logo
Did accidental flap retraction cause the Air India crash? An aviation expert's theory is going viral

Did accidental flap retraction cause the Air India crash? An aviation expert's theory is going viral

First Post11 hours ago

Captain Steve, an aviation expert, suggests that a critical cockpit error may have triggered the tragic Air India crash, which killed 274 people. He believes that pilots may have accidentally retracted the flaps instead of the landing gear during the initial climb, a move he described as 'a tragic mistake'. However, this is speculation and an investigation into the tragedy has been launched read more
Air India plane crash: According to Captain Steve, the pilots may have accidentally retracted the flaps instead of the landing gear during the initial climb, a move he described as 'a tragic mistake.' AFP
Days after the devastating Air India crash in Ahmedabad — one of the deadliest aviation disasters in the country's history — a new theory is making waves online about what might have gone wrong.
The Boeing 787 Dreamliner, operating as Flight AI-171, was en route from Ahmedabad to London Gatwick when it crashed into a residential hostel shortly after takeoff. The incident claimed the lives of at least 274 people, including passengers, crew, and people on the ground.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Now, a video by international aviation expert Captain Steve is going viral on X (formerly Twitter). In it, he offers a possible explanation for the tragedy, suggesting that a critical cockpit error may have triggered the crash.
The aircraft was flown by two highly experienced pilots on board. The pilots were identified as Captain Sumeet Sabharwal and First Officer Clive Kunder, who had over 9,000 hours of flying experience.
According to Captain Steve, the pilots may have accidentally retracted the flaps instead of the landing gear during the initial climb, a move he described as 'a tragic mistake.'
But first, what are airplane flaps, and what do they do?
Flaps are movable panels located along the trailing edge of an aircraft's wings.
They are extended during takeoff and landing to increase the wing's surface area, which provides more 'lift', an aerodynamic force that keeps the plane airborne.
Flaps are movable panels located along the trailing edge of an aircraft's wings. Image for Representation.
This additional lift is crucial during low-speed flight, like takeoff or landing. On the Boeing 787, the standard procedure is to set flaps to 5 (or higher) for takeoff, then gradually retract them only as the aircraft climbs and picks up speed.
Flaps are adjusted manually by either pilot, depending on the situation. In cruise flight, they remain retracted.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
What Captain Steve believes went wrong
In a conversation with CNN-News18, Captain Steve explained what he thinks happened in the cockpit moments after takeoff.
As the aircraft begins to climb, the usual command is given: 'Gear up.' But, he asked, what if the co-pilot accidentally pulled the flap lever instead of the gear lever?
'If that happened — and this is a big if — this explains a lot about why this airplane stopped flying, why the lift over the wings died,' Steve said.
At the low speeds of takeoff, retracting the flaps too soon would instantly reduce lift, he said. Combine that with the landing gear still extended, which increases drag, and you have a 'bad combination,' he explained.
He breaks it down further: 'The flaps are retracting, all that extra lift you're producing in the wings goes away. You're already slow… and those great big landing gears are still down, creating drag. This is a bad combination.'
What really happened to AI-171?
Captain Steeve has now shared his theory on the Air India #PlaneCrash. pic.twitter.com/oHQTz3wysn — Mohit Chauhan (@mohitlaws) June 13, 2025
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
In the viral video, Captain Steve points out that the nose of the plane initially rises to about 2.5 degrees — but it doesn't go any higher. 'The gear never moves. The wings barely flex. That's a visual sign — very little lift is being generated,' he noted.
Seconds later, the nose begins to drop. 'That's the airplane trying to create more airflow over the wings to compensate. But it's too slow, too heavy. The lift is gone.'
In Steve's words, the pilot may have tried one final manoeuvre to save the flight — pulling the nose up even more.
'The airplane begins to kind of wallow… the pilot pulls back even more on the nose. That aggravates the whole thing."
'They might've had a chance at 1,500 feet, maybe even 1,000, to recover,' he said. 'But they never got there.'
Ruling out engine loss, the bird strike theories
Captain Steve also dismisses other common theories doing the rounds online, like dual engine failure or a bird strike.
He also notes that both engines appear to be working normally in the available footage. 'No flames, no sparks. Nothing to suggest a power failure.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
On the theory that birds could've hit the engines, Steve is doubtful. 'Could both engines have been taken out by a flock of birds? Possible — but we'd expect to see smoke, fire, or debris. There's none.'
Members of the security forces work at the site of an airplane that crashed in India's northwestern city of Ahmedabad in Gujarat state, June 12, 2025. AP
He also rules out fuel contamination. 'The engines showed no signs of sputtering on the roll. Everything up to rotation looked textbook.'
For Captain Steve, the signs point not to mechanical failure, but to an aerodynamic one. A plane can still lose lift even with working engines, especially if the flaps are mistakenly retracted too early.
'It's heartbreaking,' he concludes. 'These pilots may have done everything they could. But in those few seconds, the margin for error was razor-thin. And one wrong move may have cost 241 lives.'
While this is just a theory, investigators are now analysing the aircraft's black box and trying to uncover what really happened.
With input from agencies

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pilots, experts grapple with Guj crash videos
Pilots, experts grapple with Guj crash videos

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

Pilots, experts grapple with Guj crash videos

1 2 3 Kolkata: Veteran pilots, who told TOI about the possibility of inadvertently switching off the second live engine in the Air India Dreamliner in the event of the stalling of the first engine during take-off, have identified another error that might have occurred in the cockpit during the critical take-off phase: the retraction of flaps that assist lift instead of the landing gear that causes drag. "After take-off, when instruments show positive climb rate, the monitoring pilot announces 'positive rate'. The flying pilot verifies and commands 'gear up' to retract landing gear. This sequence occurs seconds after lift-off, approximately 100 ft above ground, to reduce drag and enhance lift. The pilot might have mistakenly retracted the flaps, crucial for lift, instead of the gear," a seasoned pilot explained. The impact of such an error, if it occurred, will be confirmed only after experts analyse the Digital Flight Data Recorder and Cockpit Voice Recorder. Video evidence of the 31-second flight shows the landing gear remaining deployed even as the aircraft exceeded 600 ft before descending and crashing on a populated area. But the footage quality prevents confirmation of flap positions. "Retracting flaps, while the landing gear remains down, reduce lift. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Pinga-Pinga e HBP? Tome isso 1x ao dia se tem mais de 40 anos Portal Saúde do Homem Clique aqui Undo The aircraft, carrying fuel for a 10-hour journey, required maximum lift. The deployed landing gear at crash time suggests either pilot distraction during an emergency or an error," the pilot said. He noted that Ahmedabad's high temperature (around 40°C) created thin air, hampering lift and engine performance, reducing thrust during take-off and ascent. Though such errors should not occur with experienced crew members, like AI 171's (Capt Sumeet Sabharwal: 8,200 hours, First Officer Clive Kunder: 1,100 hours), a source pointed at the co-pilot's previous experience on Airbus A320 before Boeing Dreamliner training. "Different manufacturers have distinct cockpit configurations. Pilots should ideally progress within the same manufacturer's aircraft family. The co-pilot should have advanced to an A330, but pilot shortages may have prevented this," the source explained. Another pilot suggested an incident during the final take-off might have distracted the crew, leading to errors with insufficient reaction time. But an experienced aviator differed with the suggestion, pointing out that the Boeing Dreamliner's sophisticated flight control system incorporates multiple safety mechanisms. These include prevention of stalling through pitch-up restrictions, speed control via elevator and auto-throttle adjustments, automatic trimming for stability and safeguards against extreme banking angles and G-force loads. Pilots agree that regardless of mechanical or human factors, the event occurred when corrective action time was minimal. Additional altitude would have provided more response time, but the available 20 seconds proved insufficient. Kolkata: Veteran pilots, who told TOI about the possibility of inadvertently switching off the second live engine in the Air India Dreamliner in the event of the stalling of the first engine during take-off, have identified another error that might have occurred in the cockpit during the critical take-off phase: the retraction of flaps that assist lift instead of the landing gear that causes drag. "After take-off, when instruments show positive climb rate, the monitoring pilot announces 'positive rate'. The flying pilot verifies and commands 'gear up' to retract landing gear. This sequence occurs seconds after lift-off, approximately 100 ft above ground, to reduce drag and enhance lift. The pilot might have mistakenly retracted the flaps, crucial for lift, instead of the gear," a seasoned pilot explained. The impact of such an error, if it occurred, will be confirmed only after experts analyse the Digital Flight Data Recorder and Cockpit Voice Recorder. Video evidence of the 31-second flight shows the landing gear remaining deployed even as the aircraft exceeded 600 ft before descending and crashing on a populated area. But the footage quality prevents confirmation of flap positions. "Retracting flaps, while the landing gear remains down, reduce lift. The aircraft, carrying fuel for a 10-hour journey, required maximum lift. The deployed landing gear at crash time suggests either pilot distraction during an emergency or an error," the pilot said. He noted that Ahmedabad's high temperature (around 40°C) created thin air, hampering lift and engine performance, reducing thrust during take-off and ascent. Though such errors should not occur with experienced crew members, like AI 171's (Capt Sumeet Sabharwal: 8,200 hours, First Officer Clive Kunder: 1,100 hours), a source pointed at the co-pilot's previous experience on Airbus A320 before Boeing Dreamliner training. "Different manufacturers have distinct cockpit configurations. Pilots should ideally progress within the same manufacturer's aircraft family. The co-pilot should have advanced to an A330, but pilot shortages may have prevented this," the source explained. Another pilot suggested an incident during the final take-off might have distracted the crew, leading to errors with insufficient reaction time. But an experienced aviator differed with the suggestion, pointing out that the Boeing Dreamliner's sophisticated flight control system incorporates multiple safety mechanisms. These include prevention of stalling through pitch-up restrictions, speed control via elevator and auto-throttle adjustments, automatic trimming for stability and safeguards against extreme banking angles and G-force loads. Pilots agree that regardless of mechanical or human factors, the event occurred when corrective action time was minimal. Additional altitude would have provided more response time, but the available 20 seconds proved insufficient. Follow more information on Air India plane crash in Ahmedabad here . Get real-time live updates on rescue operations and check full list of passengers onboard AI 171 .

Woman, postponed flight to meet pregnant daughters-in-law, killed in Air India crash
Woman, postponed flight to meet pregnant daughters-in-law, killed in Air India crash

India Today

time2 hours ago

  • India Today

Woman, postponed flight to meet pregnant daughters-in-law, killed in Air India crash

Yasmin Vohra, a 51-year-old woman from Vadodara, had postponed her flight to London from June 9 to June 12, wanting to be by the side of her two pregnant daughters-in-law during their final trimester. One of them, the wife of her younger son, was expecting her first had carefully planned the journey, lovingly packing toys, lipsticks, clothes and traditional superfoods to support her daughters-in-law. It was meant to be a joyful family reunion and the beginning of a new chapter. But her plans ended in unimaginable tragedy. advertisementYasmin boarded Air India Flight AI171 on Thursday afternoon, headed for London Gatwick. Shortly after takeoff from Ahmedabad's Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport, the Boeing 787 Dreamliner crashed into a medical hostel in Meghani Nagar, a densely populated area just outside the airport's perimeter. The crash killed 242 people on board and at least 24 others on the ground. Yasmin's nephew Parwez, who was travelling with her, also died. His wife, who is expecting a child, remains unaware of her husband's husband, Yasin Vohra, now waits in the scorching heat outside the PM Centre at Civil Hospital in Ahmedabad. DNA profiling is underway to identify the victims, and he continues to hold on to hope for a proper farewell. "After we dropped her at the airport, we had barely reached Anand when we heard about the crash," he I learnt the aircraft had 1.25 lakh litres of fuel, I knew deep inside I would never see her again. Yet I went to the hospital searching for her, only to see bodies and injured being rushed in."He now scrolls through CCTV footage of his wife bidding farewell to neighbours before leaving for the airport. "She said sorry to everyone in case she had ever made a mistake," he recalls. "We didn't know she was saying her final goodbye."Their granddaughters still ask for Yasmin. "Where is Dadi? Where are our gifts?" they wonder. Yasin says he doesn't have the heart to tell them the the formalities are complete and Yasmin's remains are identified, Yasin will take what he describes as the longest journey of his life - to bring her home one last InTrending Reel

On a wing & a prayer, passengers return to Ahmedabad airport
On a wing & a prayer, passengers return to Ahmedabad airport

Indian Express

time3 hours ago

  • Indian Express

On a wing & a prayer, passengers return to Ahmedabad airport

Precisely 48 hours after the Air India Boeing Dreamliner crashed in the afternoon of June 12, Ali Mohammad Khan (25) from Jharkhand's Garhwa district was among four young men at the airport, waiting to board a flight to the UAE, where a 'better life' hopefully awaits. The group said they are 'nervous' but 'placing faith in God' as they prepared for takeoff, scheduled for 4 pm. Looking at the clock showing 1:40 pm — the exact time when AI-171 had gone down on Thursday — and the information screen which showed that the scheduled flight to London Gatwick airport on Saturday had been cancelled, Ali said, 'The incident makes me anxious… In any case, the idea of taking a flight is overwhelming, but the crash has turned it into a fear of sorts. I am praying and leaving the rest to God. It is the first such crash in many years, so it does not happen regularly.' Bilal Khan (26), who is accompanying Ali, said that 'life must go on'. 'Once we take this flight and land safely, we might overcome this nervousness,' he said. 'We have a new life to look forward to.' The two men, along with Shoaib Akhtar from Gopalganj and Ashok Kumar from Muzaffarpur, got this job through a common agency. Ashok (28) is the most on edge. 'I always had a fear of flying… I am leaving it to God… My wife and children are back home, and I am going to make a better life for all of us. I am reminding myself of that.' Just a few benches away at the almost deserted drop-off area, Swati Kuldeep Soni, a resident of Banswara in Rajasthan, is waiting with her seven-year-old son, Shivam, who is excited to board his first flight. Swati said, 'I have the crash at the back of my mind, but I also know that it is not usual for planes to crash. I am flying after several years to be with my husband, who works in Dubai in a shipping company. But it is my son's first flight. When we saw the news of families lost in the crash, along with young children, my thoughts went there for a moment…' Shivam, predictably, can't contain his enthusiasm: 'I made my mother select a window seat as I want to see what the world looks like from the sky.' At the airport gates, security personnel could be overheard discussing the cancellation of the Ahmedabad-Gatwick flight and the 'anxiety among passengers'. Saiyed Masoom Raza Naqvi, a labourer from Kodinar, arrived to drop off his 18-year-old son, who is travelling to Dubai on a short trip to 'explore career opportunities'. Raza said the crash cannot become an impediment to flying. 'Accidents can happen everywhere. Humanity survived a pandemic; being scared is not an option. We have to accept the accident as an unfortunate moment for the victims and pray for their families, but my son is flying without fear,' he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store