logo
As Trump invokes Bagram, story of the strategic air base in Afghanistan

As Trump invokes Bagram, story of the strategic air base in Afghanistan

Indian Express03-05-2025

US President Donald Trump on Thursday claimed that China now occupies the Bagram Airfield, which American forces had vacated weeks before pulling out from Afghanistan in 2021.
Trump claimed that the Americans were going to 'keep' Bagram which is 'an hour away from where China makes its nuclear weapons'. But 'they (presumably the Joe Biden -administration) gave Bagram up, and right now, China occupies Bagram,' he said.
It is unclear which Chinese nuclear facility Trump was referring to. The closest known testing site is 2,000 km away at Lop Nur in Xinjiang, where China tested its first atom bomb in 1964. The closest nuclear weapons facility is the Koko Nur complex, further east in the Qinghai province.
When Trump made similar comments in March, the Taliban had issued a strong denial. 'Bagram is controlled by the Islamic Emirate (Taliban), not China. Chinese troops are not present here, nor do we have any such pact with any country,' it had said.
Taliban fighters, members of a unit from Helmand Province, at a guard post just outside the prison at Bagram Air Base, a former U.S. military base, in Bagram, Afghanistan, Dec. 5, 2021. (David Guttenfelder/The New York Times)
Built by Soviets…
Bagram Airfield, the largest air base in Afghanistan, lies some 60 km to the north of Kabul, in the strategic Parwan province.
Experts say that in Parwan lie the keys to controlling much of Afghanistan. The 2.6 km-long Salang tunnel here connects Kabul to Mazar-e-Sharif and other cities in the north, while highways provide linkages to Ghazni and Kandahar in the south, and Bamiyan to its west.
The air base was originally built by the Soviets in the 1950s, during the early days of the Cold War, when both the US and the USSR were jockeying for influence in Afghanistan. In 1959, for his landmark visit to the country, then US President Dwight Eisenhower landed in Bagram.
During the Soviet-Afghan War from 1979-89, Bagram became a vital Soviet base. Troops from airborne divisions were deployed from Bagram, and Sukhoi Su-25s flew daily missions against mujahideen in the mountains from the base. The base was fortified, and began housing military personnel.
Men at the abandoned prison complex at Bagram Air Base, a former U.S. military base, in Bagram, Afghanistan, Dec. 5, 2021. (David Guttenfelder/The New York Times)
…Expanded by US
After the Soviet withdrawal, in the 1990s, the abandoned Bagram base became a frontline in a war between the Taliban, who held Kabul to the south, and the Northern Alliance fighters based in mountain gorges to its north. The airbase was heavily damaged as a result.
After the September 11, 2001 attacks, the US and its allies took over the Bagram Airfield. Over the next two decades, as the 'War on Terror' raged on, Bagram became the epicentre of the American presence in Afghanistan.
The base was further expanded — it grew to over 77 sq km — and a new, improved runway, almost 3.5 km-long, was constructed, as were medical facilities and fast food joints for US personnel.
A disused hangar also ended up being used as a detention facility, which has drawn comparisons to Guantanamo Bay base in Cuba due to reports of torture and abuse by US soldiers.
A Taliban fighter stands on top of the outer security wall surrounding Bagram Air Base, a former U.S. military base, in Bagram, Afghanistan, Dec. 5, 2021. (David Guttenfelder/The New York Times)
American exit, Chinese stakes
The previous Trump administration in 2020 signed a deal with the Taliban, which provided for a pullout of all NATO troops from Afghanistan soil.
Over the next year, the Taliban gained ground as the US began pulling resources from Afghanistan. The final American aircraft took off from the Kabul airport on August 30, 2021. US forces had vacated Bagram on July 2; the base fell to the Taliban on August 15.
With little domestic support for keeping troops in Afghanistan, keeping the Bagram Airfield was never on the cards. 'Retaining Bagram would have required putting as many as 5,000 US troops in harm's way just to operate and defend it,' then Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin told the House Armed Services Committee in September 2021.
The base is under Taliban control today. That said, the US has long been concerned over China making inroads into Afghanistan after its exit. Even as most countries have been wary of fully engaging with the Taliban, China gave the Taliban representative in Beijing ambassador credentials last year.
For China, relations with Afghanistan matter because it has a sizable Muslim population of its own in the bordering Xinjiang. Beijing would want to ensure that radical elements in Afghanistan do not cross over into its own territory. To that end, it has attempted to bolster ties within a limited framework and also made some investments in Afghanistan.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The US and China Are Talking Again. Don't Call It a Reset
The US and China Are Talking Again. Don't Call It a Reset

Mint

time35 minutes ago

  • Mint

The US and China Are Talking Again. Don't Call It a Reset

Trade negotiations between the US and China in London mark a cautious step toward easing tensions, but not a new beginning. It's a short-term strategy to avoid further deterioration — a fragile truce that could be reversed at any moment. At the core is a deeper issue: National security. Both sides now view trade through that lens, and handshakes won't fix it. Washington must recognize that Beijing seeks respect and won't accept a one-sided, long-term deal. China, for its part, needs to understand that it won't be business as usual — and that the US will expect more concessions and market access to the world's second-largest economy. The alternative is continued hostility, which will make for a more chaotic global trade environment, and a more dangerous world. The London climbdown is positive, but precarious. Rapprochement has turned into recrimination before. After the initial euphoria of a trade-war ceasefire agreed in Geneva in May, both sides accused the other of reneging on a deal to temporarily lower tariffs that had climbed well above 100%. Now negotiators say they've reached an agreement in principle on a framework to deescalate trade tensions, based on the consensus forged in Geneva. Delegations from both sides will take the proposal back to their respective leaders, following nearly 20 hours of talks over two days. 'Once the presidents approve it, we will then seek to implement it,' US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said. The full details of the accord weren't immediately available, but US officials said they 'absolutely expect' that issues around shipments of rare earth minerals and magnets will be resolved. There are no winners or losers coming out of this, notes Steve Okun, founder and chief executive officer of AC Advisors. The fundamental questions are much larger than any round of talks. 'The Trump administration needs to decide whether it views Beijing as a strategic competitor, or an existential threat,' he told me. 'Washington can take the economic hit from a trade war, but politically, Xi Jinping can suffer the hit for longer than Trump can. So one side has economic leverage, and the other political leverage — that's a standstill, for now.' The Chinese president is biding his time, despite a sluggish economy. In the most recent sign of how the trade war is hurting, exports rose less than expected last month. The worst drop in US-bound shipments since February 2020 — the outbreak of the pandemic — counteracted strong demand from elsewhere. Still, sales to other markets are providing much-needed support for an economy stuck in deflation and struggling with weak domestic demand. Beijing is sticking to its narrative that this trade war is Washington's problem, and that China is being unfairly targeted. A recent Xinhua commentary warned that America's security-focused view of economic issues risks undermining global cooperation. There is a pathway to peaceful coexistence, but compromises are required, notes Ryan Hass of the Brookings Institution. To break through with Xi, Trump will need to acknowledge that both countries are major powers. Neither can dictate terms to the other. Both would be hurt by high tariffs on each other's goods — but on their own, they're not enough to force capitulation. The US public has no appetite for a broader conflict with Beijing. Disapproval of China's behavior may be high, but the top priority is still to avoid war. Americans are clear in their desire to manage competition without that escalating into open conflict. For that to happen, Washington must recognize that Beijing craves respect. The US would be wise to pay heed to the Chinese concept of mianzi or 'face' — Xi will only agree to a long-term deal that he can pitch at home and abroad as a win. Beijing has taken lessons from Trump's first trade war, and judged that agreement to be one-sided in favor of Washington. It won't make that mistake again. China doesn't always like reciprocating face, but officials would be wise to give some to Trump, too. His tariffs have been outlandish, but his supporters also demand that he show strength, not concession. Beijing should be able to understand what happens when politicians need to cater to public pressure. Neither side has the upper hand to make the other come away an obvious loser. At the most, the London talks might have achieved just enough to help shape the future on a less-hostile basis. That in itself is progress — but it would be a mistake to call this moment a reset. More From Bloomberg Opinion: This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners. Karishma Vaswani is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asia politics with a special focus on China. Previously, she was the BBC's lead Asia presenter and worked for the BBC across Asia and South Asia for two decades. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.

‘Will be met with very big force': Donald Trump's stern warning to protesters in Washington; security tightened in DC ahead of US Army's 250th parade
‘Will be met with very big force': Donald Trump's stern warning to protesters in Washington; security tightened in DC ahead of US Army's 250th parade

Time of India

time38 minutes ago

  • Time of India

‘Will be met with very big force': Donald Trump's stern warning to protesters in Washington; security tightened in DC ahead of US Army's 250th parade

Donald Trump US President Donald Trump has warned demonstrators planning to protest during the upcoming military parade in Washington that they would face 'very big force." Speaking from the Oval Office on Tuesday, Trump issued a blunt message. 'For those people that want to protest, they're going to be met with very big force,' he said. 'And I haven't even heard about a protest, but you know, this is people that hate our country, but they will be met with very heavy force. ' The event on Saturday marks the 250th anniversary of the US Army and coincides with the MAGA chief's 79th birthday. The day will feature an Army festival on the National Mall, a military parade through the capital, and a mass enlistment and re-enlistment ceremony led by the president. Law enforcement is preparing for massive crowds. According to US Secret Service Special Agent in Charge Matt McCool, thousands of personnel from federal and local agencies will be deployed. 'At least nine permits have been issued for protests on that day,' he confirmed. Both the FBI and Metropolitan Police have said there are no credible threats. ' Nationwide Day of Defiance ' One of the major organisers of nationwide protests is a group called No Kings. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like May 2025: Top 5 Dividend Stocks [Read Now] Seeking Alpha Read Now Undo On its website, the group says, 'They've defied our courts, deported Americans, disappeared people off the streets, attacked our civil rights and slashed our services. The corruption has gone too far. No thrones. No crowns. No kings.' The group has opted not to protest in Washington itself, accusing Trump of turning the parade into 'a made-for-TV display of dominance.' Instead, they are calling for a 'Nationwide Day of Defiance' to draw attention to what they describe as authoritarian politics under Trump. POTUS's action regarding LA protests The president also defended his recent decision to deploy 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines to Los Angeles, after protests broke out over immigration raids. 'Los Angeles was under siege until we got there,' Trump said, although state officials argue that the military deployment has only worsened tensions. While Trump cited violent episodes, including torched vehicles and attacks on officers, protest supporters say most demonstrations have been peaceful. Trump claimed without evidence that many protesters were 'paid insurrectionists.' The president's stance mirrors his long history of strong support for law enforcement and scepticism towards protest movements. In 2020, during nationwide unrest after George Floyd's killing, he reportedly asked military leaders if protesters could be shot. California Governor Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass have strongly condemned the decision to deploy the National Guard in Los Angeles. Former presidential candidate Kamala Harris has also joined in the criticism. Many other Democratic leaders have criticised Trump's decision to deploy force without the state's permission, calling him a 'dictator.' Trump's birthday and US Army's 250th parade in DC A grand military parade is set to take place in Washington, DC on June 14 to mark the 250th anniversary of the US Army's founding. The day also happens to be Trump's 79th birthday, and he is expected to speak at the event. Organised by the US Army and America250 commission, the celebration will include historical and modern military displays, fireworks, a parachute show by the Golden Knights, and a concert on the National Mall. About 200,000 people are expected to attend. The main parade route runs along Constitution Avenue, with standing room only for spectators. Security will be tight, as the event has been labelled a National Special Security Event by the Department of Homeland Security. Entry will be limited to specific checkpoints, and several items like drones, chairs, and large bags are banned. Roads, flights, metro stations, and river access will face temporary disruptions. Concerns have been raised over damage from heavy tanks, prompting the Army Corps of Engineers to install steel plates to protect roads. The event is expected to cost between $25 million and $45 million, including possible road repairs. Trump defended the spending, calling it a valuable show of strength.

NASA's new employee separation agreement haunts thousands of employees. Here's what's happening
NASA's new employee separation agreement haunts thousands of employees. Here's what's happening

Hindustan Times

time43 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

NASA's new employee separation agreement haunts thousands of employees. Here's what's happening

NASA has become the latest federal agency to roll out a new buyout option aimed at trimming its workforce. The option offers employees a chance to resign at a later date while still receiving pay. The space agency's Deferred Resignation Program (DRP) is part of a broader push to cut costs and align staffing with shifting mission priorities amid deep budget cuts proposed by the Trump administration. On Friday, NASA's acting Administrator Janet Petro said the agency is introducing new voluntary separation programs to help ease the transition for workers impacted by the changes. 'Looking ahead, we're taking steps to streamline operations and ensure we're aligned with mission priorities,' Petro said. 'Starting next week, we'll introduce voluntary separation tools, including a new Deferred Resignation Program (DRP) to help manage workforce transitions thoughtfully and transparently.' ALSO READ| Donald Trump military parade FAQs: RSVP, ticket prices, venue details, date and more While most deferred resignations so far have kept employees on paid administrative leave only through 30 September, NASA's program allows eligible workers to remain on the books until 9 January 2026. Some deemed essential to ongoing operations will stay even longer until 30 September 2026 with paid leave beginning in April of that year. 'NASA is continuing its phased approach to streamline its workforce and reduce its overall headcount,' NASA spokesperson Cheryl Warner said in a statement. 'This affords employees the opportunity to depart while ensuring the agency remains fully capable to pursue its mission.' NASA centres have already warned staff of staffing cuts. At the Goddard Space Flight Center in Maryland, leadership has told employees they expect to lose 18% of the workforce. ALSO READ| After Fort Bragg, Trump lists military bases that will be renamed - Fort Robert E Lee to Fort Hood Notably, President Trump's 2026 budget proposal calls for a 24% cut to NASA's budget and a 29% reduction in its civil service workforce. Petro acknowledged and said NASA would 'remain focused on maintaining the technical excellence and capability our mission demands.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store