Just one can of diet soda can increases this health risk, new study shows
New Australian research has found that knocking back just one artificially sweetened soft drink a day, like Diet Coke, Pepsi Max or Zero Sugar Solo, may increase your risk of developing type 2 diabetes by a staggering 38%.
Advertisement
Surprisingly, that's an even higher risk than those opting for classic full-sugar options, which were linked to a 23% rise.
4 New research found that knocking back just one artificially sweetened soft drink a day may increase your risk of developing type 2 diabetes.
Pormezz – stock.adobe.com
Professor Barbora de Courten, senior author on the study, told news.com.au that the findings signal a need to rethink current public health strategies.
'It might be time to broaden the policy discussion not just about taxing sugar, but about reducing population-level intake of all harmful beverages, regardless of whether they're sweetened with sugar or synthetic alternatives,' said Professor de Courten, who is also a specialist physician at the Department of Diabetes & Vascular Medicine.
Sugar, artificial beverages, and type 2 diabetes
Advertisement
4 Professor Barbora de Courten said that the findings signal a need to rethink current public health strategies.
Parilov – stock.adobe.com
The longitudinal study, conducted by a team from Monash University, RMIT University and the Cancer Council Victoria, followed more than 36,000 Australian adults over nearly 14 years.
'Drinking one or more of these beverages each day – whether sweetened with sugar or artificial substitutes – was linked to a significantly higher chance of developing type 2 diabetes,' said Mr Hussen Kabthymer, who was involved in the study.
Professor de Courten said the findings challenge the common belief that artificially sweetened drinks are a better option.
Advertisement
4 Professor de Courten said the findings challenge the common belief that artificially sweetened drinks are a better option.
Rawpixel.com – stock.adobe.com
'Artificial sweeteners often recommended to people at risk of diabetes as a healthier alternative, but our results suggest they may pose their own health risks,' she said.
While the connection between sugary drinks and diabetes could mostly be explained by obesity, the connection between diet soft drinks and type 2 diabetes stayed strong even after factoring in body weight, suggesting that these drinks might directly affect how our metabolism works.
'The study, which involved participants aged 40–69 years, also adjusted for other lifestyle factors such as diet, exercise, education, and health history.
What is type 2 diabetes?
Advertisement
4 Type 2 diabetes is a chronic condition where the body either can't properly use insulin or doesn't produce enough of it, causing blood sugar levels to rise.
Mdv Edwards – stock.adobe.com
Type 2 diabetes impacts about 1.3 million Australians and over 500 million people globally, with most cases related to diet and lifestyle.
It is a chronic condition where the body either can't properly use insulin or doesn't produce enough of it, causing blood sugar levels to rise.
According to Diabetes Australia, it usually develops in adults over 45, but is increasingly occurring in younger age groups.
Over time, uncontrolled type 2 diabetes can damage the eyes, kidneys, nerves and heart, and lead to serious complications like kidney failure, vision loss and heart disease.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Fears grow about silent siblings with the rise of social media sperm donations
Changing patterns in fertility rates and how Australian women fall pregnant have raised concerns about the rise of informal sperm donation and a lack of national oversight when it comes to the potential for some men to donate heavily in a concentrated area. For years, women have turned to websites, apps and informal groups on social media to find a potential father for their unborn child. A growing trend of women putting off pregnancy until later in life and shortages of sperm and egg donations at clinics has helped lead to a "boom" in informal sperm donations, says Dr Evie Kendal. "Trying to ban informal sperm donation itself will functionally be impossible," the bioethicist from Swinburne university told Yahoo News Australia. "But we can absolutely educate people about the health risks involved in informal sperms donations ... and we can absolutely consider it the same as other forms of donation in terms of having guidelines regarding the number of families that can perhaps be contributed to from a particular donor." While she admits that is a tall task, when combined with making sperm donation through clinics more accessible, "so that people don't feel like they have to run that risk of using an informal donor", that will go some way to mitigating some of the worst risks. "There's risk of exploitation, there's risk of unsafe practices ... and there's the risk that after the fact the donor that might actually demand parental rights and it might be difficult to prove they had engaged in a donation," Dr Kendal said. Related: Aussie parents call for end to stigma around growing 'triangle families' trend At a more societal level, the public health scientist said it's worrying that a donor could provide sperm to a number of women in a given area, leading to a situation where individuals aren't aware of half-siblings they have in the community. "The problem we're seeing at the moment is a sperm donor being used for too many families and creating many half siblings that are potentially even living in close proximity," Dr Kendal told Yahoo. "So these are children who are potentially growing up together and don't know that they're half siblings. And of course, some of those children may, in the future, actually have romantic relationships with each other, not realising that they're half siblings." It sounds unlikely, but that exact scenario has played out in Victoria recently after one Melbourne man donated sperm to 15 women he met via social media groups and a sperm donation app, The Age reported last month. In total he created 27 half-siblings, some of whom reportedly lived within a few kilometres of each other without realising they were related. There are multiple Facebook groups dedicated for men willing to offer up their sperm to women who want to have babies. While some are state based, the top group – Sperm Donation Australia – has just shy of 22,000 members. It was started by Adam Hooper who did not respond to Yahoo's attempts at contact, but last year told told the ABC his Facebook group "put the idea of men donating on the map". Meanwhile Tinder-style apps like Just a Baby: Become a parent promises to let users swipe through various member profiles so they can; "Find People. Make Babies". While informal sperm donation is perhaps impossible to regulate, experts in the space want to see tougher rules for such online groups and apps. Fertility lawyer Stephen Page, who also sits on the board of the Fertility Society of Australia and New Zealand (FSANZ) has raised the same concerns as Dr Kendal about the potential of multiple half-siblings not knowing about each other. "There's no regulation, you can set up a website, you can set up an app and bang the drum and get men coming along saying that they will be donors," he told the ABC last month. He would like to a see system enforced where donors need to provide formal ID to the admin of such online groups which is passed on to a regulatory authority, and men are monitored for the number of donations. Push for more affordable IVF amid declining fertility rate For many people hoping to become parents, cost-of-living pressures are deterring them from fertility treatment, which in many cases has become increasingly expensive in Australia. The average number of children born per woman was 1.51 in 2024, well below the 1.8 just a decade earlier. With Australia posting a record-low fertility rate in 2024, experts say low-cost IVF options will be crucial to addressing the decline in births. A recent survey by Connect IVF found that almost half of Australians surveyed said fertility services were not affordable, potentially leaving same sex couples and others to seek out alternative options. Do you have a story tip? Email: newsroomau@ You can also follow us on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Twitter and YouTube.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
There's One Simple Method to Reduce Alcohol Intake, Scientists Say, And It Works
Researchers have discovered an effective method of getting people to drink less alcohol: Highlight the increased risk of cancer that comes with imbibing and pair that with counting each and every drink. This particular combo of 'why to reduce' and 'how to reduce' messaging can be useful for promoting good health in a population, the researchers found in a 2021 study. Too much drinking doesn't just lead to cancer, of course. Overdoing it on the booze is associated with a whole range of problems, including premature death, heart disease, digestive issues, and an increased risk of dementia. "We found that pairing information about alcohol and cancer with a particular practical action – counting their drinks – resulted in drinkers reducing the amount of alcohol they consumed," said economist and psychologist Simone Pettigrew from The George Institute for Global Health when the findings were announced. Related: For the study, three surveys were filled out: 7,995 people completed the first, 4,588 of those people completed the second three weeks later, and 2,687 people finished the final survey three weeks after that. The participants were split up into different groups and shown different advertisements and messages about drinking. One combination stood out, compared to a control group: A TV ad linking booze and cancer, together with a suggestion to keep count of your drinks, was one of the most effective at getting people to try and cut down on alcohol intake. It was also the only combination where people actually did significantly reduce their alcohol consumption over the six weeks. Other approaches – like encouraging people to decide on a number of drinks and then stick to it – did prompt some of the volunteers to try and cut down, but there was a clear winner based on the people taking part in this research. "Many people don't know that alcohol is a carcinogen," said Pettigrew. "It's important information that drinkers should have access to. But telling people alcohol causes cancer is just part of the solution – we also need to give them ways to take action to reduce their risk." Alcohol consumption can be attributed to as many as 7 percent of premature deaths worldwide, according to the World Health Organization, and making drinkers more aware of the health risks is one way of tackling that problem. While health agencies have also looked at ways of making booze less readily available and more expensive, ultimately, personal choices will determine whether or not behavior around alcohol will shift in the long term. In this particular study, the participants were chosen to be "broadly demographically representative of the Australian drinking public", so it's not an approach that will necessarily work elsewhere – but it seems that counting your drinks could be one option to try if you want to cut down. "There are limited resources available for alcohol harm-reduction campaigns, so it's important to find out which messages resonate best to ensure they have the best chance of working," said Pettigrew. The research was published in Addictive Behaviors. An earlier version of this article was first published in June 2021. Related News Untested Peptide Injections Are Being Sold as 'Next-Gen Biohacks' People With a Home by The Ocean Live Longer And We Don't Know Why The Mere Sight of a Sick Person Can Trigger Our Immune System Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Ancient Tools Suggest Indonesian 'Hobbits' Had a Mysterious Neighbor
The ancestors of the ancient 'hobbits' who once lived on the Indonesian island of Flores were not the only early hominins to cross deep ocean barriers more than a million years ago. A team of archaeologists from Indonesia and Australia has now discovered the tools of a mysterious neighbor who resided on the island of Sulawesi to the north around the same time, if not earlier. "It's highly unlikely these early hominins had the cognitive capacity (especially the ability for advanced planning) required to invent boats," archaeologist and co-lead of the expedition, Adam Brumm, told ScienceAlert. "It is more likely that hominins got to Sulawesi by accident, most probably as a result of 'rafting' on natural vegetation mats. It's thought rodents and monkeys made overwater crossings from the Asian mainland to reach Sulawesi in this way." Related: The seven flaked stones on Sulawesi were found at different depths below ground, but according to the dating of local sandstone and a nearby pig fossil, the tools range in age from 1.04 million years to 1.48 million years. If correct, the artifacts could represent the earliest evidence of human activity in Wallacea – a string of mainly Indonesian islands that has separated the Asian and Australian continents for millions of years. The identity of the isolated toolmakers remains a mystery. Brumm has been studying early hominins in the region for decades, and he co-led the recent archaeological expedition on Sulawesi with Budianto Hakim from the National Research and Innovation Agency of Indonesia (BRIN). Archaeologist Debbie Argue, who was not involved in the discovery, told ScienceAlert the findings are "most important", because they add to the startling fact that early Pleistocene hominins could somehow make sea crossings. "With evidence for hominins on three islands that have never been attached to a mainland – Flores, Luzon, and now Sulawesi – island Southeast Asia is shaping up to be an extraordinary frontier for human evolution," said Argue. Until now, the earliest evidence of stone tools in Wallacea – which are thought to be 1.02 million years old – came from the island of Flores. Flores is the same place where archaeologists discovered the short-statured Homo floresiensis – also known as the 'hobbit' – in a cave in 2003. This meter-high hominin (3.3 feet) with a brain the size of grapefruit took the world by surprise when it was found, because it didn't look like any other early human. The remains of H. floriensis date up to 100,000 years ago, but its presumed ancestors on the island date back 700,000 years. The 1.02 million-year-old stone tools on Flores were probably made by those ancestors – whether descended from Homo erectus or another hominin species on the Asian mainland. According to a 2021 interview with archaeologist Lucy Timbrell, Brumm accidentally happened upon the Flores tools while "nursing an appalling hangover" due to a local village ceremony the night before. "Whilst stumbling about in the sweltering heat, in a bewildered state, I found some heavily patinated stone tools eroding out from a fluvial conglomerate exposed at the base of a gully," Brumm recalled in the interview. "I have since tried to make major archaeological discoveries while hungover, but it only worked that one time." Archaeologists have yet to uncover hominin fossils on Sulawesi, but the evidence of stone tools indicates their existence. It's unknown if the Sulawesi population was related to hominins on Flores, but the late Mike Morwood, one of the co-discoverers of the 2003 'hobbit', was convinced that Sulawesi was the key to understanding where H. floresiensis came from. "We had always suspected that hominins were established on Sulawesi for a very long period of time, but until now we had never found clear evidence," Brumm told ScienceAlert. Influenced by Morwood's thinking, Brumm suspects that Sulawesi was once a stepping stone to Flores from mainland Asia (which once stretched as far as Java and Borneo). In 2010, Morwood told The Guardian that he suspected tools on Sulawesi could date back two million years. "This is going to put the cat among the pigeons," he said at the time. No doubt he would have been thrilled by the recent work of Brumm's and Hakim's team. The archaeologists now plan to search Sulawesi for direct remains of the mysterious tool makers. "We are also working at much younger sites that we hope will provide insight into what happened to these early humans when our species arrived on the island at least 65,000 years ago," said Brumm. The study was published in Nature. Related News DNA Casts Doubt Over Theory on What Killed Napoleon's Forces Study Reveals How Many IVF Babies Have Been Born Worldwide Image on The Shroud of Turin May Not Belong to a Real Human Solve the daily Crossword
