Bengaluru cardiologist on private vs govt medical college for MBBS or PG education
In the high-stakes world of Indian medical education, the debate between government and private colleges is long-standing, and recently, it reignited on social media. But beyond just fees and entrance ranks, what truly shapes a good doctor? Is it clinical exposure, teaching quality, or something deeper? A series of tweets by doctors has sparked a nuanced conversation, revealing how
medical training in India
is far more complex than the 'private vs government' binary suggests.
It all began when
Dr Vivek Pandey
, an orthopaedic doctor and teacher, took to Twitter to share a troubling observation from his OPD. He asked basic clinical questions about nerve weakness to an intern and two first-year postgraduates — all of whom couldn't answer. Despite their competitive entrance scores and coaching experience, the students were unable to respond without multiple-choice prompts. 'Something has terribly gone wrong with our medical education system,' he tweeted, noting that easy access to information via apps like ChatGPT or Grok hasn't translated into clinical competence.
A user responded bluntly, pointing to the fact that these students were from a top private medical college. The user wrote, "Had they studied well, they wouldn't be paying crores for a seat' in a private university. But Dr Pandey was quick to defend his students. 'Don't judge my kids,' he replied, explaining that many miss out on government seats by just a few marks in an intensely competitive, reservation-heavy system, leaving private colleges as the only practical option. 'They aren't dumb. Most are good and hardworking. Their parents have earned the money to ensure their kids don't lose years chasing a seat.' He added that top-quality doctors also emerge from private institutions and that "only greats manage govt seats" is a myth.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Unsold Container Homes in National Capital Region - Prices You Won't Believe!
Shipping Container Homes | Search Ads
Search Now
Undo
This back-and-forth triggered a wider discussion. One user, reflecting on personal experience, stressed that clinical competence stems from training in government hospitals, where students work under renowned faculty and face a heavy patient load, giving them unmatched hands-on experience. 'Clinical training happens in wards, not in AC classrooms,' they wrote.
Bengaluru cardiologist
Dr Deepak Krishnamurthy joined the conversation, striking a balanced note. 'Teaching should happen in wards,' he agreed, but added that not all government colleges are ideal.
— DrDeepakKrishn1 (@DrDeepakKrishn1)
'Many have no one to guide students.' He added that most of the time, they are on their own and only a few medical colleges, both government and private, offer truly good teaching.' He concluded by saying that not all government colleges are good, and not all private ones are bad.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
14 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Racing against the clock: Why US, India can't miss window for a trade deal
The negotiation is unfolding in real time. The US is using tariffs as leverage; India, for its part, is signalling unusual flexibility Anushka Shah Listen to This Article Time is running out for Washington and New Delhi. On July 9, a 90-day pause on new American tariffs will expire, ending a brief truce meant to enable a limited trade deal. In April, President Donald Trump announced two steep tariffs: A 10 per cent universal tariff on all imports and a 16 per cent reciprocal tariff targeting Indian goods. While the United States temporarily suspended the latter to allow negotiations, that window is quickly closing. The negotiation is unfolding in real time. The US is using tariffs as leverage; India, for its part, is signalling unusual flexibility. More than
The Hindu
26 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Minister of State L. Murugan meets Vietnamese delegation
India and Vietnam on Thursday (June 5, 2025) agreed to step up cooperation in the media and entertainment sector during a meeting held between Union Minister of State for Information and Broadcasting and Parliamentary Affairs, L. Murugan, and a delegation of high-ranking officials from Vietnam. The Vietnamese delegation was led by Nguyen Trong Nghia, Polit Bureau member of the Communist Party of Vietnam (CPV) and chairperson of the CPV's Central Commission for Information, Education and Mass Mobilisation. The meeting was also attended by I&B Secretary Sanjay Jaju, and other senior officials of the Ministry. 'India and Vietnam share traditionally close and warm bilateral relations. In 2022, the two countries celebrated the 50th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic relations. The India - Vietnam bilateral relations were elevated in the year 2016 to the level of 'Comprehensive Strategic Partnership' during the visit of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi to Vietnam,' a government release said. 'Mr. Nguyen Trong Nghia lauded India's impressive growth as the world's fourth largest economy and emphasised the strong friendship and partnership between both the countries,' it said, adding that it was proposed to have programmes for enhanced cooperation between media organisations of both sides. Also read: India-Vietnam strategic partnership 'source of security, stability, progress in region': EAM Jaishankar Mr. Murugan appreciated the participation of a large Vietnamese delegation to the World Audio Visual and Entertainment Summit 2025, in May. 'Both the countries stressed their deep civilisational connections including a shared Buddhist heritage and agreed to work actively to further strengthen their multi-dimensional cooperation,' the release said.
The Hindu
26 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Diplomacy is about ‘incrementalism', says Congress leader Manish Tewari
In the face of questions raised by the Congress party on the 'political value' of the people that the multi-party delegations had met, and what they had 'actually accomplished' on the Centre's international diplomatic outreach after the recent India-Pakistan conflict, delegates said diplomacy was about 'incrementalism', and was not a '20-20 cricket match'. Ahead of External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar's meetings with two delegations, Congress general secretary (communication) Jairam Ramesh had said on Wednesday (June 4, 2025) in a post on X that there needed to be an 'honest assessment of what was actually accomplished' and not what was 'spin doctored'. Mr. Jaishankar on Thursday (June 5, 2025) met the delegation headed by senior Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) leader K. Kanimozhi that visited Russia, Latvia, Slovenia, Greece, and Spain, and the delegation headed by senior Janata Dal-United (JD-U) leader Sanjay K. Jha that visited Japan, South Korea, Singapore, Indonesia, and Malaysia. 'There are reliable reports that the welcome in some countries was very lukewarm — to put it mildly — and that the political value of the people the MPs met was below par. Videos of the MPs engaging in silly fun and frolic while on a serious national mission have also been surfacing,' Mr. Ramesh said. Senior Congress leader Manish Tewari, who was part the delegation led by Nationalist Congress Party-Sharadchandra Pawar (NCP-SP) MP Supriya Sule to Egypt, Qatar, Ethiopia, and South Africa, on the question of whether the tour succeeded in its aim, spoke of consolidation of gains. 'Diplomacy is about incrementalism and consolidating those gains,' Mr. Tewari said. The diplomatic outreach had ensured the Indian point of view was presented concurrently in 33 countries, he added. 'The hyphenation (India-Pak) is a temporary mirage. It is only natural that when two nuclear powers are in conflict the world gets concerned,' the Congress leader said. 'We live in a contested political space. But for now, exposing Pakistan's perfidy should be the national priority,' Mr. Tewari said on the question of criticism from his own party on the utility of such a tour. Other delegates also contested the Congress's claim. JD(U) leader Sanjay K. Jha said that his delegation had met the Japanese Foreign Minister, had breakfast with Ambassadors to Japan from various countries, and in Jakarta, met with ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations) Ambassadors. 'To criticise an all-party delegation, which spoke in one voice on such an important issue, is a new low for the Congress,' Mr. Jha said. Communist Party of India-Marxist (CPI-M) MP John Brittas, who was part of Mr. Jha's delegation, said it had clarified India's viewpoint. 'We didn't go to play a 20-20 cricket match, for there to be winners or losers. Each person is entitled to their own opinion. Our delegation has laid down the foundation, clarifying India's viewpoint, and also underlined the dangers of Pakistan-sponsored terrorism. It is for the government now to build over it,' Mr. Brittas said. The president of the All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (AIMIM), Asaduddin Owaisi, who was part of a delegation led by Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) MP Baijayant Panda to Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, and Algeria, said that it was 'subjective criticism' to claim that the delegation did not meet people of 'political value'. 'Out of the four countries we visited, one (Algeria) is currently a non-permanent member of the UNSC (United Nations Security Council), and another (Bahrain) will get a seat next year. They exert influence on Pakistan and will be crucial in India's efforts to put Pakistan on the FATF (Financial Action Task Force) grey list,' Mr. Owaisi said, adding that the delegation met top decision-making bodies in all the four countries, and also members of think tanks.
