hard choices
Russian President Vladimir Putin got everything he could have hoped for in Alaska. President Donald Trump got very little — judging by his own pre-summit metrics. The question now is whether Trump secured any moderate gains or planted seeds for Ukraine's future security if there's an eventual peace deal with Russia that were not immediately obvious after Friday's summit. And he's left with some searing strategic questions. Despite Trump's claim to have made 'a lot of progress' and that the summit was a '10 out of 10,' all signs point to a huge win for the Russian autocrat. Trump's lavish stage production of Putin's arrival Friday, with near-simultaneous exits from presidential jets and red-carpet strolls, provided some image rehabilitation for a leader who is a pariah in the rest of the West and who is accused of war crimes in Ukraine. And by the end of their meeting, Trump had offered a massive concession to his visitor by adopting the Russian position that peace moves should concentrate on a final peace deal — which will likely take months or years to negotiate — rather than a ceasefire to halt the Russian offensive now. As CNN's Nick Paton Walsh pointed out, that just gives Putin more time to grind down Ukraine. Most importantly, Trump has, at least for now, backed away from threats to impose tough new sanctions on Russia and expand secondary sanctions on the nations that buy its oil and therefore bankroll its war. He'd threatened such measures by a deadline that expired last week out of frustration with Putin's intransigence and a growing belief the Russian leader was 'tapping' him along. This leverage may have brought Putin to Alaska. But Trump seems to have relaxed it for little in return. 'Because of what happened today, I think I don't have to think about that now,' Trump said in an interview with Fox News after the summit. Trump briefed European leaders after the summit, telling them that Putin called on Ukraine to yield the roughly a third or so of the Donbas, encompassing the eastern regions of Luhansk and Donetsk, that Russia does not currently control. In return, he'd offer to freeze the front lines in the Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions, CNN's Kevin Liptak reported, citing European officials. This would force Ukraine into an agonizing dilemma. Some analysts fear such a deal would allow Moscow's forces a platform to launch a future attack. European leaders also said Trump voiced openness to providing US security guarantees for Ukraine once the war ends. This could be significant because the president has yet to commit to US support for any Western-led peace mission in the country. But he didn't specify what kind of backing he's willing to provide. CNN's Kit Maher reported Saturday that multiple European leaders had been invited to a meeting between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at the White House on Monday. It was unclear which of them will attend, but it raises the possibility of a new widening of Trump's peacemaking effort to include US allies. But the Kyiv government will also be on alert for any attempt to pressure it to make concessions to plans that Trump agreed with Putin. Dueling shows of force F-35 jets and a B-2 bomber accompany the plane carrying the Russian President Vladimir Putin as he arrives at Elmendorf-Richardson Joint Base ahead of Russian President Vladimir Putin and US President Donald Trump meeting in Alaska, United States on August 15, 2025. Fatih Aktas/Anadolu/Getty Images Friday's meeting began with a B-2 stealth bomber and F-22 fighters roaring overhead in a dramatic moment of US superpower signaling. But Putin one-upped that symbolism by greeting Trump with the words 'Good afternoon, dear neighbor,' as he leveraged the summit's location in Alaska to imply that the two countries had important and immediate mutual interests that should not be disrupted by a distant war in Europe. For Ukrainians and their European allies — who were shut out of the meeting and whom Trump briefed afterward — there was at least a moment of relief that Trump didn't sell Kyiv out. The fact that a US-Russia land swap plan didn't emerge from Alaska is a win for Europe's emergency pre-summit diplomacy. Still, Trump hinted that he will pile pressure on Ukraine's leader when they meet at the White House on Monday. It's 'now up to President Zelensky to get it done,' Trump told Fox News in the friendly post-summit interview, after refusing to answer questions with Putin in what had been billed as a joint press conference. Trump's options moving forward Before the summit, Trump obliterated careful efforts by his staff to lower expectations when he told Fox News, 'I won't be happy if I walk away without some form of a ceasefire.' President Donald Trump after speaking with reporters aboard Air Force One while en route to Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska, on Friday, August 15, 2025. Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP The failure to get there is important. Russia is happy to commit to a detailed peace process with interminable negotiations that would allow it to continue fighting — including in its increasingly successful summer offensive — while it talks. But Ukrainians are desperate for relief from years of Russian drone and missile attacks on civilians as a generation bleeds out on World War I-style battlefields. Peace talks without a ceasefire will leave it open to Russian or US pressure. Trump's zeal to work for peace in Ukraine is commendable, even if his repeated public requests for a Nobel Peace Prize raise questions about his ultimate motives. And one upside of the summit is that the US and Russia — the countries with the biggest nuclear arsenals — are talking again. But the underlying premise of Trump's peacemaking is that the force of his personality and his supposedly unique status as the world's greatest dealmaker can end wars. That myth is looking very ragged after his long flight home from Alaska. And by falling short of his own expectations in the Alaska summit, Trump left himself with some tough calculations about what to do next. ► Does he revert to his previous attempts to pressure Ukraine in search of an imposed peace that would validate Putin's illegal invasion and legitimize the idea that states can rewrite international borders, thereby reversing a foundation of the post-World War II-era? ► Or as the dust settles, and he seeks to repair damage to his prestige, does he revert to US pressure and sanctions to try to reset Russian calculations? He at least left open the possibility of sticks rather than carrots in his Fox News interview, saying: 'I may have to think about it in two weeks or three weeks or something, but we don't have to think about that right now.' ► Alternatively, Trump could commit to the Russian vision of talks on a final peace agreement. History shows that this would be neither quick nor honored by the Russians over the long term. He's hoping for a three-way summit between Putin, Zelensky and himself. That would satisfy his craving for spectacle and big made-for-TV events. But after Friday's evidence that Russia doesn't want to end the war, it's hard to see how it would create breakthroughs. ► Another possibility is that Trump simply gets discouraged or bored with the details and drudgery of a long-term peace process that lacks big, quick wins he can celebrate with his supporters. US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin hold a press conference following their meeting at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska, on August 15, 2025. Jeenah Moon/Reuters 'A large part of (Trump) is all about style. There's not a lot of real enjoyment of getting into the substance of things,' Jim Townsend, a former deputy assistant secretary of defense for European and NATO policy who is now affiliated with the Center for New American Security, said before the summit. 'He likes the meringue on top. And I think that's how you can be manipulated.' Trump's style-before-substance strategy clearly backfired in Alaska. Putin appeared far more prepared as Trump winged it. In retrospect, it's hard to see what the Russian president offered to US envoy Steve Witkoff in the Kremlin that convinced the administration that the Alaska talks were a good idea. And Russia is clearly playing on Trump's desire for photo-op moments in the expectation that it can keep him engaged while offering few other concessions. Trump's Nobel campaign suffered a setback Trump may remain the best hope for peace in Ukraine. He can speak directly to Putin, unlike Ukraine or its European allies. Ultimately, US power will be needed to guarantee Ukrainian security, since Europeans lack the capacity to do it alone. And the US retains the capability to hurt Russia and Putin with direct and secondary sanctions. But Trump has to want to do it. And for now he seems back under Putin's spell. The Russian leader's transparent manipulation of the US president and Trump's credulity will worry Ukraine. On Fox News, Trump said Putin praised his second term, saying the US was 'as hot as a pistol' and he had previously thought the US was 'dead.' Putin also publicly reinforced Trump's talking point that the invasion three years ago would 'never have happened' if he had been president. 'I'm quite sure that it would indeed be so. I can confirm that,' said Putin. Rescue workers extinguish a fire on a civilian enterprise in the Novobavarskyi district struck by a Russian drone on June 4, 2025, in Kharkiv, Ukraine. Viacheslav Mavrychev/Suspilne Ukraine/GlobalTrump told Fox News' Sean Hannity that he was 'so happy' to hear validation from Putin and that the Russian leader had reinforced another one of his false claims, telling him that 'you can't have a great democracy with mail-in voting.' That a US president would take such testimony at face value from a totalitarian strongman is mind-boggling — even more so in the light of US intelligence agency assessments that the Russians interfered in the 2016 election to help Trump win. Ultimately, events in Alaska drove a hole through a White House claim in a recent statement that Trump is 'the President of Peace.' Trump has touted interventions that cooled hostilities in standoffs between India and Pakistan; Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo; Thailand and Cambodia; and Armenia and Azerbaijan to argue he's forging peace around the globe at an extraordinary clip. 'I seem to have an ability to end them,' Trump said on Fox News of these conflicts. He does deserve credit for effectively using US influence in these efforts, including with the unique cudgel of US trade benefits. He has saved lives, even if the deals are often less comprehensive than meets the eye. But his failure so far to end the Ukraine war that he pledged would be so easy to fix — along with US complicity in the humanitarian disaster in Gaza — means a legacy as a peacemaker and the Nobel Prize that he craves remain out of reach. Once, he predicted he could end the Ukraine war in 24 hours. Despite his bluster, a comment on Fox News shows that after Alaska, he has a better understanding of how hard it will be. 'I thought this would be the easiest of them all and it was the most difficult.' This story has been updated with additional developments.


See - Sada Elbalad
an hour ago
- See - Sada Elbalad
Netanyahu Outlines Conditions for Ending Gaza War
Ahmed Emam Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has laid out his government's conditions for ending the war in the Gaza Strip, according to a statement released by his office. The statement said the conditions include the complete disarmament of Hamas as well as the removal of all weapons from Gaza. Netanyahu's office described these steps as 'fundamental pillars' for achieving what he termed security and stability in the region. The proposed conditions also call for Israel to maintain control over Gaza's perimeter, ensuring continued Israeli security oversight. In addition, Netanyahu's office outlined a plan for a governing authority to be established inside Gaza—one that would not be affiliated with either Hamas or the Palestinian Authority. The remarks signal a vision for a new administrative structure in the enclave once the war ends. The announcement comes amid ongoing international discussions over ceasefire efforts and the future of Gaza's governance once hostilities subside. read more Gold prices rise, 21 Karat at EGP 3685 NATO's Role in Israeli-Palestinian Conflict US Expresses 'Strong Opposition' to New Turkish Military Operation in Syria Shoukry Meets Director-General of FAO Lavrov: confrontation bet. nuclear powers must be avoided News Iran Summons French Ambassador over Foreign Minister Remarks News Aboul Gheit Condemns Israeli Escalation in West Bank News Greek PM: Athens Plays Key Role in Improving Energy Security in Region News One Person Injured in Explosion at Ukrainian Embassy in Madrid Videos & Features Story behind Trending Jessica Radcliffe Death Video News Israeli-Linked Hadassah Clinic in Moscow Treats Wounded Iranian IRGC Fighters Arts & Culture "Jurassic World Rebirth" Gets Streaming Date News China Launches Largest Ever Aircraft Carrier News Ayat Khaddoura's Final Video Captures Bombardment of Beit Lahia Business Egyptian Pound Undervalued by 30%, Says Goldman Sachs Videos & Features Tragedy Overshadows MC Alger Championship Celebration: One Fan Dead, 11 Injured After Stadium Fall Arts & Culture South Korean Actress Kang Seo-ha Dies at 31 after Cancer Battle Lifestyle Get to Know 2025 Eid Al Adha Prayer Times in Egypt News The Jessica Radcliffe Orca Attack? 100% Fake and AI-Generated


Daily News Egypt
4 hours ago
- Daily News Egypt
Kenya Faces Backlash Over Role in Controversial Afrikaner Resettlement Plan
A fresh diplomatic storm is brewing in southern Africa as Kenya finds itself entangled in a contentious U.S.-backed program to resettle white Afrikaners from South Africa in the United States. The initiative, first launched under former U.S. President Donald Trump, has sparked legal disputes, political pushback, and rising tensions between Pretoria, Nairobi, and Washington. According to official sources, the U.S. State Department—working through the NGO Church World Service (CWS)—requested that Kenya send over 30 staff members to South Africa to help process resettlement applications. These staffers reportedly applied for 'volunteer visas' to enter the country, but South Africa's Home Affairs Ministry has signaled it may reject the requests, arguing that the work is paid and falls outside the scope of such visas. At the heart of the controversy is the unusual way the resettlement program operates. Instead of processing asylum cases in a third country, as is standard practice, the U.S. has chosen to evaluate claims directly within South Africa. The program initially targeted Afrikaners who claimed they were victims of racial persecution, but was later expanded to include 'ethnic minorities facing discrimination.' International bodies such as the International Organization for Migration have refused to recognize these applicants as legitimate refugees. Former UNHCR official Hans Lunschoff noted that processing asylum claims inside the country of origin is 'highly irregular and generally reserved for exceptional political cases, not mass relocations.' The initiative has fueled friction between South Africa and the U.S. President Cyril Ramaphosa has repeatedly rejected claims that minorities face systemic persecution, pointing out that violent crime in South Africa affects all racial groups. His government also bristled at Washington's decision to impose 30% tariffs on certain South African imports after failing to halt the program. Kenya's involvement has added a new layer of controversy. Nairobi-based CWS, which runs a regional office in East Africa, has been tasked with conducting medical screenings, cultural orientation, and travel logistics for the resettled Afrikaners. Kenyan nationals applying for visas to take part in the mission are believed to be tied to this organization, which has both American and Kenyan leadership figures. With the first group of Afrikaner families already relocated to the U.S. earlier this year and another wave expected by late August, the political fallout is intensifying. Critics in both South Africa and Kenya accuse Washington of politicizing migration, while human rights experts warn of dangerous precedents in redefining refugee status along racial or ideological lines. The dispute risks straining Kenya's ties with both Pretoria and Washington, raising broader questions about the intersection of migration policy, geopolitics, and the ethics of selective resettlement.