
Police federation consider legal action against Bayoh inquiry
Details of the substance of the private meetings have not been disclosed.
Aamer Anwar, the solicitor for Mr Bayoh's family, said it was not unusual for the chair of a public inquiry to meet victims' families.
David Kennedy, General Secretary of the SPF, said: 'These unusual developments have left many core participants feeling that the process no longer appears transparent and open, with all core participants having been treated equally.
'We have lost confidence in the inquiry and regrettably, we have been compelled to indicate that we consider it necessary to petition for judicial review.
"We are seeking a fair and transparent public inquiry. We will of course listen to what Lord Bracadale has to say at the forthcoming hearing, but as things stand I imagine that it will be necessary to proceed with the petition."
The inquiry is a public inquiry governed by the Inquiries Act 2005. It has so far cost just under £24 million.
The inquiry was announced by the Scottish Ministers on 12 November 2019 to examine the circumstances of the death of Sheku Bayoh, who died following his arrest by officers of Police Scotland on 3 May 2015.
The inquiry began hearing evidence on or around 10 May 2022.
Earlier today the BBC reported that Lord Bracadale was to consider whether he should step down after the SPF questioned his impartiality.
Mr Bayoh, a father-of-two, was 31 when he died in May 2015 after being restrained by six police officers in Kirkcaldy, Fife.
Former High Court judge Lord Bracadale, who was appointed five years ago, will seek the opinion of all the parties represented at the inquiry at a hearing in June, before deciding whether to carry on or step aside.
If he stays, the federation could challenge his decision through a judicial review.
But if Lord Bracadale goes, it will result in a significant delay to the inquiry issuing its findings.
Aamer Anwar, the Bayoh family's solicitor, described the SPF's move as a "desperate and pathetic attempt to derail the inquiry".
And he said if Lord Bracadale does step down it would delay proceedings by "years".
A spokesperson for the inquiry said: "The Scottish Police Federation has raised concerns about Lord Bracadale meeting with the families of Mr Bayoh.
"Loss of confidence by a core participant in the fairness of the conduct and procedure of the inquiry by Lord Bracadale is a matter of concern.
"The Inquiry intends to hold a public hearing in June on the fairness of the conduct and procedure adopted by Lord Bracadale in meeting the families. Submissions are invited from all core participants."
Since his appointment in 2020, Lord Bracadale has held 122 days of oral hearings, examining what happened on the day of Mr Bayoh's death, the way the incident was investigated and handled by the authorities and whether race was a factor.
The uncertainty over his position comes with the inquiry's finishing line in sight.
It has completed the process of gathering evidence and was due to hear closing submissions before Lord Bracadale begins the task of reaching his conclusions.
Mr Anwar added: "Lord Bracadale is a man who is widely respected across the legal profession.
"He has given 50 years of his life to public service, without blemish.
"This attempt to attack his integrity and impartiality, as far as the Bayoh family is concerned, is beneath contempt."
Latest figures show that by the end of December last year the overall cost of Lord Bracadale's inquiry itself, covering factors such as its set-up and staffing, had hit £23,765,467.
This was up from £22,095,804 at the end of September.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scottish Sun
an hour ago
- Scottish Sun
‘Crass' cops slammed for playing ‘snog, marry, kill' with mugshots of local call girls and felons
Read on to find out how playing the popular game could land you in trouble COP QUIZ FURY 'Crass' cops slammed for playing 'snog, marry, kill' with mugshots of local call girls and felons Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) LAYING 'snog, marry, avoid' with colleagues at work could be sexual harassment, a tribunal has ruled. The 'crass' and 'inappropriate' game may breach the Equality Act, an Employment judge said. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up The risqué quiz involves naming three people and then asking a person to pick which one you would like to kiss, which one you would get married to and which one you would steer clear of altogether. In the BBC hit comedy Gavin and Stacey, Pam, Mick, Gavin and Smithy played a version of it featuring celebrities during a car ride from Essex to Wales. However, the tribunal found it may break workplace laws. The ruling came in the case of a police officer who sued Derbyshire Police after a female colleague involved him in the game — using mugshots of sex workers. The officer candidly admitted to the tribunal that she had 'jokingly' played the game with co-workers and included PC Shafarat Mohammed in their discussion. PC Mohammed claimed that during the discussion in May or June 2022 he was only shown images of black women and was asked what he liked about one of them. He said he was 'embarrassed' and 'offended' by the questioning and felt it was inappropriate. The tribunal judge said: 'We agree that the questions were inappropriate.' However, the tribunal found there was no racial or religious element to it as the sex workers were of varying ethnicities. PC Mohammed lost his case for racial and religious discrimination and harassment. Two top cops accused of mocking a colleague's Irish accent in 'grossly offensive' leaving video


Scottish Sun
2 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Ex-BBC football pundit BANNED from driving for six months after being caught speeding in his Mercedes
The former pundit complained the speed camera that caught him was hidden STAR'S ROAD BAN Ex-BBC football pundit BANNED from driving for six months after being caught speeding in his Mercedes Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) RETIRED BBC football pundit Garth Crooks got a six-month driving ban yesterday after being caught speeding again. The former Tottenham Hotspur striker, 67, admitted driving his 1.4l Mercedes A Class diesel hatchback at 24mph in a 20mph zone. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 1 Garth Crooks got a six-month driving ban after being caught speeding again Credit: BBC He complained that the speed camera that caught him in Holloway, North London, in January this year was hidden. But JPs at Lavender Hill magistrates' court said the limit applies at all times and not just when a camera is spotted. Crooks already had nine points for two speeding offences and a traffic signal rap. He got a further three — triggering an automatic ban. FA Cup and Uefa Cup-winner Crooks was fined £666 with £110 costs. He was also and ordered to pay a £266 victim surcharge. Crooks - who was awarded the OBE in 1999 - told the court he was now 'retired' and in receipt of a £118,000 a year pension. On seeing a press photographer outside, Crooks covered his face with his jacket as he descended the court steps.


The Sun
3 hours ago
- The Sun
Ex-BBC football pundit BANNED from driving for six months after being caught speeding in his Mercedes
RETIRED BBC football pundit Garth Crooks got a six-month driving ban yesterday after being caught speeding again. The former Tottenham Hotspur striker, 67, admitted driving his 1.4l Mercedes A Class diesel hatchback at 24mph in a 20mph zone. 1 He complained that the speed camera that caught him in Holloway, North London, in January this year was hidden. But JPs at Lavender Hill magistrates' court said the limit applies at all times and not just when a camera is spotted. Crooks already had nine points for two speeding offences and a traffic signal rap. He got a further three — triggering an automatic ban. FA Cup and Uefa Cup-winner Crooks was fined £666 with £110 costs. He was also and ordered to pay a £266 victim surcharge. Crooks - who was awarded the OBE in 1999 - told the court he was now 'retired' and in receipt of a £118,000 a year pension. On seeing a press photographer outside, Crooks covered his face with his jacket as he descended the court steps. Martin Keown battles epic rant from Garth Crooks on BBC's Final score