Meet Justice AS Oka, SC judge who returns to work on last day - two days after mother's death
Justice Oka was informed about the death of his mother, Vasanti Oka in Mumbai on 21 May after , after attending a felicitation by the Supreme Court Advocates on Record Association (SCOARA). Her funeral was held in his ancestral home in Thane around on Thursday. Justice Oka attended the funeral.
A day after attending his mother's funeral, Justice Oka will sit in the court today.
One of the cases that Justice Oka is scheduled to hear today is a suo motu case that the Supreme Court took up on the right to privacy of adolescents in the backdrop of controversial remarks made by the Calcutta High Court last year. After delivering the verdicts, Justice Oka is expected to sit in Court number 1 with Chief Justice of India BR Gavai.
'The Ceremonial Bench comprising Hon'ble the Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay S Oka and Hon'ble Mr Justice Augustine George Masih in Chief Justice's Court will sit after the pronouncement of judgments in Court No. 3,' a notice by the SC for lawyers read.
Justice Oka met his mother last week when he had gone to Mumbai to attend a function organised in honour of Chief Justice of India BR Gavai.
'I don't approve [of] one tradition which is followed in the Supreme Court that [the] retiring judge should not work on the last day. It will take some time for us to get rid of that tradition but at least I have one satisfaction that [on the] last day, I will be sitting in a regular bench and pronouncing some judgments,' Justice Oka said at theSCOARA felicitation asserting that he 'hates' the word retirement and instead of thinking of retirement, he took on more work in the last couple of months.
Justice Abhay Shreeniwas Oka was born on 25 May, 1960. He did BSc, LLM. From University Of Bombay and was enrolled as an Advocate on 28 June, 1983.
Justice Oka began practice at the Thane District Court in the chamber of his father. He was elevated as an additional judge of the Bombay High Court on August 29, 2003, and became a permanent judge on November 12, 2005. On May 10, 2019, he took oath as the Chief Justice of the Karnataka High Court. He was appointed as a judge of the Supreme Court on August 31, 2021.
Justice Oka is known for judgements protecting personal liberties and free speech. As Karnataka HC Chief Justice, a bench he headed had declared that prohibitory orders imposed by the Bengaluru police to curb protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act were illegal.
As SC judge, Justice Oka's bench had quashed an FIR against a Maharashtra college professor booked for his WhatsApp status critical of the abrogation of Article 370 and for wishing Pakistan on its independence day.
'Every citizen of India has a right to be critical of the action of abrogation of Article 370 and the change of status of Jammu and Kashmir,' the bench had said in March last year.
Introducing Justice Oka during Wednesday's felicitation, SCAORA Secretary Nikhil Jain said, "His judgments resonated across the fabric of our civil society. His deep legal acumen and humaneness set him apart always. His judgments were always grounded and far reaching."
I don't approve [of] one tradition which is followed in the Supreme Court that [the] retiring judge should not work on the last day.
SCAORA President Vipin Nair said that from being a passionate lawyer to an exemplary jurist, Justice Oka has an intimate understanding of the proceedings of the bar.
"He has stood like an unshakable rock. We must not forget Oak tree is the strongest in the wild. I was told that a court stenographer lost many of the drafts and Justice Oka recreated all of them," Nair was quoted as saying by legal news website Bar and Bench.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
27 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
SC order on Bihar voter roll revision vindicates concerns: CPI(ML) leader Dipankar Bhattacharya
Patna, CPI Liberation general secretary Dipankar Bhattacharya on Thursday said the Supreme Court's interim order on the ongoing Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls in Bihar has "vindicated" the concerns raised by civil society and opposition parties since the controversial drive began. SC order on Bihar voter roll revision vindicates concerns: CPI(ML) leader Dipankar Bhattacharya In a statement issued after the SC order, Bhattacharya said, "Finally, we have an interim order from the apex court in Bihar's SIR case. The order rejects the EC's stubborn refusal to heed the suggestions already made by the Supreme Court and addresses three core concerns about the practical implementation of the drive. This interim order vindicates some of the basic objections and apprehensions raised from day one since the sudden launch of the SIR". Earlier in the day, a bench comprising Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi directed the EC to publish the names of the 65 lakh voters deleted from the list, along with reasons for deletion, to ensure transparency. The bench passed the order while hearing pleas challenging the June 24 EC decision to conduct the SIR of the electoral rolls in Bihar. "The issue of legality of SIR is yet to be determined by the Supreme Court. The interim order asks the EC to come clean about all the deletions with specific assigned reasons, make the information public and accessible to all electors, not routed through Booth Level Agents of political parties, and accept Aadhaar as a valid supporting document", Bhattacharya said Bhattacharya is one of the petitioners who moved the top court, seeking direction for quashing the EC order. "What happens to the 3.5 million migrant workers whose names have been removed? For people like Mintu Paswan, declared dead by the SIR, this could be a second lease of electoral life," he added. He called for the EC to take responsibility for correcting its errors, suggesting the establishment of grievance redressal camps at booth and block levels. "The scale of exclusion is massive, time is short, and most electors have been penalised without fault. "The onus of correction should also be put on the perpetrators of error. That is the principle of fairness, natural justice and transparency that the EC had invoked as guiding tenets for the SIR in its counter affidavit filed before the SC on July 21", he said. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
News18
an hour ago
- News18
Declared dead by EC, Bihar man visits CEO's office to say he is alive
Patna, Aug 14 (PTI) A resident of Bhojpur district in Bihar on Thursday called on the Chief Electoral Officer of the state to plead that he was alive. Mintu Paswan, who was earlier this week produced before the Supreme Court, was taken to the CEO's office by a delegation of CPI(ML) Liberation. 'I don't know whether I was seen as an apparition by the officials. The fact remains that I have been distraught to learn that I have been declared dead in the special intensive revision (SIR)," Paswan told reporters here. He alleged that no booth level officer (BLO) had visited his home. CPI(ML)-L secretary Kunal, who was present on the occasion, said, 'Anomalies of this type are the very reason behind our general secretary Dipankar Bhattacharya opposing SIR in the Supreme Court. Mintu is being asked to fill up Form 06, meant for registration of new voters, even though he has voted in the past". The CEO has asked him to hand over the form to the BLO concerned, who already stands exposed for a goof-up, the Left leader asserted. 'He (the BLO) has confessed to his mistake and told the CEO that Mintu's name got struck off instead of another person," said Kunal. Replying to a query from journalists, he said, 'We have identified altogether 21 people, so far, who have been wrongfully declared dead, leading to deletion of their names. Of them, 10 were produced before the Supreme Court. He added that the apex court was convinced of the mistake in only two instances – one was of Mintu and the other was that of a woman in Raghopur. Incidentally, Raghopur is the assembly seat of the leader of the opposition Tejashwi Yadav, whose party RJD is an alliance partner of the Left. 'We do not know how effective the intervention by the Supreme Court is going to be. The Election Commission has been brazening it out, falsely claiming that political parties are not coming up with any claims or objections. We shall keep helping as many people as possible in getting their names included in the voters' list," Kunal said. PTI NAC NN view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
Supreme Court Permits Aadhaar-Based Claims For Bihar Voter Roll Deletions, Orders Public Disclosure
The Supreme Court has granted significant relief to Bihar voters by permitting those whose names have been removed from the draft electoral roll to file claims using their Aadhaar cards as supporting documentation. The ruling came during Thursday's hearing of a petition challenging the Election Commission's June 24 decision to conduct a Special Intensive Revision of Bihar's voter list. A bench comprising Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi issued comprehensive directions requiring the Election Commission to provide extensive public disclosure of deleted voter information through multiple media channels including newspapers, radio, and television. The court emphasized the importance of transparency in the electoral process and ensuring citizens are not dependent on political parties for crucial voting information. The Supreme Court questioned the Election Commission's rationale for withholding the names of individuals whose registrations had been cancelled, particularly those who had died, migrated, or relocated to different constituencies. When informed that such lists had been shared exclusively with political parties in Bihar, the justices expressed concern about restricting public access to this vital information. The court directed the Election Commission to establish public display boards and website publications containing the names of deleted voters along with specific reasons for their removal. This measure aims to enable affected citizens to take corrective action within the stipulated 30-day period without relying on political intermediaries for information access. Following intense judicial scrutiny, the Election Commission agreed to comply with the court's demands for greater transparency in the voter deletion process. The court has mandated that the Election Commission submit a compliance report detailing implementation of these directives by August 22, demonstrating the urgency placed on resolving these electoral concerns. The legal challenge against Bihar's Special Intensive Revision was initiated by several opposition parties, including the Rashtriya Janata Dal, Congress, and the Association for Democratic Reforms. These organizations raised concerns about the potential disenfranchisement of legitimate voters through the revision process and questioned the methodology employed by the Election Commission. During previous hearings on August 13, the Supreme Court acknowledged that electoral rolls cannot remain static and require periodic updates to maintain accuracy. The court noted that the expansion of acceptable identity documents from seven to eleven for Bihar's voter list revision actually represented a voter-friendly approach rather than an exclusionary measure, contrary to opposition claims. The court's intervention addresses widespread concerns about voter suppression and ensures that legitimate voters have adequate opportunity to contest erroneous deletions from the electoral roll. By requiring Aadhaar card documentation for claims, the court has simplified the process for citizens seeking to restore their voting rights while maintaining verification standards. The directive for comprehensive media publicity serves multiple purposes, including informing affected citizens about their deletion status and providing clear pathways for remedial action. This approach recognizes that many voters may be unaware of their removal from electoral rolls until they attempt to vote during elections. The Supreme Court's emphasis on reducing citizen dependence on political parties reflects broader concerns about maintaining electoral neutrality and ensuring equal access to voting rights regardless of political affiliation. By mandating direct government communication with citizens, the court aims to eliminate potential manipulation of voter information by partisan interests. The Election Commission's agreement to implement these transparency measures represents a significant shift toward more open electoral processes in Bihar. The requirement for detailed reasons accompanying voter deletions will enable better scrutiny of the revision process and help identify any systematic issues affecting legitimate voters. The court has deferred further hearings on petitions challenging the Bihar Special Intensive Revision pending the Election Commission's compliance report, indicating satisfaction with the proposed transparency measures while maintaining judicial oversight of the process. This ruling establishes important precedents for electoral transparency across India, potentially influencing similar voter registration processes in other states. The decision balances the need for accurate electoral rolls with protection of legitimate voting rights, ensuring that administrative efficiency does not compromise democratic participation. The August 22 compliance deadline creates urgency for the Election Commission to implement these transparency measures before upcoming electoral processes, ensuring that affected voters have adequate time to address any erroneous deletions from the voter rolls.
