Family ‘devastated' following death of great-grandfather attacked by XL bully
The family of a great-grandfather who was attacked by an XL bully have said they are 'absolutely devastated' by his death.
John McColl, 84, died on Sunday more than a month after he suffered serious injuries when he was attacked as he walked home in Warrington, Cheshire, on February 24.
In a statement, relatives said: 'As a family we are absolutely devastated with what has happened to John.
'He fought hard for the last five weeks but he decided he could not fight any more and passed away on Sunday March 30 at 1.40pm surrounded by family.
'Our dad, grandad and great-grandad will always be loved by us all and sadly missed by each and every one of us.
'We would like to thank the emergency services and first-aid responders who helped John at the scene, along with the residents of Dallam who also came to his aid and the staff at Aintree and Whiston hospitals for all that they did for him and us as a family.'
Sean Garner, 30, of Warrington, was charged following the attack with being the owner of a dog dangerously out of control causing serious injury and two counts of possession or custody of a dog to which section 1 of the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 applied.
A spokesman for Cheshire Police said the CPS had been informed of Mr McColl's death and would determine if there were any changes to the charges.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 hours ago
- Yahoo
HMRC boss ‘regrets' frustrations over £49m phishing scam disclosure
HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) chief executive John-Paul Marks has told MPs that he regrets any frustration over how information about a breach affecting around 100,000 taxpayers was disclosed. The revenue body has faced criticism and questions over why MPs were not informed earlier about the incident. On June 4, it was disclosed that HMRC had lost £47 million after a phishing scam breached tens of thousands of tax accounts. Following updated information published by HMRC on Tuesday, that figure was revised upwards, to £49 million. Senior civil servants at HMRC told the Treasury Committee that 100,000 people had been contacted, or were in the process of being contacted, after their accounts were locked down in what they said was an 'organised crime' incident which started last year. The Treasury Committee, which held a live session on June 4, wrote to Mr Marks earlier this week, telling him that: 'To discover this information during a session from press reports and without adequate time for the committee to review the information in detail is unacceptable.' During a Public Accounts Committee hearing on Thursday, Mr Marks told MPs: 'We welcome your scrutiny.' Mr Marks described the incident as a 'serious, and (an) unacceptable loss of £49 million to the Exchequer, affecting 100,000 of our customers, which is about 0.2% of the PAYE caseload'. He added: 'Given we collect over £840 billion a year, the judgment on materiality is different for HMRC perhaps than other government departments. 'But nonetheless, I agree with the point with regards (to) disclosure, and I will do that in my annual report, which I will publish next month for the first time, so that is, again, properly done according to the rules under public money. 'The final thing really to say, I do regret if there's been any frustration in terms of our handling of this, that was not our intent at all.' He said he would respond to correspondence he had received this week with more detail. Mr Marks continued: 'I welcome your point, with regards (to) the opportunity to have in-private briefings, the level of security threats is significant and constant. 'The team detected and disrupted this one well. There was a criminal investigation. And in (a) private hearing, I'm happy to bring the head of the fraud investigation service, my chief security officer, to explain more about some of that detail but also the threat environment and the way in which we are ensuring HMRC is secure now and secure for the future as well.' Earlier this week, an HMRC spokesperson said: 'We faced a series of evolving and complex criminal attempts to access online tax accounts and our priority has been to protect customers and their accounts. 'Our customers suffered no financial loss as a result. 'Thorough investigation has been necessary to understand the extent of this activity and pursue the criminals responsible. 'We've worked closely with the Information Commissioner's Office throughout to ensure we met our obligations.'
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Yahoo
HMRC boss ‘regrets' frustrations over £49m phishing scam disclosure
HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) chief executive John-Paul Marks has told MPs that he regrets any frustration over how information about a breach affecting around 100,000 taxpayers was disclosed. The revenue body has faced criticism and questions over why MPs were not informed earlier about the incident. On June 4, it was disclosed that HMRC had lost £47 million after a phishing scam breached tens of thousands of tax accounts. Following updated information published by HMRC on Tuesday, that figure was revised upwards, to £49 million. Senior civil servants at HMRC told the Treasury Committee that 100,000 people had been contacted, or were in the process of being contacted, after their accounts were locked down in what they said was an 'organised crime' incident which started last year. The Treasury Committee, which held a live session on June 4, wrote to Mr Marks earlier this week, telling him that: 'To discover this information during a session from press reports and without adequate time for the committee to review the information in detail is unacceptable.' During a Public Accounts Committee hearing on Thursday, Mr Marks told MPs: 'We welcome your scrutiny.' Mr Marks described the incident as a 'serious, and (an) unacceptable loss of £49 million to the Exchequer, affecting 100,000 of our customers, which is about 0.2% of the PAYE caseload'. He added: 'Given we collect over £840 billion a year, the judgment on materiality is different for HMRC perhaps than other government departments. 'But nonetheless, I agree with the point with regards (to) disclosure, and I will do that in my annual report, which I will publish next month for the first time, so that is, again, properly done according to the rules under public money. 'The final thing really to say, I do regret if there's been any frustration in terms of our handling of this, that was not our intent at all.' He said he would respond to correspondence he had received this week with more detail. Mr Marks continued: 'I welcome your point, with regards (to) the opportunity to have in-private briefings, the level of security threats is significant and constant. 'The team detected and disrupted this one well. There was a criminal investigation. And in (a) private hearing, I'm happy to bring the head of the fraud investigation service, my chief security officer, to explain more about some of that detail but also the threat environment and the way in which we are ensuring HMRC is secure now and secure for the future as well.' Earlier this week, an HMRC spokesperson said: 'We faced a series of evolving and complex criminal attempts to access online tax accounts and our priority has been to protect customers and their accounts. 'Our customers suffered no financial loss as a result. 'Thorough investigation has been necessary to understand the extent of this activity and pursue the criminals responsible. 'We've worked closely with the Information Commissioner's Office throughout to ensure we met our obligations.' Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
‘We want our park back': Ontario Beach Park visitors react to new security measures
ROCHESTER, N.Y. (WROC) – Although Ontario Beach Park remains a popular summer destination for many across Rochester, some have expressed worries following a fight which broke out there last week. This resulted in a man's arrest for possessing an illegal gun with a high-capacity magazine while at the park. News 8 spoke with folks attending the weekly 'Concerts by the Shore' series about their reaction to last week's fight. John & Mary DeGrazia, both city residents, say they've attended concerts in the park every year for the last 37 years and have never felt unsafe. 'The years that we've come here, we've never seen a fight, ever,' John said. 'I was kind of surprised to see and hear about it.' The disruption caused by the fight has frustrated many, including city resident Kim Canton. 'We come here and meet some wonderful people, and for these other people to come in and ruin for us, it's a terrible shame,' Canton said. In response to the safety concerns, county leaders announced changes in patrol and security procedures at the park. This includes an increased law enforcement presence and the installation of four gates at entry and exit points. Mary Ann Newland, who has attended Concerts by the Shore for many years, expressed worry that these measures won't be enough. 'I think that the older folks, if they get shut out by the gates, they're not going to come back,' Newland said. 'They also want to close off the parking lot, but I don't see that working because a lot of these kids come on busses.' Others, including Ontario Beach Park Committee Member Fred Amato, thinks the county's response is necessary. 'If more people come here and think they're going to take the park over, acting like idiots, I think the police are going to be doing something they should be doing,' Amato said. 'We want our park back. It's our park, it belongs to all of us.' More details about the new gates to be installed at Ontario Beach Park can be found here. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
