HC gives Haryana time till December 31 to notify reserved forest in Morni Hills
'The Morni Hills are serving as the prime green cover, acting as lungs for the tri-city of Chandigarh, Panchkula & Mohali. Indubitably, the authorities are required to take a decision, one way or the other, regarding completion of the process which begins with the issuance of notification under Section 4(1) of the 1927 Act and culminates upon a notification issued under Section 20 of the 1927 Act,' the bench presided over by chief justice Sheel Nagu and justice Sumeet Goel said while adding that the forest secretary of the state would file a compliance report about the same within seven months. '… failure wherein may invite punitive consequences (as per law) for the officer concerned as also other functionaries,' it added while fixing the second week of January, 2026, for filing the compliance affidavit.
The court was hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) filed in 2017 by one Vijay Bansal, a Panchkula resident, who had demanded settlement of the area as prescribed under the Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887. The area was formerly a part of the Sirmaur district in Himachal Pradesh and became a part of Haryana in 1966. In December 1987, the government issued a notification of reserved forest area. However, the process of demarcation has not been completed even now, the plea had said.
The court made it clear that demarcation and survey is to be done by the forest settlement officer (FSO) and not by the revenue authorities, as being claimed by the state government. The appointment of FSO was made in 2018.
The court criticised the inaction by Haryana government in not completing the exercise even as notification was done in 1987. 'To permit nearly four decades to elapse without any discernible, substantive action flowing from a statutory declaration is, to put it mildly, an affront to the principles of effective governance and a manifest failure at the end of officers, both statutory and Constitutional. Such inaction on the part of such officers, particularly in a matter of such profound public importance, merits the unequivocal condemnation of this court,' the bench observed, deprecating 'in the strongest possible terms, the protracted official lethargy and its discernible unwillingness to discharge its solemn responsibilities' of identifying the area.
The court has now directed that the FSO be handed over all the documents regarding demarcation and survey which are in the possession of the revenue authorities, forest authorities and Survey of India and he be provided with requisite facilities and infrastructure to enable him to make inquiry, entry, survey, demarcation, and prepare map and acquire land so that reserved forest notification is issued and published in the official gazette by the given deadline.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
2 days ago
- India.com
High stakes meeting between Putin and Trump today in Alaska; unprecedented security in place, if talks fail...
New Delhi: As the Russia-Ukraine war rages on, and the USA and Russia have been engaged in a vitriolic rhetoric, the presidents of both countries, Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin, will meet in Alaska, USA, on August 15. The big agenda of this meeting is to stop the Russia-Ukraine war that has escalated since February 2022, when Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Notably, the two leaders are meeting after seven years. Where is the Trump-Putin meeting being held? The much-awaited and important meeting will be held at the Elmendorf-Richardson Military Base in Anchorage, Alaska's largest city, with only one translator between them. The details of the discussions between the two leaders will not be shared, as both leaders will hold a press conference after the meeting. What are the security and protocol preparations for the meeting? Before Putin's arrival in Alaska, his armoured limousine Aurus Senate had already reached the base by a Russian cargo plane. The water bottles and cups used in the meeting will also be sealed by Putin's team, while Russian fighter jets have been deployed in Anadyr, 88 km from Alaska. The Russian President will be accompanied by his FSO (Federal Protective Service) unit. Moreover, 32 thousand American soldiers are already deployed at this military base, also called the Ice Fortress. According to Trump's security protocol, Keyhole (KH-11) recon satellites will also be active. At the same time, the entire network of the base will be air-gapped (cut off from the internet) for cybersecurity. A no-fly zone will be enforced in the entire area up to a radius of 300 km. There will be double-layer security inside and outside the base. The first will be military police and National Guard, the second will be Special Forces and Secret Service's counter-assault team. Trump's Air Force One plane will be under full-time military guard as soon as it lands. Why have the two presidents chosen Alaska only for their meeting? According to the BBC, the biggest reason for Trump and Putin meeting in Alaska is security. The nearest part of Alaska's mainland is just 90 km away from Russia's Chukotka. Putin can reach there without flying over any 'enemy' country. There are some Russian air force bases and military monitoring stations in this area, where there may also be nuclear weapons. Putin's meeting here will be more secure. The second reason is distance. Alaska is very far from Ukraine and Europe. Alaska is the only US state with territory in the Arctic. Its proximity to Russia, with only about 88 km (55 miles) across the Bering Strait separating the two, gives Alaska significant strategic importance in US defence and Arctic policy. Alaska's closeness to Russia makes it a practical location for high-level discussions on global security, commerce, and environmental concerns. What are the risk factors for Putin in Alaska? This meeting is taking place at the initiative of US President Trump, and hence America will take any risk regarding Putin's security in Alaska, USA. This can be dangerous not only for the future of US-Russia relations, but also for the Russia-Ukraine war. On its part, Russia will be on highest alert to keep the president safe. What will happen if the talks fail? In the event of the failure of the talks between the US and Russian presidents, the United States will impose extra tariffs on India. This was announced by US Finance Minister Scott Besant. Talking to Bloomberg, he said, 'This tariff will depend on the outcome of the meeting between US President Trump and Russian President Putin in Alaska on Friday.'
Time of India
6 days ago
- Time of India
Replace military trucks with proper school buses: Punjab and Haryana HC directs Centre
Chandigarh: The Punjab and Haryana High Court has directed the central govt to take steps to replace military trucks currently being used to transport school-going children with proper school buses that conform to statutory norms. This change is to be implemented in a phased manner to ensure the safety of school-going children from military families. In its detailed order released on Monday, the high court directed adherence to the "Automotive Industry Standard" for School Buses (AIS 063:2005) and guidelines issued by the Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE). The division bench, headed by chief justice Sheel Nagu, passed these orders while hearing a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Mohali resident Pradeep Sharma. The petitioner sought directions for the central govt and military authorities to coordinate and replace the military trucks, which were illegally converted into school buses, with proper school buses adhering to govt norms in a time-bound manner. The petitioner stated that the PIL was not adversarial and was for the benefit of defence personnel and their families. He prayed that, if required, funds should also be released by the govt to the military authorities for introducing proper transport to ensure the safety of school-going children who were being forced to travel in unsafe trucks converted into school buses by adding grills and ladders. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Unsold 2022 Cars Now Almost Free - Prices May Surprise You Unsold Cars | Search Ads Learn More Undo The petition pointed out that the govt had issued norms for school buses to have hard bodies with proper emergency exits, spaces below seats, front-facing seats, large windows with visibility and without curtains, CCTVs, speed governors, and many other features. These were totally lacking in the military trucks temporarily converted into buses to carry school children. It was also noted that while such a practice might have been accepted some decades ago, it has no place in modern India, where strict norms are now in place, with even the Supreme Court and high courts passing directions on the safety of school buses. Indemnity Bonds from families The order has come as a major relief and is welcomed by defence personnel, many of whom are posted in remote areas, as it eases concerns about the safety of their children. An officer, who did not want to be named, welcomed the development and mentioned that 'indemnity bonds' were being taken by military authorities from parents, relinquishing any claim against the govt in case of accidents leading to injury or death in such military trucks. MSID: 123239193 413 | Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
Hindustan Times
09-08-2025
- Hindustan Times
BBMB row: HC defers hearing on Punjab's plea to Aug 21
The Punjab and Haryana high court on Friday deferred hearing on a plea by the Punjab government seeking quashing of Bhakra Beas Management Board's 'illegal' move to allocate additional water to Haryana. The BBMB was established by the Union power ministry in 1966 under Section 79 of the Punjab Reorganisation Act, which regulates water distribution from Bhakra, Nangal and Pong dams between Punjab, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Delhi and Rajasthan. The high court bench of chief justice Sheel Nagu and justice Sanjiv Berry posted the matter for hearing on August 21 while allowing the petitioner state to implead Haryana as a party to the dispute, which was not done in the petition. At the heart of the controversy are April 23 and April 28, BBMB decisions allowing the release of 8,500 cusecs (4,500 cusecs additional) of water to Haryana despite opposition from Punjab. The Punjab government refused to accept the decision and deployed police at Nangal dam, 13km downstream from Bhakra, to stop the additional water release. On May 6, the high court directed Punjab to release additional water, an order which was unsuccessfully challenged up to the Supreme Court by the Punjab government. However, additional water was not allowed to be released, and BBMB officials alleged that they were prevented from executing the HC orders by the Punjab Police. Recently, BBMB has decided to hand over the security of the installations to the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) and has even made a payment of ₹8.58 crore to the Union ministry of home affairs for the security force's deployment. 'The present writ petition has been filed by the state of Punjab challenging the jurisdictional overreach and arbitrary actions of BBMB, particularly in relation to the illegal allocation of water from Bhakra-Nangal Dam to the state of Haryana beyond its agreed share,' the petition said, which also demand appointment of a 'neutral and impartial chairman' through a process involving all partner states. Currently, the appointment is done by the Centre. 'Punjab had repeatedly raised objections to overdraws by Haryana and Rajasthan, which were disregarded. BBMB's actions were based on an unrecognised technical committee meeting and later Board meetings convened in clear violation of BBMB's own rules. The matter was referred to the Union power ministry under Rule 7 of the BBMB rules, but BBMB unlawfully continued holding meetings and making decisions even after such reference,' the petition reads. The petition says BBMB convened April 30 and May 3 meetings in contravention of BBMB regulations, as the minimum notice period of seven days for urgent meetings and circulation of the agenda 12 days in advance were not adhered to. 'The BBMB is only empowered to regulate supply as per existing agreements, not to unilaterally allocate excess water,' the plea says. The BBMB was established by the Union power ministry in 1966 under Section 79 of the Punjab Reorganisation Act, which regulates water distribution from Bhakra, Nangal and Pong dams between Punjab, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Delhi and Rajasthan.
