logo
Blast at training facility kills 3 L.A. deputies in one of department's worst losses of life

Blast at training facility kills 3 L.A. deputies in one of department's worst losses of life

CTV News18-07-2025
L.A. County Sheriff's deputies stand outside the Biscailuz Center Academy Training facility, where three deputies were killed during a training accident, on Friday, July 18, 2025. (Carlin Stiehl / Los Angeles Times via Getty Images)
A Friday blast at a Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department training facility killed three members of its arson and explosives unit, marking one of the department's worst losses of life from a single incident, the sheriff said.
All three were veteran deputies. The department hasn't said what they were doing at the time of the blast or what caused it.
Los Angeles County Sheriff Robert Luna said the arson and explosives team undergoes in-depth training and responds to more than 1,000 calls a year. The deputies had served 19, 22 and 33 years in the department, Luna said.
'They have years of training,' the sheriff said at a news conference. 'They are fantastic experts and, unfortunately, I lost three of them today.'
The explosion was reported about 7:30 a.m. at the Biscailuz Training Facility, Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department spokesperson Nicole Nishida said.
Aerial footage from KABC-TV shows the explosion happened in a parking lot filled with sheriff's patrol cars and box trucks. Three covered bodies could be seen near a truck with a ramp attached to a side door. A patrol cruiser parked nearby had its rearview mirror shattered by the blast.
Luna said it took more than four hours to render the scene safe and the deaths are being investigated by the department's homicide detectives, with the assistance of the FBI and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. No one else was injured in the explosion, he said.
An early line of investigation was looking at a possible training accident, according to a law enforcement official briefed on the matter who was not authorized to discuss it and spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity.
In a post on X, Attorney General Pam Bondi said the explosion 'appears to be a horrific incident' and federal agents are at the scene to learn more.
'Please pray for the families of the sheriff's deputies killed,' Bondi wrote.
I just spoke to @USAttyEssayli about what appears to be a horrific incident that killed at least three at a law enforcement training facility in Los Angeles.
Our federal agents are at the scene and we are working to learn more. Please pray for the families of the sheriff's… — Attorney General Pamela Bondi (@AGPamBondi) July 18, 2025
Luna said the deaths marked the department's worst loss of life in a single incident since 1857, when four officers were killed by gunfire, and noted that he couldn't release the deputies' names because he had yet to speak to one of the families.
'I have met with two of three families thus far. Those were extremely challenging conversations,' Luna said, his voice breaking.
Arson investigators from the Los Angeles Fire Department and members of the Los Angeles Police Department bomb squad were also assisting the investigation at the training facility, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass said in a post on X.
The City of L.A. is supporting the @LASDHQ through this horrific incident in Monterey Park.
LAFD/ATF arson investigators and members of the LAPD bomb squad are assisting at the training facility.
The thoughts of all Angelenos are with all of those impacted by this blast. https://t.co/sJ955YhslT — Mayor Karen Bass (@MayorOfLA) July 18, 2025
California Gov. Gavin Newsom's office said he's been briefed and that the Governor's Office of Emergency Services is in contact with the Sheriff's Department and closely monitoring the situation. He later posted on X that members of the State Fire Marshal were helping with the investigation at the request of the ATF.
Jason Zabala, a deputy who is a member of the sheriff's department SWAT team, called the deputies who died 'the best of the best.'
'When you sign up for the job, you know it's going to be a dangerous job. As the years goes on, you realize how dangerous it is,' he said.
By Etienne Laurent, Eric Tucker And Olga R. Rodriguez
Tucker reported from Washington and Rodriguez from San Francisco.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump, other high-profile people had names redacted from Epstein files by FBI for privacy reasons
Trump, other high-profile people had names redacted from Epstein files by FBI for privacy reasons

National Post

time17 minutes ago

  • National Post

Trump, other high-profile people had names redacted from Epstein files by FBI for privacy reasons

The Federal Bureau of Investigation redacted President Donald Trump's name and those of other high-profile individuals from government files related to Jeffrey Epstein, according to three people familiar with the matter. Article content The redactions were made by a team of FBI employees tasked with reviewing the Epstein files for potential public release. The names were withheld under privacy protections because those individuals, including Trump, were private citizens when the federal investigation into Epstein began in 2006, the people said. They spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly. Article content Article content The appearance of a person's name in the documents does not indicate they were under investigation or even accused of wrongdoing. Article content Article content The review was part of a broader effort sparked by Trump's campaign promise to 'declassify' files related to Epstein, which his MAGA base has long requested. In March, FBI Director Kash Patel directed his special agents from the New York and Washington field offices to join the bureau's FOIA employees at the agency's sprawling Central Records Complex in Winchester, Virginia, and another building a few miles away. Responding to public pressure, FBI personnel were instructed to search for and review every single Epstein-related document and determine what could be released. That included a mountain of material accumulated by the FBI over nearly two decades, including grand jury testimony, prosecutors' case files, as well as tens of thousands of pages of the bureau's own investigative files on Epstein. Article content It was a herculean task that involved as many as 1,000 FBI agents and other personnel pulling all-nighters while poring through more than 100,000 documents, according to a July letter from Senator Dick Durbin to U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi. Article content The employees reviewed the records using the Freedom of Information Act as their guide for deciding what information should be withheld. That alone isn't uncommon. In the FOIA, Congress established nine exemptions as a way to balance the public's right to know against the government's need to protect sensitive interests, such as national security, official deliberations, ongoing law enforcement proceedings or privacy. When such competing interests arise in non-FOIA matters, those exemptions are often applied even if the exact language set forth in the FOIA statute doesn't appear in the final record. Article content While reviewing the Epstein files, FBI personnel identified numerous references to Trump in the documents, the people familiar with the matter said. Dozens of other high-profile public figures also appeared, the people said. Article content In preparation for potential public release, the documents then went to a unit of FOIA officers who applied redactions in accordance with the nine exemptions. The people familiar with the matter said that Trump's name, along with other high-profile individuals, was blacked out because he was a private citizen when the federal investigation of Epstein was launched in 2006.

Musk's X must face part of lawsuit over child pornography video
Musk's X must face part of lawsuit over child pornography video

CTV News

timean hour ago

  • CTV News

Musk's X must face part of lawsuit over child pornography video

The X app is seen on a phone in this image. (Photographer: Gabby Jones/Bloomberg) Warning: The following story contains graphic details. A federal appeals court on Friday revived part of a lawsuit accusing Elon Musk's X of becoming a haven for child exploitation, though the court said the platform deserves broad immunity from claims over objectionable content. While rejecting some claims, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco said X, formerly Twitter, must face a claim it was negligent by failing to promptly report a video containing explicit images of two underage boys to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC). The case predated Musk's 2022 purchase of Twitter. A trial judge had dismissed the case in December 2023. X's lawyers did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Musk was not a defendant. One plaintiff, John Doe 1, said he was 13 when he and a friend, John Doe 2, were lured on SnapChat into providing nude photos of themselves to someone John Doe 1 thought was a 16-year-old girl at his school. The SnapChat user was actually a child pornography trafficker who blackmailed the plaintiffs into providing additional explicit photos. Those images were later compiled into a video that was posted on Twitter. According to court papers, Twitter took nine days after learning about the content to take it down and report it to NCMEC, following more than 167,000 views, court papers showed. Circuit Judge Danielle Forrest said section 230 of the federal Communications Decency Act, which protects online platforms from liability over user content, didn't shield X from the negligence claim once it learned about the pornography. 'The facts alleged here, coupled with the statutory 'actual knowledge' requirement, separates the duty to report child pornography to NCMEC from Twitter's role as a publisher,' she wrote for a three-judge panel. X must also face a claim its infrastructure made it too difficult to report child pornography. It was found immune from claims it knowingly benefited from sex trafficking, and created search features that 'amplify' child pornography posts. Dani Pinter, a lawyer at the National Center on Sexual Exploitation, which represented the plaintiffs, said in a statement: 'We look forward to discovery and ultimately trial against X to get justice and accountability.' The case is Doe 1 et al v Twitter Inc et al, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 24-177. Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Cynthia Osterman.

4 people killed in a shooting at a Montana bar
4 people killed in a shooting at a Montana bar

CTV News

time4 hours ago

  • CTV News

4 people killed in a shooting at a Montana bar

ANACONDA, Mont. — The ATF says multiple people have been shot at a Montana business, and authorities are searching for a suspect. Officials warned people to avoid the area of Anaconda. The suspect's home was cleared by a SWAT team and the suspect was still at large, the Granite County Sheriff's office said in a social media post. Authorities have yet to release details about what led to the shooting or the conditions of those who were injured. Sandra Barker, a spokesperson for the FBI's Salt Lake City office, which covers Montana, said the FBI is assisting in the response to the shooting but referred questions about it to local authorities.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store