Top Lib woman's brutal seven-word warning to new leader Sussan Ley
The first woman leader of the federal Liberal party could be doomed to fail as she tries to rescue the party from one of its lowest points in the wake of the election.
After a close contest against ex-shadow treasurer Angus Taylor, former deputy leader Sussan Ley on Tuesday won the top job and a place in the history books.
On Wednesday, the Liberal Party's federal vice president Fiona Scott was asked on national television how long Ms Ley would last as leader.
'I don't know, I mean a day's a long time in politics. Well, you know - it could be a day, it won't be a day. I mean, cheeky, but look you don't know what the political tides will bring,' she told Nine News.
Just hours later, Ms Scott said her comments had been 'mischaracterised' and that her attempts at a joke had been misconstrued as criticism.
'That was just a bit of a joke at the time, but no, I did go on to clarify that I absolutely support Sussan. I think it's a wonderful step forward. I've had a friendship with Sussan since 2010. She was one of the first ministers I met,' she told Sky News.
'I actually think that Sussan as leader, supported by Ted, is a fantastic step forward for the Liberal Party and it gives us the opportunity to grow.'
Asked about Ms Scott's response, Foreign Minister Penny Wong told Nine 'ouch... that's not the most ringing endorsement I've heard but... I'm going to leave it to the Liberal party to sort this out.'
Ms Ley's victory follows a brutal May 3 vote loss that decimated the coalition's ranks, and some warn Ms Ley could be the next victim of a 'glass cliff'.
Coined by Australian National University gender equality expert Michelle Ryan and her research partner Alex Haslan in 2005, the term refers to a phenomenon where women, and those from minority groups, are more likely to be appointed to top positions during times of crisis, meaning they can be set up to fail.
With more than two decades of parliamentary experience under her belt, Ms Ley was 'incredibly qualified' for the job, Professor Ryan said.
'But the timing definitely suggests that it's somewhat of a glass cliff,' she told AAP.
'The fact that they've come out of an unprecedented loss at an election, and this is the first time a woman is leading - I don't think those two things are unconnected.
'It's also interesting that people that might have put themselves forward in a better time are not putting themselves forward now.'
The pool of Liberal leadership candidates was relatively small to begin with given the scale of the election defeat, but potential leaders such as Dan Tehan and Andrew Hastie were quick to rule themselves out of contention.
'The Liberal Party is under great scrutiny - there's a lot of agitation,' Prof Ryan said.
'Whoever was going to take on this leadership position was unlikely to be prime minister.'
Asked about the glass cliff trend, Ms Ley did not accept it and said her appointment and agenda was about connecting and listening to women.
Prof Ryan also acknowledged this, noting Ms Ley's election was not just a leadership issue, but part of the party's efforts address its bleeding female support.
'The glass cliff makes it harder to succeed, but that doesn't mean success is not possible,' she said.
Nationals senator Matt Canavan - who made a failed bid to topple his party leader David Littleproud to underscore his demand to drop the coalition's 2050 net zero emissions target - said Ms Ley will have to 'perform'.
'The pressure will be on,' he told Nine's Today.
Ms Ley said on Tuesday that net zero would be 'under review' alongside all of the previous coalition policies, adding 'there won't be a climate war' within the party.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Morning Mail: Israel expands Gaza offensive, how to fix childcare, Epstein files to remain sealed
Good morning. Israel's military has announced it is expanding its offensive in Gaza City as Benjamin Netanyahu ordered generals to accelerate 'the defeat of Hamas'. In Australia, a leading doctor and public critic of Israel has stepped down from chairing a medical insurance provider. We look at what Jason Clare has to do to fix childcare at tomorrow's meeting with state ministers, a US judge rules the Epstein files must remain sealed, and how a French live-streamer has died live online. Flood warning | People in New South Wales have been warned to 'stay ready and stay safe' as another bout of intense rainfall hits the state, bringing possible floods. Doctor's call | High-profile emergency physician Dr Stephen Parnis has stepped down as chair of the board of a leading medical insurance provider in an apparent response to concerns about statements he has made on social media opposing the war in Gaza. Childcare crunch | As the education minister, Jason Clare, prepares to meet his state counterparts today to discuss reforms to the childcare sector, Kate Lyons traces how – despite review after review making recommendations to the government – little has been done to create a proper national system of regulation. Netanyahu 'inflammatory' | Australia's peak Jewish group has lambasted Benjamin Netanyahu for his attack on Anthony Albanese as 'inflammatory and provocative', adding that it showed a 'woeful lack of understanding of social and political conditions in Australia'. Emmanuel Macron has described as 'abject' Netanyahu's claims of an antisemitic surge in France. Winter's over | Tasmanian Labor has replaced Dean Winter as parliamentary leader, with Josh Willie elected unopposed to serve as the state's new opposition leader after a failed bid to unseat the premier, Jeremy Rockliff. Epstein ruling | A federal judge in New York who presided over the sex-trafficking case against the late financier Jeffrey Epstein has rejected the government's request to unseal grand jury transcripts. Israel offensive | Israel has announced it is expanding its military operation in Gaza City as Benjamin Netanyahu said the aim was to speed up the timetable 'for seizing control of the last terrorist strongholds and the defeat of Hamas'. In the UK, a court heard that the terror charge brought against the Kneecap rapper Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh for flying the Hezbollah flag should be thrown out. Moscow red line | Moscow has said it must be part of any international talks on Ukraine's security as Russia continues to stall on Donald Trump's push for a meeting between Vladimir Putin and Volodymyr Zelenskyy. We're looking at what it all means for the prospects of peace in Ukraine. Online death | French authorities are investigating the death of a man during a live video stream on the Kick platform, where he had regularly been shown enduring violence and humiliation. Lai trial | A lawyer for Jimmy Lai has argued that it is not wrong to support freedom of expression as he began his final argument in the Hong Kong democracy activist and newspaper founder's landmark national security trial. Can the government keep kids safe in childcare? After revelations about abuse at childcare centres, Kate Lyons talks to Reged Ahmad about whether the government can restore faith in the sector. Sorry your browser does not support audio - but you can download here and listen $ Discussion at today's sessions of the government economic roundtable will be dominated by the thorny issue of tax: how much we should be paying, and which form that tax should take. Our economics editor, Patrick Commins, casts his expert eye over the key questions, while economist Nicki Hutley argues that the focus should really have been about creating an economy that's good for everyone. The subject of Luke Buckmaster's critical lens this week is Kangaroo Island, a relationship-centric family drama by first-time feature director Timothy David, starring Rebecca Breeds and set on the eponymous South Australian idyll. The landscape is something of scene-stealer in a 'tonally uneven' film, but just when it seems destined for 'Hallmarkian slosh' it has moments that resonate. Sign up to Morning Mail Our Australian morning briefing breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion Tennis | On the eve of her final tournament, double Wimbledon champion and Australian Open finalist Petra Kvitova explains why she has no regrets about her career. Rugby union | The Wallaroos begin their World Cup campaign against Samoa in Manchester on Saturday night AEST and the young squad is hoping to spring a few surprises. Football | Experts are concerned that local laws are not robust enough to tackle illegal international online gambling on football, especially with the Women's Asian Cup taking place in Australia next year. The Telegraph highlights a 'billion-dollar' spending spree by two cousins that could transform Sydney's Hills district. The Adelaide Crows' case against Izak Rankine's ban has gone into overtime with the hearing delayed 24 hours, the Age reports. Tempers are at boiling point on the Gold Coast over increased parking charges at Burleigh Heads, according to the Bulletin. The Mercury looks at how the Tasmanian premier, Jeremy Rockliff, outmanoeuvred Labor 'at every turn'. Business | Full-year earnings from Whitehaven, Domain and Star Entertainment Group. Brisbane | Pre-trial hearing begins for the Australian company charged with bribery over its conduct on Nauru a decade ago. Environment | AGL reveals its climate action plan. If you would like to receive this Morning Mail update to your email inbox every weekday, sign up here, or finish your day with our Afternoon Update newsletter. You can follow the latest in US politics by signing up for This Week in Trumpland. And finally, here are the Guardian's crosswords to keep you entertained throughout the day. Until tomorrow. Quick crossword Cryptic crossword
Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
Starmer will give 16-year-olds the vote – but they aren't studying politics
Children are uninterested in studying politics at GCSE, despite Labour announcing that it will lower the voting age to 16. Analysis by The Telegraph shows that the take-up of politics-related subjects at GCSE has remained significantly lower than others, such as religious studies, over the past five years. Around three per cent of teenagers are thought to have taken a politics-related GCSE this summer, according to provisional entry data from the Department for Education (DfE). Separate figures obtained by The Telegraph show that teaching staff are ill-equipped to provide lessons on the subject to 16-year-olds. Just nine teachers across the whole of England who offered lessons on government and politics to GCSE pupils last year had a relevant post A-level qualification in the subject, according to official data released through Freedom of Information laws. Last month, ministers confirmed that they would lower the voting age in Britain by two years. Angela Rayner, the Deputy Prime Minister, said Labour would make its manifesto pledge law by the end of this Parliament, meaning 16-year-olds would be able to vote at the next general election. Experts have called for that to be matched with better politics teaching in schools amid concerns over a lack of political engagement among young people and an over-reliance on social media content. The DfE does not publish specific participation data for the government and politics GCSE because entries are so low that it is categorised along with other social sciences. Citizenship studies Pupils can also take a separate GCSE in citizenship studies, which is a mandatory part of the national curriculum and is taught in the same vein as personal, social, health and economic education. Take-up of overall social sciences has grown by a quarter since 2021, with 50,025 pupils sitting GCSEs this summer in one or more of those subjects – which also include psychology and law. But individual figures for politics are thought to make up a very small portion of those numbers. The Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA), a Northern Irish exam board that is one of the only ones to offer the government and politics GCSE, has recorded just a handful of students taking the subject over the past few years. Data provided to The Telegraph showed that 205 pupils sat the CCEA's government and politics GCSE in 2021, with the figure rising to 313 last year. The figures are eclipsed by the popularity of other optional subjects at GCSE, with nearly 292,000 students studying geography and more than 240,000 taking religious studies. Entries for citizenship studies GCSE have remained similarly low, having barely moved over the past five years despite an increase in the 16-year-old population. Around three per cent of students sat an exam in the subject last year, with the figure expected to stay roughly the same this summer. The Government is facing calls to make politics a more fundamental part of the national curriculum in England to better equip children with the skills they need for adult life. Last year, Labour appointed Prof Becky Francis, an education expert, to lead an independent review into the current curriculum and assessment model, which will publish its findings in the autumn. An interim report by Prof Francis, published earlier this year, said the review had 'heard consistently from children and young people and their parents that they want more focus' on subjects such as 'financial education, careers knowledge and politics and governance'. However, a Government source told The Telegraph there were no plans to make politics a compulsory GCSE subject or to broaden teaching on the topic, even with 16-year-olds set to get the vote. They instead pointed to the existing citizenship part of the national curriculum, which includes teaching on the UK's political system and democracy, as well as modules on the justice system, police and public money. Schools are required to offer citizenship lessons, but there is no minimum number of hours mandated for the subject and many schools stop teaching it by Year Nine. By contrast, schools must teach a minimum of two hours of physical education each week. Rollout has also been criticised as patchy, with just 42 per cent of teachers in England saying their schools provided regular citizenship lessons in 2023, according to a poll by the Institute For Public Policy Research think tank. Data from the school workforce census, obtained by The Telegraph through freedom of information requests, also showed a dearth in qualified politics teachers at GCSE level – they are instead concentrated on A-level pupils. There were 17 teachers across the whole of England offering politics lessons to pupils in Years Seven to Nine last year who had a post-A-level qualification in the subject, with the figure dropping to just nine for pupils in Years 10 and 11. The number of qualified teachers then swelled to 1,342 for pupils in Years 12 and 13, with politics generally taken more seriously as a subject at A-level. The DfE did not provide similar data for qualified teachers offering GCSE lessons on citizenship studies, but figures show that fewer than a fifth of those teaching all age groups had a degree in a relevant subject last year. Overall GCSE results this summer are expected to be broadly similar to those seen last year, when more than a fifth – or 21.8 per cent – of all entries were awarded the top grades. However, pupils could face tougher competition for sixth form places this year after the Government hit private school fees with VAT for the first time from Jan 1, 2025. It is expected to spark a scramble for places at top state-funded schools, with a rise in the 16-year-old population set to add to pressure. Prof Lee Elliot Major, a social mobility expert at the University of Exeter, told the PA news agency: 'Competition for the most selective sixth forms will be fiercer than ever, with fears over VAT on private schools likely driving more families to seek out places in the state sector.'
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Judge denies DOJ's request to release Epstein grand jury docs
Donald Trump was handed another blow on Wednesday when a federal judge denied his administration's attempts to release grand jury testimony from the Jeffrey Epstein case. U.S. District Judge Richard Berman deemed Trump's Justice Department did not provide adequate reasoning to unseal the highly-protected materials. He also said that the grand jury motion was likely a 'diversion' coming from the Trump administration. '[T]he court denies the government's motion to unseal the Epstein grand jury transcripts and exhibits,' the Clinton-appointed judge wrote in his Wednesday decision. It comes after Attorney General Pam Bondi moved at the direct of the president this summer to request the documents be unsealed in attempts to satisfy Americans who were enraged over the lackluster review of the Epstein files. The request came only after weeks of bemoaning from the MAGA base claiming there was a 'cover-up' and that Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel were not being as 'transparent' as Trump promised they would be. 'Based on the ridiculous amount of publicity given to Jeffrey Epstein, I have asked Attorney General Pam Bondi to produce any and all pertinent Grand Jury testimony, subject to Court approval,' Trump wrote on his Truth Social account last month amid the backlash. On July 18, Bondi filed motions in the Southern Districts of New York and Florida to have judges grant release of grand jury testimony from the [sexual] trafficker's cases in the respective states. Florida swiftly denied the request, while SDNY requested the government send their reasoning for requesting the years-old documents be drudged up. Trump's government argued in its reasoning that 'the passage of time has not dulled the public's interest in these cases.' It also revealed that there were only two witnesses in the case – an FBI agent and New York Police Department officer, both of whom are still alive. But Judge Berman claimed that the reasoning was not sufficient for him to grant the request to unseal the grand jury testimony. 'The Government is a logical party to make comprehensive disclosure to the public of the Epstein files,' Berman wrote in the Wednesday decision. 'By comparison, the instant grand jury motion appears to be a 'diversion' from the breath and scope of the Epstein files in the Government's possession.' He also said that Trump's administration did not exhibit there were any 'special circumstances' that would justify unsealing the documents. Berman has come under fire from Trump and his supporters in the past for being a partisan judge. Bill Clinton appointed Berman to the bench in the Southern District of New York in 1998, where he has worked ever since as a judge and then a senior judge starting in September 2011. It's widely known that Clinton and Epstein had personal, professional and philanthropic connections. Epstein donated $1,000 to Clinton's presidential campaign in 1991 and two years later contributed $10,000 to the White House Historical Association for a redecoration project. This got him and longtime girlfriend and accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell a ticket to a White House donors' reception hosted by Bill and Hillary Clinton. Maxwell is still serving out a 20-year sentence in relation to the child [sexual] trafficking crimes. She even spoke for nine hours over the course of two days with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche in Florida last month to answer questions about Epstein's crimes. She was transferred to a prison in Texas days after the interviews and appears to be angling for pardon from Trump. Flight logs for Epstein's private plane the Lolita Express show that Clinton took at least 17 flights between 2002 and 2003, often with staff, Secret Service agents and Clinton Foundation supporters. Trump also has links to the disgraced financier and appears on his flight logs. Epstein attended Trump's wedding to his second wife Marla Maples in 1993. The deep connections to those most influential in political and business circles is what Americans think is stopping the release of files related to his crimes and his sketchy death. Conspiracies still float online claiming that Epstein was killed in prison in August 2019 and that it was made to look like he took his own life – even though Trump's DOJ concluded that Epstein did [kill himself].
