
CEO: I rejected a $600 million acquisition offer, leaving me 'freaked out' and sleepless—now my company's worth $4.4 billion
Six years after Aaron Levie dropped out of college to start a business in his parents' attic with three friends, he faced a decision so nerve-wracking that he spent months "freaked out" and sleepless, he says.
The company was Box, a provider of cloud-based content management and file-sharing tools now based in Redwood City, California. And the decision revolved around a $600 million acquisition offer the four co-founders received from a business called Citrix, a larger rival at the time.
The question facing the co-founders was simple: Accept the offer or turn it down, betting that they could eventually build Box into something bigger than $600 million? Levie, now 40, vividly remembers the "volatile" few months he spent debating the pros and cons.
He'd left the University of Southern California to start Box, which the co-founders first ran from the attic in Mercer Island, Washington, and then from Levie's uncle's garage in Berkeley, California. When Citrix made its offer, the friends were all in their mid-20s, and the idea that their fledgling startup could sell for so much money — after years of cold-emailing investors and pitching Fortune 500 businesses on becoming clients — was extremely tempting, Levie says.If they'd gotten the offer a few years earlier, they "would have definitely sold" the business, says Levie. But by 2011, they had more experience and confidence running Box. They'd raised roughly $80 million in funding, and had approximately 7 million users, TechCrunch reported at the time.
The cloud-storage industry was growing, and if Box could potentially be worth more than $600 million one day, the co-founders figured that the only way to know for sure was to keep working toward that goal themselves, recalls Levie.
So, they rolled the dice and rejected the offer.
Today, Box has a market value of $4.42 billion — and 115,000 business clients globally, according to a company spokesperson — a decade after its initial public offering in 2015.
Here, Levie discusses the "volatile" months spent deliberating over Citrix's offer, the advice he received from other founders who'd sold their businesses and his relatively simple formula for success.
CNBC Make It: After six years of growing Box, you received your first serious acquisition offer. How did you approach the decision to accept or reject it?
Levie: This one was really tough for us. It was a couple of months, lots of conversations. The four of us actually went to a hotel one night in Half Moon Bay, [California,] and we basically treated this as an off-site [to discuss]: What do we want to do with our lives?
We were in our mid-20s. What do you do in your mid-20s if you've sold a company? We would probably go [start a company] again, and we'd eventually be back in this exact situation. We eventually concluded this was a once-in-a-lifetime moment to build something much, much bigger than what we had built. We had something that was working.
When there's an exit opportunity, your worst case is that you will literally make $0 in the alternative path. We still said that would be better than the potential of what [we'd be] giving up.
If we were wrong — if it didn't work out, and this was the best it was ever going to be — could we live with ourselves? We basically concluded: Yes. We'd have to go and do it again, but we could live with ourselves.
What about the other side of the argument? Besides the money, what were the reasons you might've wanted to sell?
Maybe you have less stress in your life? That would probably be a big one.
I called five or so CEO-founders during this process, and [their advice] was a little bit mixed. One or two said: "Hey, this is pretty life-changing. You really should consider it."
A couple others said, "You have a tiger by the tail. Don't let it go. Keep doubling down. As an entrepreneur, when you have a thing that's working, just keep riding it." That sat with me, because these were people that, 5 or 10 years prior, had sold their company. [And they're saying] "don't interrupt it."
There are some advantages to joining forces with a bigger company, for sure, but those are advantages you want to use when you don't see a path to victory on your own terms.
How confident were you with your decision? Did it still feel like a huge risk to give up the guaranteed exit money?
Oh, my God. Yes. We didn't get any sleep after making that decision. I was probably freaked out for weeks or months.
I happen to be a very nervous person to begin with, so it's not the kind of [situation] that I like to find myself in. You're just constantly [wondering]: Did we make the right call? What if this scenario happened? I probably should have been on drugs, and I wasn't, but I was totally spazzing out mentally.
We got lucky, because we eventually did another funding round at a higher valuation, and we kind of put it behind us. [Box raised an additional $81 million in October 2011 at a valuation of more than $600 million, according to TechCrunch.]
Once you turned down the offer, what were the biggest obstacles you faced in growing Box past that $600 million benchmark?
The biggest obstacles have largely just been execution. Can you build the right features fast enough? Can you sell to all of the customers fast enough? Most of any success or failure in software is purely down to execution.
There's a refrain: "Ideas don't matter, only execution does." I'm a massive believer in the truth of that.
Box is now valued at more than $4 billion. Has that changed how you think about success?
I like business because I like building things and creating things that solve problems. Success, to some degree, is just the ability to sustain that and keep growing it.
I have a family now — two kids, a wife. It's great to have a fantastic family, and it's great to be able to go solve really interesting problems. That's what I'm in it for.
I don't think there's a certain number of employees or a particular revenue threshold [I'm seeking]. That won't drive any difference in happiness.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Skift
14 hours ago
- Skift
Carey Hires New CEO, Pushes Strategy Shift for Elite Limo Service
Alex Mirza, the new CEO of limo company Carey, is betting that AI can revive a business model squeezed by Uber, Lyft, and the looming threat of self-driving cars. In his first interview since taking the top job last week, Mirza outlined plans to transform Carey from what had become known as a "brand for just special occasions" into a service for younger customers and everyday executive travel. The challenge is substantial for Carey, which was taken over by private equity firm The Najafi Companies last September. Carey operates in about 1,000 cities across 65 countries, serving corporate clients, including Fortune 500 companies and event organizers. But the company has watched ride-sharing services capture a large chunk of the fractured limo market. New Boss, New Strategy One of Mirza's responses centers on AI-powered personalization and what he calls "intelligent luxury." "We're reinventing this company to be relevant to younger people and more people with different use cases," Mirza said. Mirza's strategy draws on his past experiences. He previously founded a recruitment tech service licensed by Fortune 500 companies, was CEO of Cachet Hotels in China, led the hospitality division at Caesars Entertainment, facilitated the $5 billion merger of Ticketmaster with Live Nation, helped with corporate development at Hilton, and led strategic planning at Starwood Hotels. The Talent Factor The approach builds on what Mirza describes as Carey's core strength: driver loyalty and training. Roughly half of Carey's base rate goes to drivers, and the company provides full benefits packages. Mirza said Carey is starting from a strong position. The company's chauffeurs average a dozen years of tenure, far longer than typical ride-sharing drivers. The new CEO also cited "off-the-charts" net promoter scores, a measure of customer feedback, and high repeat customer rates (though he didn't share specifics). "People are scared of human capital and managing it, but that'll be our bread and butter," Mirza said. Mirza sees parallels between Carey's situation and luxury hotel chains that had to modernize while preserving their premium positioning. Just as the hotel groups have invested heavily in their loyalty programs, Mirza plans to reintroduce one at Carey. Tech Push Another objective is investing in Carey's tech. The new CEO acknowledged that the company is playing catch-up. In July, the company plans to launch a tech platform that will use algorithms to match customers with specific chauffeurs based on passenger profiles and trip purposes. Think of it as "the Airbnb superhost concept on steroids," Mirza said, where customers can see and select their preferred drivers rather than simply booking a car. The AI initiative extends beyond matching. Carey plans to use algorithms to create "talent tiers" that rank chauffeur performance and tie compensation to those rankings. The company also wants to deploy "agentic AI" to replicate the service quality of top-performing drivers across its fleet. Mirza said Carey could appear on ride-sharing apps or travel booking sites, but only use its own vetted drivers and maintain brand control. It already has a small effort with one of the platforms, though he declined to say which one. Carey's Strategy Shift The company's event business provides a foundation for growth. Carey has handled transportation for the Super Bowl for 16 years and works with the NBA and other major events, creating temporary operations that can manage hundreds of vehicles and drivers. This event expertise, combined with Carey's security clearances and vetting processes, positions the company for what Mirza sees as a growing demand for executive protection services in "a world that's very unstable, unsafe." Mirza believes Carey has an opportunity to better market the discretion of its professional drivers: Passengers can feel safe discussing business, for example, and celebrities don't have to worry about paparazzi getting tipped off. The broader strategy reflects Carey's attempt to expand into technology companies, healthcare, and small businesses while maintaining its base among law firms, financial services, and entertainment companies and one-off consumer rentals for weddings and other special occasions. Daunting Hurdles Questions remain about execution. The luxury ground transportation market has seen numerous attempts at technology-driven transformation. It may be hard for Carey to navigate between premium positioning and mass market accessibility. Exhibit A: Blacklane, a chauffeur service app, has built international operations using similar positioning around professional service and reliability. Last year, Berlin-based Blacklane raised $65 million (€60 million) in a series G round of funding, with a potential IPO under discussion. It's available in more than 200 cities. Mirza dismissed the comparison: "It's like the difference between Airbnb and Four Seasons," he said, implying that Carey is like the luxury hotel brand. Meanwhile, Tesla's forthcoming robotaxi launch and Waymo's increased expansion of its driverless taxis could pressure labor costs. As the lack of combustion engines frees up space, autonomous vehicles may eventually reimagine the amenities and configurations passengers expect. Mirza emphasized that innovation will come from the bottom up, involving drivers and regional managers rather than corporate consultants. Mirza offered reassurance to longtime Carey customers, including corporate travel managers and executive assistants who arrange transportation for high-profile clients. "Discretion and safety are things that we value that are not going to be compromised," he said. "But we need to bring a higher level of hospitality to it, get better at marketing, and use AI to boost efficiency.
Yahoo
14 hours ago
- Yahoo
KKR ranks as top alternative asset manager in Fortune 500
Greetings, Term Sheeters. This is finance reporter Luisa Beltran, subbing for Allie. Three well-known private equity firms—Blackstone, KKR, and Apollo Global Management—made the Fortune 500 this year. While these three firms started off as private equity, they have since branched out into other sectors and are now considered alternative asset managers. For many, Blackstone, KKR, and Apollo are still known for their PE roots, and I only mention this because private equity hasn't been doing so well lately. Even though some tariffs are on pause, many mergers are on hold due to uncertainty and volatility. The IPO market, which has crawled since 2021, appears to be on an upswing but it's still too early to say we're in a rebound. Without M&A or IPOs, private equity has struggled to sell its deals. In the first quarter, the number of PE equity exits dropped 44% year over year to 323 transactions valued at $73.79 billion, according to PitchBook. Without these realizations, many PE firms have struggled to return money to their investors. (Apollo is apparently the exception, returning nearly $2 billion to fund investors from April to May 22, according to the Wall Street Journal.) This has led to a hard market for fundraising, which declined 35% to $116 billion globally in Q1 compared to the same period in 2024. (Not everyone has had problems raising money. Thoma Bravo, the software focused investment firm, said Tuesday it raised more than $34.4 billion for three funds, including $24.3 billion for its flagship XVI pool.) Luckily for Blackstone, KKR, and Apollo, private equity is just one of their strategies. Apollo is one of the biggest lenders on Wall Street, while Blackstone is a large credit and real estate investor, and KKR still does PE but has expanded into other asset classes like real estate, credit, and infrastructure. (Other PE firms like Carlyle Group, EQT, Ares and TPG weren't big enough for the Fortune 500 but made the Fortune 1000 ranking.) But this year has still been tough. The stock prices of many public alt managers have tumbled. Blackstone is down 30% from its 52-week high of $200.96, which it reached in November. KKR hit a 52-week high of $170.40 in January but has since fallen 29% and Apollo is off nearly 31% since reaching its year high of $189.49 in December. When it comes to the Fortune 500, in which companies are ranked by gross revenue, I was surprised by how the three firms ranked. KKR was ranked highest of the trio, despite having the smallest amount of assets under management. Founded in 1976, KKR is currently led by co-CEOs Joseph Bae and Scott Nuttall. The firm, which made it into the S&P 500 last year, had $664 billion assets under management as of March 31. KKR placed 145th on the Fortune 500, the highest of the three alt managers, with about $30 billion in 2024 gross revenue. Apollo, the alt firm led by Marc Rowan, had $785 billion in AUM at the end of Q1. Apollo ranked 163rd on the Fortune 500 with about $26.2 billion in 2024 gross revenue. Blackstone, which first made the Fortune 500 in 2014, is easily the biggest of the public alt managers with $1.2 trillion in assets under management. In 2024, it produced $13.2 billion in gross revenue, placing 321th on the Fortune 500. See you tomorrow, Luisa BeltranX: @LuisaRBeltranEmail: a deal for the Term Sheet newsletter here. Nina Ajemian curated the deals section of today's newsletter. Subscribe here. This story was originally featured on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Yahoo
Carvana jumped 63 spots on the Fortune 500—CFO explains what fueled the rise
Good morning. Conducting a turnaround and pivoting toward growth needs to be grounded in strategy, according to Carvana's CFO Mark in Tempe, Arizona, Carvana is an e-commerce platform for buying and selling used cars. The company landed at No. 314 on the Fortune 500 this year, up 63 spots from 2024. Carvana was founded in 2012 by Ernest Garcia (CEO), Ryan Keeton (chief brand officer), and Ben Huston (COO), and went public in 2017. Jenkins, a former finance professor at Wharton who first met Garcia while earning his doctorate at Stanford University, joined the company in debuted on the Fortune 500 at No. 483 in 2021 and jumped to No. 290 in 2022, reflecting rapid growth. 'In 2022, when interest rates rose and financial markets became very rocky, we took on some additional debt to fund an acquisition,' Jenkins explained. That raised bankruptcy concerns, causing the stock to plunge 99% from its peak of $370.10. Carvana responded by restructuring its debt, reducing near-term interest payments, and extending maturities to stabilize its a result, the company launched a three-step strategic plan that took them from 2022 to 2024, beginning with a focus on profitability and shifting toward expanding market share and sustaining growth. In Q4 2024, Carvana earned a record net income of $159 million, a turnaround from a loss of $200 million in Q4 2023. For the full year 2024, the company reported record net income of $404 million, and record adjusted EBITDA of $1.378 billion. Carvana's momentum continued in Q1 2025, when it reported net income of $373 million, revenue of $4.23 billion (up 38% year over year), and 133,898 retail units sold (up 46% year over year). Its stock price closed at $340.12 on Tuesday.'We haven't seen particularly meaningful effects of tariffs on our business,' Jenkins noted, adding that any fluctuations in used vehicle prices have been 'relatively short-term and transitory.' He added, 'It's very hard to predict exactly what will happen, so our goal is flexibility and being able to adapt in real-time as conditions change.'The recent 25% tariffs on imported vehicles have reshaped the U.S. auto market, making new cars more expensive and driving many consumers toward used vehicles. While some industry observers predicted volatility, analysts suggest that Carvana is well positioned to benefit from these tariffs, as its exclusive focus on the U.S. used car market insulates it from direct import costs. The company's differentiated customer offering, vertical integration, and technology-driven model may provide further advantages as more buyers seek affordable alternatives to new Carvana is shifting to a new objective: to sell 3 million retail units per year at an adjusted EBITDA margin of 13.5% within five to 10 years, Jenkins the long-term strategy? It centers on profitable growth through three main areas: improving the customer experience, building brand trust and awareness, and expanding inventory and scale, he explained. Since 2017, the company has executed on previous management objectives of growing retail units and revenue, increasing gross profit per unit, and showing operating is in the early stages of strengthening customer offerings, which will get a boost from technology, Jenkins said. 'We think there are opportunities for AI to completely streamline the shopping experience, streamline all of our customer communication, and lead to a simpler transaction experience,' he he have any advice for CFOs on a turnaround strategy? 'Concentrate on a few high-impact areas and apply rigorous focus and teamwork to achieve targets,' Jenkins he's not in the office working on strategy, you may find Jenkins on a hiking trail. 'Arizona, especially in the winter, has great weather, and there are so many great places to hike,' he said. Sheryl This story was originally featured on