La Grange Farmers Market season kicks off with fresh finds
It may not have felt like produce season yet when the 29th season for La Grange's outdoor farmers market opened last week, but a healthy stream of shoppers browsed the area anyway, patronizing longtime vendors and new arrivals alike.
The market will run from 7 a.m. to 1 p.m. every Thursday in its usual location at the corner of La Grange Road and Harris Avenue.
'The best thing to notice here is the variety,' said Dan Mulka, executive director of the La Grange Business Association. 'We have everything from the farmer's market that you would expect — all the crafts, all the lettuce and all the fruits. But we also have everything from flowers, lemonade, Alaskan salmon … we have a variety of things from almost every palette. So if you have a picky eater in your family, or a diverse set of culinary tastes, there's a little bit of something for everybody.'
Mulka said the 46 vendors on hand for the initial market May 22 were seven more than last year, and that applications for spots were up by 10%. A full list of participating vendors can be found at lgba.com.
Among the new vendors were Chicago Green Chile Company, Hook Point Fisheries, Heatley's Hot Pepper Farm and My Sourdough Bakery.
'We're trying to bring in a variety,' Mulka said. 'We're trying to evolve and bring options.'
Chicago Green Chile Company is operated by retired Chicago Police officer Vince Fagan.
'I was born and raised in Beverly in the city, and I used to come through here all the time with friends and family,' Fagan said.
Chicago Green Chile's most popular offerings are a green topping sauce — either mild or with more heat — followed closely by pickled asparagus spears with green chile. He's new to the La Grange market, but he's sold his wares at markets in Geneva, Wheaton, Frankfort and Morris.
'Last fall was when we started off doing these products, but I developed my recipes several years before that,' Fagan said. 'This is the first big retail season and we're expanding like crazy.'
Fagan said his products are designed to be flexible to customers' tolerance for heat.
'This is my recipe,' he said. 'The company motto is 'flavor not fire.''
Another food vendor, The Cheese People, are a staple at many area farmers markets, but the La Grange event has a particular appeal for cheese monger Carolyn Waldee.
'I love this farmers market,' Waldee said. 'This is actually the first one I worked back in 2018. The community is really lovely, there's a great community of vendors here.'
A Taste of Michigan Cherries is in its second year at La Grange's Farmers Market.
'We had tried to get into this market before, but there were no openings because there were none available,' Miguel Duran said. 'Then something happened and they asked us if we wanted to try it, we said yes, and came right away last year in 2024 and it was very good for us in this market…we also have other markets. Saturdays, I'm in Park Ridge and my wife is in Arlington Heights.'
Customer Ashly Audet was at the market looking for fresh finds.
'We got some asparagus and we noticed it was the same price (as regular stores) and it's local and a little bit fresher,' Audet said. 'And we got some bread that was baked fresh and actually got some coffee that was roasted yesterday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Alaska Sustainable Energy Conference 2025 left unspoken what Alaskans truly value
The Canning River, seen here in 2018, flows from the Brooks Range into the Beaufort Sea along the western edge of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. (Photo by Lisa Hupp/U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) At the conclusion of the 2025 Alaska Sustainable Energy Conference much attention was given to profitability of fossil fuels, while far less was said about the meaning of 'sustainability' itself. In fact, both Alaskans and the principles of sustainability were notably absent from the conference's central themes and many of its attendees. From the outset, the federal government's priority appeared to be reassuring foreign interests of the United States' continued ability to sell off Alaska piece by piece. Conference organizers, led by Gov. Mike Dunleavy appeared eager as regulatory protections continue to be rolled back by the Trump administration. Federal officials, including U.S. Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright, and Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin, expressed strong support for the further weakening of environmental safeguards to unilaterally advance long-contested development projects across Alaska. Many attendees represented corporate interests excited to profit from new extraction opportunities or potential buyers, watching to see if the administration follows through on promises to mine Alaska's oil, gas, and critical minerals. These companies appeared enthusiastic to exploit the land with minimal oversight and a lack of local consent. The audience was left with a misleading impression of Alaskan support. At the center of ongoing and proposed projects, such as Red Dog mine, Graphite One, and Ambler Road, was the largest item for sale: a natural gas reservoir on the North Slope. The proposed Alaska liquid natural gas pipeline, currently led by the Alaska Gasoline Development Corp. and New York-based Glenfarne Group LLC, would extract natural gas from subsurface carbon and transport it 800 miles south to Nikiski for export. The estimated almost $40 billion project promises only temporary jobs and infrastructure. Environmentally, natural gas poses risks similar to coal and oil. It is composed primarily of methane, a potent greenhouse gas. Inevitable gas leaks during extraction and transportation can release up to 10% of methane before combustion, with the remainder ultimately emitted as carbon dioxide. These outcomes reflect outdated, combustion-based energy models. Regarding Alaska's wildlife and people, cabinet members seemed to dismiss concerns after brief visits, suggesting the animals are happy and that communities would benefit from further resource development despite evidence to the contrary. The 'resource curse' is a paradox that explains the economic dynamics of regions rich in natural resources, but limited in democratic representation. Extraction projects often introduce new workers, housing, and other infrastructure at great cost to local communities. Despite generating profits for corporate sponsors, these projects typically result in a net loss for the public. Workers are imported from out of state, while profits are exported. Local towns are then responsible for maintaining infrastructure without receiving corresponding benefits like revenue to support housing, health care or affordable energy. As finite resources are exhausted, companies maintain profit margins while community returns diminish. Once operations end, communities are often left with environmental damage and abandoned development, economically and socially worse off than before. Alaska's economy remains heavily reliant on oil and gas. As existing operations decrease in yield, public education and health care routinely face budgetary cuts. The natural gas reserve would only provide exports for a few decades, but its development would cause irreparable environmental damage, and leave Alaska facing another energy crisis within a generation. Why Gov. Dunleavy labeled this conference 'sustainable' remains unclear. It is unrealistic to claim the pipeline would benefit any of the roughly 190 communities beyond the Railbelt. While the state invests in LNG exports, rural towns reliant on diesel will face rising costs and health issues, including cancer risks. Regardless of one's stance on oil and gas, Chris Wright, the U.S. Secretary of Energy, himself stated: 'Energy… it's about people and math.' However, his equation solves for profit, while Alaska's equation for energy must begin and end with the voices and needs of the people. Scientists attending the summit this week in an official capacity were restricted to framing oil and gas as the primary development priority. This narrowed the conversation and sidelined discussions around advances in technology such as solar, wind, hydroelectric, and geothermal energy. Still, a handful of sustainability advocates attended as guests, business owners, protesters, and speakers. One speaker, Lesil McGuire, senior advisor with New Energy Alaska, an advocacy coalition that promotes renewable energy noted, 'Solar arrays can be propped up in a number of weeks.' As of 2020 solar energy has become cheaper to install and maintain than fossil fuels. Alaska needs energy infrastructure tailored to its unique environment, focused on long-term self reliance through renewable sources. Current examples include solar installations in the Northwest Arctic Borough, microgrid cooperatives, and heat pump incentives in Southeast Alaska. A cursory glance shows Alaska's capacity for renewable energy that could be faster to build and more cost effective than the LNG pipeline. In reality the conference didn't need to be held in Alaska, as Alaskans themselves played a minimal role. Led by Gov. Dunleavy, the 'Alaska Sustainable Energy Conference 2025' resembled government-backed promotion of the oil and gas industry and signaled extraction projects could move forward without oversight and regardless of local stakeholder's needs or opposition. International representatives seemed to be promised fuel for import, and out-of-state corporations appeared to be invited to profit at the expense of Alaska's environment. Renewable energy has been viable for decades and continues to become more efficient. Given a voice and a seat at the table, many Alaskans and Americans would likely favor local, self-sufficient renewables for lower prices and long-term reliability. Natural gas in Alaska will run out in this lifetime, do nothing to reduce costs in the majority of Alaskan communities, and may cause permanent harm to the environment. The United States and Alaska are not in need of a technological revolution in fossil fuels, but an information revolution in renewable energy. It is vitally important that all Alaskan voices are heard. Alaska values pristine wilderness, supports true sustainability, and is not for sale.
Yahoo
30-05-2025
- Yahoo
Alaska's Longest Bridge Moves Forward with Nordholm's Marine Logistics Expertise
EVERETT, WA / / May 30, 2025 / Nordholm Companies has announced the successful completion of a high-stakes sea fastening and marine logistics operation for the Juneau Creek Bridge, which will become Alaska's longest bridge. In collaboration with Curtin Maritime, Traylor Bros., Stinger, and Connolly Pacific, Nordholm engineered and executed the barge-based transport of over 40 massive steel girders across the Pacific Ocean to the remote Alaskan site. The Challenges of the Operation This operation enabled the timely delivery of all girders to Alaska, without which bridge construction would have stalled. To add even more pressing urgency to the matter, with Alaska's unique climate and low temperatures, it would have brought about severe weather risks if the shipping were delayed until late fall. In addition to this ticking clock, there were numerous other challenges at play. For example, the ultra-tight deck layout left only about a foot between beams. Additionally, the bridge needed components forged in accordance with a custom structural steel plan to account for ocean movement. Furthermore, orchestrating multi-party coordination between five different entities in total, all to meet a seven-week deadline, proved to be a taxing process, as did the complex lifting and securing of the over-dimensional beams. "The real challenge wasn't the weight," said Greg Nordholm, P.E., lead engineer and founder of Nordholm Companies. "It was how tight the layout had to be. There was barely a foot of space between each girder. Designing a steel plan that allowed us to keep everything low and secure on that limited deck area-that's where our decades of expertise came in." "This was a true team effort across companies and states," added Chris Weinman, Construction Manager at Nordholm Companies. "The girders had extreme dimensions-13 feet tall with a 36-inch base-and had to be secured precisely to ensure a seaworthy journey to Alaska." A Massive Alaskan Undertaking Every girder, measuring over 100 feet in length and weighing as much as 160,000 pounds, was manufactured by Stinger in Arizona and subsequently shipped to Long Beach, CA. In Long Beach, Connolly Pacific oversaw the crane operations to "trip and fly" the girders onto the barge, where Nordholm Companies installed custom-engineered sea fastening under significant time constraints. David Dugan, the Superintendent at Nordholm, and Chris Weinman, the Construction Manager, guided the field team during a challenging seven-week period to prepare all girders for transport. Curtin Maritime managed the barge and shipping logistics, while Traylor Bros. is ready for the deliveries to commence the bridge construction in Alaska. "We had to hit the shipping deadline before the Gulf of Alaska's weather turned dangerous," said Nordholm. "If we missed that window, the entire project could have been delayed." "The teamwork between Traylor, Curtin Maritime, and Nordholm was excellent," Greg added. "It made an extremely challenging project both fun to execute and professionally satisfying." The Future of Nordholm Companies Nordholm Companies is currently planning several major international moves, including: Three container cranes from Long Beach to Chile A dry dock move from San Diego to Namibia Drill rig transport in Prudhoe Bay For large-scale marine logistics, Nordholm seeks cargo transport projects exceeding $100K, particularly those involving heavy lifting and limited barge space. For more information, visit About Nordholm Companies With over 35 years of experience in ocean cargo transport, including ship-to-shore cranes, dry docks, and oversized equipment, Nordholm Companies continues to be a leading name in marine heavy logistics. ContactRiley EvansEmail: 425-259-0213 Everett, WAWebsite: SOURCE: Nordholm Companies View the original press release on ACCESS Newswire Sign in to access your portfolio
Newsweek
30-05-2025
- Newsweek
Some Americans to Receive $1,702 Direct Payment in June: Are You Eligible?
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Thousands of Alaska residents will soon receive a $1,702 direct payment from the state as part of the annual Permanent Fund Dividend program, a uniquely Alaskan initiative that redistributes a share of the state's oil wealth directly to its citizens. Why It Matters The Permanent Fund Dividend is an annual payment made to qualifying Alaska residents, drawn from the state's Permanent Fund, which was established in 1976 to invest a portion of the state's oil revenue. The fund invests in a diverse portfolio of assets, including stocks, bonds, real estate, and other investments to generate returns for residents and preserve the state's vast oil wealth. The fund has grown to over $81 billion and distributes a portion of its earnings, usually giving out in excess of $1,000 to eligible residents of the Last Frontier State. Payments vary from year to year, with the highest ever payment being $3,284. Some 600,000 Alaskans are expected to benefit this year. Stock image/file photo: Person holding several $100 bills. Stock image/file photo: Person holding several $100 bills. GETTY What to Know According to the Alaska Department of Revenue, the next wave of payments will be issued on June 18, benefiting eligible individuals who applied by the deadline and whose applications have been approved for the 2024 Permanent Fund Dividend. For the 2024 dividend, the payment amount is $1,403.83 with an additional $298.17 Energy Relief Payment, bringing the total to $1,702. It is roughly $400 more than last year's, which was $1,312. The largest payout occurred in 2022, when each eligible Alaskan received $3,284. This amount included a record-high base dividend of $2,622, along with a one-time energy relief payment of $662. Eligibility Criteria To qualify, individuals must: Be Alaska residents for the entire calendar year prior to the payment year. Intend to remain in Alaska indefinitely. Not be convicted or incarcerated for any felony or misdemeanor crimes in the state. Have filed an application by the annual March 31 deadline. According to the official PFD site, individuals with an "Eligible-Not Paid" status as of May 8 will receive their payments on June 18, assuming no issues arise with their applications. The income is also considered taxable by the state and the federal government. What People Are Saying Department of Revenue Commissioner Adam Crum said in a statement: "This is the 43rd year Alaskans have received their share of the state's natural resources and investment earnings. The 2024 PFD will create an economic opportunity across all of our local communities." What Happens Next The Alaska Legislature continues to debate the future structure of the PFD, especially as oil revenue becomes more volatile and investment returns fluctuate. Discussions have included capping the dividend, changing the formula, or implementing new taxes to offset budget shortfalls.
